Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!

From: David Thomson (news5_at_volantis.org)
Date: 12/27/04 

Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 20:16:08 -0600

"Bill Hobba" <bhobba@rubbish.net.au> wrote in message
news:1gHzd.89234$K7.50848@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>
>> You won't find gravity bending light ANYWHERE in the Universe.
>
> I suppose Wheeler and all those people that believe in GR and it
> implications confirmed by experiment are idiots then - see
> http://www.pupress.princeton.edu/sample_chapters/ciufolini/chapter3.pdf.

I don't think that just because someone is confused that they are
necessarily an idiot.

> In particular see page 32 'There are two known tests of the existence of
> space curvature generated by a central mass based on trajectories of
> photons: the deflection of electromagnetic waves and the time delay of
> radio
> waves. Both measurements may be interpreted as tests of the existence and
> of
> the amount of space curvature generated by a mass M and in part (see
> below)
> of the equivalence principle.'

The key word in your statement above, Bill, is "interpreted." The data is
correct, however, the interpretation is wrong. The nuclear binding force
that holds together the matter of the stars is responsible for the curvature
of the space. Gravity is 10^42 times weaker than the nuclear binding force.
There is no way that gravity could cause such a warp of space.

Besides, in order for gravity to be the explanation, there has to be some
kind of substance to space such that it would have mass. You can't have a
gravitational force pulling in a vacuum. Also, Einstein purposefully
created his Relativity theories to bypass any kind of Aether.

Since subatomic matter must exist within the Aether in order to pick up
charge, any binding of the subatomic particles entails a folding of the
Aether. This is understood by examining the mathematically derived
geometrical structure of the Aether. When Aether folds, it is like pinching
a rubber ***. Other Aether units move in to fill the gap, creating a
stretch in the fabric of space-time. The strong force does not act on the
Aether itself, but upon the strong force carrier of the subatomic particle.

It just happens that the strong force and gravitational force are directly
proportional to each other. This can create an opportunity for someone to
mistakenly think that gravity is the cause for the observed curvature of
space, especially if they haven't quantified the strong force correctly in
the first place. It can also create an opportunity for someone to develop a
completely incorrect physics that gives the correct answer.

Dave