Re: Lorentz transformations - a derivation
From: Bilge (dubious_at_radioactivex.lebesque-al.net)
Date: 01/09/05
- Next message: RP: "Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905"
- Previous message: Bilge: "Re: Lorentz transformations - a derivation"
- In reply to: jem: "Re: Lorentz transformations - a derivation"
- Next in thread: jem: "Re: Lorentz transformations - a derivation"
- Reply: jem: "Re: Lorentz transformations - a derivation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 14:12:05 GMT
jem:
>Bill Hobba wrote:
>> "jem" <xxx@xxx.xxx> wrote in message
>> news:sdSDd.25692$Q%4.10400@fed1read06...
>
>>>Remember this proposed definition? An inertial reference frame is a
>>>reference frame in which all stationary standard clocks tick at the same
>>>rate.
>>
>>
>> How do you sync those clocks?
>
>It's not necessary to synchronize clocks in order to compare their tick
>rates.
Synchronizing clocks _is_ comparing their tick rates.
- Next message: RP: "Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905"
- Previous message: Bilge: "Re: Lorentz transformations - a derivation"
- In reply to: jem: "Re: Lorentz transformations - a derivation"
- Next in thread: jem: "Re: Lorentz transformations - a derivation"
- Reply: jem: "Re: Lorentz transformations - a derivation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|