Re: grand unification theory
From: SeanSinjin (delphiconsultingguy_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 12/27/04
- Next message: George Hammond: "Re: God=G_uv Comments of Isham Dembski Unwin"
- Previous message: beda: "Re: Models are not necessarily facsimiles of so-called reality"
- In reply to: DavidBowman: "Re: grand unification theory"
- Next in thread: SeanSinjin: "Re: grand unification theory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 27 Dec 2004 09:07:44 -0800
> > > We have a theory about magnetism fully in accord with observation
> to an incredible degree of accuracy called QED.
>
> Bill points out that we have do have a well-developed theory which
> explains magnetism. What is your response, sir?
> Thank you in advance, Sean!
My magnetism theory is premised on my version of ether, and it largely
incorporates the QED's predictive mathematics by design, so you see, I
am not contradicting QED.
Sean
- Next message: George Hammond: "Re: God=G_uv Comments of Isham Dembski Unwin"
- Previous message: beda: "Re: Models are not necessarily facsimiles of so-called reality"
- In reply to: DavidBowman: "Re: grand unification theory"
- Next in thread: SeanSinjin: "Re: grand unification theory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]