sci.physics.relativity
By Date

6065 messages sorted by: [ thread ]

---

Starting: 12/31/04
Ending: 01/31/05

• Re: Nikola Tesla on Relativity John Schoenfeld (01/31/05)
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM ZenIsWhen (01/31/05)
• Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rateof decay when they move very fast? Androcles (01/31/05)
• Re: Nikola Tesla on Relativity robert j. kolker (01/31/05)
• Re: The concept of proper time glbrad01 (01/31/05)
• Re: What is "time"? John C. Polasek (01/31/05)
• Re: Nikola Tesla on Relativity Androcles (01/31/05)
• Re: Nikola Tesla on Relativity Eugene Shubert (01/31/05)
• Re: Langrange strange David McAnally (01/31/05)
• Re: Biology is a branch of physics. reany_at_asu.edu (01/31/05)
• Re: My disagreement with Weinberg's approach Ken S. Tucker (01/31/05)
• Re: Physics is as physics does reany_at_asu.edu (01/31/05)
• Re: My disagreement with Weinberg's approach Androcles (01/31/05)
• Re: My disagreement with Weinberg's approach Androcles (01/31/05)
• Re: Nikola Tesla on Relativity Bill Hobba (01/31/05)
• Re: Division by Zero in Nature, and Decomposition of Time. robert j. kolker (01/31/05)
• Re: Nikola Tesla on Relativity robert j. kolker (01/31/05)
• Re: What is "time"? Androcles (01/31/05)
• Re: Nikola Tesla on Relativity John Schoenfeld (01/31/05)
• Re: True or false: Physics is all about the behavior of ... N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/31/05)
• Re: The Complete Disproof of Relativity and current Quantum Mechanics Eric Gisse (01/31/05)
• Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rateof decay when they move very fast? Uncle Al (01/31/05)
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM Rob Duncan (01/31/05)
• Re: Division by Zero in Nature, and Decomposition of Time. LEFTY (01/31/05)
• Re: The Complete Disproof of Relativity and current Quantum Mechanics Eric Gisse (01/31/05)
• Re: Nikola Tesla on Relativity John Schoenfeld (01/31/05)
• Re: to androcles 2 Eric Gisse (01/31/05)
• Re: The concept of proper time jowr.pi_at_gmail.com (01/31/05)
• Re: Nikola Tesla on Relativity Uncle Al (01/31/05)
• Re: to androcles 2 Henri Wilson (01/31/05)
• Re: Nikola Tesla on Relativity robert j. kolker (01/31/05)
• Re: Nikola Tesla on Relativity robert j. kolker (01/31/05)
• Re: The concept of proper time Jesse Mazer (01/31/05)
• Re: Impossible dreams. Daniel Weston (01/31/05)
• Re: New cosmological anomalies reported Daniel Weston (01/31/05)
• Re: to androcles 2 Henri Wilson (01/31/05)
• Re: Biology is a branch of physics. Daniel Weston (01/31/05)
• Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rateof decay when they move very fast? jgreenfield_at_seol.net.au (01/31/05)
• Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Bill Hobba (01/31/05)
• Re: Nikola Tesla on Relativity Boris Mohar (01/31/05)
• Re: Nikola Tesla on Relativity reany_at_asu.edu (01/31/05)
• Is all of science physics? reany_at_asu.edu (01/31/05)
• Re: Lagrangian of Relativistic Free Particle. Ken S. Tucker (01/31/05)
• Re: Physics is as physics does Daniel Weston (01/31/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Jesse Mazer (01/31/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox glbrad01 (01/31/05)
• Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Ken S. Tucker (01/31/05)
• Nikola Tesla on Relativity John Schoenfeld (01/31/05)
• Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?! Bilge (01/31/05)
• Re: True or false: Physics is all about the behavior of ... Bilge (01/31/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/31/05)
• Re: Physics is as physics does reany_at_asu.edu (01/31/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/30/05)
• Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Koobee Wublee (01/30/05)
• Re: My disagreement with Weinberg's approach Paul Stowe (01/30/05)
• Lagrangian of Relativistic Free Particle. Bill Hobba (01/30/05)
• Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? John C. Polasek (01/30/05)
• Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" jacob navia (01/30/05)
• Re: Physics is as physics does Daniel Weston (01/30/05)
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM ZenIsWhen (01/30/05)
• Re: My disagreement with Weinberg's approach Tom Capizzi (01/30/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Jesse Mazer (01/30/05)
• Re: to androcles 2 Tom Capizzi (01/30/05)
• Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" jacob navia (01/30/05)
• Re: What is "time"? Androcles (01/30/05)
• Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Bill Hobba (01/30/05)
• Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" Timo Nieminen (01/30/05)
• Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Bill Hobba (01/30/05)
• Re: to androcles 2 Tom Capizzi (01/30/05)
• Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" jacob navia (01/30/05)
• Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson Paul B. Andersen (01/30/05)
• Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Dirk Van de moortel (01/30/05)
• Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" Gregory L. Hansen (01/30/05)
• Re: True or false: Physics is all about the behavior of ... reany_at_asu.edu (01/30/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/30/05)
• Physics is as physics does reany_at_asu.edu (01/30/05)
• Re: What is the difference between the unknowable and the non-existent harry (01/30/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/30/05)
• Re: My disagreement with Weinberg's approach Paul Stowe (01/30/05)
• Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Koobee Wublee (01/30/05)
• Re: What is "time"? Henri Wilson (01/30/05)
• Re: My disagreement with Weinberg's approach John Kennaugh (01/30/05)
• Re: to androcles 2 Henri Wilson (01/30/05)
• Re: to androcles 2 Henri Wilson (01/30/05)
• Re: New cosmological anomalies reported Eugene Shubert (01/30/05)
• Re: to androcles 2 Paul B. Andersen (01/30/05)
• Re: Biology is a branch of physics. Daniel Weston (01/30/05)
• Re: True or false: Physics is all about the behavior of ... N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/30/05)
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/30/05)
• Re: The Complete Disproof of Relativity and current Quantum Mechanics Jeff (01/30/05)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... Kees Roos (01/30/05)
• New cosmological anomalies reported Jack Sarfatti (01/30/05)
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/30/05)
• Re: The Complete Disproof of Relativity and current Quantum Mechanics Jeff (01/30/05)
• Re: Biology is a branch of physics. reany_at_asu.edu (01/30/05)
• Re: True or false: Physics is all about the behavior of ... reany_at_asu.edu (01/30/05)
• Re: Langrange strange Tom Capizzi (01/30/05)
• Re: What is "time"? John C. Polasek (01/30/05)
• Re: Help: I need to understand the Lorentz force Mark Palenik (01/30/05)
• Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? John C. Polasek (01/30/05)
• Re: Help: I need to understand the Lorentz force Magneto (01/30/05)
• Re: I need to understand the Lorentz force Lee Pugh (01/30/05)
• Re: Help: I need to understand the Lorentz force Mark Palenik (01/30/05)
• Re: True or false: Physics is all about the behavior of ... reany_at_asu.edu (01/30/05)
• Re: MISCONCEPTIONS OF PRESENT THEORY OF CAPACITANCE John C. Polasek (01/30/05)
• Biology is a branch of physics. Daniel Weston (01/30/05)
• the fancy and the concrete beda pietanza (01/30/05)
• the ether and the fluctuations of vacuum beda pietanza (01/30/05)
• Re: True or false: Physics is all about the behavior of ... beda pietanza (01/30/05)
• Re: The concept of proper time Franz Heymann (01/30/05)
• Re: Standard model accurately describes elementary particle interactions 99% of the time PD (01/30/05)
• Re: Impossible dreams. PD (01/30/05)
• Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Franz Heymann (01/30/05)
• Re: True or false: Physics is all about the behavior of ... N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/30/05)
• Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity Androcles (01/30/05)
• Re: True or false: Physics is all about the behavior of ... reany_at_asu.edu (01/30/05)
• Re: What is "time"? Androcles (01/30/05)
• Re: True or false: Physics is all about the behavior of ... reany_at_asu.edu (01/30/05)
• Impossible dreams. Len Gaasenbeek (01/30/05)
• Re: The concept of proper time Androcles (01/30/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Tom Roberts (01/30/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox robert j. kolker (01/30/05)
• What is the difference between the unknowable and the non-existent reany_at_asu.edu (01/30/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Jesse Mazer (01/30/05)
• Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Mike (01/30/05)
• Re: help with math beda pietanza (01/30/05)
• Re: Langrange strange Dirk Van de moortel (01/30/05)
• Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity harry (01/30/05)
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM TMG (01/30/05)
• Re: Langrange strange Tom Capizzi (01/30/05)
• Re: True or false: Physics is all about the behavior of ... N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/30/05)
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM ZenIsWhen (01/30/05)
• Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity Bilge (01/30/05)
• Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Franz Heymann (01/30/05)
• Re: What is "time"? Leif Andersson (01/30/05)
• Re: What is "time"? Leif Andersson (01/30/05)
• The concept of proper time reany_at_asu.edu (01/30/05)
• Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity reany_at_asu.edu (01/30/05)
• True or false: Physics is all about the behavior of ... reany_at_asu.edu (01/30/05)
• Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?! Schroedinger's Cat (01/30/05)
• Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" Bilge (01/30/05)
• Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?! Schroedinger's Cat (01/30/05)
• Re: Langrange strange Ken S. Tucker (01/30/05)
• Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Bill Hobba (01/30/05)
• Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Bill Hobba (01/30/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Bilge (01/30/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Bilge (01/30/05)
• Re: Langrange strange Dirk Van de moortel (01/30/05)
• Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Nick (01/30/05)
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/30/05)
• Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (01/30/05)
• Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Mike (01/30/05)
• Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" George Dishman (01/30/05)
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM ZenIsWhen (01/30/05)
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/30/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/30/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/30/05)
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/30/05)
• Re: Help: I need to understand the Lorentz force Ken S. Tucker (01/30/05)
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/30/05)
• Re: SR's Bx', Ey', etc, invariantly not directly measureable? Androcles (01/30/05)
• Re: SR's Bx', Ey', etc, invariantly not directly measureable? Bilge (01/30/05)
• Re: MISCONCEPTIONS OF PRESENT THEORY OF CAPACITANCE Bilge (01/30/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Bilge (01/30/05)
• Re: Langrange strange Bilge (01/30/05)
• Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Franz Heymann (01/30/05)
• Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Franz Heymann (01/30/05)
• Re: Division by Zero in Nature, and Decomposition of Time. chris.b_at_mail.dk (01/30/05)
• Re: Langrange strange FrediFizzx (01/30/05)
• Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Koobee Wublee (01/30/05)
• Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?! Richard Schultz (01/30/05)
• Re: SR's Bx', Ey', etc, invariantly not directly measureable? eleaticus (01/30/05)
• Re: Langrange strange David McAnally (01/30/05)
• Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? RP (01/30/05)
• Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Tom Roberts (01/30/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Bilge (01/30/05)
• Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? zzbunker_at_netscape.net (01/30/05)
• Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Bill Hobba (01/30/05)
• Re: Langrange strange Bill Hobba (01/30/05)
• Re: Langrange strange N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/30/05)
• Re: NEW DavidBowman (01/30/05)
• Langrange strange DavidBowman (01/30/05)
• Re: MISCONCEPTIONS OF PRESENT THEORY OF CAPACITANCE John C. Polasek (01/30/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/30/05)
• Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?! David Thomson (01/30/05)
• Re: What does "edu." mean? stephen_at_nomail.com (01/30/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/30/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/30/05)
• Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/30/05)
• Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? redbelly98_at_yahoo.com (01/30/05)
• Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/30/05)
• Re: What does "edu." mean? Bilge (01/30/05)
• Re: My disagreement with Weinberg's approach N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/30/05)
• Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Jesse Mazer (01/30/05)
• Re: What does "edu." mean? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/30/05)
• Re: My disagreement with Weinberg's approach Ken S. Tucker (01/30/05)
• Re: What does "edu." mean? Androcles (01/30/05)
• Re: What does "edu." mean? Androcles (01/30/05)
• Re: MISCONCEPTIONS OF PRESENT THEORY OF CAPACITANCE Androcles (01/30/05)
• Re: MISCONCEPTIONS OF PRESENT THEORY OF CAPACITANCE Androcles (01/30/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Bilge (01/30/05)
• Re: SR's Bx', Ey', etc, invariantly not directly measureable? Bilge (01/30/05)
• Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rateof decay when they move very fast? Androcles (01/30/05)
• Re: What is "time"? Androcles (01/30/05)
• Re: Time before the big bang tj Frazir (01/30/05)
• Re: My disagreement with Weinberg's approach Tom Roberts (01/30/05)
• Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" jacob navia (01/30/05)
• Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rate of decay when they move very fast? Tom Roberts (01/30/05)
• Re: Standard model accurately describes elementary particle interactions 99% of the time Tom Roberts (01/30/05)
• Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rateof decay when they move very fast? Uncle Al (01/30/05)
• Re: to androcles 2 beda pietanza (01/29/05)
• Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" Tom Roberts (01/29/05)
• Standard model accurately describes elementary particle interactions 99% of the time Bill Hobba (01/29/05)
• Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Bill Hobba (01/29/05)
• Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" Androcles (01/29/05)
• Re: Physics can be defined as a search .... Daniel Weston (01/29/05)
• Re: The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics Bill Hobba (01/29/05)
• Re: MISCONCEPTIONS OF PRESENT THEORY OF CAPACITANCE Bill Hobba (01/29/05)
• Re: to androcles 2 Tom Capizzi (01/29/05)
• Re: Math typo correction in Zielinski's problem JP (01/29/05)
• Re: Coordinate-free measures of coordinate dependent covariants? Bilge (01/29/05)
• Re: What does "edu." mean? Tom Capizzi (01/29/05)
• Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?! Franz Heymann (01/29/05)
• Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rateof decay when they move very fast? Franz Heymann (01/29/05)
• Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rateof decay when they move very fast? Dirk Van de moortel (01/29/05)
• Re: MISCONCEPTIONS OF PRESENT THEORY OF CAPACITANCE FrediFizzx (01/29/05)
• Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rateof decay when they move very fast? Androcles (01/29/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/29/05)
• Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?! David Thomson (01/29/05)
• Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rate of decay when they move very fast? Franz Heymann (01/29/05)
• Re: Physics can be defined as a search .... reany_at_asu.edu (01/29/05)
• Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity Jesse Mazer (01/29/05)
• Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?! David Thomson (01/29/05)
• Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?! David Thomson (01/29/05)
• Re: What is "time"? Henri Wilson (01/29/05)
• Re: to androcles 2 Henri Wilson (01/29/05)
• Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson Henri Wilson (01/29/05)
• Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? RP (01/29/05)
• Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rateof decay when they move very fast? Uncle Al (01/29/05)
• What does "edu." mean? Daniel Weston (01/29/05)
• Re: MISCONCEPTIONS OF PRESENT THEORY OF CAPACITANCE Dirk Van de moortel (01/29/05)
• Re: Physics can be defined as a search .... Daniel Weston (01/29/05)
• Re: Math typo correction in Zielinski's problem Gib Bogle (01/29/05)
• Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" Bill Rowe (01/29/05)
• Re: MISCONCEPTIONS OF PRESENT THEORY OF CAPACITANCE Sue... (01/29/05)
• Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" Greg Hennessy (01/29/05)
• Re: Solution of Zielinski's Problem in Einstein's GR abuse_at_mistral.net (01/29/05)
• Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" Tom Capizzi (01/29/05)
• Re: MISCONCEPTIONS OF PRESENT THEORY OF CAPACITANCE Androcles (01/29/05)
• Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rate of decay when they move very fast? Sue... (01/29/05)
• MISCONCEPTIONS OF PRESENT THEORY OF CAPACITANCE Sue... (01/29/05)
• Re: Asynchronous Anisotropy Experiment shevek (01/29/05)
• Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/29/05)
• Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Tom Roberts (01/29/05)
• Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" Androcles (01/29/05)
• Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? John C. Polasek (01/29/05)
• Re: New dimension? D (01/29/05)
• Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" Greg Hennessy (01/29/05)
• Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? redbelly98_at_yahoo.com (01/29/05)
• Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rate of decay when they move very fast? Tom Capizzi (01/29/05)
• Zielinski's Problem and Russian Torsion WMD R&D (corrected draft) Jack Sarfatti (01/29/05)
• Re: Math typo correction in Zielinski's problem Nora Baron (01/29/05)
• Re: If the FAQ could stipulate the meanings of these terms reany_at_asu.edu (01/29/05)
• Re: Accellerated learning The Ghost In The Machine (01/29/05)
• Re: Accellerated learning PD (01/29/05)
• Re: Dark Energy World Hologram Peter Harding (01/29/05)
• Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rate of decay when they move very fast? PD (01/29/05)
• Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity Androcles (01/29/05)
• Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rateof decay when they move very fast? Franz Heymann (01/29/05)
• Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rateof decay when they move very fast? Franz Heymann (01/29/05)
• Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity kenseto (01/29/05)
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM TMG (01/29/05)
• Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity John Kennaugh (01/29/05)
• Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Eugene Shubert (01/29/05)
• Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rate of decay when they move very fast? Tom Roberts (01/29/05)
• Re: Dark Energy World Hologram josephus (01/29/05)
• Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Franz Heymann (01/29/05)
• The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics Lldwdl (01/29/05)
• Re: Math typo correction in Zielinski's problem Doug (01/29/05)
• Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rateof decay when they move very fast? Dirk Van de moortel (01/29/05)
• Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity harry (01/29/05)
• Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rateof decay when they move very fast? Androcles (01/29/05)
• Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity reany_at_asu.edu (01/29/05)
• Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rate of decay when they move very fast? reany_at_asu.edu (01/29/05)
• Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rate of decay when they move very fast? reany_at_asu.edu (01/29/05)
• Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Jeany (01/29/05)
• Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rate of decay when they move very fast? Gregory L. Hansen (01/29/05)
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/29/05)
• Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity John Kennaugh (01/29/05)
• Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rate of decay when they move very fast? Rene Tschaggelar (01/29/05)
• Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rateof decay when they move very fast? Dave (01/29/05)
• Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Franz Heymann (01/29/05)
• Re: If the FAQ could stipulate the meanings of these terms reany_at_asu.edu (01/29/05)
• Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Franz Heymann (01/29/05)
• Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 David McAnally (01/29/05)
• Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Franz Heymann (01/29/05)
• Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Franz Heymann (01/29/05)
• Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Franz Heymann (01/29/05)
• Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Franz Heymann (01/29/05)
• Re: My disagreement with Weinberg's approach Ken S. Tucker (01/29/05)
• Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Franz Heymann (01/29/05)
• What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rate of decay when they move very fast? Michael Levin (01/29/05)
• Re: If the FAQ could stipulate the meanings of these terms Bill Hobba (01/29/05)
• Re: New dimension? Ken S. Tucker (01/29/05)
• Accellerated learning DavidBowman (01/29/05)
• Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" Androcles (01/29/05)
• Re: New dimension? DavidBowman (01/29/05)
• SR's Bx', Ey', etc, invariantly not directly measureable? eleaticus (01/29/05)
• Re: An observation is the statement made from a 'rationalized' sensation Bilge (01/29/05)
• Re: Terrible confusion when asked to interpret what others have said. Bilge (01/29/05)
• Re: The Complete Disproof of Relativity and current Quantum Mechanics Bilge (01/29/05)
• Coordinate-free measures of coordinate dependent covariants? eleaticus (01/29/05)
• Re: Solution of Zielinski's Problem in Einstein's GR Gib Bogle (01/29/05)
• Re: Math typo correction in Zielinski's problem Gib Bogle (01/29/05)
• Re: Rebuttal to Lesages Shadows (New mods on 1/20) Franz Heymann (01/29/05)
• Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Franz Heymann (01/29/05)
• Re: Sam, Joe, a mosquito and a ladder. Franz Heymann (01/29/05)
• Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?! Bilge (01/29/05)
• Re: New dimension? ande452_at_attglobal.net (01/29/05)
• Re: New dimension? Bilge (01/29/05)
• Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" Bill Rowe (01/29/05)
• Re: New dimension? ande452_at_attglobal.net (01/29/05)
• Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? Bilge (01/29/05)
• Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" Bill Rowe (01/29/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Bilge (01/29/05)
• Math typo correction in Zielinski's problem Jack Sarfatti (01/29/05)
• Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson valls_at_icmf.inf.cu (01/29/05)
• Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?! Schroedinger's Cat (01/29/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox robert j. kolker (01/29/05)
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM TMG (01/29/05)
• Re: Rebuttal to Lesages Shadows (New mods on 1/20) Timo Nieminen (01/29/05)
• Re: Rebuttal to Lesages Shadows (New mods on 1/20) greywolf42 (01/29/05)
• Re: Asynchronous Anisotropy Experiment greywolf42 (01/29/05)
• Solution of Zielinski's Problem in Einstein's GR Jack Sarfatti (01/29/05)
• Re: help with math alanmc95210_at_yahoo.com (01/29/05)
• Frank Wilczek Cosmic Superconductor My Math Typo Correction Jack Sarfatti (01/29/05)
• Re: The Complete Disproof of Relativity and current Quantum Mechanics jowr.pi_at_gmail.com (01/29/05)
• Re: If the FAQ could stipulate the meanings of these terms Tom Capizzi (01/29/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/29/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/29/05)
• Frank Wilczek on Cosmic Superconductivity & Russian Torsion WMD Jack Sarfatti (01/29/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Tom Roberts (01/29/05)
• Re: My disagreement with Weinberg's approach Tom Roberts (01/29/05)
• Re: Asynchronous Anisotropy Experiment shevek (01/29/05)
• Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity Tom Roberts (01/29/05)
• Re: If the FAQ could stipulate the meanings of these terms reany_at_asu.edu (01/29/05)
• Re: Nature of Inertia and Gravity revealed by Logical Strengthening of Special Relativity RP (01/29/05)
• Re: Terrible confusion when asked to interpret what others have said. reany_at_asu.edu (01/29/05)
• Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?! Tom Capizzi (01/29/05)
• Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity Jesse Mazer (01/29/05)
• What the hell does 'intersubjective' mean? reany_at_asu.edu (01/29/05)
• Re: If the FAQ could stipulate the meanings of these terms Tom Capizzi (01/29/05)
• Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 YBM (01/28/05)
• Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 YBM (01/28/05)
• Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. YBM (01/28/05)
• Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. YBM (01/28/05)
• Re: New dimension? Ken S. Tucker (01/28/05)
• Re: Androcles and Draper discuss spacetime as a vector space YBM (01/28/05)
• Re: Time before the big bang YBM (01/28/05)
• Re: Nature of Inertia and Gravity revealed by Logical Strengthening of Special Relativity Ken S. Tucker (01/28/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Bilge (01/28/05)
• Re: Nature of Inertia and Gravity revealed by Logical Strengthening of Special Relativity Tom Capizzi (01/28/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Bilge (01/28/05)
• Re: What is Negative Energy ??? Bill Hobba (01/28/05)
• Re: to androcles 2 Tom Capizzi (01/28/05)
• Re: local one ways speed of light xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/28/05)
• Re: New dimension? Bill Hobba (01/28/05)
• Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Timo Nieminen (01/28/05)
• Re: Androcles and Draper discuss spacetime as a vector space Timo Nieminen (01/28/05)
• Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? RP (01/28/05)
• Re: Rebuttal to Lesages Shadows (New mods on 1/20) greywolf42 (01/28/05)
• Re: Asynchronous Anisotropy Experiment greywolf42 (01/28/05)
• Re: What is "time"? Paul B. Andersen (01/28/05)
• Re: to androcles 2 Henri Wilson (01/28/05)
• Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? redbelly98_at_yahoo.com (01/28/05)
• New dimension? D (01/28/05)
• Re: to androcles 2 Henri Wilson (01/28/05)
• Re: The Complete Disproof of Relativity and current Quantum Mechanics Jeff (01/28/05)
• Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?! David Thomson (01/28/05)
• Re: What is Negative Energy ??? valls_at_icmf.inf.cu (01/28/05)
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/28/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Jesse Mazer (01/28/05)
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/28/05)
• An observation is hope. AllYou! (01/28/05)
• Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" greywolf42 (01/28/05)
• Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" greywolf42 (01/28/05)
• Re: Terrible confusion when asked to interpret what others have said. AllYou! (01/28/05)
• Re: If the FAQ could stipulate the meanings of these terms AllYou! (01/28/05)
• An observation is the statement made from a 'rationalized' sensation reany_at_asu.edu (01/28/05)
• An observation is the statement made from a 'rationalized' sensation reany_at_asu.edu (01/28/05)
• Re: Terrible confusion when asked to interpret what others have said. reany_at_asu.edu (01/28/05)
• Re: Sam, Joe, a mosquito and a ladder. Androcles (01/28/05)
• Re: If the FAQ could stipulate the meanings of these terms reany_at_asu.edu (01/28/05)
• Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Dirk Van de moortel (01/28/05)
• Re: Nature of Inertia and Gravity revealed by Logical Strengthening of Special Relativity Ken S. Tucker (01/28/05)
• Re: If the FAQ could stipulate the meanings of these terms AllYou! (01/28/05)
• Re: Sam, Joe, a mosquito and a ladder. RP (01/28/05)
• Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/28/05)
• Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/28/05)
• Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/28/05)
• Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/28/05)
• Re: Androcles and Draper discuss spacetime as a vector space Androcles (01/28/05)
• Re: Time before the big bang Androcles (01/28/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/28/05)
• Re: Sam, Joe, a mosquito and a ladder. Androcles (01/28/05)
• Re: Sam, Joe, a mosquito and a ladder. Dirk Van de moortel (01/28/05)
• Re: Sam, Joe, a mosquito and a ladder. Androcles (01/28/05)
• Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? RP (01/28/05)
• Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Gregory L. Hansen (01/28/05)
• Re: Sam, Joe, a mosquito and a ladder. Androcles (01/28/05)
• Re: Terrible confusion when asked to interpret what others have said. Daniel Weston (01/28/05)
• Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Creighton Hogg (01/28/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/28/05)
• Re: Time before the big bang Androcles (01/28/05)
• Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. PD (01/28/05)
• Re: Androcles and Draper discuss spacetime as a vector space PD (01/28/05)
• Re: Time before the big bang PD (01/28/05)
• Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 PD (01/28/05)
• Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 PD (01/28/05)
• Re: What did Patrick mean? Daniel Weston (01/28/05)
• Re: Nature of Inertia and Gravity revealed by Logical Strengthening of Special Relativity qchiang2_at_yahoo.com (01/28/05)
• Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/28/05)
• Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Dirk Van de moortel (01/28/05)
• Re: Sam, Joe, a mosquito and a ladder. Eli Botkin (01/28/05)
• Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/28/05)
• Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 David McAnally (01/28/05)
• Terrible confusion when asked to interpret what others have said. AllYou! (01/28/05)
• Re: If the FAQ could stipulate the meanings of these terms reany_at_asu.edu (01/28/05)
• Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 PD (01/28/05)
• Relativistic Rap sawlake-gg_at_yahoo.com (01/28/05)
• If you want to know Infeld's view, go have a seance reany_at_asu.edu (01/28/05)
• Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Dirk Van de moortel (01/28/05)
• Re: What is Negative Energy ??? valls_at_icmf.inf.cu (01/28/05)
• Re: Sam, Joe, a mosquito and a ladder. Uncle Al (01/28/05)
• Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/28/05)
• Re: The hopeless confusion between observation and reality AllYou! (01/28/05)
• Re: Sam, Joe, a mosquito and a ladder. Dave (01/28/05)
• Re: If the FAQ could stipulate the meanings of these terms Tom Capizzi (01/28/05)
• Re: Sam, Joe, a mosquito and a ladder. Dirk Van de moortel (01/28/05)
• Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. David McAnally (01/28/05)
• Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? Dirk Van de moortel (01/28/05)
• Re: The hopeless confusion between observation and reality reany_at_asu.edu (01/28/05)
• Re: Sam, Joe, a mosquito and a ladder. tadchem (01/28/05)
• Re: Time before the big bang PD (01/28/05)
• Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Gregory L. Hansen (01/28/05)
• If the FAQ could stipulate the meanings of these terms reany_at_asu.edu (01/28/05)
• Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Dirk Van de moortel (01/28/05)
• Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/28/05)
• The hopeless confusion between observation and reality AllYou! (01/28/05)
• Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" Tom Roberts (01/28/05)
• Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/28/05)
• Re: What did Patrick mean? robert j. kolker (01/28/05)
• Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? Dirk Van de moortel (01/28/05)
• Re: Two peas in a pod. AllYou! (01/28/05)
• Observations are not a determination of reality, and do not include explanations. AllYou! (01/28/05)
• Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Mark Fergerson (01/28/05)
• Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 PD (01/28/05)
• Re: help with math beda pietanza (01/28/05)
• What did Patrick mean? reany_at_asu.edu (01/28/05)
• Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? redbelly98_at_yahoo.com (01/28/05)
• Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 PD (01/28/05)
• Re: local one ways speed of light beda pietanza (01/28/05)
• Re: local one ways speed of light beda pietanza (01/28/05)
• The invention of physical concepts is NOT about labeling sensations reany_at_asu.edu (01/28/05)
• Re: Androcles and Draper discuss spacetime as a vector space PD (01/28/05)
• Re: Physics can be defined as a search .... reany_at_asu.edu (01/28/05)
• Re: The Complete Disproof of Relativity and current Quantum Mechanics DavidBowman (01/28/05)
• Re: My theory can beat up your theory jem (01/28/05)
• Re: Physics can be defined as a search .... jem (01/28/05)
• Re: What is "time"? DavidBowman (01/28/05)
• Re: help with math jem (01/28/05)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (01/28/05)
• Sam, Joe, a mosquito and a ladder. Androcles (01/28/05)
• Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?! Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (01/28/05)
• Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?! bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/28/05)
• Re: to androcles 2 Paul B. Andersen (01/28/05)
• Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?! Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (01/28/05)
• Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?! bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/28/05)
• Experience!!!!!!!!!!!!.......... ... Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (01/28/05)
• Re: local one ways speed of light Dirk Van de moortel (01/28/05)
• Re: Asynchronous Anisotropy Experiment Harry (01/28/05)
• Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?! Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (01/28/05)
• Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?! bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/28/05)
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM Tom Capizzi (01/28/05)
• Re: 2005 is Einstein Year John Kennaugh (01/28/05)
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM Mark South (01/28/05)
• Re: to androcles 2 Tom Capizzi (01/28/05)
• Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?! Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (01/28/05)
• Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?! bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/28/05)
• Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Franz Heymann (01/28/05)
• Re: to androcles 2 Henri Wilson (01/28/05)
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/28/05)
• Re: What is "time"? George (01/28/05)
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/28/05)
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/28/05)
• Re: SR's EM Covariants invariantly unproven? Bilge (01/28/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Bilge (01/28/05)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... Kees Roos (01/28/05)
• Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? Creighton Hogg (01/28/05)
• Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Franz Heymann (01/28/05)
• Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/28/05)
• Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" Bill Rowe (01/28/05)
• Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?! Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (01/28/05)
• Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? ande452_at_attglobal.net (01/28/05)
• Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? ande452_at_attglobal.net (01/28/05)
• Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? ande452_at_attglobal.net (01/28/05)
• Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?! Richard Schultz (01/28/05)
• Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?! bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/28/05)
• Re: Androcles and Draper discuss spacetime as a vector space jowr.pi_at_gmail.com (01/28/05)
• Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?! Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (01/28/05)
• Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?! David Thomson (01/28/05)
• Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Jesse Mazer (01/28/05)
• Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?! bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/28/05)
• Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? The Ghost In The Machine (01/28/05)
• Re: Help: I need to understand the Lorentz force Ken S. Tucker (01/28/05)
• Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?! Creighton Hogg (01/28/05)
• Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? Rob (01/28/05)
• Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? Creighton Hogg (01/28/05)
• Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?! Tom Capizzi (01/28/05)
• Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/28/05)
• Re: Androcles and Draper discuss spacetime as a vector space Androcles (01/28/05)
• Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/28/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Creighton Hogg (01/28/05)
• Re: Division by Zero in Nature, and Decomposition of Time. LEFTY (01/28/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Tom Roberts (01/28/05)
• Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? Tom Roberts (01/28/05)
• Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? Tom Roberts (01/28/05)
• Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? Creighton Hogg (01/28/05)
• Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? Rob (01/28/05)
• Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? Creighton Hogg (01/28/05)
• Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? Rob (01/28/05)
• Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?! bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/28/05)
• Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/28/05)
• Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?! Tom Capizzi (01/28/05)
• Re: local one ways speed of light xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/28/05)
• Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? Rob (01/28/05)
• Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? FrediFizzx (01/28/05)
• Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment mountain man (01/28/05)
• Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment mountain man (01/28/05)
• Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Gregory L. Hansen (01/28/05)
• Re: Androcles and Draper discuss spacetime as a vector space whopkins_at_csd.uwm.edu (01/28/05)
• Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? Rob (01/28/05)
• Re: to androcles 2 Androcles (01/28/05)
• Re: Nature of Inertia and Gravity revealed by Logical Strengthening of Special Relativity xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/28/05)
• Re: The balloon point of view Tom Capizzi (01/28/05)
• Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/28/05)
• Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/28/05)
• Re: local one ways speed of light N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/28/05)
• Re: The balloon point of view Bill Hobba (01/28/05)
• Re: What before big bang? YBM (01/28/05)
• Re: Help: I need to understand the Lorentz force redbelly98_at_yahoo.com (01/28/05)
• Re: to androcles 2 Tom Capizzi (01/28/05)
• Re: Lorentz vs. Einstein beda pietanza (01/27/05)
• Re: local one ways speed of light beda pietanza (01/27/05)
• Re: to androcles 2 beda pietanza (01/27/05)
• Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Timo Nieminen (01/27/05)
• Re: Rebuttal to Lesages Shadows (Part I) greywolf42 (01/27/05)
• Re: Time before the big bang Androcles (01/27/05)
• Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Dirk Van de moortel (01/27/05)
• Re: The balloon point of view shevek (01/27/05)
• Re: The balloon point of view shevek (01/27/05)
• Re: Asynchronous Anisotropy Experiment shevek (01/27/05)
• Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 PD (01/27/05)
• Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 PD (01/27/05)
• Re: What is "time"? Henri Wilson (01/27/05)
• Re: The Complete Disproof of Relativity and current Quantum Mechanics stephen_at_nomail.com (01/27/05)
• Re: Androcles and Draper discuss spacetime as a vector space Midtown (01/27/05)
• Re: to androcles 2 Henri Wilson (01/27/05)
• The Complete Disproof of Relativity and current Quantum Mechanics Jeff (01/27/05)
• Re: Help: I need to understand the Lorentz force Ken S. Tucker (01/27/05)
• Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/27/05)
• Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson Henri Wilson (01/27/05)
• Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Franz Heymann (01/27/05)
• Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/27/05)
• Re: SR's EM Covariants invariantly unproven? eleaticus (01/27/05)
• Re: Androcles and Draper discuss spacetime as a vector space Randy Poe (01/27/05)
• Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Dirk Van de moortel (01/27/05)
• Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. YBM (01/27/05)
• Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Dirk Van de moortel (01/27/05)
• Re: What did Infeld mean? AllYou! (01/27/05)
• Re: The Fundamental Flaw of SRT Dirk Van de moortel (01/27/05)
• Re: What did Infeld mean? AllYou! (01/27/05)
• Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/27/05)
• Re: What did Infeld mean? AllYou! (01/27/05)
• Re: Memorization is the beginning of wisdom AllYou! (01/27/05)
• Re: The Fundamental Flaw of SRT Paul Cardinale (01/27/05)
• Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?! David Thomson (01/27/05)
• Re: Memorization is the beginning of wisdom reany_at_asu.edu (01/27/05)
• Re: What did Infeld mean? reany_at_asu.edu (01/27/05)
• Re: What did Infeld mean? Dirk Van de moortel (01/27/05)
• Re: Androcles and Draper discuss spacetime as a vector space Androcles (01/27/05)
• Re: What did Infeld mean? AllYou! (01/27/05)
• Re: What did Infeld mean? Daniel Weston (01/27/05)
• Re: What did Infeld mean? reany_at_asu.edu (01/27/05)
• Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 PD (01/27/05)
• Re: What did Infeld mean? AllYou! (01/27/05)
• Re: Memorization is the beginning of wisdom AllYou! (01/27/05)
• Re: What did Infeld mean? AllYou! (01/27/05)
• Re: What did Infeld mean? reany_at_asu.edu (01/27/05)
• Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. PD (01/27/05)
• Re: Memorization is the beginning of wisdom reany_at_asu.edu (01/27/05)
• Re: Androcles and Draper discuss spacetime as a vector space PD (01/27/05)
• Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/27/05)
• Re: What did Infeld mean? PD (01/27/05)
• Re: Androcles and Draper discuss spacetime as a vector space Androcles (01/27/05)
• Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/27/05)
• Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity kenseto (01/27/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox robert j. kolker (01/27/05)
• Re: I need to understand the Lorentz force PD (01/27/05)
• Androcles and Draper discuss spacetime as a vector space PD (01/27/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/27/05)
• Re: to androcles 2 beda pietanza (01/27/05)
• Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. PD (01/27/05)
• Re: My theory can beat up your theory Dirk Van de moortel (01/27/05)
• Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Dirk Van de moortel (01/27/05)
• Re: Physics can be defined as a search .... AllYou! (01/27/05)
• Re: Memorization is the beginning of wisdom AllYou! (01/27/05)
• Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Harry (01/27/05)
• Re: Help: I need to understand the Lorentz force PD (01/27/05)
• Re: Help: I need to understand the Lorentz force DRLunsford (01/27/05)
• Re: Help: I need to understand the Lorentz force Marcel_at_hotmail.com (01/27/05)
• Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 PD (01/27/05)
• Re: I need to understand the Lorentz force Jeremy Watts (01/27/05)
• Re: Help: I need to understand the Lorentz force rge11x (01/27/05)
• Memorization is the beginning of wisdom reany_at_asu.edu (01/27/05)
• Physics can be defined as a search .... reany_at_asu.edu (01/27/05)
• Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Tom Roberts (01/27/05)
• Re: What is "time"? John C. Polasek (01/27/05)
• Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Tom Roberts (01/27/05)
• Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity kenseto (01/27/05)
• Re: help with math beda pietanza (01/27/05)
• Re: Time before the big bang PD (01/27/05)
• Re: What is "time"? Androcles (01/27/05)
• Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/27/05)
• Re: Doppler effect and relative speeds? Bilge (01/27/05)
• Re: Time before the big bang N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/27/05)
• Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment mountain man (01/27/05)
• Re: My theory can beat up your theory jem (01/27/05)
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM ZenIsWhen (01/27/05)
• Re: My theory can beat up your theory Dirk Van de moortel (01/27/05)
• Re: What did Infeld mean? AllYou! (01/27/05)
• Re: What did Infeld mean? Bilge (01/27/05)
• Re: SR's EM Covariants invariantly unproven? Bilge (01/27/05)
• Re: The real numbers and time exist as concepts in theoryland AllYou! (01/27/05)
• Re: The real numbers and time exist as concepts in theoryland AllYou! (01/27/05)
• Re: The real numbers and time exist as concepts in theoryland jem (01/27/05)
• Re: The real numbers and time exist as concepts in theoryland jem (01/27/05)
• Re: The real numbers and time exist as concepts in theoryland AllYou! (01/27/05)
• Re: The real numbers and time exist as concepts in theoryland jem (01/27/05)
• Re: What before big bang? YBM (01/27/05)
• Re: SR's EM Covariants invariantly unproven? Bilge (01/27/05)
• Re: The real numbers and time exist as concepts in theoryland AllYou! (01/27/05)
• Re: The real numbers and time exist as concepts in theoryland AllYou! (01/27/05)
• Re: All concepts live only in the mind AllYou! (01/27/05)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... AllYou! (01/27/05)
• Re: My theory can beat up your theory jem (01/27/05)
• Re: The real numbers and time exist as concepts in theoryland jem (01/27/05)
• Re: What did Infeld mean? AllYou! (01/27/05)
• Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Bill Hobba (01/27/05)
• Re: What did Infeld mean? AllYou! (01/27/05)
• Re: What did Infeld mean? reany_at_asu.edu (01/27/05)
• Re: More about the balloon point of view Bill Hobba (01/27/05)
• Re: Zielinski's and Puthoff's gravity theories refuted Ken S. Tucker (01/27/05)
• Re: What is "time"? Bill Hobba (01/27/05)
• Re: Asynchronous Anisotropy Experiment Harry (01/27/05)
• Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity Harry (01/27/05)
• Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Bjoern Feuerbacher (01/27/05)
• Re: Help: I need to understand the Lorentz force Ken S. Tucker (01/27/05)
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/27/05)
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/27/05)
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/27/05)
• Re: What is Negative Energy ??? Ken S. Tucker (01/27/05)
• Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity Harry (01/27/05)
• Re: Nature of Inertia and Gravity revealed by Logical Strengthening of Special Relativity Harry (01/27/05)
• Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" Harry (01/27/05)
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/27/05)
• Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment mountain man (01/27/05)
• Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Franz Heymann (01/27/05)
• Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Franz Heymann (01/27/05)
• Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Franz Heymann (01/27/05)
• Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Franz Heymann (01/27/05)
• Superluminal information transfer paradox Dr. Photon (01/27/05)
• Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Harry (01/27/05)
• What is "time"? Leif Andersson (01/27/05)
• Re: Time before the big bang Bernardz (01/27/05)
• Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Franz Heymann (01/27/05)
• Re: What is Negative Energy ??? Bernardz (01/27/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox CWatters (01/27/05)
• Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity David Evens (01/27/05)
• Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Koobee Wublee (01/27/05)
• Re: SR's EM Covariants invariantly unproven? eleaticus (01/27/05)
• Re: Have you ever wondered..... Kees Roos (01/27/05)
• Re: The TOTAL Disproof of Relativity and current QM jowr.pi_at_gmail.com (01/27/05)
• Re: More about the balloon point of view Leif Andersson (01/27/05)
• Re: SR's EM Covariants invariantly unproven? eleaticus (01/27/05)
• Re: Nature of Inertia and Gravity revealed by Logical Strengthening of Special Relativity Bill Hobba (01/27/05)
• Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?! Richard Schultz (01/27/05)
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM Enoch (01/27/05)
• Re: The balloon point of view Tom Roberts (01/27/05)
• Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Timo Nieminen (01/27/05)
• Re: Nature of Inertia and Gravity revealed by Logical Strengthening of Special Relativity Tom Capizzi (01/27/05)
• Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?! bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/27/05)
• Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/27/05)
• Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Tom Roberts (01/27/05)
• Re: What did Infeld mean? xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/27/05)
• Re: Nature of Inertia and Gravity revealed by Logical Strengthening of Special Relativity xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/27/05)
• Correction on Bu Jack Sarfatti (01/27/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/27/05)
• Re: Zielinski's and Puthoff's gravity theories refuted xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/27/05)
• Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?! Tom Capizzi (01/27/05)
• Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Timo Nieminen (01/27/05)
• Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/27/05)
• Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity RP (01/27/05)
• Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/27/05)
• Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment mountain man (01/27/05)
• Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al mountain man (01/27/05)
• Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/27/05)
• Re: What did Infeld mean? Bilge (01/27/05)
• Re: Lorentz on special relativity Bilge (01/27/05)
• Re: All concepts live only in the mind reany_at_asu.edu (01/27/05)
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM ZenIsWhen (01/27/05)
• Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?! robert j. kolker (01/27/05)
• Re: All concepts live only in the mind robert j. kolker (01/27/05)
• Bohr Complementarity in General Relativity Jack Sarfatti (01/27/05)
• Re: Division by Zero in Nature, and Decomposition of Time. LEFTY (01/27/05)
• Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?! Tom Capizzi (01/27/05)
• Re: The balloon point of view Bill Hobba (01/27/05)
• Re: All concepts live only in the mind Daniel Weston (01/27/05)
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM TMG (01/27/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox robert j. kolker (01/27/05)
• Re: What is Negative Energy ??? zzbunker_at_netscape.net (01/27/05)
• Re: My theory can beat up your theory Daniel Weston (01/27/05)
• Re: All concepts live only in the mind reany_at_asu.edu (01/27/05)
• Re: Zielinski's and Puthoff's gravity theories refuted Ken S. Tucker (01/27/05)
• Re: My theory can beat up your theory reany_at_asu.edu (01/27/05)
• Re: The real numbers and time exist as concepts in theoryland reany_at_asu.edu (01/27/05)
• Re: Maximum velocity Bill Hobba (01/27/05)
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM Glenn Knickerbocker (01/27/05)
• Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity harry (01/27/05)
• Re: What did Infeld mean? Bill Hobba (01/27/05)
• Re: Time before the big bang Androcles (01/27/05)
• Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity harry (01/26/05)
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM Matthew L. Martin (01/26/05)
• Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity RP (01/26/05)
• Re: What did Infeld mean? Daniel Weston (01/26/05)
• Re: Nature of Inertia and Gravity revealed by Logical Strengthening of Special Relativity Bill Hobba (01/26/05)
• Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity harry (01/26/05)
• Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/26/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Bilge (01/26/05)
• Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" Joseph Lazio (01/26/05)
• Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity Ken S. Tucker (01/26/05)
• Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/26/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Jim Black (01/26/05)
• Zielinski's and Puthoff's gravity theories refuted Jack Sarfatti (01/26/05)
• Re: What did Infeld mean? AllYou! (01/26/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Sam Wormley (01/26/05)
• Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity Bilge (01/26/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox RP (01/26/05)
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM madge (01/26/05)
• Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" Tom Roberts (01/26/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Jesse Mazer (01/26/05)
• Nature of Inertia and Gravity revealed by Logical Strengthening of Special Relativity qchiang2_at_yahoo.com (01/26/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Sam Wormley (01/26/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/26/05)
• Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 PD (01/26/05)
• Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson Paul B. Andersen (01/26/05)
• Re: What did Infeld mean? xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/26/05)
• Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com (01/26/05)
• Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Dirk Van de moortel (01/26/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox CWatters (01/26/05)
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM Chuckles (01/26/05)
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM Chuckles (01/26/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Uncle Al (01/26/05)
• Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson Paul B. Andersen (01/26/05)
• Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. PD (01/26/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/26/05)
• Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?! David Thomson (01/26/05)
• Re: SR's EM Covariants invariantly unproven? Bilge (01/26/05)
• Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com (01/26/05)
• Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/26/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/26/05)
• What did Infeld mean? AllYou! (01/26/05)
• Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com (01/26/05)
• Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox