Re: Physics is simple...we complicate it
From: nightbat (nightbat_at_home.ffni.com)
Date: 01/06/05
- Next message: Paul Stowe: "Re: Intuitivity of Rel. Phy. - It's the philosophy, stupid"
- Previous message: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: Einstein's example of simultaneity"
- In reply to: Mark Oliver: "Physics is simple...we complicate it"
- Next in thread: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: Physics is simple...we complicate it"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:02:43 -0500
nightbat wrote
Mark Oliver wrote:
>
> We have a way of complicating the obvious. Our sentient physical existence
> has evolved to the point where we can observe our life at quantum levels.
> Unfortunately, because of this ability......we have lost focus on assembling
> the big picture of the Universe. No different than looking at your computer
> screen from an inch away, you only see a fraction of what is on the screen
> right in front of you. Our existence is based upon physics, math, and what
> we already observe, no tricks or secrets. The Universe must have a simple,
> and common link, applicable to all matter and energy, in all regions of the
> Universe. Matter and energy are indeed the same. Yet, were did all this
> substance come from? As we know that you cannot make something from nothing.
> Or can you? There must be a logical explanation to where all this
> matter/energy came from. Why? Because its here. Scientists can't figure it
> out.....as they observe too close and can't see the big picture.
>
> All Dynamic Dimensional Distinctions are based upon the unbalance of force
> and resistance. When force is singular, it's equal to inverse square
> resistance (1=1 square). Subsequently, perfectly balanced equal forces
> negate each other, and we observe this as nothing. Yet in realty, nothing
> is an infinite source of energy, and is the basis of our existence, when
> unbalanced. As forces combine, they accelerate and dominate inverse square
> resistance. However, the Universe will re-balance against this unbalance.
> When forces join at oblique angles (which they must as no two things can
> occupy the same space at the same time), they will form a new force from the
> determination of both. However, when forces accelerate to the value of
> 1E308, the cycle resets, and energy cumulates as sub-atomic particle matter.
> As these quantum elements combine, its mass grows and the unbalance of
> forces becomes greater, hence gravity also grows in proportion to mass
> (which is simply cumulative unbalanced forces).
>
> We observe the force of Gravity, however, the force carrier of gravity (the
> Graviton) still eludes scientists to this day. Why......simple......it
> doesn't exist......as Gravity is merely a force within of all accelerations
> of force. As energy cumulates as matter, this unbalances natural space-time
> (1=1square) and creates the path of least resistance surrounding all
> objects, leading to the centerline of all objects. We already observe that
> all matter and energy on Earth follows the path of least resistance. Thus
> this rule must apply in space, as it's the same matter and energy, and
> physics. Water on Earth flows towards the center of Earth to re-balance via
> the path of least resistance, simultaneously this same water orbits the Sun,
> following the Sun's path of least resistance. When the Sun and Earth's
> spacetime distortion re-balance at a point in space between them, the
> smaller object (Earth) it will orbit the larger object. This orbital path
> represents a balance of force and resistance (1=1square), and the path of
> least resistance for Earth to follow. Ironically, this path is also the
> most resistive, yet ambiguous, as forces are perfectly balanced at this
> point.
>
> Is time travel possible......sorry Mr. Einstein it is not, as there is no
> such thing as negative velocity.....thus time travel is impossible. But you
> are correct.......as you travel near the speed of light.....distance and
> time are altered, as time, distance and speed are relative to each other. At
> velocities approaching C, gravitational forces become so strong, that an
> object will become compressed, (thinner and longer), and time will begin to
> slow. Why does time slow? Because Gravitational forces within the
> accelerating physical object start to unify matter and energy to singular
> values (this is gravity's purpose). As matter and energy unify, they
> revert to their origin of "nothing", as we understand nothing. At C, the
> object will simply vanish, into the dimension of C. C is a dimension we
> don't understand. Light exists even in darkness; you merely need to shine a
> high-powered flashlight across a dark field onto to a tree to observe this.
> You don't see the light between the source (flashlight) and the tree, yet it
> aluminates the tree. So indeed light exists even in darkness.
>
> Is there any other logical explanation as to where all this matter and
> energy came from? Even the Big Bang? Perhaps. Yet, how does nothing
> become something? Consider this, if you measure 6 feet from head to toe,
> you must also measure the exact same, from toe to head.
>
> Proving that everything has an perfect equal opposite.
>
> Thus everything = nothing, and nothing = everything.
>
> We just exist in the middle, during a cycle of re-balance.
>
> This is logical.
>
> Mark Oliver
> www.threexd.com
> markoliver@threexd.com
nightbat
Nice lengthy explanation job Mark but try adhering to what you
spew and simplifying the applicable reference physics yourself.
/\ = TS''' or <<< uniform E---non-uniform E---uniform E >>>
the nightbat
- Next message: Paul Stowe: "Re: Intuitivity of Rel. Phy. - It's the philosophy, stupid"
- Previous message: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: Einstein's example of simultaneity"
- In reply to: Mark Oliver: "Physics is simple...we complicate it"
- Next in thread: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: Physics is simple...we complicate it"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
