Re: Lorentz transformations - a derivation

From: Bilge (dubious_at_radioactivex.lebesque-al.net)
Date: 01/09/05 

Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 20:33:03 GMT

 jem:
>Bilge wrote:

>> See the posts from the last time you made that suggestion.
>>
>
>Perhaps it's you who should see the old posts. No circularity was
>demonstrated there.
 
   Since I don't think it's possible to get the point across any
better this time, I have no real interest in reading the old posts
or repeating what I wrote the first time.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Lorentz transformations - a derivation
    ... >Bilge wrote: ... >Perhaps it's you who should see the old posts. ... No circularity was ... or repeating what I wrote the first time. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Lorentz transformations - a derivation
    ... >>Perhaps it's you who should see the old posts. ... No circularity was ... > or repeating what I wrote the first time. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Lorentz transformations - a derivation
    ... >>Perhaps it's you who should see the old posts. ... No circularity was ... > or repeating what I wrote the first time. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Parallel Universe
    ... It is not the first time that a clandestine group ... It's really strange how they have picked apart all the posts to ... Are they hoping to make money somehow on other people's labours? ...
    (soc.culture.scottish)
  • Re: OT: The war on women
    ... not been able to work as a nurse since. ... I tried to tell you before that it's not the first time it's come up ... I don't know how a person who only occasionally posts can be ... First thing that jumped out was her assertion that her IQ was measured ...
    (rec.music.beatles)