Re: Maximum speed of light
From: FrediFizzx (fredifizzx_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 01/20/05
- Next message: Paul Stowe: "Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al"
- Previous message: Tom Roberts: "Re: Wikipedia on mass"
- In reply to: wespe_at_operamail.com: "Maximum speed of light"
- Next in thread: Chris O'Riordan: "Re: Maximum speed of light"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 21:39:48 -0800
<wespe@operamail.com> wrote in message
news:1106148041.616130.81720@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
| Hi,
|
| OK, we know that speed of light is 300.000km/sec in space. But also,
| space is not totally empty and crawling with virtual particles. So,
| what if these particles are slowing light down? Suppose speed of light
| could go up to, say, 400.000km/sec, if space was less dense in these
| particles. Maybe in the future it will be possible to create a
| super-conductor-vacuum and utilize this maximum speed. Why not, hm?
If you want to learn how this probably really works, see Volovik's "The
Universe in a Helium Droplet". Is it possible to modify a local
configuration of the quantum vacuum so the speed of light can change? Sure.
FrediFizzx
http://www.vacuum-physics.com/QVC/quantum_vacuum_charge.pdf
or postscript
http://www.vacuum-physics.com/QVC/quantum_vacuum_charge.ps
- Next message: Paul Stowe: "Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al"
- Previous message: Tom Roberts: "Re: Wikipedia on mass"
- In reply to: wespe_at_operamail.com: "Maximum speed of light"
- Next in thread: Chris O'Riordan: "Re: Maximum speed of light"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
