Re: Einstein's math and physical objects
From: harry (harald.vanlintel_at_epfl.ch)
Date: 01/16/05
- Next message: reany_at_asu.edu: "Does that delineate idle from non-idle speculation for you?"
- Previous message: Todd: "Re: Einstein's math and physical objects"
- In reply to: Todd: "Re: Einstein's math and physical objects"
- Next in thread: Todd: "Re: Einstein's math and physical objects"
- Reply: Todd: "Re: Einstein's math and physical objects"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 16 Jan 2005 07:13:20 -0800
[Tod]:
"Let me avoid the acceleration by bringing about the final state in a
somewhat different way. Imagine that the disks are at rest in frame B
and
the disks are not rotating. Diametrically opposite wires connect the
disks
as before. Frame B is moving in the positive x-direction relative to
frame
A. Thus, A sees the disks sliding in the positive x-direction, not
rotating, and the wires parallel to the x-axis."
Oh oh, I'm afraid you now messed up - for without rotation the wires
are simply crossed for all observers.
This isn't going to help...
Harald
- Next message: reany_at_asu.edu: "Does that delineate idle from non-idle speculation for you?"
- Previous message: Todd: "Re: Einstein's math and physical objects"
- In reply to: Todd: "Re: Einstein's math and physical objects"
- Next in thread: Todd: "Re: Einstein's math and physical objects"
- Reply: Todd: "Re: Einstein's math and physical objects"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|