Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!

From: David Thomson (news5_at_volantis.org)
Date: 01/04/05


Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 23:15:32 -0600


"Bill Hobba" <bhobba@rubbish.net.au> wrote in message
news:Sf0Bd.96350$K7.81686@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>
> "David Thomson" <news5@volantis.org> wrote in message
> news:pGKAd.45$2D6.2831@news.uswest.net...
>> "Bill Hobba" <bhobba@rubbish.net.au> wrote in message
>> news:nBcAd.91960$K7.50290@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>> >> The units of c=1 is nonsense.
>> >
>> > Are you serious? Are you claiming it is not possible to devise units
>> > in
>> > which the speed of light will measure 1?
>>
>> E = mc^2
>>
>> therefore
>>
>> mc^2 = mc^2
>>
>> therefore
>>
>> m = m
>
> The above trivial tautological statements are true regardless of the value
> of c.

It's not trivial. It's proof that E does not equal m. E cannot be
converted to m. The whole mass/energy paradigm is a fraud.

>> If you're going to make c = 1, you have to do it on both sides of the
>> equation. And if you say that E doesn't really equal mc^2, then you
> didn't
>> have an equation to begin with. Do you see the nonsense of c=1 now?
>>
>> Dave
>
> As I have said previously - get your lobotomy reversed.

Bill, you are amazingly scientific in your responses. You probably think
very highly of yourself for comments like that.

Dave



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!
    ... "Bill Hobba" wrote in message ... > The above trivial tautological statements are true regardless of the value ... Dave ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!
    ... "Bill Hobba" wrote in message ... > The above trivial tautological statements are true regardless of the value ... Dave ...
    (sci.physics.particle)
  • Re: Einsteins Aether
    ... Bill Hobba wrote: ... Dave has passed away several years ago: ... People often confuse us. ... I would probably be as popular as him, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)