Re: Hansen discovers how to reason.
From: Gregory L. Hansen (glhansen_at_steel.ucs.indiana.edu)
Date: 01/28/05
- Next message: mountain man: "Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment"
- Previous message: FrediFizzx: "Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron?"
- In reply to: Androcles: "Re: Hansen discovers how to reason."
- Next in thread: Androcles: "Re: Hansen discovers how to reason."
- Reply: Androcles: "Re: Hansen discovers how to reason."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 01:50:44 +0000 (UTC)
In article <ne9Kd.392$n9.216@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk>,
Androcles <dummy@dummy.net> wrote:
>
>"Timo Nieminen" <timo@physics.uq.edu.au> wrote in message
>news:Pine.LNX.4.50.0501271444400.14575-100000@localhost...
>
>> Do you know that the definition of a vector space requires the vector
>> (-1)*t to be equal to (-t)?
>
>
>Yes, I do know that, and I know that physically, -t doesn't exist.
t doesn't exist, either. t is in the future. But the future doesn't
exist, the present does.
-- "I fart for joy and I laugh more than if I had cast my old age, as a serpent does its skin." -- Aristophanes, Peace, 421 BC
- Next message: mountain man: "Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment"
- Previous message: FrediFizzx: "Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron?"
- In reply to: Androcles: "Re: Hansen discovers how to reason."
- Next in thread: Androcles: "Re: Hansen discovers how to reason."
- Reply: Androcles: "Re: Hansen discovers how to reason."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
