Re: Lorentz transformations - a derivation
From: jem (xxx_at_xxx.xxx)
Date: 01/13/05
- Next message: jem: "Re: Einstein's math and physical objects"
- Previous message: reany_at_asu.edu: "Re: Physics is about mathematical models"
- In reply to: Bilge: "Re: Lorentz transformations - a derivation"
- Next in thread: Bilge: "Re: Lorentz transformations - a derivation"
- Reply: Bilge: "Re: Lorentz transformations - a derivation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 09:14:29 -0500
Bilge wrote:
> jem:
> >Bilge wrote:
>
> >> I've never been able to find, ``Ye Olde Literary Devives and
> >> Pedagogical Implements Shoppe.''
> >
> >Have you tried the Yellow Pages?
>
> Only in this universe.
>
> >> The theory doesn't tell you how to build the literary devices.
> >
> >Theory describes the functioning of every measuring device used in
> >Physics, and tells you how to build none of them.
>
> Which devices does relativity describe?
It describes and exclusively uses Standard/Ideal clocks.
>
> >
> >> >but of course it has to be verified that real
> >> >world counterparts exist. Clocks whose mechanisms are insignificantly
> >> >affected by very large accelerations have been producd.
> >>
> >> Which is precisely the circularity to which I referred.
> >
> >I don't get your point. It's always necessary to determine whether real
> >measuring devices function acceptably close to the way they function in
> >Theory.
>
> Which theory is that?
>
Any theory.
- Next message: jem: "Re: Einstein's math and physical objects"
- Previous message: reany_at_asu.edu: "Re: Physics is about mathematical models"
- In reply to: Bilge: "Re: Lorentz transformations - a derivation"
- Next in thread: Bilge: "Re: Lorentz transformations - a derivation"
- Reply: Bilge: "Re: Lorentz transformations - a derivation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|