Langrange strange
From: DavidBowman (dt041054_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 01/30/05
- Next message: DavidBowman: "Re: NEW"
- Previous message: John C. Polasek: "Re: MISCONCEPTIONS OF PRESENT THEORY OF CAPACITANCE"
- Next in thread: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: Langrange strange"
- Reply: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: Langrange strange"
- Reply: Bill Hobba: "Re: Langrange strange"
- Reply: FrediFizzx: "Re: Langrange strange"
- Reply: Bilge: "Re: Langrange strange"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 29 Jan 2005 19:47:55 -0800
Mathworld.com has about 5 definitions for "Langrangian", all of which
are like trying to find out what division is and being presented with 5
algorithms for doing it, when the student really was looking for:
"division is the ratio of two numbers".
I can tell that the Langragian is basic and general, which makes it
interesting. It seems to be some kind of abstract discrete structure
like a group or a lattice, and it's used kind of to mean "system".
Is it possible to describe the Langrangian such that even a
simpleminded fellow like myself can understand?
Thanx agin!
=[ d
- Next message: DavidBowman: "Re: NEW"
- Previous message: John C. Polasek: "Re: MISCONCEPTIONS OF PRESENT THEORY OF CAPACITANCE"
- Next in thread: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: Langrange strange"
- Reply: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: Langrange strange"
- Reply: Bill Hobba: "Re: Langrange strange"
- Reply: FrediFizzx: "Re: Langrange strange"
- Reply: Bilge: "Re: Langrange strange"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]