Re: God=G_uv Comments of Isham Dembski Unwin

From: George Hammond (nowhere_at_nomailspam.net)
Date: 12/27/04 

Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 16:47:47 +0000 (UTC)

"David Iain Greig" <greig@ediacara.org> wrote in message
news:slrnct0515.2307.greig@darwin.ediacara.org...
> George Hammond <nowhere@nomailspam.net> wrote:
> >
> > "stew dean" <stewart@webslave.dircon.co.uk> wrote in message
> > news:1104084862.136866.184680@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> >>
> >
> >
> >> > > Anyway let me ask my question again.
> >> > >
> >> > > Using your theory how do I prove the existance of god?
> >> > > Or perhaps this question is too trivial?
> >> >
> >> > [Hammond]
> >> > No the question is too tongue in cheek for me to bother with.
> >> >
> >> > The SPOG *IS* a scientific proof of God.
> >> >
> >> > 1. You don't need to "use" Newton's theory to prove F=ma,
> >> > it *IS* a proof that F=ma
> >>
> >> You are saying a theory is proof of it's self. This is known as a
> >> tautalogy. It is not how science works - something you should be aware
> >> of. You are saying X is because X is.
> >
> > [Hammond]
> > Hey ***... Hammond's God=G_uv is a PROVEN DISCOVERY,
> > it is not a "theory".... I only use the word "theory" as a bend over
> > backwards
> > pandering to ignorant halfass pedants like you.
>
> George, did you understand science better before you went insane
> all those years ago? The scientist I suspect you once were would
> really be horrified to see what sort of howling madman you've
> turned into. I'm sorry for him.
>
> I think we're all very, very sorry for you. I just wanted to say
> that when we make fun of your insanity, it's not his fault, and
> that I hope whatever is left of him inside you, staring out in
> horror, understands that.
>
> I understand some of the medications you could take to control
> your problems can have bad side effects. Hopefully you're
> somewhere safe and warm this winter, and not roaming the streets.
>
> --D.

[Hammond]
   Hey... I don't have any problems, and don't take any
"medications". And furthermore, just because I have
a lot of Internet kooks stalking me around and posting
harrassment to my discussion topics doesn't mean
I'm crazy..... it means THEY'RE CRAZY.... and as you
know almost ALL high profile and celebrated scientists who
make tremendous scientific discoveries have a huge
camp following of such hecklers..... christ... look at
sci.physicis.relativity.... half the posters there are
academic mental cases trying to prove Einstein's theory
is wrong!
   And furthermore... just because I'm not afraid of
such fury... doesn't mean that you wouldn't *** your pants
if it ever happened to you... and we don't need you coming on
here telling us how scared you are about it.... we already know.
   What bothers me is that if you are "moderator" of
talk.origins I would expect that you have some academic
credentials of some kind... mind telling us what they
are?.... because you forlorn posts seems to reflect
a very low level of intelligence, and certainly a low level
of education. Let me ask you... if you wrote to Chris Isham,
Bill Dembski, Steve Unwin (all intenationally famous PhD's
in physicis/math) do you think they would feel obliged to respond
to you, as THEY HAVE to me?..... I don't think so... you don't
sound like you have enough education to keep anyone from
falling asleep.
   And furthermore, I'm wondering what the MODERATOR
of a news group is doing posting OFF TOPIC,
HECKLING posts to my discussion threads:

Do you have a history of mental illness?
Are you currently seeing a psychiatrist?
Are you unemployed?
Do you have a history of maladjustment?

Anyway... whatever your problem is.... I find it
VERY PECULIAR for the moderator of a Usenet
Newsgroup to be posting AD HOMINEM,
OFF TOPIC, PERSONAL ATTACKS
on the discussion threads of one of the posters.

Don't you have better things to do?

PS: If you are concerned about the occasional 4-letter
word that creeps into my posts... o.k.... I'll try to
keep it down... but please realize the insults coming
from the hecklers are pretty foul to begin with...
perhaps I shouldn't be answering them in their own genre..
...but sometimes it saves a lot of bandwidth.
   If this is aggrevating your sense of propriety, do let
me know.

====================================
   SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE

http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
        mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
====================================
please ask you news server to add:
alt.sci.relativistic-proof-of-god.moderated
===================================