Re: Division by Zero in Nature, and Decomposition of Time.
From: Alex Hunsley (lard_at_tardis.ed.ac.molar.uk)
Date: 01/03/05
- Next message: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv A CHRISTMAS MESSAGE"
- Previous message: greywolf42: "Re: On Superconductors, Superfluids and Heat Transfer"
- In reply to: Lefty: "Re: Division by Zero in Nature, and Decomposition of Time."
- Next in thread: Lefty: "Re: Division by Zero in Nature, and Decomposition of Time."
- Reply: Lefty: "Re: Division by Zero in Nature, and Decomposition of Time."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 02:23:51 GMT
Lefty wrote:
>
> Darn that sock, it's full of holes. : )
>
>
> All we are talking about here is simple division, and the largest possible
> clock that one might be able to construct.
>
> I think that your reply was perhaps copied and pasted without even reading
> the original post.
>
> The facts contained in the original post are quite elementary. If you think
> that calculus can be used to disprove my claims, then SHOW ME some, and I
> WILL PUT A $20 THOMAS JEFFERSON ON YOUR PAYPAL ACCT.
>
>
> -WK-
"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"
-- Charles Darwin
- Next message: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv A CHRISTMAS MESSAGE"
- Previous message: greywolf42: "Re: On Superconductors, Superfluids and Heat Transfer"
- In reply to: Lefty: "Re: Division by Zero in Nature, and Decomposition of Time."
- Next in thread: Lefty: "Re: Division by Zero in Nature, and Decomposition of Time."
- Reply: Lefty: "Re: Division by Zero in Nature, and Decomposition of Time."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|