Re: Large Electron Positron Collider
From: PD (pdraper_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 01/19/05
- Next message: Pmb: "Re: Wikipedia on mass"
- Previous message: Harry: "Re: LET (was: Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity)"
- In reply to: DavidBowman: "Re: Large Electron Positron Collider"
- Next in thread: Creighton Hogg: "Re: Large Electron Positron Collider"
- Reply: Creighton Hogg: "Re: Large Electron Positron Collider"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 19 Jan 2005 05:53:33 -0800
DavidBowman wrote:
> Well, THAT'S a relief!
>
> Is it it fair to say then, that modulo:
>
> -- increasing statistical certainty margins
>
> -- triaing students and operators, and
>
> -- turning lead into gold
>
> that once an accellerator has seen everything it can below it's GEv
> limit, that it really can't do any useful experiments?
>
> Thanx,
>
> =[ d
No, that's an overly general statement. There is always excellent
physics to be done at an existing accelerator, and there is always high
demand for accelerator time at any facility. However, each lab has
limited resources, and the research program as a whole has limited
resources. Tough decisions are made constantly about the optimal place
to invest time, people, equipment, and attention.
PD
- Next message: Pmb: "Re: Wikipedia on mass"
- Previous message: Harry: "Re: LET (was: Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity)"
- In reply to: DavidBowman: "Re: Large Electron Positron Collider"
- Next in thread: Creighton Hogg: "Re: Large Electron Positron Collider"
- Reply: Creighton Hogg: "Re: Large Electron Positron Collider"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]