Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein?
From: John C. Polasek (jpolasek_at_cfl.rr.com)
Date: 01/29/05
- Next message: D: "Re: New dimension?"
- Previous message: Greg Hennessy: "Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging""
- In reply to: Jeany: "Who will stun the world as next Einstein?"
- Next in thread: Bill Hobba: "Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 13:33:54 -0500
On 29 Jan 2005 05:51:40 -0800, ctiei@hotmail.com (Jeany) wrote:
>In article <3a9ce32c.0106230251.743f15f3@posting.google.com>, cybermind
><cybermind@163.com> writes:
>
>>Many Chinese people believe Dr. Cui Silong, Leifei Institute of New
>>Energy, is stunning the world to with his new physics theory
>>Analytical Space-Time, which helps develop most powerful
>>electromagnetic technics. The new theory fundamentally unified general
>>relativity and quantum mechanics seamlessly with principle of a string
>>and deflection of space-time. Professor Chuanjian commented it in a
>>special physics review: Now that the new theory has allowed us to see
>>the aureole of God through the general effect of deflection or
>>rotation of space-time, would it lead us to see the true face of God
>>or comprehend the mind of God?
>>
>>You can refer to the new theory at: http://www.tastphysics.com
>>or http://cuisilong.itgo.com
TAST theory uses the Lorentz transform for everything. At eq. 1-26 he
derives the redshift 2e-6 around the sun which is the correct value
for gravitational redshift.But he wrongly uses the low-orbit velocity
(instead of the escape velocity), together with the square of the
Lorentz (1=v2/c2), instead of the square root.
Of course Vorb^2 = MG/r and Vesc^2 = 2MG/r, which is the virial
theorem. He should have used Vesc for the gravitational redshift (as
on my website), but got the doubled effect using Vorb by squaring
sqr(1-v2/c2).
In addition he volunteers the information that the redshift is
affected by density, when it's mass only.
In the bending of starlight he gets the total answer without even
integrating along the path of the ray. He vaguely credits not only
sun's gravitation but also an undefined influence of the sun star
system.
His enthusiasm is outrunning his virtuosity.
John Polasek
- Next message: D: "Re: New dimension?"
- Previous message: Greg Hennessy: "Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging""
- In reply to: Jeany: "Who will stun the world as next Einstein?"
- Next in thread: Bill Hobba: "Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
