Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion
From: Bilge (dubious_at_radioactivex.lebesque-al.net)
Date: 01/17/05
- Next message: jgreenfield_at_seol.net.au: "Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity of Light and Matter"
- Previous message: Mark T: "Re: Flat earth?"
- In reply to: Ilja Schmelzer: "Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion"
- Next in thread: Ilja Schmelzer: "Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion"
- Reply: Ilja Schmelzer: "Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 08:43:51 GMT
Ilja Schmelzer:
>
>"robert j. kolker" <nowhere@nowhere.net> schrieb
>> There is not a single aether based theory of gravity which is supported
>> by vetted and reproduced experiment. Not one.
>
>I disagree. See gr-qc/0205035
>
>> Aether is a looser concept. Physics gets along just fine without it.
>
>GR cannot be quantized.
Nobody thought that yang and mills' theory could be used to
describe massive gauge fields or the strong interaction, either.
On the other hand, ed witten and the other superstring constituency
(optimistically) assert quantum gravity is unavoidable in string
theories.
- Next message: jgreenfield_at_seol.net.au: "Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity of Light and Matter"
- Previous message: Mark T: "Re: Flat earth?"
- In reply to: Ilja Schmelzer: "Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion"
- Next in thread: Ilja Schmelzer: "Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion"
- Reply: Ilja Schmelzer: "Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
