Re: Biology is a branch of physics.
reany_at_asu.edu
Date: 01/31/05
- Next message: David McAnally: "Re: Langrange strange"
- Previous message: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: My disagreement with Weinberg's approach"
- In reply to: Daniel Weston: "Re: Biology is a branch of physics."
- Next in thread: reany_at_asu.edu: "Re: True or false: Physics is all about the behavior of ..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 30 Jan 2005 18:50:20 -0800
Daniel Weston wrote:
> Patrick, biology was invented to facilitate a division of labor.
Please
> read up on biology before you start arrogating.
Any particular textbook you recommend?
> At one time everything
> was philosophy. The branches were set up to enable there to be a
> practical division of labor. Biology itself is broken down into
> subdivisions. Etc. etc.
Are you claiming that science is just physics, because biology used to
be considered a branch of science? Are we now to say that biology is
one of the physicses?
I never cease to be amazed at the weirdness of people who post to this
NG, no matter what their education is.
Patrick
- Next message: David McAnally: "Re: Langrange strange"
- Previous message: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: My disagreement with Weinberg's approach"
- In reply to: Daniel Weston: "Re: Biology is a branch of physics."
- Next in thread: reany_at_asu.edu: "Re: True or false: Physics is all about the behavior of ..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
