Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!
bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com
Date: 01/18/05
- Next message: AllYou!: "Re: behoynd SR masquerade"
- Previous message: EjP: "Re: Large Electron Positron Collider"
- In reply to: David Thomson: "Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!"
- Next in thread: David Thomson: "Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 18 Jan 2005 13:15:52 -0800
David Thomson wrote:
> It's not trivial. It's proof that E does not equal m. E cannot be
> converted to m. The whole mass/energy paradigm is a fraud.
>
geez Dave. who ever said that E=m? even if one sets c=1, one can
adjust the other units accordingly to make the equation meaningful.
>
> Bill, you are amazingly scientific in your responses. You probably
think
> very highly of yourself for comments like that.
>
he is just as "scientific" as you are, if not more so. your babbling
also does not have any scientific content to it.
what happened to helping me answer my freshman physics homework
problem? you do know what an integral is, right?
- Next message: AllYou!: "Re: behoynd SR masquerade"
- Previous message: EjP: "Re: Large Electron Positron Collider"
- In reply to: David Thomson: "Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!"
- Next in thread: David Thomson: "Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
