Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM
From: Dubh Ghall (puck_at_pooks.hill.fey)
Date: 01/24/05
- Next message: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: What is Negative Energy ???"
- Previous message: kenseto: "Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity"
- In reply to: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM"
- Next in thread: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM"
- Reply: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 22:37:30 GMT
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 02:27:56 GMT, "George Hammond" <nospam1@nospam.net> wrote:
>[Hammond]
>And watch you credentials too. Remember, I'm the one
>with degrees in Physics....
Which only proves that you have a good memory, and/or can cheat well. It says
nothing for your intelligence, your ability to understand and use what you have
remembered.
--
Puck Greenman
The spelling Like any opinion stated here
purely my own
#162 BAAWA Knight.
January 27th
Na bister 500,000
- Next message: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: What is Negative Energy ???"
- Previous message: kenseto: "Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity"
- In reply to: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM"
- Next in thread: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM"
- Reply: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|