Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!

From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (net_at_nospam.com)
Date: 12/26/04


Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 14:04:54 -0700

Dear David Thomson:

"David Thomson" <news5@volantis.org> wrote in message
news:tPDzd.11$KT4.278@news.uswest.net...
> "robert j. kolker" <nowhere@nowhere.net> wrote in message
> news:33859oF3t1gltU1@individual.net...
>>
>>
>> Paul Stowe wrote:
>>> Experiments, what experiments???
>>>
>>> OK, please provide a reference to an 'experiment' setup to test Dark
>>> Matter and show us how it was detected in the lab!
>>
>> Not in a lab. You don't find dark matter in a lab any more than you find
>> light bending in a gravity field in a lab or the anomalous preecession
>> of the apihellion of a planet in the lab. You find it where it is, or
>> might be, which is Way Out There.
>
> You won't find gravity bending light ANYWHERE in the Universe.

It is found in our solar system, in signalling to/from Venus. It is found
in sightings of stars during a solar eclipse.

> The gravitational law is based on the force between two masses,

Newton predicts no such effect on light.

> and since photons have zero mass, the gravitational force is zero.

Gravitational force is zero in GR anyway.

> Now if you really wanted to know how light bends around massive objects,
> you might ask me for the answer, because I have it.

No wonder people accuse science of being religion. David Thomson, the
mystic.

> As for dark matter, it exists mainly near massive objects.

Most of it is in the intergalactic void. The balance is inside the visible
rim of spiral galaxies.

> There is more dark matter near Earth than there is in the emptiness of
> space.

Citation?

> But it can't be detected because dark matter exists outside of the
> Aether.

I hope so.

> The Aether is what gives structure to the angular momentum of dark
> matter by imparting the qualities of charges to it.

DM has no charge. It interacts with both itself and normal matter via
gravitation... not charge.

David A. Smith



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!
    ... You don't find dark matter in a lab any more than you find ... >> light bending in a gravity field in a lab or the anomalous preecession ... > You won't find gravity bending light ANYWHERE in the Universe. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!
    ... You don't find dark matter in a lab any more than you find ... >> light bending in a gravity field in a lab or the anomalous preecession ... > You won't find gravity bending light ANYWHERE in the Universe. ...
    (sci.physics.particle)
  • Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!
    ... You don't find dark matter in a lab any more than you find ... >> light bending in a gravity field in a lab or the anomalous preecession ... > You won't find gravity bending light ANYWHERE in the Universe. ... > As for dark matter, it exists mainly near massive objects. ...
    (sci.physics.particle)
  • Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!
    ... You don't find dark matter in a lab any more than you find ... >> light bending in a gravity field in a lab or the anomalous preecession ... > You won't find gravity bending light ANYWHERE in the Universe. ... > As for dark matter, it exists mainly near massive objects. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!
    ... You don't find dark matter in a lab any more than you find ... >> light bending in a gravity field in a lab or the anomalous preecession ... > You won't find gravity bending light ANYWHERE in the Universe. ... > As for dark matter, it exists mainly near massive objects. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)