Re: Flat earth vs God=G_uv ?
From: TMG (TMG_at_Nowhere.org)
Date: 01/18/05
- Next message: Bilge: "Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al"
- Previous message: Paul Hollister: "Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe?"
- In reply to: George Hammond: "Re: Flat earth vs God=G_uv ?"
- Next in thread: George Hammond: "Re: Flat earth vs God=G_uv ?"
- Reply: George Hammond: "Re: Flat earth vs God=G_uv ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 00:50:17 -0500
George Hammond wrote:
> "Pastor Frank" <PF@christfirst.com> wrote in message
> news:1105882681.2cb4c7aa4b34266f092b1a2e9261272f@teranews...
>
>
>>"Bill Hobba" <bhobba@rubbish.net.au> wrote in message
>
>
>>>[Hobba]
>>>Anyone with a brain can see the enormity of the conspiracy
>>>to cover up a flat earth would make such totally unreasonable.
>>>But nothing prevents religious fanatics each putting forth their
>>>different views of the world because religious faith is not based
>>>on evidence. If they could be refuted as simply as the idea of
>>>a flat earth it would have been done long ago. All that can be
>>>refuted is simplistic interpretations of religious text - but
>>>only morons (or fundamentalists who want to escape progress)
>>>believe the literal interpretations anymore. I seem to recall
>>>somewhere in the Bible it says man will never know the cause
>>>of nigh and day. Nowadays such is trivially seen to be false.
>>>But those of genuine religious sensibility recognize it was not
>>>meant to be taken literally and was supposed to indicate there
>>>are some things man will never know - faith is required to
>>>take you further.
>>>
>
>
>>[Pastor Frank]
>> What you are talking about has nothing to do with religion.
>> Christ spoke only in parables, full of psychological symbolism
>> and metaphor, and only "fundamentalist" atheist "morons",
>> who are perceptually and philosophically challenged and are
>> proud of it, can't understand any of it. See below
>>
>>Pastor Frank
>
>
> [Hammond]
> Well... I am GLAD to see that both of your are in AGREEMENT
> that the Bible is "parabolic", "metaphorical" and "non literal" in
> its description of The Divine Phenomenon. Both of you may go
> to the head of the Seminary class for that one.
What about thousands of your posts claiming that your SPOG proves that
the exact *LITERAL* interpretation of the bible is an "ABSOLUTELY PROVEN
SCIENTIFIC FACT"?
- Next message: Bilge: "Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al"
- Previous message: Paul Hollister: "Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe?"
- In reply to: George Hammond: "Re: Flat earth vs God=G_uv ?"
- Next in thread: George Hammond: "Re: Flat earth vs God=G_uv ?"
- Reply: George Hammond: "Re: Flat earth vs God=G_uv ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
