Re: GOD=G_uv A CHRISTMAS MESSAGE

From: TMG (TMG_at_Nowhere.org)
Date: 12/29/04 

Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 23:35:58 +0000 (UTC)

George Hammond wrote:

> "TMG" <TMG@Nowhere.org> wrote in message
> news:d62dnXk6AaxMo0_cRVn-tA@comcast.com...
>
>>George Hammond wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"TMG" <TMG@Nowhere.org> wrote in message
>>>news:qrOdnUKZSPEQYE3cRVn-vQ@comcast.com...
>>>
>>>
>>>>George Hammond wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>[Hammond]
>>
>><snip>
>>

Mr. [Hammond] snipped a lot of verbiage here indicating I was simply
pointing out (to his ISP) his posting behavior. Actually, my email(s) to
them simply asked that they read sci.physics.relativity and draw their
own conclusions about their subscriber, and how his posts conform to
their policy.

>>On the other hand, your threating someone's livelihood and family might
>>not be taken as lightly. You seem disposed to go at this "hammer and
>>tongs" in the real world, as it were. I wouldn't ever advise an USENET
>>thorn in *my* paw being taken that seriously.
>
>
> [Hammond]
> You are the one who is threating your livelihood by conducting your
> psychotic "night job" (for several years now) of stalking and
> harassing Hammond.

Are you Hammond?

> Everyone who knows you is just holding their
> breath and saying a silent prayer against the day when you finally do
> something bizzare and *** up the life of both you and your family..
> ... I'm sure this includes your employers.

I doubt you can name a real, living person that personally knows me.
This needs to be from *your* personal knowledge - no fair pulling
co-workers names off the website. It's also unfair to consult the dead -
ala your conversations with *** Feynman. No quotes from Feynman after
1988 unless they prove I'm right.

> This bizzare behavour of yours has been pointed
> out to you by others... for instance the poster on alt.config when you
> stalked me over there and started posting your ad hominem attacks..
> he asked you what you were doing there, why you were stalking Hammond
> and suggested you were nuts... and he was right!

Actually, the question was who was *more* crazy - [Hammond] or those
that keep trying to educate him.

> Until now its been only words.... but now your are advertising for
> the assistance of other "internet bangers" to assist you in sending
> complaints.

I've made no such request. I informed [Hammond] of a fact. No assistance
in anything can be seen to the non-paranoid observer. If readers want to
barrage abuse@earthlink with comments about [Hammond], that's certainly
not my concern.

> That is a direct physical act of harassment that requires a legal response
> from me... and believe me if you persist you'll be hearing about it.

USENET is not physical - *AND* nobody I've seen has posted anything but
the truth. Certainly nothing of a real world threat.

> For chrissakes, if you're a PhD in Mathematics and have managed to secure
> a reasonable job (which isn't always easy for mathematicians) I'd expect
> that you'd think twice before involving yourself in anything as sleazy
> as intenet stalking and harassment...

No stalking, and no harassment. You bristle at facts. You feel pummeled
by truth. You turn your rage at a messenger of truth. I correct pure,
factual errors and you fly off the handle. Most anything can make you
fly off the handle - but if you're going to whine about *facts*, you're
climbing out on a thin branch.

And I keep telling you Geophysics isn't just maths.

> why for chrissakes if your
> collegues ever found out about it...

What makes you think my colleagues aren't laughing at you along with the
rest of us?

> or the personnell office ever received
> a letter of complaint from my attorney (who is a former state representative
> and well known to them) you can be sure they will be raising their
> eyebrows about your mental condition. In todays world with terrorism
> and unbalanced nuts acting up everywhere...

Ummm - *my* picture isn't up in the guardhouse at the front gate. Can
you guess who's is?

> I'd reconsider your
> behavior and try to run a lower profile... for chrissakes budget cuts
> are everywhere and nuts like you would be the first target for
> a cut....

Unlikely - I generate far more spendable cash than I consume. You might
misunderstand the environment. A charming demeanor with the
grad/post-grad community is also a bit of a cushion. You might try
teaching more.

> Personally, I like you "to a point"... but your mild psychotic overlay
> has an obvious tendency to get out of hand.... and believe me....
> everyone who knows you knows about it and all of us are keeping our
> fingers crossed day and night that the strain on you doesn't get so
> high that you'll crack and do something stupid and *** up your life,
> career and everything else....

I think you're recycling. See above.

> for chrissakes... knock off this
> public internet harrassment of yours...

Stating facts that contradict your fragile and flawed view of the
universe is not harassment.

> you've got too much to lose.
> And especially don't fall into the trap of stalking and attacking some
> alter ego figure like Hammond. For chrissakes Hammond is a total loser
> (careerwise) and has consequently sacrificed his life to pure research,
> and HAS DISCOVERED SOMETHING OF IMPORTANCE....

And learned, rational, highly intelligent people in MANY fields tell you
you're wrong. Even wrong to the point of being irrational. Several
fields of science, theology, psychology, and social sciences all have
told you that your view of the universe is inconsistent with *observed
facts*. I'm certainly not the only one.

You, yourself, have posted the brush-offs and dismissals of the physics,
theological, and social professionals when confronted with your
"theory". How can anyone reposting your "information" be considered
"attacking".

In a similar vein, you have posted several long descriptions of your own
personal descent into madness and actual involuntary confinement in a
mental institution. You typed these posts with your own fingers. How is
anyone alluding to these posts attacking you?

> for God's sake don't come down on the wrong side of it professionally.
> You can't sue a total loser and win!

That's a civil concept. Criminal and mental health hearings aren't cash
based.

> WISE UP for chrissakes... go find some outher outlet for your
> aggressions.... take up bowling or something... and just thank your
> lucky stars you're not in Hammond's position in life.
> Look... I'm not asking you to do something noble and courageous
> like trying to help me.... I'm just asking you not to publicly commit
> hari kari trying to persecute me...

Posting factual rebuttals to a USENET spew is not persecution. You need
  to relax.

Take a deep breath,... now let is out. Nobody is after you. Relax - this
is USENET. If you expect validation, acceptance, and fame in this
environment, you've missed the point of the media.

Regards.

Quantcast