Re: whither electroweak, 4-1=4?
From: DavidBowman (dt041054_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 12/27/04
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: What gives an object its identity"
- Previous message: Paul Stowe: "Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!"
- In reply to: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: whither electroweak, 4-1=4?"
- Next in thread: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: whither electroweak, 4-1=4?"
- Reply: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: whither electroweak, 4-1=4?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 26 Dec 2004 16:49:13 -0800
> Gravity was one of the "four forces".
??
what was gravity unified with, or was it proved that strong ==
electroweak?
> Once it is in the public mind, it is hard to replace
it with something that is correct.
I figured it was something like that.
=[ d
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: What gives an object its identity"
- Previous message: Paul Stowe: "Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!"
- In reply to: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: whither electroweak, 4-1=4?"
- Next in thread: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: whither electroweak, 4-1=4?"
- Reply: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: whither electroweak, 4-1=4?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
