sci.physics.relativity
By Thread

6065 messages sorted by: [ date ]

---

Starting: 12/31/04
Ending: 01/31/05

• Nikola Tesla on Relativity John Schoenfeld (01/31/05)
  • Re: Nikola Tesla on Relativity reany_at_asu.edu (01/31/05)
  • Re: Nikola Tesla on Relativity Boris Mohar (01/31/05)
    • Re: Nikola Tesla on Relativity robert j. kolker (01/31/05)
      • Re: Nikola Tesla on Relativity Bill Hobba (01/31/05)
      • Re: Nikola Tesla on Relativity Eugene Shubert (01/31/05)
      • Re: Nikola Tesla on Relativity robert j. kolker (01/31/05)
      • Re: Nikola Tesla on Relativity John Schoenfeld (01/31/05)
  • Re: Nikola Tesla on Relativity robert j. kolker (01/31/05)
    • Re: Nikola Tesla on Relativity John Schoenfeld (01/31/05)
      • Re: Nikola Tesla on Relativity robert j. kolker (01/31/05)
  • Re: Nikola Tesla on Relativity Uncle Al (01/31/05)
    • Re: Nikola Tesla on Relativity John Schoenfeld (01/31/05)
  • Re: Nikola Tesla on Relativity Androcles (01/31/05)
• Lagrangian of Relativistic Free Particle. Bill Hobba (01/30/05)
  • Re: Lagrangian of Relativistic Free Particle. Ken S. Tucker (01/31/05)
• New cosmological anomalies reported Jack Sarfatti (01/30/05)
  • Re: New cosmological anomalies reported Eugene Shubert (01/30/05)
    • Re: New cosmological anomalies reported Daniel Weston (01/31/05)
• the fancy and the concrete beda pietanza (01/30/05)
• the ether and the fluctuations of vacuum beda pietanza (01/30/05)
• Impossible dreams. Len Gaasenbeek (01/30/05)
  • Re: Impossible dreams. PD (01/30/05)
    • Re: Impossible dreams. Daniel Weston (01/31/05)
• True or false: Physics is all about the behavior of ... reany_at_asu.edu (01/30/05)
  • Re: True or false: Physics is all about the behavior of ... N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/30/05)
    • Re: True or false: Physics is all about the behavior of ... reany_at_asu.edu (01/30/05)
      • Re: True or false: Physics is all about the behavior of ... N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/30/05)
      • Biology is a branch of physics. Daniel Weston (01/30/05)
      • Re: Biology is a branch of physics. reany_at_asu.edu (01/30/05)
      • Re: Biology is a branch of physics. Daniel Weston (01/30/05)
      • Physics is as physics does reany_at_asu.edu (01/30/05)
      • Re: Physics is as physics does Daniel Weston (01/30/05)
      • Re: Physics is as physics does reany_at_asu.edu (01/31/05)
      • Re: Physics is as physics does Daniel Weston (01/31/05)
      • Re: Physics is as physics does reany_at_asu.edu (01/31/05)
      • Re: Biology is a branch of physics. Daniel Weston (01/31/05)
      • Re: Biology is a branch of physics. reany_at_asu.edu (01/31/05)
      • Re: True or false: Physics is all about the behavior of ... reany_at_asu.edu (01/30/05)
      • Re: True or false: Physics is all about the behavior of ... N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/30/05)
      • Re: True or false: Physics is all about the behavior of ... reany_at_asu.edu (01/30/05)
      • Re: True or false: Physics is all about the behavior of ... N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/31/05)
  • Re: True or false: Physics is all about the behavior of ... reany_at_asu.edu (01/30/05)
  • Re: True or false: Physics is all about the behavior of ... beda pietanza (01/30/05)
    • Re: True or false: Physics is all about the behavior of ... reany_at_asu.edu (01/30/05)
  • Re: True or false: Physics is all about the behavior of ... Bilge (01/31/05)
    • Is all of science physics? reany_at_asu.edu (01/31/05)
• Re: NEW DavidBowman (01/30/05)
• Langrange strange DavidBowman (01/30/05)
  • Re: Langrange strange N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/30/05)
    • Re: Langrange strange David McAnally (01/30/05)
      • Re: Langrange strange David McAnally (01/31/05)
  • Re: Langrange strange Bill Hobba (01/30/05)
    • Re: Langrange strange Dirk Van de moortel (01/30/05)
  • Re: Langrange strange FrediFizzx (01/30/05)
  • Re: Langrange strange Bilge (01/30/05)
    • Re: Langrange strange Ken S. Tucker (01/30/05)
    • Re: Langrange strange Tom Capizzi (01/30/05)
      • Re: Langrange strange Dirk Van de moortel (01/30/05)
      • Re: Langrange strange Tom Capizzi (01/30/05)
• Standard model accurately describes elementary particle interactions 99% of the time Bill Hobba (01/29/05)
  • Re: Standard model accurately describes elementary particle interactions 99% of the time Tom Roberts (01/30/05)
  • Re: Standard model accurately describes elementary particle interactions 99% of the time PD (01/30/05)
• MISCONCEPTIONS OF PRESENT THEORY OF CAPACITANCE Sue... (01/29/05)
  • Re: MISCONCEPTIONS OF PRESENT THEORY OF CAPACITANCE Androcles (01/29/05)
    • Re: MISCONCEPTIONS OF PRESENT THEORY OF CAPACITANCE Sue... (01/29/05)
      • Re: MISCONCEPTIONS OF PRESENT THEORY OF CAPACITANCE Dirk Van de moortel (01/29/05)
      • Re: MISCONCEPTIONS OF PRESENT THEORY OF CAPACITANCE Androcles (01/30/05)
  • Re: MISCONCEPTIONS OF PRESENT THEORY OF CAPACITANCE FrediFizzx (01/29/05)
    • Re: MISCONCEPTIONS OF PRESENT THEORY OF CAPACITANCE Androcles (01/30/05)
  • Re: MISCONCEPTIONS OF PRESENT THEORY OF CAPACITANCE Bill Hobba (01/29/05)
  • Re: MISCONCEPTIONS OF PRESENT THEORY OF CAPACITANCE John C. Polasek (01/30/05)
  • Re: MISCONCEPTIONS OF PRESENT THEORY OF CAPACITANCE Bilge (01/30/05)
    • Re: MISCONCEPTIONS OF PRESENT THEORY OF CAPACITANCE John C. Polasek (01/30/05)
• Zielinski's Problem and Russian Torsion WMD R&D (corrected draft) Jack Sarfatti (01/29/05)
• The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics Lldwdl (01/29/05)
  • Re: The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics Bill Hobba (01/29/05)
• Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Jeany (01/29/05)
  • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Franz Heymann (01/29/05)
  • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Eugene Shubert (01/29/05)
    • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Nick (01/30/05)
  • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? John C. Polasek (01/29/05)
  • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Bill Hobba (01/29/05)
    • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Jesse Mazer (01/30/05)
      • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Bill Hobba (01/30/05)
      • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Koobee Wublee (01/30/05)
      • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Bill Hobba (01/30/05)
      • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Bill Hobba (01/30/05)
      • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? John C. Polasek (01/30/05)
      • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Koobee Wublee (01/30/05)
      • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Bill Hobba (01/30/05)
      • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Ken S. Tucker (01/31/05)
      • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Bill Hobba (01/30/05)
      • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? John C. Polasek (01/30/05)
      • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Bill Hobba (01/31/05)
      • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Dirk Van de moortel (01/30/05)
      • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Koobee Wublee (01/30/05)
      • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? zzbunker_at_netscape.net (01/30/05)
      • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Tom Roberts (01/30/05)
      • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Mike (01/30/05)
      • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (01/30/05)
      • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Franz Heymann (01/30/05)
      • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Mike (01/30/05)
      • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Franz Heymann (01/30/05)
      • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Franz Heymann (01/30/05)
      • The concept of proper time reany_at_asu.edu (01/30/05)
      • Re: The concept of proper time Androcles (01/30/05)
      • Re: The concept of proper time Franz Heymann (01/30/05)
      • Re: The concept of proper time jowr.pi_at_gmail.com (01/31/05)
      • Re: The concept of proper time Jesse Mazer (01/31/05)
      • Re: The concept of proper time glbrad01 (01/31/05)
• What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rate of decay when they move very fast? Michael Levin (01/29/05)
  • Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rateof decay when they move very fast? Dave (01/29/05)
  • Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rate of decay when they move very fast? Rene Tschaggelar (01/29/05)
    • Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rate of decay when they move very fast? reany_at_asu.edu (01/29/05)
  • Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rate of decay when they move very fast? Gregory L. Hansen (01/29/05)
  • Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rate of decay when they move very fast? reany_at_asu.edu (01/29/05)
  • Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rateof decay when they move very fast? Androcles (01/29/05)
    • Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rateof decay when they move very fast? Dirk Van de moortel (01/29/05)
    • Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rateof decay when they move very fast? Franz Heymann (01/29/05)
    • Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rateof decay when they move very fast? Uncle Al (01/30/05)
      • Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rateof decay when they move very fast? Androcles (01/30/05)
      • Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rateof decay when they move very fast? jgreenfield_at_seol.net.au (01/31/05)
      • Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rateof decay when they move very fast? Uncle Al (01/31/05)
      • Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rateof decay when they move very fast? Androcles (01/31/05)
  • Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rate of decay when they move very fast? Tom Roberts (01/29/05)
  • Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rateof decay when they move very fast? Franz Heymann (01/29/05)
  • Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rate of decay when they move very fast? PD (01/29/05)
    • Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rate of decay when they move very fast? Tom Capizzi (01/29/05)
  • Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rate of decay when they move very fast? Sue... (01/29/05)
    • Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rate of decay when they move very fast? Franz Heymann (01/29/05)
    • Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rate of decay when they move very fast? Tom Roberts (01/30/05)
  • Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rateof decay when they move very fast? Uncle Al (01/29/05)
    • Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rateof decay when they move very fast? Androcles (01/29/05)
      • Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rateof decay when they move very fast? Dirk Van de moortel (01/29/05)
    • Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rateof decay when they move very fast? Franz Heymann (01/29/05)
• Accellerated learning DavidBowman (01/29/05)
  • Re: Accellerated learning PD (01/29/05)
  • Re: Accellerated learning The Ghost In The Machine (01/29/05)
• Math typo correction in Zielinski's problem Jack Sarfatti (01/29/05)
  • Re: Math typo correction in Zielinski's problem Gib Bogle (01/29/05)
    • Re: Math typo correction in Zielinski's problem Doug (01/29/05)
  • Re: Math typo correction in Zielinski's problem Nora Baron (01/29/05)
    • Re: Math typo correction in Zielinski's problem Gib Bogle (01/29/05)
    • Re: Math typo correction in Zielinski's problem JP (01/29/05)
• Solution of Zielinski's Problem in Einstein's GR Jack Sarfatti (01/29/05)
  • Re: Solution of Zielinski's Problem in Einstein's GR Gib Bogle (01/29/05)
  • Re: Solution of Zielinski's Problem in Einstein's GR abuse_at_mistral.net (01/29/05)
• Frank Wilczek Cosmic Superconductor My Math Typo Correction Jack Sarfatti (01/29/05)
• Frank Wilczek on Cosmic Superconductivity & Russian Torsion WMD Jack Sarfatti (01/29/05)
• New dimension? D (01/28/05)
  • Re: New dimension? Bill Hobba (01/28/05)
    • Re: New dimension? Ken S. Tucker (01/28/05)
      • Re: New dimension? ande452_at_attglobal.net (01/29/05)
      • Re: New dimension? Ken S. Tucker (01/29/05)
  • Re: New dimension? ande452_at_attglobal.net (01/29/05)
  • Re: New dimension? Bilge (01/29/05)
    • Re: New dimension? D (01/29/05)
  • Re: New dimension? DavidBowman (01/29/05)
• Relativistic Rap sawlake-gg_at_yahoo.com (01/28/05)
• Sam, Joe, a mosquito and a ladder. Androcles (01/28/05)
  • Re: Sam, Joe, a mosquito and a ladder. tadchem (01/28/05)
    • Re: Sam, Joe, a mosquito and a ladder. Dirk Van de moortel (01/28/05)
      • Re: Sam, Joe, a mosquito and a ladder. Dave (01/28/05)
      • Re: Sam, Joe, a mosquito and a ladder. RP (01/28/05)
      • Re: Sam, Joe, a mosquito and a ladder. Androcles (01/28/05)
      • Re: Sam, Joe, a mosquito and a ladder. Franz Heymann (01/29/05)
    • Re: Sam, Joe, a mosquito and a ladder. Androcles (01/28/05)
  • Re: Sam, Joe, a mosquito and a ladder. Uncle Al (01/28/05)
    • Re: Sam, Joe, a mosquito and a ladder. Androcles (01/28/05)
      • Re: Sam, Joe, a mosquito and a ladder. Dirk Van de moortel (01/28/05)
  • Re: Sam, Joe, a mosquito and a ladder. Eli Botkin (01/28/05)
    • Re: Sam, Joe, a mosquito and a ladder. Androcles (01/28/05)
• Experience!!!!!!!!!!!!.......... ... Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (01/28/05)
• Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? Rob (01/28/05)
  • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? FrediFizzx (01/28/05)
    • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? Rob (01/28/05)
      • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/28/05)
      • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? ande452_at_attglobal.net (01/28/05)
      • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/28/05)
      • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? Creighton Hogg (01/28/05)
      • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/28/05)
      • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? Creighton Hogg (01/28/05)
      • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/28/05)
      • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? Dirk Van de moortel (01/28/05)
      • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/28/05)
      • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? Dirk Van de moortel (01/28/05)
      • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? ande452_at_attglobal.net (01/28/05)
      • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? Tom Roberts (01/28/05)
  • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? ande452_at_attglobal.net (01/28/05)
    • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? Rob (01/28/05)
      • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? Rob (01/28/05)
      • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? Creighton Hogg (01/28/05)
      • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? Creighton Hogg (01/28/05)
    • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? The Ghost In The Machine (01/28/05)
  • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? Tom Roberts (01/28/05)
    • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? Rob (01/28/05)
      • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? redbelly98_at_yahoo.com (01/28/05)
      • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? RP (01/28/05)
      • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? redbelly98_at_yahoo.com (01/28/05)
      • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? RP (01/28/05)
      • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? redbelly98_at_yahoo.com (01/29/05)
      • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? RP (01/29/05)
      • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? redbelly98_at_yahoo.com (01/30/05)
      • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? RP (01/30/05)
  • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? Bilge (01/29/05)
• The Complete Disproof of Relativity and current Quantum Mechanics Jeff (01/27/05)
  • Re: The Complete Disproof of Relativity and current Quantum Mechanics stephen_at_nomail.com (01/27/05)
    • Re: The Complete Disproof of Relativity and current Quantum Mechanics Jeff (01/28/05)
      • Re: The Complete Disproof of Relativity and current Quantum Mechanics Bilge (01/29/05)
      • Re: The Complete Disproof of Relativity and current Quantum Mechanics Jeff (01/30/05)
      • Re: The Complete Disproof of Relativity and current Quantum Mechanics Eric Gisse (01/31/05)
  • Re: The Complete Disproof of Relativity and current Quantum Mechanics DavidBowman (01/28/05)
  • Re: The Complete Disproof of Relativity and current Quantum Mechanics jowr.pi_at_gmail.com (01/29/05)
    • Re: The Complete Disproof of Relativity and current Quantum Mechanics Jeff (01/30/05)
      • Re: The Complete Disproof of Relativity and current Quantum Mechanics Eric Gisse (01/31/05)
• Androcles and Draper discuss spacetime as a vector space PD (01/27/05)
  • Re: Androcles and Draper discuss spacetime as a vector space Androcles (01/27/05)
    • Re: Androcles and Draper discuss spacetime as a vector space PD (01/27/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper discuss spacetime as a vector space Androcles (01/27/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper discuss spacetime as a vector space Randy Poe (01/27/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper discuss spacetime as a vector space Midtown (01/27/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper discuss spacetime as a vector space jowr.pi_at_gmail.com (01/28/05)
  • Re: Androcles and Draper discuss spacetime as a vector space whopkins_at_csd.uwm.edu (01/28/05)
    • Re: Androcles and Draper discuss spacetime as a vector space Androcles (01/28/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper discuss spacetime as a vector space PD (01/28/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper discuss spacetime as a vector space Androcles (01/28/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper discuss spacetime as a vector space YBM (01/28/05)
    • Re: Androcles and Draper discuss spacetime as a vector space PD (01/28/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper discuss spacetime as a vector space Timo Nieminen (01/28/05)
• Re: What before big bang? YBM (01/27/05)
  • Re: What before big bang? YBM (01/28/05)
    • What does "edu." mean? Daniel Weston (01/29/05)
      • Re: What does "edu." mean? Tom Capizzi (01/29/05)
      • Re: What does "edu." mean? Androcles (01/30/05)
      • Re: What does "edu." mean? Androcles (01/30/05)
      • Re: What does "edu." mean? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/30/05)
      • Re: What does "edu." mean? Bilge (01/30/05)
      • Re: What does "edu." mean? stephen_at_nomail.com (01/30/05)
• Superluminal information transfer paradox Dr. Photon (01/27/05)
• What is "time"? Leif Andersson (01/27/05)
  • Re: What is "time"? Bill Hobba (01/27/05)
  • Re: What is "time"? Androcles (01/27/05)
    • Re: What is "time"? Leif Andersson (01/30/05)
      • Re: What is "time"? Androcles (01/30/05)
  • Re: What is "time"? John C. Polasek (01/27/05)
    • Re: What is "time"? Henri Wilson (01/27/05)
      • Re: What is "time"? Paul B. Andersen (01/28/05)
      • Re: What is "time"? Henri Wilson (01/29/05)
      • Re: What is "time"? Androcles (01/30/05)
      • Re: What is "time"? Henri Wilson (01/30/05)
      • Re: What is "time"? Androcles (01/31/05)
    • Re: What is "time"? Leif Andersson (01/30/05)
      • Re: What is "time"? John C. Polasek (01/30/05)
      • Re: What is "time"? Androcles (01/30/05)
      • Re: What is "time"? John C. Polasek (01/31/05)
  • Re: What is "time"? George (01/28/05)
  • Re: What is "time"? DavidBowman (01/28/05)
• Correction on Bu Jack Sarfatti (01/27/05)
• Bohr Complementarity in General Relativity Jack Sarfatti (01/27/05)
• Zielinski's and Puthoff's gravity theories refuted Jack Sarfatti (01/26/05)
  • Re: Zielinski's and Puthoff's gravity theories refuted Ken S. Tucker (01/27/05)
    • Re: Zielinski's and Puthoff's gravity theories refuted xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/27/05)
      • Re: Zielinski's and Puthoff's gravity theories refuted Ken S. Tucker (01/27/05)
• Nature of Inertia and Gravity revealed by Logical Strengthening of Special Relativity qchiang2_at_yahoo.com (01/26/05)
  • Re: Nature of Inertia and Gravity revealed by Logical Strengthening of Special Relativity Bill Hobba (01/26/05)
    • Re: Nature of Inertia and Gravity revealed by Logical Strengthening of Special Relativity xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/27/05)
      • Re: Nature of Inertia and Gravity revealed by Logical Strengthening of Special Relativity Tom Capizzi (01/27/05)
      • Re: Nature of Inertia and Gravity revealed by Logical Strengthening of Special Relativity Bill Hobba (01/27/05)
      • Re: Nature of Inertia and Gravity revealed by Logical Strengthening of Special Relativity Harry (01/27/05)
      • Re: Nature of Inertia and Gravity revealed by Logical Strengthening of Special Relativity xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/28/05)
    • Re: Nature of Inertia and Gravity revealed by Logical Strengthening of Special Relativity qchiang2_at_yahoo.com (01/28/05)
      • Re: Nature of Inertia and Gravity revealed by Logical Strengthening of Special Relativity Ken S. Tucker (01/28/05)
      • Re: Nature of Inertia and Gravity revealed by Logical Strengthening of Special Relativity Tom Capizzi (01/28/05)
      • Re: Nature of Inertia and Gravity revealed by Logical Strengthening of Special Relativity Ken S. Tucker (01/28/05)
      • Re: Nature of Inertia and Gravity revealed by Logical Strengthening of Special Relativity RP (01/29/05)
• What did Infeld mean? AllYou! (01/26/05)
  • Re: What did Infeld mean? xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/26/05)
    • Re: What did Infeld mean? AllYou! (01/26/05)
      • Re: What did Infeld mean? xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/27/05)
  • Re: What did Infeld mean? Daniel Weston (01/26/05)
    • Re: What did Infeld mean? AllYou! (01/27/05)
    • Re: What did Infeld mean? reany_at_asu.edu (01/27/05)
      • Re: What did Infeld mean? AllYou! (01/27/05)
      • Re: What did Infeld mean? reany_at_asu.edu (01/27/05)
      • Re: What did Infeld mean? AllYou! (01/27/05)
      • The invention of physical concepts is NOT about labeling sensations reany_at_asu.edu (01/28/05)
      • Observations are not a determination of reality, and do not include explanations. AllYou! (01/28/05)
  • Re: What did Infeld mean? Bill Hobba (01/27/05)
  • Re: What did Infeld mean? Bilge (01/27/05)
    • Re: What did Infeld mean? AllYou! (01/27/05)
      • Re: What did Infeld mean? Bilge (01/27/05)
      • Re: What did Infeld mean? AllYou! (01/27/05)
  • Re: What did Infeld mean? reany_at_asu.edu (01/27/05)
  • Re: What did Infeld mean? PD (01/27/05)
    • Re: What did Infeld mean? reany_at_asu.edu (01/27/05)
      • Re: What did Infeld mean? AllYou! (01/27/05)
      • Re: What did Infeld mean? Dirk Van de moortel (01/27/05)
      • Re: What did Infeld mean? AllYou! (01/27/05)
    • Re: What did Infeld mean? AllYou! (01/27/05)
    • Re: What did Infeld mean? Daniel Weston (01/27/05)
      • Re: What did Infeld mean? AllYou! (01/27/05)
      • What did Patrick mean? reany_at_asu.edu (01/28/05)
      • Re: What did Patrick mean? robert j. kolker (01/28/05)
      • Re: What did Patrick mean? Daniel Weston (01/28/05)
      • The hopeless confusion between observation and reality AllYou! (01/28/05)
      • Re: The hopeless confusion between observation and reality reany_at_asu.edu (01/28/05)
      • Re: The hopeless confusion between observation and reality AllYou! (01/28/05)
      • If you want to know Infeld's view, go have a seance reany_at_asu.edu (01/28/05)
      • Terrible confusion when asked to interpret what others have said. AllYou! (01/28/05)
      • Re: Terrible confusion when asked to interpret what others have said. Daniel Weston (01/28/05)
      • An observation is the statement made from a 'rationalized' sensation reany_at_asu.edu (01/28/05)
      • An observation is hope. AllYou! (01/28/05)
      • What the hell does 'intersubjective' mean? reany_at_asu.edu (01/29/05)
      • Re: An observation is the statement made from a 'rationalized' sensation Bilge (01/29/05)
      • An observation is the statement made from a 'rationalized' sensation reany_at_asu.edu (01/28/05)
      • Re: Terrible confusion when asked to interpret what others have said. Bilge (01/29/05)
      • Re: Terrible confusion when asked to interpret what others have said. reany_at_asu.edu (01/28/05)
      • Re: Terrible confusion when asked to interpret what others have said. AllYou! (01/28/05)
      • Re: Terrible confusion when asked to interpret what others have said. reany_at_asu.edu (01/29/05)
• The TOTAL Disproof of Relativity and current QM JLeeCforRP (01/26/05)
  • Re: The TOTAL Disproof of Relativity and current QM jowr.pi_at_gmail.com (01/27/05)
• Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/26/05)
  • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox robert j. kolker (01/26/05)
  • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Uncle Al (01/26/05)
    • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Will Janoschka (01/26/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Uncle Al (01/26/05)
    • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/26/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox CWatters (01/26/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/26/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Sam Wormley (01/26/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox robert j. kolker (01/27/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/27/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox CWatters (01/27/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox RP (01/26/05)
  • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox CWatters (01/26/05)
    • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/26/05)
  • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Sam Wormley (01/26/05)
  • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Jesse Mazer (01/26/05)
  • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Jim Black (01/26/05)
  • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Bilge (01/26/05)
    • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/27/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox robert j. kolker (01/27/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Bilge (01/28/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/28/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Bilge (01/28/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/29/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Bilge (01/29/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/29/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Bilge (01/30/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/30/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Bilge (01/30/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/30/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Bilge (01/30/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/30/05)
  • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Tom Roberts (01/28/05)
    • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Creighton Hogg (01/28/05)
    • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/28/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Jesse Mazer (01/28/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/30/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Bilge (01/28/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Tom Roberts (01/29/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/29/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox robert j. kolker (01/29/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/30/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Bilge (01/30/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/30/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Bilge (01/30/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Jesse Mazer (01/30/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/30/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Jesse Mazer (01/30/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/30/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Jesse Mazer (01/31/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox glbrad01 (01/31/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Tom Roberts (01/30/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/31/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox robert j. kolker (01/30/05)
• einstein's cows Jim Light (01/26/05)
• SR's EM Covariants invariantly unproven? eleaticus (01/26/05)
  • Re: SR's EM Covariants invariantly unproven? jowr.pi_at_gmail.com (01/26/05)
    • Re: SR's EM Covariants invariantly unproven? eleaticus (01/26/05)
      • Re: SR's EM Covariants invariantly unproven? jowr.pi_at_gmail.com (01/26/05)
    • Re: SR's EM Covariants invariantly unproven? Dirk Van de moortel (01/26/05)
      • Re: SR's EM Covariants invariantly unproven? eleaticus (01/26/05)
      • Re: SR's EM Covariants invariantly unproven? Dirk Van de moortel (01/26/05)
  • Re: SR's EM Covariants invariantly unproven? Bilge (01/26/05)
    • Re: SR's EM Covariants invariantly unproven? eleaticus (01/27/05)
      • Re: SR's EM Covariants invariantly unproven? Bilge (01/27/05)
      • Re: SR's EM Covariants invariantly unproven? eleaticus (01/27/05)
      • Re: SR's EM Covariants invariantly unproven? Bilge (01/28/05)
    • Re: SR's EM Covariants invariantly unproven? eleaticus (01/27/05)
      • Re: SR's EM Covariants invariantly unproven? Bilge (01/27/05)
      • Coordinate-free measures of coordinate dependent covariants? eleaticus (01/29/05)
      • Re: Coordinate-free measures of coordinate dependent covariants? Bilge (01/29/05)
      • SR's Bx', Ey', etc, invariantly not directly measureable? eleaticus (01/29/05)
      • Re: SR's Bx', Ey', etc, invariantly not directly measureable? Bilge (01/30/05)
      • Re: SR's Bx', Ey', etc, invariantly not directly measureable? eleaticus (01/30/05)
      • Re: SR's Bx', Ey', etc, invariantly not directly measureable? Bilge (01/30/05)
      • Re: SR's Bx', Ey', etc, invariantly not directly measureable? Androcles (01/30/05)
• Help with SR time/mass notion dseppala_at_austin.rr.com (01/25/05)
  • Re: Help with SR time/mass notion Tom Roberts (01/25/05)
    • Re: Help with SR time/mass notion jem (01/25/05)
• The Fundamental Flaw of SRT kenseto (01/25/05)
  • Re: The Fundamental Flaw of SRT Dirk Van de moortel (01/25/05)
    • Re: The Fundamental Flaw of SRT Paul Cardinale (01/27/05)
      • Re: The Fundamental Flaw of SRT Dirk Van de moortel (01/27/05)
• More about the balloon point of view Leif Andersson (01/25/05)
  • Re: More about the balloon point of view Bill Hobba (01/26/05)
    • Re: More about the balloon point of view Leif Andersson (01/27/05)
      • Re: More about the balloon point of view Bill Hobba (01/27/05)
• help with math beda pietanza (01/25/05)
  • Re: help with math Dirk Van de moortel (01/25/05)
    • Re: help with math Tom Capizzi (01/25/05)
    • Re: help with math beda pietanza (01/25/05)
      • Re: help with math Dirk Van de moortel (01/26/05)
  • Re: help with math jem (01/25/05)
    • Re: help with math Jem (01/26/05)
    • Re: help with math beda pietanza (01/27/05)
      • Re: help with math jem (01/28/05)
      • Re: help with math beda pietanza (01/28/05)
      • Re: help with math alanmc95210_at_yahoo.com (01/29/05)
      • Re: help with math beda pietanza (01/30/05)
• Help: I need to understand the Lorentz force lucasjensen_at_yahoo.dk (01/25/05)
  • Re: I need to understand the Lorentz force Dirk Van de moortel (01/25/05)
  • Re: Help: I need to understand the Lorentz force Marcel_at_hotmail.com (01/27/05)
  • Re: Help: I need to understand the Lorentz force Ken S. Tucker (01/27/05)
  • Re: I need to understand the Lorentz force Lee Pugh (01/30/05)
• Help: I need to understand the Lorentz force lucasjensen_at_yahoo.dk (01/25/05)
  • Re: Help: I need to understand the Lorentz force PD (01/26/05)
    • Re: Help: I need to understand the Lorentz force Dirk Van de moortel (01/26/05)
      • Re: Help: I need to understand the Lorentz force Ken S. Tucker (01/27/05)
      • Re: Help: I need to understand the Lorentz force redbelly98_at_yahoo.com (01/28/05)
      • Re: Help: I need to understand the Lorentz force Ken S. Tucker (01/28/05)
  • Re: Help: I need to understand the Lorentz force rge11x (01/27/05)
    • Re: Help: I need to understand the Lorentz force Mark Palenik (01/30/05)
  • Re: I need to understand the Lorentz force Jeremy Watts (01/27/05)
    • Re: I need to understand the Lorentz force PD (01/27/05)
  • Re: Help: I need to understand the Lorentz force PD (01/27/05)
    • Re: Help: I need to understand the Lorentz force Magneto (01/30/05)
  • Re: Help: I need to understand the Lorentz force DRLunsford (01/27/05)
  • Re: Help: I need to understand the Lorentz force Ken S. Tucker (01/30/05)
    • Re: Help: I need to understand the Lorentz force Mark Palenik (01/30/05)
• Maximum velocity Glue (01/25/05)
  • Re: Maximum velocity Dirk Van de moortel (01/25/05)
    • Re: Maximum velocity Glue (01/25/05)
      • Re: Maximum velocity Dirk Van de moortel (01/25/05)
      • Re: Maximum velocity Glue (01/25/05)
  • Re: Maximum velocity N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/25/05)
  • Re: Maximum velocity Ken S. Tucker (01/25/05)
    • Re: Maximum velocity Steve J (01/25/05)
      • Re: Maximum velocity N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/26/05)
  • Re: Maximum velocity The Ghost In The Machine (01/25/05)
  • Re: Maximum velocity EjP (01/25/05)
    • Re: Maximum velocity Steve J (01/26/05)
  • Re: Maximum velocity Bill Hobba (01/26/05)
    • Re: Maximum velocity Glue (01/26/05)
      • Re: Maximum velocity N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/26/05)
      • Re: Maximum velocity Bill Hobba (01/26/05)
      • Re: Maximum velocity Tom Capizzi (01/26/05)
      • Re: Maximum velocity Bill Hobba (01/27/05)
• Time before the big bang Steve J (01/25/05)
  • Re: Time before the big bang Bill Hobba (01/25/05)
  • Re: Time before the big bang Androcles (01/25/05)
    • Re: Time before the big bang PD (01/25/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang Androcles (01/25/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang PDraper (01/25/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang Androcles (01/26/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang PD (01/26/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang Androcles (01/26/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang PD (01/26/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang Androcles (01/26/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang PD (01/26/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang Androcles (01/27/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang PD (01/27/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang Androcles (01/27/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang PD (01/28/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang Androcles (01/28/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang PD (01/28/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang Androcles (01/28/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang YBM (01/28/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang Tom Capizzi (01/26/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang Androcles (01/26/05)
  • Re: Time before the big bang AllYou! (01/25/05)
    • Re: Time before the big bang Dirk Van de moortel (01/25/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang AllYou! (01/25/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang Dirk Van de moortel (01/25/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang AllYou! (01/25/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang Dirk Van de moortel (01/25/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang AllYou! (01/25/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang Dirk Van de moortel (01/25/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang AllYou! (01/25/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang Dirk Van de moortel (01/25/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang AllYou! (01/25/05)
  • Re: Time before the big bang N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/25/05)
    • Re: Time before the big bang Bernardz (01/26/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/26/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang Bernardz (01/27/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/27/05)
  • Re: Time before the big bang tj Frazir (01/30/05)
• E = wLF As a Riccati Differential Equation and Types 1, 2 Motion OsherD (01/25/05)
  • Re: E = wLF As a Riccati Differential Equation and Types 1, 2 Motion Peter Kinane (01/25/05)
• johnreed time takelet randamajor_at_yahoo.com (01/24/05)
  • Re: johnreed time takelet Androcles (01/24/05)
• A Derivation of Special Relativity without Invoking Group Theory Eugene Shubert (01/24/05)
  • Re: A Derivation of Special Relativity without Invoking Group Theory Tom Roberts (01/24/05)
    • Re: A Derivation of Special Relativity without Invoking Group Theory Old Man (01/25/05)
      • Re: A Derivation of Special Relativity without Invoking Group Theory Gregory L. Hansen (01/25/05)
      • Re: A Derivation of Special Relativity without Invoking Group Theory Bill Hobba (01/25/05)
      • Re: A Derivation of Special Relativity without Invoking Group Theory Tom Roberts (01/25/05)
    • Re: A Derivation of Special Relativity without Invoking Group Theory Gerald L. O'Barr (01/25/05)
  • Re: A Derivation of Special Relativity without Invoking Group Theory Uncle Al (01/24/05)
  • Re: A Derivation of Special Relativity without Invoking Group Theory whopkins_at_csd.uwm.edu (01/24/05)
    • Re: A Derivation of Special Relativity without Invoking Group Theory Eugene Shubert (01/25/05)
      • Re: A Derivation of Special Relativity without Invoking Group Theory Tom Roberts (01/25/05)
      • Re: A Derivation of Special Relativity without Invoking Group Theory Eugene Shubert (01/26/05)
    • Re: A Derivation of Special Relativity without Invoking Group Theory Eugene Shubert (01/25/05)
      • Re: A Derivation of Special Relativity without Invoking Group Theory Jesse Mazer (01/25/05)
      • Re: A Derivation of Special Relativity without Invoking Group Theory David Evens (01/25/05)
  • Re: A Derivation of Special Relativity without Invoking Group Theory Bilge (01/25/05)
• The balloon point of view Leif Andersson (01/24/05)
  • Re: The balloon point of view stephen_at_nomail.com (01/24/05)
    • Re: The balloon point of view mtm (01/25/05)
  • Re: The balloon point of view Bill Hobba (01/25/05)
  • Re: The balloon point of view Joe Fischer (01/25/05)
  • Re: The balloon point of view Tom Roberts (01/25/05)
    • Re: The balloon point of view shevek (01/26/05)
      • Re: The balloon point of view Bill Hobba (01/27/05)
      • Re: The balloon point of view shevek (01/27/05)
      • Re: The balloon point of view Bill Hobba (01/28/05)
      • If the FAQ could stipulate the meanings of these terms reany_at_asu.edu (01/28/05)
      • Re: If the FAQ could stipulate the meanings of these terms Tom Capizzi (01/28/05)
      • Re: If the FAQ could stipulate the meanings of these terms reany_at_asu.edu (01/28/05)
      • Re: If the FAQ could stipulate the meanings of these terms AllYou! (01/28/05)
      • Re: If the FAQ could stipulate the meanings of these terms reany_at_asu.edu (01/28/05)
      • Re: If the FAQ could stipulate the meanings of these terms AllYou! (01/28/05)
      • Re: If the FAQ could stipulate the meanings of these terms reany_at_asu.edu (01/29/05)
      • Re: If the FAQ could stipulate the meanings of these terms Tom Capizzi (01/29/05)
      • Re: If the FAQ could stipulate the meanings of these terms reany_at_asu.edu (01/29/05)
      • Re: If the FAQ could stipulate the meanings of these terms Tom Capizzi (01/29/05)
      • Re: If the FAQ could stipulate the meanings of these terms reany_at_asu.edu (01/29/05)
      • Re: If the FAQ could stipulate the meanings of these terms Bill Hobba (01/29/05)
      • Re: The balloon point of view Tom Roberts (01/27/05)
      • Re: The balloon point of view shevek (01/27/05)
      • Re: The balloon point of view Tom Capizzi (01/28/05)
• What is Negative Energy ??? blitz_commander_at_yahoo.com.sg (01/24/05)
  • Re: What is Negative Energy ??? Bill Hobba (01/24/05)
    • Re: What is Negative Energy ??? valls_at_icmf.inf.cu (01/24/05)
      • Re: What is Negative Energy ??? Bill Hobba (01/25/05)
      • Re: What is Negative Energy ??? valls_at_icmf.inf.cu (01/25/05)
      • Re: What is Negative Energy ??? Bill Hobba (01/26/05)
      • Re: What is Negative Energy ??? Ken S. Tucker (01/26/05)
      • Re: What is Negative Energy ??? valls_at_icmf.inf.cu (01/28/05)
      • Re: What is Negative Energy ??? Bill Hobba (01/28/05)
      • Re: What is Negative Energy ??? zzbunker_at_netscape.net (01/27/05)
  • Re: What is Negative Energy ??? Androcles (01/24/05)
  • Re: What is Negative Energy ??? PD (01/24/05)
    • Re: What is Negative Energy ??? Tom Roberts (01/24/05)
      • Re: What is Negative Energy ??? PD (01/24/05)
      • Re: What is Negative Energy ??? Ken S. Tucker (01/24/05)
      • Re: What is Negative Energy ??? Bernardz (01/25/05)
      • Re: What is Negative Energy ??? Ken S. Tucker (01/25/05)
      • Re: What is Negative Energy ??? Bernardz (01/26/05)
      • Re: What is Negative Energy ??? Ken S. Tucker (01/26/05)
      • Re: What is Negative Energy ??? Bernardz (01/27/05)
      • Re: What is Negative Energy ??? Ken S. Tucker (01/27/05)
      • Re: What is Negative Energy ??? valls_at_icmf.inf.cu (01/28/05)
• Curved 4D space and GR skeptics Scandere (01/24/05)
  • Re: Curved 4D space and GR skeptics Harry (01/24/05)
  • Re: Curved 4D space and GR skeptics Ken S. Tucker (01/24/05)
    • Re: Curved 4D space and GR skeptics Harry (01/24/05)
• recommend some newbie learning material on ... blitz_commander_at_yahoo.com.sg (01/24/05)
  • Re: recommend some newbie learning material on ... N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/24/05)
  • Re: recommend some newbie learning material on ... Bilge (01/24/05)
  • Re: recommend some newbie learning material on ... PD (01/24/05)
    • Re: recommend some newbie learning material on ... Bill Hobba (01/25/05)
• General Relativity Without Singularities: the Tardis Effect Hunter (01/24/05)
• General Relativity Without Singularities Hunter Monroe (01/24/05)
• Andersen's Second Rule and more eleaticus (01/24/05)
  • Re: Andersen's Second Rule and more YBM (01/24/05)
  • Re: Andersen's Second Rule and more xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/24/05)
• local one ways speed of light beda pietanza (01/24/05)
  • Re: local one ways speed of light N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/24/05)
    • Re: local one ways speed of light xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/24/05)
      • Re: local one ways speed of light beda pietanza (01/24/05)
      • Re: local one ways speed of light xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/26/05)
      • Re: local one ways speed of light Dirk Van de moortel (01/26/05)
      • Re: local one ways speed of light xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/28/05)
      • Re: local one ways speed of light Dirk Van de moortel (01/28/05)
      • Re: local one ways speed of light xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/28/05)
    • Re: local one ways speed of light beda pietanza (01/24/05)
      • Re: local one ways speed of light N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/25/05)
      • Re: local one ways speed of light beda pietanza (01/25/05)
      • Re: local one ways speed of light N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/26/05)
      • Re: local one ways speed of light beda pietanza (01/27/05)
      • Re: local one ways speed of light N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/28/05)
      • Re: local one ways speed of light beda pietanza (01/28/05)
      • Re: local one ways speed of light beda pietanza (01/28/05)
• An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Tom Roberts (01/23/05)
  • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment harry (01/23/05)
  • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Bill Hobba (01/23/05)
    • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Henri Wilson (01/24/05)
      • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Henri Wilson (01/25/05)
  • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Koobee Wublee (01/24/05)
  • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Tom Roberts (01/24/05)
    • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment harry (01/24/05)
      • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Tom Roberts (01/24/05)
    • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment greywolf42 (01/25/05)
  • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment JM Albuquerque (01/24/05)
    • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Tom Roberts (01/25/05)
      • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment JM Albuquerque (01/25/05)
      • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Harry (01/26/05)
      • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Tom Roberts (01/29/05)
  • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment greywolf42 (01/24/05)
    • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Tom Roberts (01/25/05)
      • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Dirk Van de moortel (01/26/05)
  • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment mountain man (01/27/05)
    • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Tom Roberts (01/27/05)
      • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Harry (01/27/05)
      • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Tom Roberts (01/27/05)
      • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Harry (01/27/05)
      • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment mountain man (01/28/05)
      • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Jesse Mazer (01/28/05)
      • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Franz Heymann (01/29/05)
    • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Franz Heymann (01/27/05)
      • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment mountain man (01/27/05)
      • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/27/05)
      • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Franz Heymann (01/27/05)
      • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment mountain man (01/28/05)
      • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Franz Heymann (01/28/05)
      • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Tom Roberts (01/27/05)
      • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Franz Heymann (01/28/05)
    • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Bjoern Feuerbacher (01/27/05)
      • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment mountain man (01/27/05)
    • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Mark Fergerson (01/28/05)
• IRT: A New Theory of Relativity kenseto (01/23/05)
  • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity robert j. kolker (01/23/05)
    • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity kenseto (01/23/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity robert j. kolker (01/23/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity kenseto (01/23/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity Sam Wormley (01/23/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity kenseto (01/23/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/23/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity kenseto (01/24/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/24/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity Bjoern Feuerbacher (01/25/05)
  • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity Bernardz (01/23/05)
    • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity Paul Stowe (01/23/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity Bernardz (01/24/05)
    • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity kenseto (01/24/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity Bernardz (01/26/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity kenseto (01/27/05)
  • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity Uncle Al (01/23/05)
    • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity kenseto (01/24/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/24/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity kenseto (01/24/05)
  • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity Jesse Mazer (01/24/05)
    • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity kenseto (01/24/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity Dirk Van de moortel (01/24/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity Sam Wormley (01/24/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity kenseto (01/24/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity Dirk Van de moortel (01/24/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity Jesse Mazer (01/24/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity kenseto (01/24/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity Jesse Mazer (01/24/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity kenseto (01/25/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity Jesse Mazer (01/26/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity kenseto (01/27/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity Jesse Mazer (01/29/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity kenseto (01/29/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity Jesse Mazer (01/29/05)
• CNN,Sky News and Einstein 2005 World Year of Physics K_Loupspeed (01/23/05)
• The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian SDR (01/23/05)
  • Re: The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/23/05)
• The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian SDR (01/22/05)
  • Re: The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/22/05)
  • Re: The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian Bill Hobba (01/23/05)
• So you say there are no stupid questions? DavidBowman (01/22/05)
  • Re: So you say there are no stupid questions? Paul Stowe (01/22/05)
    • Re: So you say there are no stupid questions? DavidBowman (01/23/05)
      • Re: So you say there are no stupid questions? Tom Capizzi (01/23/05)
      • Re: So you say there are no stupid questions? Bernardz (01/23/05)
      • Re: So you say there are no stupid questions? Paul Stowe (01/23/05)
      • Re: So you say there are no stupid questions? robert j. kolker (01/23/05)
      • Re: So you say there are no stupid questions? Bernardz (01/24/05)
    • Re: So you say there are no stupid questions? Androcles (01/24/05)
      • Re: So you say there are no stupid questions? DavidBowman (01/24/05)
  • Re: So you say there are no stupid questions? Tom Roberts (01/25/05)
• Re: Dark Matter: Galactic Core frame drag? oookhc_at_hotmail.com (01/22/05)
• The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian SDR (01/22/05)
• The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian SDR (01/22/05)
  • Re: The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/22/05)
• Mass in E=mc^2 Mike (01/22/05)
  • Re: Mass in E=mc^2 Dirk Van de moortel (01/22/05)
    • Re: Mass in E=mc^2 AllYou! (01/25/05)
      • Re: Mass in E=mc^2 Dirk Van de moortel (01/25/05)
      • Re: Mass in E=mc^2 AllYou! (01/25/05)
  • Re: Mass in E=mc^2 Koobee Wublee (01/23/05)
    • Re: Mass in E=mc^2 Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (01/23/05)
      • Re: Mass in E=mc^2 bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/23/05)
      • Re: Mass in E=mc^2 Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (01/23/05)
      • Re: Mass in E=mc^2 bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/23/05)
      • Re: Mass in E=mc^2 Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (01/24/05)
      • Re: Mass in E=mc^2 bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/24/05)
    • Re: Mass in E=mc^2 Dirk Van de moortel (01/23/05)
  • Re: Mass in E=mc^2 Pmb (01/23/05)
    • Re: Mass in E=mc^2 Dirk Van de moortel (01/23/05)
      • Re: Mass in E=mc^2 xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/24/05)
      • Re: Mass in E=mc^2 Dirk Van de moortel (01/24/05)
      • Re: Mass in E=mc^2 xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/26/05)
    • Re: Mass in E=mc^2 Pmb (01/23/05)
      • Re: Mass in E=mc^2 Dirk Van de moortel (01/23/05)
      • Re: Mass in E=mc^2 xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/26/05)
      • Re: Mass in E=mc^2 RP (01/26/05)
      • Re: Mass in E=mc^2 Dirk Van de moortel (01/26/05)
      • Re: Mass in E=mc^2 valls_at_icmf.inf.cu (01/26/05)
• Re: The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/22/05)
  • Re: The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian Bill Hobba (01/22/05)
    • Re: The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian Ken S. Tucker (01/22/05)
  • Re: The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/22/05)
    • Re: The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian DavidBowman (01/22/05)
• English translation of BOTH the original Relativity papers?? Bryan Shelton (01/22/05)
  • Re: English translation of BOTH the original Relativity papers?? Helen Dukas' Ghost (01/22/05)
    • Re: English translation of BOTH the original Relativity papers?? harry (01/22/05)
• What are Quasars made of? Paul Hollister (01/22/05)
  • Re: What are Quasars made of? Bill Hobba (01/22/05)
    • Re: What are Quasars made of? Bill Hobba (01/22/05)
      • Re: What are Quasars made of? Paul Hollister (01/22/05)
      • Re: What are Quasars made of? Road Kill (01/22/05)
      • Re: What are Quasars made of? George Dishman (01/22/05)
      • Re: What are Quasars made of? Bill Hobba (01/22/05)
      • Re: What are Quasars made of? DavidBowman (01/22/05)
      • Re: What are Quasars made of? jgreen_at_seol.net.au (01/23/05)
      • Re: What are Quasars made of? Rudolf Drabek (01/23/05)
      • Re: What are Quasars made of? Ken S. Tucker (01/23/05)
  • Re: What are Quasars made of? Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (01/22/05)
  • Re: What are Quasars made of? DavidBowman (01/22/05)
  • Re: What are Quasars made of? DavidBowman (01/22/05)
  • Re: What are Quasars made of? oookhc_at_hotmail.com (01/22/05)
• is it is r is it ain't true ... eleaticus (01/21/05)
  • Re: is it is r is it ain't true ... EjP (01/21/05)
  • Re: is it is r is it ain't true ... Bilge (01/21/05)
    • Re: is it is r is it ain't true ... eleaticus (01/23/05)
• Re: help DavidBowman (01/21/05)
• GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/20/05)
  • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM Jim Hawkins (01/21/05)
    • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/21/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM DavidBowman (01/21/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM Eugene Shubert (01/21/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/21/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/21/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/21/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM TMG (01/21/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/21/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM TMG (01/22/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/22/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM Grae (01/21/05)
  • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM reply to Chuckles (01/21/05)
    • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM TMG (01/21/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/21/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM TMG (01/22/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/22/05)
    • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM EjP (01/21/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/21/05)
  • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/21/05)
  • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/22/05)
    • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM Tom Capizzi (01/22/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/23/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM Tom Capizzi (01/23/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/24/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM Tom Capizzi (01/24/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/24/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/24/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/24/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM Chuckles (01/25/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM TMG (01/25/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/25/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/25/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM Tom Capizzi (01/25/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/25/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM pete (01/25/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/26/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM Dubh Ghall (01/24/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/25/05)
  • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/24/05)
    • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM Chuckles (01/25/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/25/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM Enoch (01/27/05)
    • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM TMG (01/25/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/25/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM xifer (01/25/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/26/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM Marc Goodman (01/26/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/26/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM Marc Goodman (01/26/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/26/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM ZenIsWhen (01/26/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/26/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM Chuckles (01/26/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM ZenIsWhen (01/27/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/30/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/26/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/26/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM Kevin S. Wilson (01/26/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/26/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM Chuckles (01/26/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM Glenn Knickerbocker (01/27/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM madge (01/26/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/27/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM Matthew L. Martin (01/26/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM TMG (01/27/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/27/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/27/05)
  • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/27/05)
  • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM ZenIsWhen (01/27/05)
  • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/28/05)
    • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/28/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM Tom Capizzi (01/28/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/28/05)
  • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM