Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905

From: Androcles (dummy_at_dummy.net)
Date: 01/28/05 

Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 17:37:27 GMT

"PD" <pdraper@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1106931488.999603.130950@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

> And I will repeat for the final time:
> Is 0.5 seconds = 0.5 Hz? [Q5]
> YES OR NO?

By the only clock that is ticking, yes.

>
> If you say NO to [Q5], and you do not take down the webpage, as you
> promised, then I will know that you are a liar, and a belligerent one
> at that.

Cut out your fucking bull***. I've said yes, by the only clock that is
ticking. I don't care if it ticks once a solar day, sidereal day, lunar
month or calendar year, it will still only advance 0.5 second by its own
reading between "tick" and "tock".

The page stays. Draw up your "Basic series proposed" and put a reference
to my page in it, you imbecile.

[Remainder snipped, unread]
Androcles.

Quantcast