Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment

From: Henri Wilson (H_at_..(Henri)
Date: 01/24/05


Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 23:48:02 GMT

On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 23:53:04 GMT, "Bill Hobba" <bhobba@rubbish.net.au> wrote:

>
>"Tom Roberts" <tjroberts@lucent.com> wrote in message
>news:x1TId.8807$ZV4.7443@newssvr31.news.prodigy.com...
>> Title: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley
>> Experiment
>> Author: Tom Roberts, tjroberts@lucent.com
>> Date: January 23, 2005
>
>Just a note of thanks for posting your very interesting and informative
>analysis. It is one I will be keeping.

But why would anyone bother?

The MMX null result was obviously 10% correct and was caused by the fact that
light moves at c wrt its source and is reflected from a mirror at the incident
speed wrt that mirror.

Null results don't really reveal much.

>
>Thanks Again
>Bill
>
>
>

HW.
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

"If it's repeated often enough they'll eventually believe it" __Albert Bush



Relevant Pages


Quantcast