sci.physics.relativity
By Thread

6065 messages sorted by: [ date ]

---

Starting: 12/31/04
Ending: 01/31/05

• Nikola Tesla on Relativity John Schoenfeld (01/31/05)
  • Re: Nikola Tesla on Relativity reany_at_asu.edu (01/31/05)
  • Re: Nikola Tesla on Relativity Boris Mohar (01/31/05)
    • Re: Nikola Tesla on Relativity robert j. kolker (01/31/05)
      • Re: Nikola Tesla on Relativity Bill Hobba (01/31/05)
      • Re: Nikola Tesla on Relativity Eugene Shubert (01/31/05)
      • Re: Nikola Tesla on Relativity robert j. kolker (01/31/05)
      • Re: Nikola Tesla on Relativity John Schoenfeld (01/31/05)
  • Re: Nikola Tesla on Relativity robert j. kolker (01/31/05)
    • Re: Nikola Tesla on Relativity John Schoenfeld (01/31/05)
      • Re: Nikola Tesla on Relativity robert j. kolker (01/31/05)
  • Re: Nikola Tesla on Relativity Uncle Al (01/31/05)
    • Re: Nikola Tesla on Relativity John Schoenfeld (01/31/05)
  • Re: Nikola Tesla on Relativity Androcles (01/31/05)
• Lagrangian of Relativistic Free Particle. Bill Hobba (01/30/05)
  • Re: Lagrangian of Relativistic Free Particle. Ken S. Tucker (01/31/05)
• New cosmological anomalies reported Jack Sarfatti (01/30/05)
  • Re: New cosmological anomalies reported Eugene Shubert (01/30/05)
    • Re: New cosmological anomalies reported Daniel Weston (01/31/05)
• the fancy and the concrete beda pietanza (01/30/05)
• the ether and the fluctuations of vacuum beda pietanza (01/30/05)
• Impossible dreams. Len Gaasenbeek (01/30/05)
  • Re: Impossible dreams. PD (01/30/05)
    • Re: Impossible dreams. Daniel Weston (01/31/05)
• True or false: Physics is all about the behavior of ... reany_at_asu.edu (01/30/05)
  • Re: True or false: Physics is all about the behavior of ... N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/30/05)
    • Re: True or false: Physics is all about the behavior of ... reany_at_asu.edu (01/30/05)
      • Re: True or false: Physics is all about the behavior of ... N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/30/05)
      • Biology is a branch of physics. Daniel Weston (01/30/05)
      • Re: Biology is a branch of physics. reany_at_asu.edu (01/30/05)
      • Re: Biology is a branch of physics. Daniel Weston (01/30/05)
      • Physics is as physics does reany_at_asu.edu (01/30/05)
      • Re: Physics is as physics does Daniel Weston (01/30/05)
      • Re: Physics is as physics does reany_at_asu.edu (01/31/05)
      • Re: Physics is as physics does Daniel Weston (01/31/05)
      • Re: Physics is as physics does reany_at_asu.edu (01/31/05)
      • Re: Biology is a branch of physics. Daniel Weston (01/31/05)
      • Re: Biology is a branch of physics. reany_at_asu.edu (01/31/05)
      • Re: True or false: Physics is all about the behavior of ... reany_at_asu.edu (01/30/05)
      • Re: True or false: Physics is all about the behavior of ... N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/30/05)
      • Re: True or false: Physics is all about the behavior of ... reany_at_asu.edu (01/30/05)
      • Re: True or false: Physics is all about the behavior of ... N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/31/05)
  • Re: True or false: Physics is all about the behavior of ... reany_at_asu.edu (01/30/05)
  • Re: True or false: Physics is all about the behavior of ... beda pietanza (01/30/05)
    • Re: True or false: Physics is all about the behavior of ... reany_at_asu.edu (01/30/05)
  • Re: True or false: Physics is all about the behavior of ... Bilge (01/31/05)
    • Is all of science physics? reany_at_asu.edu (01/31/05)
• Re: NEW DavidBowman (01/30/05)
• Langrange strange DavidBowman (01/30/05)
  • Re: Langrange strange N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/30/05)
    • Re: Langrange strange David McAnally (01/30/05)
      • Re: Langrange strange David McAnally (01/31/05)
  • Re: Langrange strange Bill Hobba (01/30/05)
    • Re: Langrange strange Dirk Van de moortel (01/30/05)
  • Re: Langrange strange FrediFizzx (01/30/05)
  • Re: Langrange strange Bilge (01/30/05)
    • Re: Langrange strange Ken S. Tucker (01/30/05)
    • Re: Langrange strange Tom Capizzi (01/30/05)
      • Re: Langrange strange Dirk Van de moortel (01/30/05)
      • Re: Langrange strange Tom Capizzi (01/30/05)
• Standard model accurately describes elementary particle interactions 99% of the time Bill Hobba (01/29/05)
  • Re: Standard model accurately describes elementary particle interactions 99% of the time Tom Roberts (01/30/05)
  • Re: Standard model accurately describes elementary particle interactions 99% of the time PD (01/30/05)
• MISCONCEPTIONS OF PRESENT THEORY OF CAPACITANCE Sue... (01/29/05)
  • Re: MISCONCEPTIONS OF PRESENT THEORY OF CAPACITANCE Androcles (01/29/05)
    • Re: MISCONCEPTIONS OF PRESENT THEORY OF CAPACITANCE Sue... (01/29/05)
      • Re: MISCONCEPTIONS OF PRESENT THEORY OF CAPACITANCE Dirk Van de moortel (01/29/05)
      • Re: MISCONCEPTIONS OF PRESENT THEORY OF CAPACITANCE Androcles (01/30/05)
  • Re: MISCONCEPTIONS OF PRESENT THEORY OF CAPACITANCE FrediFizzx (01/29/05)
    • Re: MISCONCEPTIONS OF PRESENT THEORY OF CAPACITANCE Androcles (01/30/05)
  • Re: MISCONCEPTIONS OF PRESENT THEORY OF CAPACITANCE Bill Hobba (01/29/05)
  • Re: MISCONCEPTIONS OF PRESENT THEORY OF CAPACITANCE John C. Polasek (01/30/05)
  • Re: MISCONCEPTIONS OF PRESENT THEORY OF CAPACITANCE Bilge (01/30/05)
    • Re: MISCONCEPTIONS OF PRESENT THEORY OF CAPACITANCE John C. Polasek (01/30/05)
• Zielinski's Problem and Russian Torsion WMD R&D (corrected draft) Jack Sarfatti (01/29/05)
• The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics Lldwdl (01/29/05)
  • Re: The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics Bill Hobba (01/29/05)
• Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Jeany (01/29/05)
  • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Franz Heymann (01/29/05)
  • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Eugene Shubert (01/29/05)
    • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Nick (01/30/05)
  • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? John C. Polasek (01/29/05)
  • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Bill Hobba (01/29/05)
    • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Jesse Mazer (01/30/05)
      • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Bill Hobba (01/30/05)
      • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Koobee Wublee (01/30/05)
      • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Bill Hobba (01/30/05)
      • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Bill Hobba (01/30/05)
      • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? John C. Polasek (01/30/05)
      • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Koobee Wublee (01/30/05)
      • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Bill Hobba (01/30/05)
      • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Ken S. Tucker (01/31/05)
      • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Bill Hobba (01/30/05)
      • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? John C. Polasek (01/30/05)
      • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Bill Hobba (01/31/05)
      • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Dirk Van de moortel (01/30/05)
      • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Koobee Wublee (01/30/05)
      • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? zzbunker_at_netscape.net (01/30/05)
      • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Tom Roberts (01/30/05)
      • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Mike (01/30/05)
      • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (01/30/05)
      • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Franz Heymann (01/30/05)
      • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Mike (01/30/05)
      • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Franz Heymann (01/30/05)
      • Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Franz Heymann (01/30/05)
      • The concept of proper time reany_at_asu.edu (01/30/05)
      • Re: The concept of proper time Androcles (01/30/05)
      • Re: The concept of proper time Franz Heymann (01/30/05)
      • Re: The concept of proper time jowr.pi_at_gmail.com (01/31/05)
      • Re: The concept of proper time Jesse Mazer (01/31/05)
      • Re: The concept of proper time glbrad01 (01/31/05)
• What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rate of decay when they move very fast? Michael Levin (01/29/05)
  • Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rateof decay when they move very fast? Dave (01/29/05)
  • Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rate of decay when they move very fast? Rene Tschaggelar (01/29/05)
    • Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rate of decay when they move very fast? reany_at_asu.edu (01/29/05)
  • Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rate of decay when they move very fast? Gregory L. Hansen (01/29/05)
  • Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rate of decay when they move very fast? reany_at_asu.edu (01/29/05)
  • Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rateof decay when they move very fast? Androcles (01/29/05)
    • Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rateof decay when they move very fast? Dirk Van de moortel (01/29/05)
    • Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rateof decay when they move very fast? Franz Heymann (01/29/05)
    • Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rateof decay when they move very fast? Uncle Al (01/30/05)
      • Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rateof decay when they move very fast? Androcles (01/30/05)
      • Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rateof decay when they move very fast? jgreenfield_at_seol.net.au (01/31/05)
      • Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rateof decay when they move very fast? Uncle Al (01/31/05)
      • Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rateof decay when they move very fast? Androcles (01/31/05)
  • Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rate of decay when they move very fast? Tom Roberts (01/29/05)
  • Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rateof decay when they move very fast? Franz Heymann (01/29/05)
  • Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rate of decay when they move very fast? PD (01/29/05)
    • Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rate of decay when they move very fast? Tom Capizzi (01/29/05)
  • Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rate of decay when they move very fast? Sue... (01/29/05)
    • Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rate of decay when they move very fast? Franz Heymann (01/29/05)
    • Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rate of decay when they move very fast? Tom Roberts (01/30/05)
  • Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rateof decay when they move very fast? Uncle Al (01/29/05)
    • Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rateof decay when they move very fast? Androcles (01/29/05)
      • Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rateof decay when they move very fast? Dirk Van de moortel (01/29/05)
    • Re: What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rateof decay when they move very fast? Franz Heymann (01/29/05)
• Accellerated learning DavidBowman (01/29/05)
  • Re: Accellerated learning PD (01/29/05)
  • Re: Accellerated learning The Ghost In The Machine (01/29/05)
• Math typo correction in Zielinski's problem Jack Sarfatti (01/29/05)
  • Re: Math typo correction in Zielinski's problem Gib Bogle (01/29/05)
    • Re: Math typo correction in Zielinski's problem Doug (01/29/05)
  • Re: Math typo correction in Zielinski's problem Nora Baron (01/29/05)
    • Re: Math typo correction in Zielinski's problem Gib Bogle (01/29/05)
    • Re: Math typo correction in Zielinski's problem JP (01/29/05)
• Solution of Zielinski's Problem in Einstein's GR Jack Sarfatti (01/29/05)
  • Re: Solution of Zielinski's Problem in Einstein's GR Gib Bogle (01/29/05)
  • Re: Solution of Zielinski's Problem in Einstein's GR abuse_at_mistral.net (01/29/05)
• Frank Wilczek Cosmic Superconductor My Math Typo Correction Jack Sarfatti (01/29/05)
• Frank Wilczek on Cosmic Superconductivity & Russian Torsion WMD Jack Sarfatti (01/29/05)
• New dimension? D (01/28/05)
  • Re: New dimension? Bill Hobba (01/28/05)
    • Re: New dimension? Ken S. Tucker (01/28/05)
      • Re: New dimension? ande452_at_attglobal.net (01/29/05)
      • Re: New dimension? Ken S. Tucker (01/29/05)
  • Re: New dimension? ande452_at_attglobal.net (01/29/05)
  • Re: New dimension? Bilge (01/29/05)
    • Re: New dimension? D (01/29/05)
  • Re: New dimension? DavidBowman (01/29/05)
• Relativistic Rap sawlake-gg_at_yahoo.com (01/28/05)
• Sam, Joe, a mosquito and a ladder. Androcles (01/28/05)
  • Re: Sam, Joe, a mosquito and a ladder. tadchem (01/28/05)
    • Re: Sam, Joe, a mosquito and a ladder. Dirk Van de moortel (01/28/05)
      • Re: Sam, Joe, a mosquito and a ladder. Dave (01/28/05)
      • Re: Sam, Joe, a mosquito and a ladder. RP (01/28/05)
      • Re: Sam, Joe, a mosquito and a ladder. Androcles (01/28/05)
      • Re: Sam, Joe, a mosquito and a ladder. Franz Heymann (01/29/05)
    • Re: Sam, Joe, a mosquito and a ladder. Androcles (01/28/05)
  • Re: Sam, Joe, a mosquito and a ladder. Uncle Al (01/28/05)
    • Re: Sam, Joe, a mosquito and a ladder. Androcles (01/28/05)
      • Re: Sam, Joe, a mosquito and a ladder. Dirk Van de moortel (01/28/05)
  • Re: Sam, Joe, a mosquito and a ladder. Eli Botkin (01/28/05)
    • Re: Sam, Joe, a mosquito and a ladder. Androcles (01/28/05)
• Experience!!!!!!!!!!!!.......... ... Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (01/28/05)
• Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? Rob (01/28/05)
  • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? FrediFizzx (01/28/05)
    • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? Rob (01/28/05)
      • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/28/05)
      • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? ande452_at_attglobal.net (01/28/05)
      • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/28/05)
      • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? Creighton Hogg (01/28/05)
      • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/28/05)
      • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? Creighton Hogg (01/28/05)
      • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/28/05)
      • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? Dirk Van de moortel (01/28/05)
      • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/28/05)
      • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? Dirk Van de moortel (01/28/05)
      • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? ande452_at_attglobal.net (01/28/05)
      • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? Tom Roberts (01/28/05)
  • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? ande452_at_attglobal.net (01/28/05)
    • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? Rob (01/28/05)
      • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? Rob (01/28/05)
      • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? Creighton Hogg (01/28/05)
      • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? Creighton Hogg (01/28/05)
    • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? The Ghost In The Machine (01/28/05)
  • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? Tom Roberts (01/28/05)
    • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? Rob (01/28/05)
      • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? redbelly98_at_yahoo.com (01/28/05)
      • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? RP (01/28/05)
      • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? redbelly98_at_yahoo.com (01/28/05)
      • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? RP (01/28/05)
      • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? redbelly98_at_yahoo.com (01/29/05)
      • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? RP (01/29/05)
      • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? redbelly98_at_yahoo.com (01/30/05)
      • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? RP (01/30/05)
  • Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? Bilge (01/29/05)
• The Complete Disproof of Relativity and current Quantum Mechanics Jeff (01/27/05)
  • Re: The Complete Disproof of Relativity and current Quantum Mechanics stephen_at_nomail.com (01/27/05)
    • Re: The Complete Disproof of Relativity and current Quantum Mechanics Jeff (01/28/05)
      • Re: The Complete Disproof of Relativity and current Quantum Mechanics Bilge (01/29/05)
      • Re: The Complete Disproof of Relativity and current Quantum Mechanics Jeff (01/30/05)
      • Re: The Complete Disproof of Relativity and current Quantum Mechanics Eric Gisse (01/31/05)
  • Re: The Complete Disproof of Relativity and current Quantum Mechanics DavidBowman (01/28/05)
  • Re: The Complete Disproof of Relativity and current Quantum Mechanics jowr.pi_at_gmail.com (01/29/05)
    • Re: The Complete Disproof of Relativity and current Quantum Mechanics Jeff (01/30/05)
      • Re: The Complete Disproof of Relativity and current Quantum Mechanics Eric Gisse (01/31/05)
• Androcles and Draper discuss spacetime as a vector space PD (01/27/05)
  • Re: Androcles and Draper discuss spacetime as a vector space Androcles (01/27/05)
    • Re: Androcles and Draper discuss spacetime as a vector space PD (01/27/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper discuss spacetime as a vector space Androcles (01/27/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper discuss spacetime as a vector space Randy Poe (01/27/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper discuss spacetime as a vector space Midtown (01/27/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper discuss spacetime as a vector space jowr.pi_at_gmail.com (01/28/05)
  • Re: Androcles and Draper discuss spacetime as a vector space whopkins_at_csd.uwm.edu (01/28/05)
    • Re: Androcles and Draper discuss spacetime as a vector space Androcles (01/28/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper discuss spacetime as a vector space PD (01/28/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper discuss spacetime as a vector space Androcles (01/28/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper discuss spacetime as a vector space YBM (01/28/05)
    • Re: Androcles and Draper discuss spacetime as a vector space PD (01/28/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper discuss spacetime as a vector space Timo Nieminen (01/28/05)
• Re: What before big bang? YBM (01/27/05)
  • Re: What before big bang? YBM (01/28/05)
    • What does "edu." mean? Daniel Weston (01/29/05)
      • Re: What does "edu." mean? Tom Capizzi (01/29/05)
      • Re: What does "edu." mean? Androcles (01/30/05)
      • Re: What does "edu." mean? Androcles (01/30/05)
      • Re: What does "edu." mean? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/30/05)
      • Re: What does "edu." mean? Bilge (01/30/05)
      • Re: What does "edu." mean? stephen_at_nomail.com (01/30/05)
• Superluminal information transfer paradox Dr. Photon (01/27/05)
• What is "time"? Leif Andersson (01/27/05)
  • Re: What is "time"? Bill Hobba (01/27/05)
  • Re: What is "time"? Androcles (01/27/05)
    • Re: What is "time"? Leif Andersson (01/30/05)
      • Re: What is "time"? Androcles (01/30/05)
  • Re: What is "time"? John C. Polasek (01/27/05)
    • Re: What is "time"? Henri Wilson (01/27/05)
      • Re: What is "time"? Paul B. Andersen (01/28/05)
      • Re: What is "time"? Henri Wilson (01/29/05)
      • Re: What is "time"? Androcles (01/30/05)
      • Re: What is "time"? Henri Wilson (01/30/05)
      • Re: What is "time"? Androcles (01/31/05)
    • Re: What is "time"? Leif Andersson (01/30/05)
      • Re: What is "time"? John C. Polasek (01/30/05)
      • Re: What is "time"? Androcles (01/30/05)
      • Re: What is "time"? John C. Polasek (01/31/05)
  • Re: What is "time"? George (01/28/05)
  • Re: What is "time"? DavidBowman (01/28/05)
• Correction on Bu Jack Sarfatti (01/27/05)
• Bohr Complementarity in General Relativity Jack Sarfatti (01/27/05)
• Zielinski's and Puthoff's gravity theories refuted Jack Sarfatti (01/26/05)
  • Re: Zielinski's and Puthoff's gravity theories refuted Ken S. Tucker (01/27/05)
    • Re: Zielinski's and Puthoff's gravity theories refuted xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/27/05)
      • Re: Zielinski's and Puthoff's gravity theories refuted Ken S. Tucker (01/27/05)
• Nature of Inertia and Gravity revealed by Logical Strengthening of Special Relativity qchiang2_at_yahoo.com (01/26/05)
  • Re: Nature of Inertia and Gravity revealed by Logical Strengthening of Special Relativity Bill Hobba (01/26/05)
    • Re: Nature of Inertia and Gravity revealed by Logical Strengthening of Special Relativity xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/27/05)
      • Re: Nature of Inertia and Gravity revealed by Logical Strengthening of Special Relativity Tom Capizzi (01/27/05)
      • Re: Nature of Inertia and Gravity revealed by Logical Strengthening of Special Relativity Bill Hobba (01/27/05)
      • Re: Nature of Inertia and Gravity revealed by Logical Strengthening of Special Relativity Harry (01/27/05)
      • Re: Nature of Inertia and Gravity revealed by Logical Strengthening of Special Relativity xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/28/05)
    • Re: Nature of Inertia and Gravity revealed by Logical Strengthening of Special Relativity qchiang2_at_yahoo.com (01/28/05)
      • Re: Nature of Inertia and Gravity revealed by Logical Strengthening of Special Relativity Ken S. Tucker (01/28/05)
      • Re: Nature of Inertia and Gravity revealed by Logical Strengthening of Special Relativity Tom Capizzi (01/28/05)
      • Re: Nature of Inertia and Gravity revealed by Logical Strengthening of Special Relativity Ken S. Tucker (01/28/05)
      • Re: Nature of Inertia and Gravity revealed by Logical Strengthening of Special Relativity RP (01/29/05)
• What did Infeld mean? AllYou! (01/26/05)
  • Re: What did Infeld mean? xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/26/05)
    • Re: What did Infeld mean? AllYou! (01/26/05)
      • Re: What did Infeld mean? xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/27/05)
  • Re: What did Infeld mean? Daniel Weston (01/26/05)
    • Re: What did Infeld mean? AllYou! (01/27/05)
    • Re: What did Infeld mean? reany_at_asu.edu (01/27/05)
      • Re: What did Infeld mean? AllYou! (01/27/05)
      • Re: What did Infeld mean? reany_at_asu.edu (01/27/05)
      • Re: What did Infeld mean? AllYou! (01/27/05)
      • The invention of physical concepts is NOT about labeling sensations reany_at_asu.edu (01/28/05)
      • Observations are not a determination of reality, and do not include explanations. AllYou! (01/28/05)
  • Re: What did Infeld mean? Bill Hobba (01/27/05)
  • Re: What did Infeld mean? Bilge (01/27/05)
    • Re: What did Infeld mean? AllYou! (01/27/05)
      • Re: What did Infeld mean? Bilge (01/27/05)
      • Re: What did Infeld mean? AllYou! (01/27/05)
  • Re: What did Infeld mean? reany_at_asu.edu (01/27/05)
  • Re: What did Infeld mean? PD (01/27/05)
    • Re: What did Infeld mean? reany_at_asu.edu (01/27/05)
      • Re: What did Infeld mean? AllYou! (01/27/05)
      • Re: What did Infeld mean? Dirk Van de moortel (01/27/05)
      • Re: What did Infeld mean? AllYou! (01/27/05)
    • Re: What did Infeld mean? AllYou! (01/27/05)
    • Re: What did Infeld mean? Daniel Weston (01/27/05)
      • Re: What did Infeld mean? AllYou! (01/27/05)
      • What did Patrick mean? reany_at_asu.edu (01/28/05)
      • Re: What did Patrick mean? robert j. kolker (01/28/05)
      • Re: What did Patrick mean? Daniel Weston (01/28/05)
      • The hopeless confusion between observation and reality AllYou! (01/28/05)
      • Re: The hopeless confusion between observation and reality reany_at_asu.edu (01/28/05)
      • Re: The hopeless confusion between observation and reality AllYou! (01/28/05)
      • If you want to know Infeld's view, go have a seance reany_at_asu.edu (01/28/05)
      • Terrible confusion when asked to interpret what others have said. AllYou! (01/28/05)
      • Re: Terrible confusion when asked to interpret what others have said. Daniel Weston (01/28/05)
      • An observation is the statement made from a 'rationalized' sensation reany_at_asu.edu (01/28/05)
      • An observation is hope. AllYou! (01/28/05)
      • What the hell does 'intersubjective' mean? reany_at_asu.edu (01/29/05)
      • Re: An observation is the statement made from a 'rationalized' sensation Bilge (01/29/05)
      • An observation is the statement made from a 'rationalized' sensation reany_at_asu.edu (01/28/05)
      • Re: Terrible confusion when asked to interpret what others have said. Bilge (01/29/05)
      • Re: Terrible confusion when asked to interpret what others have said. reany_at_asu.edu (01/28/05)
      • Re: Terrible confusion when asked to interpret what others have said. AllYou! (01/28/05)
      • Re: Terrible confusion when asked to interpret what others have said. reany_at_asu.edu (01/29/05)
• The TOTAL Disproof of Relativity and current QM JLeeCforRP (01/26/05)
  • Re: The TOTAL Disproof of Relativity and current QM jowr.pi_at_gmail.com (01/27/05)
• Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/26/05)
  • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox robert j. kolker (01/26/05)
  • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Uncle Al (01/26/05)
    • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Will Janoschka (01/26/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Uncle Al (01/26/05)
    • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/26/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox CWatters (01/26/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/26/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Sam Wormley (01/26/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox robert j. kolker (01/27/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/27/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox CWatters (01/27/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox RP (01/26/05)
  • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox CWatters (01/26/05)
    • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/26/05)
  • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Sam Wormley (01/26/05)
  • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Jesse Mazer (01/26/05)
  • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Jim Black (01/26/05)
  • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Bilge (01/26/05)
    • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/27/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox robert j. kolker (01/27/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Bilge (01/28/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/28/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Bilge (01/28/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/29/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Bilge (01/29/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/29/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Bilge (01/30/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/30/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Bilge (01/30/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/30/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Bilge (01/30/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/30/05)
  • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Tom Roberts (01/28/05)
    • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Creighton Hogg (01/28/05)
    • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/28/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Jesse Mazer (01/28/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/30/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Bilge (01/28/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Tom Roberts (01/29/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/29/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox robert j. kolker (01/29/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/30/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Bilge (01/30/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/30/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Bilge (01/30/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Jesse Mazer (01/30/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/30/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Jesse Mazer (01/30/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/30/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Jesse Mazer (01/31/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox glbrad01 (01/31/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox Tom Roberts (01/30/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox John Schoenfeld (01/31/05)
      • Re: Superluminal information transfer paradox robert j. kolker (01/30/05)
• einstein's cows Jim Light (01/26/05)
• SR's EM Covariants invariantly unproven? eleaticus (01/26/05)
  • Re: SR's EM Covariants invariantly unproven? jowr.pi_at_gmail.com (01/26/05)
    • Re: SR's EM Covariants invariantly unproven? eleaticus (01/26/05)
      • Re: SR's EM Covariants invariantly unproven? jowr.pi_at_gmail.com (01/26/05)
    • Re: SR's EM Covariants invariantly unproven? Dirk Van de moortel (01/26/05)
      • Re: SR's EM Covariants invariantly unproven? eleaticus (01/26/05)
      • Re: SR's EM Covariants invariantly unproven? Dirk Van de moortel (01/26/05)
  • Re: SR's EM Covariants invariantly unproven? Bilge (01/26/05)
    • Re: SR's EM Covariants invariantly unproven? eleaticus (01/27/05)
      • Re: SR's EM Covariants invariantly unproven? Bilge (01/27/05)
      • Re: SR's EM Covariants invariantly unproven? eleaticus (01/27/05)
      • Re: SR's EM Covariants invariantly unproven? Bilge (01/28/05)
    • Re: SR's EM Covariants invariantly unproven? eleaticus (01/27/05)
      • Re: SR's EM Covariants invariantly unproven? Bilge (01/27/05)
      • Coordinate-free measures of coordinate dependent covariants? eleaticus (01/29/05)
      • Re: Coordinate-free measures of coordinate dependent covariants? Bilge (01/29/05)
      • SR's Bx', Ey', etc, invariantly not directly measureable? eleaticus (01/29/05)
      • Re: SR's Bx', Ey', etc, invariantly not directly measureable? Bilge (01/30/05)
      • Re: SR's Bx', Ey', etc, invariantly not directly measureable? eleaticus (01/30/05)
      • Re: SR's Bx', Ey', etc, invariantly not directly measureable? Bilge (01/30/05)
      • Re: SR's Bx', Ey', etc, invariantly not directly measureable? Androcles (01/30/05)
• Help with SR time/mass notion dseppala_at_austin.rr.com (01/25/05)
  • Re: Help with SR time/mass notion Tom Roberts (01/25/05)
    • Re: Help with SR time/mass notion jem (01/25/05)
• The Fundamental Flaw of SRT kenseto (01/25/05)
  • Re: The Fundamental Flaw of SRT Dirk Van de moortel (01/25/05)
    • Re: The Fundamental Flaw of SRT Paul Cardinale (01/27/05)
      • Re: The Fundamental Flaw of SRT Dirk Van de moortel (01/27/05)
• More about the balloon point of view Leif Andersson (01/25/05)
  • Re: More about the balloon point of view Bill Hobba (01/26/05)
    • Re: More about the balloon point of view Leif Andersson (01/27/05)
      • Re: More about the balloon point of view Bill Hobba (01/27/05)
• help with math beda pietanza (01/25/05)
  • Re: help with math Dirk Van de moortel (01/25/05)
    • Re: help with math Tom Capizzi (01/25/05)
    • Re: help with math beda pietanza (01/25/05)
      • Re: help with math Dirk Van de moortel (01/26/05)
  • Re: help with math jem (01/25/05)
    • Re: help with math Jem (01/26/05)
    • Re: help with math beda pietanza (01/27/05)
      • Re: help with math jem (01/28/05)
      • Re: help with math beda pietanza (01/28/05)
      • Re: help with math alanmc95210_at_yahoo.com (01/29/05)
      • Re: help with math beda pietanza (01/30/05)
• Help: I need to understand the Lorentz force lucasjensen_at_yahoo.dk (01/25/05)
  • Re: I need to understand the Lorentz force Dirk Van de moortel (01/25/05)
  • Re: Help: I need to understand the Lorentz force Marcel_at_hotmail.com (01/27/05)
  • Re: Help: I need to understand the Lorentz force Ken S. Tucker (01/27/05)
  • Re: I need to understand the Lorentz force Lee Pugh (01/30/05)
• Help: I need to understand the Lorentz force lucasjensen_at_yahoo.dk (01/25/05)
  • Re: Help: I need to understand the Lorentz force PD (01/26/05)
    • Re: Help: I need to understand the Lorentz force Dirk Van de moortel (01/26/05)
      • Re: Help: I need to understand the Lorentz force Ken S. Tucker (01/27/05)
      • Re: Help: I need to understand the Lorentz force redbelly98_at_yahoo.com (01/28/05)
      • Re: Help: I need to understand the Lorentz force Ken S. Tucker (01/28/05)
  • Re: Help: I need to understand the Lorentz force rge11x (01/27/05)
    • Re: Help: I need to understand the Lorentz force Mark Palenik (01/30/05)
  • Re: I need to understand the Lorentz force Jeremy Watts (01/27/05)
    • Re: I need to understand the Lorentz force PD (01/27/05)
  • Re: Help: I need to understand the Lorentz force PD (01/27/05)
    • Re: Help: I need to understand the Lorentz force Magneto (01/30/05)
  • Re: Help: I need to understand the Lorentz force DRLunsford (01/27/05)
  • Re: Help: I need to understand the Lorentz force Ken S. Tucker (01/30/05)
    • Re: Help: I need to understand the Lorentz force Mark Palenik (01/30/05)
• Maximum velocity Glue (01/25/05)
  • Re: Maximum velocity Dirk Van de moortel (01/25/05)
    • Re: Maximum velocity Glue (01/25/05)
      • Re: Maximum velocity Dirk Van de moortel (01/25/05)
      • Re: Maximum velocity Glue (01/25/05)
  • Re: Maximum velocity N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/25/05)
  • Re: Maximum velocity Ken S. Tucker (01/25/05)
    • Re: Maximum velocity Steve J (01/25/05)
      • Re: Maximum velocity N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/26/05)
  • Re: Maximum velocity The Ghost In The Machine (01/25/05)
  • Re: Maximum velocity EjP (01/25/05)
    • Re: Maximum velocity Steve J (01/26/05)
  • Re: Maximum velocity Bill Hobba (01/26/05)
    • Re: Maximum velocity Glue (01/26/05)
      • Re: Maximum velocity N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/26/05)
      • Re: Maximum velocity Bill Hobba (01/26/05)
      • Re: Maximum velocity Tom Capizzi (01/26/05)
      • Re: Maximum velocity Bill Hobba (01/27/05)
• Time before the big bang Steve J (01/25/05)
  • Re: Time before the big bang Bill Hobba (01/25/05)
  • Re: Time before the big bang Androcles (01/25/05)
    • Re: Time before the big bang PD (01/25/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang Androcles (01/25/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang PDraper (01/25/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang Androcles (01/26/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang PD (01/26/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang Androcles (01/26/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang PD (01/26/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang Androcles (01/26/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang PD (01/26/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang Androcles (01/27/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang PD (01/27/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang Androcles (01/27/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang PD (01/28/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang Androcles (01/28/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang PD (01/28/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang Androcles (01/28/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang YBM (01/28/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang Tom Capizzi (01/26/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang Androcles (01/26/05)
  • Re: Time before the big bang AllYou! (01/25/05)
    • Re: Time before the big bang Dirk Van de moortel (01/25/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang AllYou! (01/25/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang Dirk Van de moortel (01/25/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang AllYou! (01/25/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang Dirk Van de moortel (01/25/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang AllYou! (01/25/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang Dirk Van de moortel (01/25/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang AllYou! (01/25/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang Dirk Van de moortel (01/25/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang AllYou! (01/25/05)
  • Re: Time before the big bang N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/25/05)
    • Re: Time before the big bang Bernardz (01/26/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/26/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang Bernardz (01/27/05)
      • Re: Time before the big bang N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/27/05)
  • Re: Time before the big bang tj Frazir (01/30/05)
• E = wLF As a Riccati Differential Equation and Types 1, 2 Motion OsherD (01/25/05)
  • Re: E = wLF As a Riccati Differential Equation and Types 1, 2 Motion Peter Kinane (01/25/05)
• johnreed time takelet randamajor_at_yahoo.com (01/24/05)
  • Re: johnreed time takelet Androcles (01/24/05)
• A Derivation of Special Relativity without Invoking Group Theory Eugene Shubert (01/24/05)
  • Re: A Derivation of Special Relativity without Invoking Group Theory Tom Roberts (01/24/05)
    • Re: A Derivation of Special Relativity without Invoking Group Theory Old Man (01/25/05)
      • Re: A Derivation of Special Relativity without Invoking Group Theory Gregory L. Hansen (01/25/05)
      • Re: A Derivation of Special Relativity without Invoking Group Theory Bill Hobba (01/25/05)
      • Re: A Derivation of Special Relativity without Invoking Group Theory Tom Roberts (01/25/05)
    • Re: A Derivation of Special Relativity without Invoking Group Theory Gerald L. O'Barr (01/25/05)
  • Re: A Derivation of Special Relativity without Invoking Group Theory Uncle Al (01/24/05)
  • Re: A Derivation of Special Relativity without Invoking Group Theory whopkins_at_csd.uwm.edu (01/24/05)
    • Re: A Derivation of Special Relativity without Invoking Group Theory Eugene Shubert (01/25/05)
      • Re: A Derivation of Special Relativity without Invoking Group Theory Tom Roberts (01/25/05)
      • Re: A Derivation of Special Relativity without Invoking Group Theory Eugene Shubert (01/26/05)
    • Re: A Derivation of Special Relativity without Invoking Group Theory Eugene Shubert (01/25/05)
      • Re: A Derivation of Special Relativity without Invoking Group Theory Jesse Mazer (01/25/05)
      • Re: A Derivation of Special Relativity without Invoking Group Theory David Evens (01/25/05)
  • Re: A Derivation of Special Relativity without Invoking Group Theory Bilge (01/25/05)
• The balloon point of view Leif Andersson (01/24/05)
  • Re: The balloon point of view stephen_at_nomail.com (01/24/05)
    • Re: The balloon point of view mtm (01/25/05)
  • Re: The balloon point of view Bill Hobba (01/25/05)
  • Re: The balloon point of view Joe Fischer (01/25/05)
  • Re: The balloon point of view Tom Roberts (01/25/05)
    • Re: The balloon point of view shevek (01/26/05)
      • Re: The balloon point of view Bill Hobba (01/27/05)
      • Re: The balloon point of view shevek (01/27/05)
      • Re: The balloon point of view Bill Hobba (01/28/05)
      • If the FAQ could stipulate the meanings of these terms reany_at_asu.edu (01/28/05)
      • Re: If the FAQ could stipulate the meanings of these terms Tom Capizzi (01/28/05)
      • Re: If the FAQ could stipulate the meanings of these terms reany_at_asu.edu (01/28/05)
      • Re: If the FAQ could stipulate the meanings of these terms AllYou! (01/28/05)
      • Re: If the FAQ could stipulate the meanings of these terms reany_at_asu.edu (01/28/05)
      • Re: If the FAQ could stipulate the meanings of these terms AllYou! (01/28/05)
      • Re: If the FAQ could stipulate the meanings of these terms reany_at_asu.edu (01/29/05)
      • Re: If the FAQ could stipulate the meanings of these terms Tom Capizzi (01/29/05)
      • Re: If the FAQ could stipulate the meanings of these terms reany_at_asu.edu (01/29/05)
      • Re: If the FAQ could stipulate the meanings of these terms Tom Capizzi (01/29/05)
      • Re: If the FAQ could stipulate the meanings of these terms reany_at_asu.edu (01/29/05)
      • Re: If the FAQ could stipulate the meanings of these terms Bill Hobba (01/29/05)
      • Re: The balloon point of view Tom Roberts (01/27/05)
      • Re: The balloon point of view shevek (01/27/05)
      • Re: The balloon point of view Tom Capizzi (01/28/05)
• What is Negative Energy ??? blitz_commander_at_yahoo.com.sg (01/24/05)
  • Re: What is Negative Energy ??? Bill Hobba (01/24/05)
    • Re: What is Negative Energy ??? valls_at_icmf.inf.cu (01/24/05)
      • Re: What is Negative Energy ??? Bill Hobba (01/25/05)
      • Re: What is Negative Energy ??? valls_at_icmf.inf.cu (01/25/05)
      • Re: What is Negative Energy ??? Bill Hobba (01/26/05)
      • Re: What is Negative Energy ??? Ken S. Tucker (01/26/05)
      • Re: What is Negative Energy ??? valls_at_icmf.inf.cu (01/28/05)
      • Re: What is Negative Energy ??? Bill Hobba (01/28/05)
      • Re: What is Negative Energy ??? zzbunker_at_netscape.net (01/27/05)
  • Re: What is Negative Energy ??? Androcles (01/24/05)
  • Re: What is Negative Energy ??? PD (01/24/05)
    • Re: What is Negative Energy ??? Tom Roberts (01/24/05)
      • Re: What is Negative Energy ??? PD (01/24/05)
      • Re: What is Negative Energy ??? Ken S. Tucker (01/24/05)
      • Re: What is Negative Energy ??? Bernardz (01/25/05)
      • Re: What is Negative Energy ??? Ken S. Tucker (01/25/05)
      • Re: What is Negative Energy ??? Bernardz (01/26/05)
      • Re: What is Negative Energy ??? Ken S. Tucker (01/26/05)
      • Re: What is Negative Energy ??? Bernardz (01/27/05)
      • Re: What is Negative Energy ??? Ken S. Tucker (01/27/05)
      • Re: What is Negative Energy ??? valls_at_icmf.inf.cu (01/28/05)
• Curved 4D space and GR skeptics Scandere (01/24/05)
  • Re: Curved 4D space and GR skeptics Harry (01/24/05)
  • Re: Curved 4D space and GR skeptics Ken S. Tucker (01/24/05)
    • Re: Curved 4D space and GR skeptics Harry (01/24/05)
• recommend some newbie learning material on ... blitz_commander_at_yahoo.com.sg (01/24/05)
  • Re: recommend some newbie learning material on ... N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/24/05)
  • Re: recommend some newbie learning material on ... Bilge (01/24/05)
  • Re: recommend some newbie learning material on ... PD (01/24/05)
    • Re: recommend some newbie learning material on ... Bill Hobba (01/25/05)
• General Relativity Without Singularities: the Tardis Effect Hunter (01/24/05)
• General Relativity Without Singularities Hunter Monroe (01/24/05)
• Andersen's Second Rule and more eleaticus (01/24/05)
  • Re: Andersen's Second Rule and more YBM (01/24/05)
  • Re: Andersen's Second Rule and more xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/24/05)
• local one ways speed of light beda pietanza (01/24/05)
  • Re: local one ways speed of light N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/24/05)
    • Re: local one ways speed of light xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/24/05)
      • Re: local one ways speed of light beda pietanza (01/24/05)
      • Re: local one ways speed of light xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/26/05)
      • Re: local one ways speed of light Dirk Van de moortel (01/26/05)
      • Re: local one ways speed of light xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/28/05)
      • Re: local one ways speed of light Dirk Van de moortel (01/28/05)
      • Re: local one ways speed of light xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/28/05)
    • Re: local one ways speed of light beda pietanza (01/24/05)
      • Re: local one ways speed of light N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/25/05)
      • Re: local one ways speed of light beda pietanza (01/25/05)
      • Re: local one ways speed of light N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/26/05)
      • Re: local one ways speed of light beda pietanza (01/27/05)
      • Re: local one ways speed of light N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/28/05)
      • Re: local one ways speed of light beda pietanza (01/28/05)
      • Re: local one ways speed of light beda pietanza (01/28/05)
• An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Tom Roberts (01/23/05)
  • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment harry (01/23/05)
  • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Bill Hobba (01/23/05)
    • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Henri Wilson (01/24/05)
      • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Henri Wilson (01/25/05)
  • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Koobee Wublee (01/24/05)
  • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Tom Roberts (01/24/05)
    • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment harry (01/24/05)
      • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Tom Roberts (01/24/05)
    • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment greywolf42 (01/25/05)
  • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment JM Albuquerque (01/24/05)
    • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Tom Roberts (01/25/05)
      • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment JM Albuquerque (01/25/05)
      • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Harry (01/26/05)
      • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Tom Roberts (01/29/05)
  • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment greywolf42 (01/24/05)
    • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Tom Roberts (01/25/05)
      • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Dirk Van de moortel (01/26/05)
  • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment mountain man (01/27/05)
    • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Tom Roberts (01/27/05)
      • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Harry (01/27/05)
      • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Tom Roberts (01/27/05)
      • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Harry (01/27/05)
      • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment mountain man (01/28/05)
      • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Jesse Mazer (01/28/05)
      • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Franz Heymann (01/29/05)
    • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Franz Heymann (01/27/05)
      • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment mountain man (01/27/05)
      • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/27/05)
      • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Franz Heymann (01/27/05)
      • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment mountain man (01/28/05)
      • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Franz Heymann (01/28/05)
      • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Tom Roberts (01/27/05)
      • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Franz Heymann (01/28/05)
    • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Bjoern Feuerbacher (01/27/05)
      • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment mountain man (01/27/05)
    • Re: An Analysis of the Resolution of the Michelson-Morley Experiment Mark Fergerson (01/28/05)
• IRT: A New Theory of Relativity kenseto (01/23/05)
  • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity robert j. kolker (01/23/05)
    • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity kenseto (01/23/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity robert j. kolker (01/23/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity kenseto (01/23/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity Sam Wormley (01/23/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity kenseto (01/23/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/23/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity kenseto (01/24/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/24/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity Bjoern Feuerbacher (01/25/05)
  • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity Bernardz (01/23/05)
    • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity Paul Stowe (01/23/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity Bernardz (01/24/05)
    • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity kenseto (01/24/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity Bernardz (01/26/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity kenseto (01/27/05)
  • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity Uncle Al (01/23/05)
    • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity kenseto (01/24/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/24/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity kenseto (01/24/05)
  • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity Jesse Mazer (01/24/05)
    • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity kenseto (01/24/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity Dirk Van de moortel (01/24/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity Sam Wormley (01/24/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity kenseto (01/24/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity Dirk Van de moortel (01/24/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity Jesse Mazer (01/24/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity kenseto (01/24/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity Jesse Mazer (01/24/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity kenseto (01/25/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity Jesse Mazer (01/26/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity kenseto (01/27/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity Jesse Mazer (01/29/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity kenseto (01/29/05)
      • Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity Jesse Mazer (01/29/05)
• CNN,Sky News and Einstein 2005 World Year of Physics K_Loupspeed (01/23/05)
• The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian SDR (01/23/05)
  • Re: The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/23/05)
• The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian SDR (01/22/05)
  • Re: The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/22/05)
  • Re: The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian Bill Hobba (01/23/05)
• So you say there are no stupid questions? DavidBowman (01/22/05)
  • Re: So you say there are no stupid questions? Paul Stowe (01/22/05)
    • Re: So you say there are no stupid questions? DavidBowman (01/23/05)
      • Re: So you say there are no stupid questions? Tom Capizzi (01/23/05)
      • Re: So you say there are no stupid questions? Bernardz (01/23/05)
      • Re: So you say there are no stupid questions? Paul Stowe (01/23/05)
      • Re: So you say there are no stupid questions? robert j. kolker (01/23/05)
      • Re: So you say there are no stupid questions? Bernardz (01/24/05)
    • Re: So you say there are no stupid questions? Androcles (01/24/05)
      • Re: So you say there are no stupid questions? DavidBowman (01/24/05)
  • Re: So you say there are no stupid questions? Tom Roberts (01/25/05)
• Re: Dark Matter: Galactic Core frame drag? oookhc_at_hotmail.com (01/22/05)
• The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian SDR (01/22/05)
• The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian SDR (01/22/05)
  • Re: The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/22/05)
• Mass in E=mc^2 Mike (01/22/05)
  • Re: Mass in E=mc^2 Dirk Van de moortel (01/22/05)
    • Re: Mass in E=mc^2 AllYou! (01/25/05)
      • Re: Mass in E=mc^2 Dirk Van de moortel (01/25/05)
      • Re: Mass in E=mc^2 AllYou! (01/25/05)
  • Re: Mass in E=mc^2 Koobee Wublee (01/23/05)
    • Re: Mass in E=mc^2 Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (01/23/05)
      • Re: Mass in E=mc^2 bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/23/05)
      • Re: Mass in E=mc^2 Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (01/23/05)
      • Re: Mass in E=mc^2 bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/23/05)
      • Re: Mass in E=mc^2 Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (01/24/05)
      • Re: Mass in E=mc^2 bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/24/05)
    • Re: Mass in E=mc^2 Dirk Van de moortel (01/23/05)
  • Re: Mass in E=mc^2 Pmb (01/23/05)
    • Re: Mass in E=mc^2 Dirk Van de moortel (01/23/05)
      • Re: Mass in E=mc^2 xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/24/05)
      • Re: Mass in E=mc^2 Dirk Van de moortel (01/24/05)
      • Re: Mass in E=mc^2 xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/26/05)
    • Re: Mass in E=mc^2 Pmb (01/23/05)
      • Re: Mass in E=mc^2 Dirk Van de moortel (01/23/05)
      • Re: Mass in E=mc^2 xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/26/05)
      • Re: Mass in E=mc^2 RP (01/26/05)
      • Re: Mass in E=mc^2 Dirk Van de moortel (01/26/05)
      • Re: Mass in E=mc^2 valls_at_icmf.inf.cu (01/26/05)
• Re: The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/22/05)
  • Re: The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian Bill Hobba (01/22/05)
    • Re: The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian Ken S. Tucker (01/22/05)
  • Re: The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/22/05)
    • Re: The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian DavidBowman (01/22/05)
• English translation of BOTH the original Relativity papers?? Bryan Shelton (01/22/05)
  • Re: English translation of BOTH the original Relativity papers?? Helen Dukas' Ghost (01/22/05)
    • Re: English translation of BOTH the original Relativity papers?? harry (01/22/05)
• What are Quasars made of? Paul Hollister (01/22/05)
  • Re: What are Quasars made of? Bill Hobba (01/22/05)
    • Re: What are Quasars made of? Bill Hobba (01/22/05)
      • Re: What are Quasars made of? Paul Hollister (01/22/05)
      • Re: What are Quasars made of? Road Kill (01/22/05)
      • Re: What are Quasars made of? George Dishman (01/22/05)
      • Re: What are Quasars made of? Bill Hobba (01/22/05)
      • Re: What are Quasars made of? DavidBowman (01/22/05)
      • Re: What are Quasars made of? jgreen_at_seol.net.au (01/23/05)
      • Re: What are Quasars made of? Rudolf Drabek (01/23/05)
      • Re: What are Quasars made of? Ken S. Tucker (01/23/05)
  • Re: What are Quasars made of? Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (01/22/05)
  • Re: What are Quasars made of? DavidBowman (01/22/05)
  • Re: What are Quasars made of? DavidBowman (01/22/05)
  • Re: What are Quasars made of? oookhc_at_hotmail.com (01/22/05)
• is it is r is it ain't true ... eleaticus (01/21/05)
  • Re: is it is r is it ain't true ... EjP (01/21/05)
  • Re: is it is r is it ain't true ... Bilge (01/21/05)
    • Re: is it is r is it ain't true ... eleaticus (01/23/05)
• Re: help DavidBowman (01/21/05)
• GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/20/05)
  • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM Jim Hawkins (01/21/05)
    • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/21/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM DavidBowman (01/21/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM Eugene Shubert (01/21/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/21/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/21/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/21/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM TMG (01/21/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/21/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM TMG (01/22/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/22/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM Grae (01/21/05)
  • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM reply to Chuckles (01/21/05)
    • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM TMG (01/21/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/21/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM TMG (01/22/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/22/05)
    • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM EjP (01/21/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/21/05)
  • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/21/05)
  • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/22/05)
    • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM Tom Capizzi (01/22/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/23/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM Tom Capizzi (01/23/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/24/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM Tom Capizzi (01/24/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/24/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/24/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/24/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM Chuckles (01/25/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM TMG (01/25/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/25/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/25/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM Tom Capizzi (01/25/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/25/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM pete (01/25/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/26/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM Dubh Ghall (01/24/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/25/05)
  • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/24/05)
    • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM Chuckles (01/25/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/25/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM Enoch (01/27/05)
    • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM TMG (01/25/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/25/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM xifer (01/25/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/26/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM Marc Goodman (01/26/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/26/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM Marc Goodman (01/26/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/26/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM ZenIsWhen (01/26/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/26/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM Chuckles (01/26/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM ZenIsWhen (01/27/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/30/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/26/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/26/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM Kevin S. Wilson (01/26/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/26/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM Chuckles (01/26/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM Glenn Knickerbocker (01/27/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM madge (01/26/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/27/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM Matthew L. Martin (01/26/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM TMG (01/27/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/27/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/27/05)
  • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/27/05)
  • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM ZenIsWhen (01/27/05)
  • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/28/05)
    • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/28/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM Tom Capizzi (01/28/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/28/05)
  • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/28/05)
    • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM Mark South (01/28/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/28/05)
    • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM TMG (01/29/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/29/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM TMG (01/29/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/30/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM TMG (01/30/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/30/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/30/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM ZenIsWhen (01/30/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/30/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM ZenIsWhen (01/30/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM George Hammond (01/30/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM ZenIsWhen (01/30/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM Rob Duncan (01/31/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROVES CATHOLICISM ZenIsWhen (01/31/05)
• to androcles 2 beda pietanza (01/20/05)
  • Re: to androcles 2 Androcles (01/21/05)
    • Re: to androcles 2 xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/21/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 Androcles (01/21/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 The Ghost In The Machine (01/21/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 Androcles (01/21/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 The Ghost In The Machine (01/22/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 Androcles (01/22/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 The Ghost In The Machine (01/22/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 The Ghost In The Machine (01/22/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 Androcles (01/22/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 The Ghost In The Machine (01/23/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 Androcles (01/23/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 The Ghost In The Machine (01/23/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 Androcles (01/23/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 Dirk Van de moortel (01/23/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/21/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 Androcles (01/21/05)
    • Re: to androcles 2 Van (01/21/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 Androcles (01/21/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/23/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 The Ghost In The Machine (01/23/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/23/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 The Ghost In The Machine (01/23/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 Androcles (01/23/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 Henri Wilson (01/23/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 Tom Capizzi (01/24/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 Henri Wilson (01/25/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 Tom Capizzi (01/25/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 Henri Wilson (01/25/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 Tom Capizzi (01/25/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 beda pietanza (01/25/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 Paul B. Andersen (01/25/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 Henri Wilson (01/26/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 Paul B. Andersen (01/28/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 Henri Wilson (01/28/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 Paul B. Andersen (01/30/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 Henri Wilson (01/31/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 beda pietanza (01/24/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 Henri Wilson (01/25/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 beda pietanza (01/25/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 Henri Wilson (01/25/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 beda pietanza (01/27/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 Henri Wilson (01/27/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 beda pietanza (01/27/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 Tom Capizzi (01/28/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 Androcles (01/28/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 Henri Wilson (01/28/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 Tom Capizzi (01/28/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 Henri Wilson (01/28/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 Tom Capizzi (01/28/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 Henri Wilson (01/29/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 Tom Capizzi (01/29/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 Henri Wilson (01/30/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 Tom Capizzi (01/30/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 Henri Wilson (01/31/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 Eric Gisse (01/31/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 beda pietanza (01/29/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 Henri Wilson (01/30/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 Tom Capizzi (01/30/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 Androcles (01/23/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 Van (01/23/05)
      • Re: to androcles 2 Androcles (01/23/05)
• Re: the unknown universe zetasum (01/20/05)
• Re: 'Why' questions in physics, with special ref. to light speed Chris O'Riordan (01/20/05)
  • Re: 'Why' questions in physics, with special ref. to light speed Bill Hobba (01/20/05)
    • Re: 'Why' questions in physics, with special ref. to light speed robert j. kolker (01/20/05)
  • Re: 'Why' questions in physics, with special ref. to light speed Tom Roberts (01/21/05)
    • Re: 'Why' questions in physics, with special ref. to light speed Ken S. Tucker (01/21/05)
• Re: The 'absoluteness' of the speed of light? Chris O'Riordan (01/20/05)
  • Re: The 'absoluteness' of the speed of light? Chris O'Riordan (01/20/05)
  • Re: The 'absoluteness' of the speed of light? Chris O'Riordan (01/20/05)
    • Re: The 'absoluteness' of the speed of light? zetasum (01/20/05)
• Nuclear Blast Scheduled for July 4th 2005 The Flavored Coffee Guy (01/20/05)
• Structure of the Lepto-Quark Jack Sarfatti (01/19/05)
  • Re: Structure of the Lepto-Quark John Enockson (01/20/05)
  • Re: Structure of the Lepto-Quark John Enockson (01/20/05)
• An evolving notion of time AllYou! (01/19/05)
  • Re: An evolving notion of time Daniel Weston (01/19/05)
    • Re: An evolving notion of time AllYou! (01/19/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time reany_at_asu.edu (01/19/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time AllYou! (01/20/05)
      • Time exists only in a theory in theory land. reany_at_asu.edu (01/20/05)
      • Re: Time exists only in a theory in theory land. robert j. kolker (01/20/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time AllYou! (01/20/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time reany_at_asu.edu (01/20/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time AllYou! (01/20/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time AllYou! (01/20/05)
      • Every physical concept is a fantasy reany_at_asu.edu (01/20/05)
      • Re: Every physical concept is a fantasy AllYou! (01/20/05)
      • The term 'physical' can probably be dispensed with in physics reany_at_asu.edu (01/20/05)
      • Re: The term 'physical' can probably be dispensed with in physics AllYou! (01/20/05)
      • Re: The term 'physical' can probably be dispensed with in physics reany_at_asu.edu (01/20/05)
      • Re: The term 'physical' can probably be dispensed with in physics AllYou! (01/20/05)
      • Re: The term 'physical' can probably be dispensed with in physics reany_at_asu.edu (01/21/05)
      • Re: The term 'physical' can probably be dispensed with in physics AllYou! (01/21/05)
      • Re: The term 'physical' can probably be dispensed with in physics reany_at_asu.edu (01/21/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time AllYou! (01/21/05)
      • Our brains can invent sensations reany_at_asu.edu (01/21/05)
      • Re: Our brains can invent sensations AllYou! (01/21/05)
      • Re: Our brains can invent sensations Daniel Weston (01/21/05)
      • Re: Our brains can invent sensations AllYou! (01/21/05)
      • Re: Our brains can invent sensations reany_at_asu.edu (01/22/05)
      • Re: Our brains can invent sensations Daniel Weston (01/22/05)
      • Re: Our brains can invent sensations reany_at_asu.edu (01/22/05)
      • Re: Our brains can invent sensations robert j. kolker (01/22/05)
      • Re: Our brains can invent sensations The Ghost In The Machine (01/22/05)
      • Re: Our brains can invent sensations AllYou! (01/24/05)
      • Re: Our brains can invent sensations reany_at_asu.edu (01/24/05)
      • Re: Our brains can invent sensations AllYou! (01/24/05)
      • Re: Our brains can invent sensations reany_at_asu.edu (01/24/05)
      • Re: Our brains can invent sensations AllYou! (01/24/05)
      • Re: Our brains can invent sensations AllYou! (01/24/05)
      • Re: Our brains can invent sensations reany_at_asu.edu (01/24/05)
      • Re: Our brains can invent sensations AllYou! (01/24/05)
      • Re: Our brains can invent sensations reany_at_asu.edu (01/24/05)
      • Re: Our brains can invent sensations AllYou! (01/24/05)
      • Re: Our brains can invent sensations reany_at_asu.edu (01/24/05)
      • Re: Our brains can invent sensations AllYou! (01/24/05)
      • Re: Our brains can invent sensations reany_at_asu.edu (01/24/05)
      • Re: Our brains can invent sensations AllYou! (01/24/05)
      • Re: Our brains can invent sensations reany_at_asu.edu (01/24/05)
      • Re: Our brains can invent sensations AllYou! (01/24/05)
      • Re: Our brains can invent sensations AllYou! (01/24/05)
      • Re: Every physical concept is a fantasy reany_at_asu.edu (01/22/05)
      • Re: Every physical concept is a fantasy AllYou! (01/24/05)
      • Re: Every physical concept is a fantasy reany_at_asu.edu (01/24/05)
      • Re: Every physical concept is a fantasy AllYou! (01/24/05)
      • Re: Every physical concept is a fantasy reany_at_asu.edu (01/24/05)
      • Re: Every physical concept is a fantasy AllYou! (01/24/05)
      • Re: Every physical concept is a fantasy reany_at_asu.edu (01/24/05)
      • An evolving notion of time AllYou! (01/24/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time Daniel Weston (01/24/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time AllYou! (01/24/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time Daniel Weston (01/25/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time AllYou! (01/25/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time jem (01/20/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time AllYou! (01/20/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time jem (01/20/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time jem (01/20/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time AllYou! (01/20/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time AllYou! (01/20/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time jem (01/20/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time AllYou! (01/20/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time jem (01/20/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time AllYou! (01/20/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time jem (01/20/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time AllYou! (01/20/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time jem (01/20/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time AllYou! (01/20/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time jem (01/21/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time AllYou! (01/21/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time jem (01/22/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time AllYou! (01/24/05)
  • Re: An evolving notion of time John C. Polasek (01/19/05)
    • Re: An evolving notion of time AllYou! (01/19/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time reany_at_asu.edu (01/19/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time AllYou! (01/20/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time reany_at_asu.edu (01/20/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time AllYou! (01/20/05)
      • It requires a theory to distinguish illusion from nonillusion reany_at_asu.edu (01/20/05)
      • Re: It requires a theory to distinguish illusion from nonillusion AllYou! (01/20/05)
      • Re: It requires a theory to distinguish illusion from nonillusion reany_at_asu.edu (01/20/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time AllYou! (01/20/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time reany_at_asu.edu (01/20/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time AllYou! (01/20/05)
      • The scientific method is a method of producing scientific knowledge reany_at_asu.edu (01/21/05)
      • Re: The scientific method is a method of producing scientific knowledge AllYou! (01/21/05)
      • Re: The scientific method is a method of producing scientific knowledge reany_at_asu.edu (01/21/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time AllYou! (01/21/05)
      • What is meant by scientific knowledge? reany_at_asu.edu (01/21/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time AllYou! (01/21/05)
      • It requires a theory to tell us whether a phenomena is an illusion or not reany_at_asu.edu (01/22/05)
      • Re: It requires a theory to tell us whether a phenomena is an illusion or not robert j. kolker (01/22/05)
      • People are free to hold to any statement or theory come what may reany_at_asu.edu (01/22/05)
      • Re: People are free to hold to any statement or theory come what may Daniel Weston (01/22/05)
      • Re: People are free to hold to any statement or theory come what may reany_at_asu.edu (01/22/05)
      • Re: People are free to hold to any statement or theory come what may Daniel Weston (01/23/05)
      • Re: People are free to hold to any statement or theory come what may reany_at_asu.edu (01/23/05)
      • Re: People are free to hold to any statement or theory come what may Daniel Weston (01/24/05)
      • Re: People are free to hold to any statement or theory come whatmay AllYou! (01/24/05)
      • Re: People are free to hold to any statement or theory come what may reany_at_asu.edu (01/24/05)
      • Re: People are free to hold to any statement or theory come whatmay AllYou! (01/24/05)
      • Re: It requires a theory to tell us whether a phenomena is an illusion or not AllYou! (01/24/05)
      • The real numbers and time exist as concepts in theoryland reany_at_asu.edu (01/24/05)
      • Re: The real numbers and time exist as concepts in theoryland AllYou! (01/24/05)
      • The idea that something is 'measureable' is a human invention reany_at_asu.edu (01/24/05)
      • The devil is in the details. AllYou! (01/24/05)
      • Re: The devil is in the details. reany_at_asu.edu (01/25/05)
      • Re: The devil is in the details. AllYou! (01/25/05)
      • 'physical concept' is not an oxymoron reany_at_asu.edu (01/25/05)
      • Re: 'physical concept' is not an oxymoron AllYou! (01/25/05)
      • Re: The real numbers and time exist as concepts in theoryland jem (01/25/05)
      • Re: The real numbers and time exist as concepts in theoryland AllYou! (01/25/05)
      • Re: The real numbers and time exist as concepts in theoryland jem (01/25/05)
      • Re: The real numbers and time exist as concepts in theoryland AllYou! (01/26/05)
      • Re: The real numbers and time exist as concepts in theoryland Jem (01/26/05)
      • Re: The real numbers and time exist as concepts in theoryland Dirk Van de moortel (01/26/05)
      • Re: The real numbers and time exist as concepts in theoryland Jem (01/26/05)
      • Re: The real numbers and time exist as concepts in theoryland Dirk Van de moortel (01/26/05)
      • Re: The real numbers and time exist as concepts in theoryland AllYou! (01/26/05)
      • My theory can beat up your theory reany_at_asu.edu (01/26/05)
      • Re: My theory can beat up your theory robert j. kolker (01/26/05)
      • Re: My theory can beat up your theory reany_at_asu.edu (01/26/05)
      • Re: My theory can beat up your theory Dirk Van de moortel (01/26/05)
      • Re: My theory can beat up your theory jem (01/27/05)
      • Re: My theory can beat up your theory Dirk Van de moortel (01/27/05)
      • Re: My theory can beat up your theory jem (01/27/05)
      • Re: My theory can beat up your theory Dirk Van de moortel (01/27/05)
      • Re: My theory can beat up your theory jem (01/28/05)
      • Re: My theory can beat up your theory Daniel Weston (01/26/05)
      • Re: My theory can beat up your theory reany_at_asu.edu (01/27/05)
      • Re: My theory can beat up your theory Daniel Weston (01/27/05)
      • Re: The real numbers and time exist as concepts in theoryland AllYou! (01/26/05)
      • Re: The real numbers and time exist as concepts in theoryland AllYou! (01/26/05)
      • Re: The real numbers and time exist as concepts in theoryland AllYou! (01/26/05)
      • All concepts live only in the mind reany_at_asu.edu (01/26/05)
      • Re: All concepts live only in the mind AllYou! (01/26/05)
      • Re: All concepts live only in the mind robert j. kolker (01/26/05)
      • Re: All concepts live only in the mind AllYou! (01/26/05)
      • Re: All concepts live only in the mind reany_at_asu.edu (01/27/05)
      • Re: All concepts live only in the mind Daniel Weston (01/27/05)
      • Re: All concepts live only in the mind robert j. kolker (01/27/05)
      • Re: All concepts live only in the mind reany_at_asu.edu (01/27/05)
      • Re: All concepts live only in the mind AllYou! (01/27/05)
      • Re: The real numbers and time exist as concepts in theoryland jem (01/27/05)
      • Re: The real numbers and time exist as concepts in theoryland AllYou! (01/27/05)
      • Re: The real numbers and time exist as concepts in theoryland jem (01/27/05)
      • Re: The real numbers and time exist as concepts in theoryland AllYou! (01/27/05)
      • Physics can be defined as a search .... reany_at_asu.edu (01/27/05)
      • Re: Physics can be defined as a search .... AllYou! (01/27/05)
      • Re: Physics can be defined as a search .... jem (01/28/05)
      • Re: Physics can be defined as a search .... reany_at_asu.edu (01/28/05)
      • Re: Two peas in a pod. AllYou! (01/28/05)
      • Re: Physics can be defined as a search .... Daniel Weston (01/29/05)
      • Re: Physics can be defined as a search .... reany_at_asu.edu (01/29/05)
      • Re: Physics can be defined as a search .... Daniel Weston (01/29/05)
      • Re: The real numbers and time exist as concepts in theoryland reany_at_asu.edu (01/26/05)
      • Re: The real numbers and time exist as concepts in theoryland AllYou! (01/26/05)
      • Is time sensible? reany_at_asu.edu (01/26/05)
      • Re: Is time sensible? AllYou! (01/26/05)
      • Re: Is time sensible? reany_at_asu.edu (01/26/05)
      • Re: Is time sensible? AllYou! (01/26/05)
      • Re: Is time sensible? reany_at_asu.edu (01/26/05)
      • Re: The death throws of a failed position. AllYou! (01/26/05)
      • Re: The real numbers and time exist as concepts in theoryland reany_at_asu.edu (01/26/05)
      • Re: The real numbers and time exist as concepts in theoryland AllYou! (01/26/05)
      • Re: The real numbers and time exist as concepts in theoryland reany_at_asu.edu (01/27/05)
      • Re: The real numbers and time exist as concepts in theoryland AllYou! (01/27/05)
      • Memorization is the beginning of wisdom reany_at_asu.edu (01/27/05)
      • Re: Memorization is the beginning of wisdom AllYou! (01/27/05)
      • Re: Memorization is the beginning of wisdom reany_at_asu.edu (01/27/05)
      • Re: Memorization is the beginning of wisdom AllYou! (01/27/05)
      • Re: Memorization is the beginning of wisdom reany_at_asu.edu (01/27/05)
      • Re: Memorization is the beginning of wisdom AllYou! (01/27/05)
      • Re: The real numbers and time exist as concepts in theoryland jem (01/27/05)
      • Re: The real numbers and time exist as concepts in theoryland AllYou! (01/27/05)
      • Re: The real numbers and time exist as concepts in theoryland jem (01/27/05)
      • Re: The real numbers and time exist as concepts in theoryland AllYou! (01/27/05)
      • Re: The scientific method is a method of producing scientific knowledge robert j. kolker (01/21/05)
      • Re: The scientific method is a method of producing scientific knowledge reany_at_asu.edu (01/21/05)
      • Re: The scientific method is a method of producing scientific knowledge robert j. kolker (01/21/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time AllYou! (01/21/05)
      • Re: The scientific method is a method of producing scientific knowledge reany_at_asu.edu (01/21/05)
      • Re: The scientific method is a method of producing scientific knowledge AllYou! (01/21/05)
      • Re: The scientific method is a method of producing scientific knowledge robert j. kolker (01/21/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time AllYou! (01/21/05)
      • Re: It requires a theory to distinguish illusion from nonillusion robert j. kolker (01/20/05)
      • Re: It requires a theory to distinguish illusion from nonillusion reany_at_asu.edu (01/20/05)
      • Re: It requires a theory to distinguish illusion from HYPNOSIS? Daniel Weston (01/20/05)
      • Re: It requires a theory to distinguish illusion from HYPNOSIS? reany_at_asu.edu (01/22/05)
  • The operational definition is what separates physics from metaphysics reany_at_asu.edu (01/19/05)
    • Re: An evolving notion of time AllYou! (01/19/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time reany_at_asu.edu (01/19/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/20/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time reany_at_asu.edu (01/20/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time AllYou! (01/20/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time AllYou! (01/20/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time reany_at_asu.edu (01/20/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time AllYou! (01/20/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time jem (01/20/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time AllYou! (01/20/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time jem (01/20/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time AllYou! (01/20/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time jem (01/20/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time AllYou! (01/20/05)
  • Re: An evolving notion of time Bill Hobba (01/20/05)
    • Re: An evolving notion of time AllYou! (01/20/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time Bill Hobba (01/20/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time AllYou! (01/20/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time Bill Hobba (01/20/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time AllYou! (01/20/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time Bill Hobba (01/20/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time AllYou! (01/21/05)
  • Re: An evolving notion of time xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/20/05)
    • Re: An evolving notion of time AllYou! (01/20/05)
    • The notion of time is as real as the universe reany_at_asu.edu (01/20/05)
      • Re: The notion of time is as real as the universe robert j. kolker (01/20/05)
      • why do they call my a solipsist reany_at_asu.edu (01/20/05)
      • Re: why do they call my a solipsist robert j. kolker (01/20/05)
      • Re: The notion of time is as real as the universe xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/21/05)
      • Re: The notion of time is as real as the universe xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/21/05)
      • Re: The notion of time is as real as the universe N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/21/05)
  • Re: An evolving notion of time John C. Polasek (01/21/05)
    • Re: An evolving notion of time AllYou! (01/21/05)
    • Re: An evolving notion of time reany_at_asu.edu (01/21/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time John C. Polasek (01/21/05)
      • Re: An evolving notion of time reany_at_asu.edu (01/21/05)
  • Re: An evolving notion of time Sue... (01/25/05)
    • Re: An evolving notion of time AllYou! (01/25/05)
• Fountain of Eternal Youth guskz_at_hotmail.com (01/19/05)
  • Re: Fountain of Eternal Youth Paul Cardinale (01/21/05)
  • Re: Fountain of Eternal Youth Paul Cardinale (01/21/05)
• Re: DO YOU NEED MONEY? READ THIS DOCUMENT Androcles (01/19/05)
• Maximum speed of light wespe_at_operamail.com (01/19/05)
  • Re: Maximum speed of light PD (01/19/05)
    • Re: Maximum speed of light N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/19/05)
      • Re: Maximum speed of light PD (01/19/05)
    • Re: Maximum speed of light Creighton Hogg (01/19/05)
      • Re: Maximum speed of light PD (01/19/05)
      • Re: Maximum speed of light Androcles (01/19/05)
      • Re: Maximum speed of light xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/20/05)
      • Re: Maximum speed of light N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/20/05)
    • Re: Maximum speed of light Androcles (01/19/05)
    • Re: Maximum speed of light Bilge (01/22/05)
    • Re: Maximum speed of light Bilge (01/22/05)
      • Re: Maximum speed of light Ken S. Tucker (01/23/05)
  • Re: Maximum speed of light FrediFizzx (01/20/05)
  • Re: Maximum speed of light Chris O'Riordan (01/20/05)
    • Re: Maximum speed of light wespe_at_operamail.com (01/20/05)
      • Re: Maximum speed of light PD (01/20/05)
      • Re: Maximum speed of light Bill Hobba (01/20/05)
      • Re: Maximum speed of light Ken S. Tucker (01/21/05)
      • Re: Maximum speed of light Bill Hobba (01/21/05)
      • Re: Maximum speed of light FrediFizzx (01/21/05)
      • Re: Maximum speed of light Bill Hobba (01/21/05)
      • Re: Maximum speed of light FrediFizzx (01/22/05)
      • Re: Maximum speed of light Bill Hobba (01/22/05)
      • Re: Maximum speed of light Paul Stowe (01/22/05)
      • Re: Maximum speed of light Bill Hobba (01/23/05)
      • Re: Maximum speed of light shuba (01/23/05)
      • Re: Maximum speed of light FrediFizzx (01/23/05)
      • Re: Maximum speed of light N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/23/05)
      • Re: Maximum speed of light FrediFizzx (01/23/05)
      • Re: Maximum speed of light N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/23/05)
      • Re: Maximum speed of light FrediFizzx (01/24/05)
      • Re: Maximum speed of light N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/25/05)
      • Re: Maximum speed of light fredifizzx_at_hotmail.com (01/25/05)
      • Re: Maximum speed of light N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/25/05)
      • Re: Maximum speed of light FrediFizzx (01/26/05)
      • Re: Maximum speed of light N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/26/05)
      • Re: Maximum speed of light PD (01/21/05)
      • Re: Maximum speed of light Bill Hobba (01/21/05)
      • Re: Maximum speed of light PD (01/22/05)
      • Re: Maximum speed of light Ken S. Tucker (01/22/05)
      • Re: Maximum speed of light Bill Hobba (01/22/05)
      • Re: Maximum speed of light Ken S. Tucker (01/23/05)
  • Re: Maximum speed of light kenseto (01/23/05)
• Dual Space theory offers replacement for relativity's gravity Andrew P. (01/19/05)
  • Re: Dual Space theory offers replacement for relativity's gravity Uncle Al (01/19/05)
    • Re: Dual Space theory offers replacement for relativity's gravity Androcles (01/19/05)
      • Re: Dual Space theory offers replacement for relativity's gravity Helmut Wabnig (01/19/05)
      • Re: Dual Space theory offers replacement for relativity's gravity John C. Polasek (01/19/05)
      • Re: Dual Space theory offers replacement for relativity's gravity Uncle Al (01/19/05)
  • Re: Dual Space theory offers replacement for relativity's gravity Chris O'Riordan (01/20/05)
  • Re: Dual Space theory offers replacement for relativity's gravity Richard Herring (01/21/05)
    • Re: Dual Space theory offers replacement for relativity's gravity John C. Polasek (01/21/05)
      • Re: Dual Space theory offers replacement for relativity's gravity Richard Herring (01/24/05)
      • Re: Dual Space theory offers replacement for relativity's gravity John C. Polasek (01/24/05)
      • Re: Dual Space theory offers replacement for relativity's gravity Richard Herring (01/24/05)
      • Re: Dual Space theory offers replacement for relativity's gravity John C. Polasek (01/24/05)
      • Re: Dual Space theory offers replacement for relativity's gravity Richard Herring (01/25/05)
      • Re: Dual Space theory offers replacement for relativity's gravity John C. Polasek (01/25/05)
      • Re: Dual Space theory offers replacement for relativity's gravity Richard Herring (01/25/05)
      • Re: Dual Space theory offers replacement for relativity's gravity John C. Polasek (01/25/05)
      • Re: Dual Space theory offers replacement for relativity's gravity Richard Herring (01/26/05)
  • Re: Dual Space theory offers replacement for relativity's gravity John C. Polasek (01/26/05)
• What's going on here - The Angel Light Greysky (01/19/05)
  • Re: What's going on here - The Angel Light DavidBowman (01/19/05)
    • Re: What's going on here - The Angel Light Cory Ramsey (01/19/05)
  • Re: What's going on here - The Angel Light Sam Wormley (01/19/05)
  • Re: What's going on here - The Angel Light Uncle Al (01/19/05)
    • Re: What's going on here - The Angel Light The Ghost In The Machine (01/20/05)
  • Re: What's going on here - The Angel Light Randy Poe (01/19/05)
  • Re: What's going on here - The Angel Light tadchem (01/20/05)
  • Re: What's going on here - The Angel Light EjP (01/21/05)
    • Re: What's going on here - The Angel Light Double-A (01/21/05)
      • Re: What's going on here - The Angel Light EjP (01/21/05)
  • Re: What's going on here - The Angel Light Richard Herring (01/24/05)
    • Re: What's going on here - The Angel Light Andy Resnick (01/25/05)
• Local Gauge Invariance and General Covariance in GR Jack Sarfatti (01/19/05)
• to androcles beda pietanza (01/18/05)
  • Re: to androcles Androcles (01/19/05)
    • Re: to androcles RP (01/19/05)
      • Re: to androcles RP (01/19/05)
      • Re: to androcles Androcles (01/21/05)
      • Re: to androcles beda (01/19/05)
      • Re: to androcles RP (01/19/05)
      • Re: to androcles beda (01/19/05)
      • Re: to androcles Androcles (01/19/05)
      • Re: to androcles RP (01/19/05)
      • Re: to androcles Androcles (01/19/05)
      • Re: to androcles Androcles (01/19/05)
      • Re: to androcles RP (01/19/05)
      • Re: to androcles Androcles (01/19/05)
      • Re: to androcles RP (01/20/05)
      • Re: to androcles Androcles (01/20/05)
      • Re: to androcles Dirk Van de moortel (01/20/05)
  • Re: to androcles Androcles (01/21/05)
• Re: Dual Space offers gravity theory tor replace relativity jcamjr (01/18/05)
• Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" greywolf42 (01/18/05)
  • Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" Greg Hennessy (01/18/05)
    • Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" greywolf42 (01/25/05)
      • Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" Greg Hennessy (01/26/05)
      • Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" Bjoern Feuerbacher (01/26/05)
      • Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" Joseph Lazio (01/26/05)
  • Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" Tom Roberts (01/19/05)
    • Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" Harry (01/19/05)
    • Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" greywolf42 (01/19/05)
      • Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" Randy Poe (01/19/05)
      • Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" greywolf42 (01/25/05)
      • Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" Randy Poe (01/26/05)
      • Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" Tom Roberts (01/26/05)
      • Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" Harry (01/27/05)
      • Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" Bilge (01/30/05)
      • Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" Gregory L. Hansen (01/30/05)
      • Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" Timo Nieminen (01/30/05)
      • Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" Greg Hennessy (01/19/05)
      • Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" greywolf42 (01/25/05)
      • Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" Greg Hennessy (01/26/05)
      • Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" Dirk Van de moortel (01/26/05)
      • Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" Bill Rowe (01/20/05)
      • Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" greywolf42 (01/25/05)
      • Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" Bill Rowe (01/28/05)
      • Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" Tom Roberts (01/28/05)
      • Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" greywolf42 (01/28/05)
      • Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" Bill Rowe (01/29/05)
      • Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" Androcles (01/29/05)
      • Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" Greg Hennessy (01/29/05)
      • Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" Androcles (01/29/05)
      • Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/29/05)
      • Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" Tom Capizzi (01/29/05)
      • Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" Greg Hennessy (01/29/05)
      • Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" Tom Roberts (01/29/05)
      • Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" Bill Rowe (01/29/05)
      • Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" Androcles (01/29/05)
      • Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" jacob navia (01/30/05)
      • Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" greywolf42 (01/28/05)
      • Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" Bill Rowe (01/29/05)
      • Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" jacob navia (01/30/05)
      • Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" jacob navia (01/30/05)
      • Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" George Dishman (01/30/05)
      • Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" jacob navia (01/30/05)
    • Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" JP (01/19/05)
      • Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging" Tom Roberts (01/20/05)
• Each Vatiation in Amplitude Modulation steals a Neighboring Frequency guskz_at_hotmail.com (01/18/05)
  • Re: Each Vatiation in Amplitude Modulation steals a Neighboring Frequency guskz_at_hotmail.com (01/18/05)
  • Re: Each Vatiation in Amplitude Modulation steals a Neighboring Frequency Bill Hobba (01/18/05)
    • Re: Each Vatiation in Amplitude Modulation steals a Neighboring Frequency guskz_at_hotmail.com (01/20/05)
      • Re: Each Vatiation in Amplitude Modulation steals a Neighboring Frequency guskz_at_hotmail.com (01/20/05)
    • Re: Each Vatiation in Amplitude Modulation steals a Neighboring Frequency Ken S. Tucker (01/20/05)
      • Re: Each Vatiation in Amplitude Modulation steals a Neighboring Frequency guskz_at_hotmail.com (01/20/05)
      • Re: Each Vatiation in Amplitude Modulation steals a Neighboring Frequency Ken S. Tucker (01/20/05)
      • Re: Each Vatiation in Amplitude Modulation steals a Neighboring Frequency guskz_at_hotmail.com (01/21/05)
• Re: outlet for discharging self-proclaimed noble-rpize winning ideas nightbat (01/18/05)
  • Re: outlet for discharging self-proclaimed noble-rpize winning ideas Double-A (01/18/05)
    • Re: outlet for discharging self-proclaimed noble-rpize winning ideas bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/19/05)
  • Re: outlet for discharging self-proclaimed noble-rpize winning ideas bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/19/05)
    • Re: outlet for discharging self-proclaimed noble-rpize winning ideas nightbat (01/20/05)
      • Re: outlet for discharging self-proclaimed noble-rpize winning ideas bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/20/05)
      • Re: outlet for discharging self-proclaimed noble-rpize winning ideas Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (01/20/05)
      • Re: outlet for discharging self-proclaimed noble-rpize winning ideas bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/20/05)
      • Re: outlet for discharging self-proclaimed noble-rpize winning ideas Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (01/20/05)
      • Re: outlet for discharging self-proclaimed noble-rpize winning ideas bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/20/05)
      • Re: outlet for discharging self-proclaimed noble-rpize winning ideas Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (01/20/05)
      • Re: outlet for discharging self-proclaimed noble-rpize winning ideas bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/20/05)
      • Re: outlet for discharging self-proclaimed noble-rpize winning ideas Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (01/20/05)
      • Re: outlet for discharging self-proclaimed noble-rpize winning ideas nightbat (01/20/05)
      • Re: outlet for discharging self-proclaimed noble-rpize winning ideas bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/20/05)
      • Re: outlet for discharging self-proclaimed noble-rpize winning ideas nightbat (01/20/05)
      • Re: outlet for discharging self-proclaimed noble-rpize winning ideas bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/20/05)
      • Re: outlet for discharging self-proclaimed noble-rpize winning ideas nightbat (01/20/05)
      • Re: outlet for discharging self-proclaimed noble-rpize winning ideas bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/21/05)
• Darwin Award for David Thomson?! Schroedinger's Cat (01/18/05)
  • Attention all: Proposal for PCQM Re: Darwin Award for David Thomson?! bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/18/05)
  • Re: Darwin Award for David Thomson?! Androcles (01/18/05)
  • Re: Darwin Award for David Thomson?! John Sefton (01/19/05)
  • Re: Darwin Award for David Thomson?! Ian Stirling (01/19/05)
  • Re: Darwin Award for David Thomson?! Ian Stirling (01/20/05)
• Comparison of E = wLF (quantum, etc.) and Einstein Field Equation OsherD (01/18/05)
• Rebuttal to Lesages Shadows (General) greywolf42 (01/18/05)
  • Rebuttal to Lesages Shadows (Part I) greywolf42 (01/18/05)
    • Re: Rebuttal to Lesages Shadows (Part I) Dirk Van de moortel (01/18/05)
      • Re: Rebuttal to Lesages Shadows (Part I) greywolf42 (01/25/05)
      • Re: Rebuttal to Lesages Shadows (Part I) Dirk Van de moortel (01/26/05)
      • Re: Rebuttal to Lesages Shadows (Part I) greywolf42 (01/27/05)
  • Rebuttal to Lesages Shadows (Part II) greywolf42 (01/18/05)
  • Rebuttal to Lesages Shadows (Part III-A) greywolf42 (01/18/05)
    • Re: Rebuttal to Lesages Shadows (Part III-A) greywolf42 (01/18/05)
  • Rebuttal to Lesages Shadows (Part III-B) greywolf42 (01/18/05)
  • Rebuttal to Lesages Shadows (Part III-C) greywolf42 (01/18/05)
  • Rebuttal to Lesages Shadows (Part IV) greywolf42 (01/18/05)
  • Rebuttal to Lesages Shadows (Part V) greywolf42 (01/18/05)
  • Rebuttal to Lesages Shadows (changes to Jan 12, 2005) greywolf42 (01/18/05)
    • Re: Rebuttal to Lesages Shadows (changes to Jan 12, 2005) Shadows (01/20/05)
      • Re: Rebuttal to Lesages Shadows (changes to Jan 12, 2005) Paul Stowe (01/21/05)
      • Re: Rebuttal to Lesages Shadows (changes to Jan 12, 2005) greywolf42 (01/21/05)
      • Re: Rebuttal to Lesages Shadows (changes to Jan 12, 2005) Bilge (01/21/05)
      • Re: Rebuttal to Lesages Shadows (changes to Jan 12, 2005) greywolf42 (01/21/05)
      • Re: Rebuttal to Lesages Shadows (changes to Jan 12, 2005) Shadows (01/21/05)
      • Re: Rebuttal to Lesages Shadows (changes to Jan 12, 2005) greywolf42 (01/21/05)
      • Re: Rebuttal to Lesages Shadows (changes to Jan 12, 2005) Paul Stowe (01/21/05)
      • Re: Rebuttal to Lesages Shadows (changes to Jan 12, 2005) Bilge (01/22/05)
      • Re: Rebuttal to Lesages Shadows (changes to Jan 12, 2005) Paul Stowe (01/22/05)
      • Re: Rebuttal to Lesages Shadows (changes to Jan 12, 2005) Bilge (01/22/05)
      • Re: Rebuttal to Lesages Shadows (changes to Jan 12, 2005) Paul Stowe (01/22/05)
      • Re: Rebuttal to Lesages Shadows (changes to Jan 12, 2005) Bilge (01/24/05)
  • Re: Rebuttal to Lesages Shadows (New mods on 1/20) greywolf42 (01/23/05)
    • Re: Rebuttal to Lesages Shadows (New mods on 1/20) Timo Nieminen (01/23/05)
      • Re: Rebuttal to Lesages Shadows (New mods on 1/20) greywolf42 (01/24/05)
      • Re: Rebuttal to Lesages Shadows (New mods on 1/20) Timo Nieminen (01/24/05)
      • Re: Rebuttal to Lesages Shadows (New mods on 1/20) greywolf42 (01/25/05)
      • Re: Rebuttal to Lesages Shadows (New mods on 1/20) Timo Nieminen (01/25/05)
      • Re: Rebuttal to Lesages Shadows (New mods on 1/20) greywolf42 (01/25/05)
      • Re: Rebuttal to Lesages Shadows (New mods on 1/20) Timo Nieminen (01/25/05)
      • Re: Rebuttal to Lesages Shadows (New mods on 1/20) greywolf42 (01/29/05)
      • Re: Rebuttal to Lesages Shadows (New mods on 1/20) Timo Nieminen (01/29/05)
      • Re: Rebuttal to Lesages Shadows (New mods on 1/20) Franz Heymann (01/29/05)
      • Re: Rebuttal to Lesages Shadows (New mods on 1/20) FrediFizzx (01/25/05)
      • Re: Rebuttal to Lesages Shadows (New mods on 1/20) greywolf42 (01/28/05)
• MMX, Doppler, ether and a question beda pietanza (01/17/05)
  • Re: MMX, Doppler, ether and a question xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/18/05)
    • xxein on einstein's logic Harry (01/18/05)
      • Re: xxein on einstein's logic xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/18/05)
      • Re: xxein on einstein's logic Harry (01/19/05)
      • Re: xxein on einstein's logic xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/20/05)
      • Re: xxein on einstein's logic beda pietanza (01/20/05)
      • Re: xxein on einstein's logic beda pietanza (01/20/05)
      • Re: xxein on einstein's logic xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/21/05)
• Dark Energy World Hologram Jack Sarfatti (01/17/05)
  • Re: Dark Energy World Hologram josephus (01/29/05)
    • Re: Dark Energy World Hologram Peter Harding (01/29/05)
• Extension of Relativity Russell E. Rierson (01/17/05)
  • Re: Extension of Relativity Bill Hobba (01/17/05)
  • Re: Extension of Relativity Bilge (01/18/05)
    • Re: Extension of Relativity Creighton Hogg (01/18/05)
      • Re: Extension of Relativity Bilge (01/20/05)
      • Re: Extension of Relativity Creighton Hogg (01/20/05)
• Re: Is There a Force of Gravity? Bilge (01/17/05)
• Re: The god=U_v guy laid bare in museum for all to gawk at! Eugene Shubert (01/17/05)
  • Re: The god=U_v guy laid bare in museum for all to gawk at! EjP (01/18/05)
• Einstein (1905) Absurdities Eleaticus (01/17/05)
  • Re: Einstein (1905) Absurdities Uncle Al (01/17/05)
    • Re: Einstein (1905) Absurdities Eugene Shubert (01/17/05)
• (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Eleaticus (01/17/05)
  • Re: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Uncle Al (01/17/05)
• Unknown Functions & Einstein's Incompetence Eleaticus (01/17/05)
  • Re: Unknown Functions & Einstein's Incompetence Uncle Al (01/17/05)
• Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Eleaticus (01/17/05)
  • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Uncle Al (01/17/05)
    • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Androcles (01/17/05)
      • Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Dirk Van de moortel (01/18/05)
• Large Electron Positron Collider DavidBowman (01/17/05)
  • Re: Large Electron Positron Collider Creighton Hogg (01/17/05)
    • Re: Large Electron Positron Collider PD (01/17/05)
      • Re: Large Electron Positron Collider David Evens (01/20/05)
  • Re: Large Electron Positron Collider EjP (01/18/05)
    • Re: Large Electron Positron Collider DavidBowman (01/19/05)
      • Re: Large Electron Positron Collider PD (01/19/05)
      • Re: Large Electron Positron Collider Creighton Hogg (01/19/05)
      • Re: Large Electron Positron Collider EjP (01/19/05)
      • Re: Large Electron Positron Collider DavidBowman (01/19/05)
      • Re: Large Electron Positron Collider PD (01/19/05)
      • Re: Large Electron Positron Collider EjP (01/19/05)
• Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe? Paul Hollister (01/17/05)
  • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/17/05)
    • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe? FrediFizzx (01/17/05)
      • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/17/05)
      • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe? ah (01/18/05)
      • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/18/05)
    • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe? Dean Elliot (01/17/05)
      • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/18/05)
      • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe? Dean Elliot (01/18/05)
      • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/18/05)
  • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe? jcamjr (01/17/05)
    • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe? Laura (01/17/05)
      • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe? jcamjr (01/17/05)
      • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe? Laura (01/17/05)
      • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe? Bill Hobba (01/17/05)
      • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe? Laura (01/17/05)
      • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe? jcamjr (01/17/05)
      • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe? Bill Hobba (01/17/05)
      • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe? Laura (01/17/05)
      • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe? ah (01/18/05)
      • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe? Paul Hollister (01/18/05)
      • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe? Bill Hobba (01/18/05)
      • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe? Max Keon (01/18/05)
      • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe? Bill Hobba (01/18/05)
      • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe? Max Keon (01/19/05)
      • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe? Bill Hobba (01/21/05)
      • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe? Ken S. Tucker (01/21/05)
      • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe? Max Keon (01/22/05)
      • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe? George (01/19/05)
      • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe? Laura (01/19/05)
      • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe? Paul Hollister (01/20/05)
      • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe? vonroach (01/21/05)
      • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe? vonroach (01/20/05)
      • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe? jcamjr (01/24/05)
      • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe? son of sound (01/24/05)
      • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe? Max Keon (01/25/05)
    • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe? DavidBowman (01/17/05)
      • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe? jcamjr (01/17/05)
      • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe? Laura (01/18/05)
      • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe? Bill Hobba (01/18/05)
  • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe? xray4abc (01/17/05)
    • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe? Laura (01/17/05)
  • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe? Bilge (01/17/05)
  • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe? Bill Hobba (01/17/05)
  • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe? Luigi Caselli (01/17/05)
  • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe? Mike (01/17/05)
  • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe? Prai Jei (01/17/05)
  • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe? John C. Polasek (01/18/05)
  • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe? raymond (01/18/05)
• Generalized Lorentz Transformation for an Accelerated Frame of Reference Eugene Shubert (01/17/05)
  • Re: Generalized Lorentz Transformation for an Accelerated Frame of Reference xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/17/05)
  • Re: Generalized Lorentz Transformation for an Accelerated Frame of Reference Eugene Shubert (01/17/05)
• An Explanation of Special Relativity HK (01/16/05)
  • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity harry (01/17/05)
    • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity HK (01/18/05)
      • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity Harry (01/19/05)
  • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity RP (01/18/05)
    • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity HK (01/18/05)
      • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity RP (01/18/05)
    • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity Tom Roberts (01/18/05)
      • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity RP (01/18/05)
      • LET (was: Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity) Tom Roberts (01/19/05)
      • Re: LET (was: Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity) Harry (01/19/05)
      • Re: LET RP (01/20/05)
      • Re: LET Harry (01/20/05)
      • Re: LET RP (01/20/05)
      • Re: Lorentz vs. Einstein Harry (01/20/05)
      • Re: Lorentz vs. Einstein RP (01/20/05)
      • Re: Lorentz vs. Einstein Harry (01/20/05)
      • Re: Lorentz vs. Einstein RP (01/21/05)
      • Re: Lorentz vs. Einstein RP (01/21/05)
      • Re: Lorentz vs. Einstein beda pietanza (01/20/05)
      • Re: Lorentz vs. Einstein RP (01/20/05)
      • Re: Lorentz vs. Einstein beda pietanza (01/21/05)
      • Re: Lorentz vs. Einstein RP (01/21/05)
      • Re: Lorentz vs. Einstein beda pietanza (01/21/05)
      • Re: Lorentz vs. Einstein RP (01/21/05)
      • Re: Lorentz vs. Einstein beda pietanza (01/22/05)
      • Re: Lorentz vs. Einstein Androcles (01/23/05)
      • Re: Lorentz vs. Einstein The Ghost In The Machine (01/23/05)
      • Re: Lorentz vs. Einstein RP (01/23/05)
      • Re: Lorentz vs. Einstein RP (01/23/05)
      • Re: Lorentz vs. Einstein beda pietanza (01/24/05)
      • Re: Lorentz vs. Einstein RP (01/25/05)
      • Re: Lorentz vs. Einstein beda pietanza (01/27/05)
      • Re: Lorentz vs. Einstein beda pietanza (01/24/05)
      • Re: Lorentz vs. Einstein Androcles (01/23/05)
      • Re: Lorentz vs. Einstein The Ghost In The Machine (01/24/05)
      • Re: Lorentz vs. Einstein Androcles (01/24/05)
      • Re: Lorentz vs. Einstein The Ghost In The Machine (01/24/05)
      • Re: Lorentz vs. Einstein Androcles (01/24/05)
      • Re: Lorentz vs. Einstein Tom Roberts (01/20/05)
      • Re: LET HK (01/20/05)
      • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity Harry (01/21/05)
      • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity HK (01/21/05)
      • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity harry (01/23/05)
      • Re: LET Androcles (01/20/05)
      • Re: LET robert j. kolker (01/20/05)
      • Re: LET Paul Stowe (01/20/05)
      • Re: LET The Ghost In The Machine (01/21/05)
      • Re: LET HK (01/20/05)
      • Re: LET Tom Roberts (01/21/05)
      • Re: LET Tom Roberts (01/21/05)
      • Re: LET Ken S. Tucker (01/21/05)
      • Re: LET N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/21/05)
      • Re: LET Ken S. Tucker (01/21/05)
      • Re: LET N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/22/05)
      • Re: LET Tom Roberts (01/22/05)
      • Re: LET Ken S. Tucker (01/22/05)
      • My disagreement with Weinberg's approach (was: Re: LET) Tom Roberts (01/22/05)
      • Re: My disagreement with Weinberg's approach (was: Re: LET) Ken S. Tucker (01/23/05)
      • Re: My disagreement with Weinberg's approach Tom Roberts (01/29/05)
      • Re: My disagreement with Weinberg's approach Ken S. Tucker (01/29/05)
      • Re: My disagreement with Weinberg's approach Tom Roberts (01/30/05)
      • Re: My disagreement with Weinberg's approach Ken S. Tucker (01/30/05)
      • Re: My disagreement with Weinberg's approach N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/30/05)
      • Re: My disagreement with Weinberg's approach John Kennaugh (01/30/05)
      • Re: My disagreement with Weinberg's approach Paul Stowe (01/30/05)
      • Re: My disagreement with Weinberg's approach Tom Capizzi (01/30/05)
      • Re: My disagreement with Weinberg's approach Paul Stowe (01/30/05)
      • Re: My disagreement with Weinberg's approach Androcles (01/31/05)
      • Re: My disagreement with Weinberg's approach Androcles (01/31/05)
      • Re: My disagreement with Weinberg's approach Ken S. Tucker (01/31/05)
      • Re: LET RP (01/21/05)
      • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity Harry (01/19/05)
      • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity Bilge (01/24/05)
      • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity Harry (01/24/05)
      • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity RP (01/24/05)
      • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity Harry (01/24/05)
      • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity reany_at_asu.edu (01/29/05)
      • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity harry (01/29/05)
      • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity reany_at_asu.edu (01/30/05)
      • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity harry (01/30/05)
      • What is the difference between the unknowable and the non-existent reany_at_asu.edu (01/30/05)
      • Re: What is the difference between the unknowable and the non-existent harry (01/30/05)
      • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity Androcles (01/30/05)
      • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity Bilge (01/30/05)
      • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity Bilge (01/24/05)
      • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity Harry (01/25/05)
      • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity RP (01/25/05)
      • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity Harry (01/25/05)
      • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity RP (01/25/05)
      • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity RP (01/26/05)
      • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity harry (01/27/05)
      • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity RP (01/27/05)
      • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity Harry (01/27/05)
      • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity harry (01/26/05)
      • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity RP (01/26/05)
      • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity harry (01/26/05)
      • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity Bilge (01/25/05)
      • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity Harry (01/26/05)
      • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity Bilge (01/26/05)
      • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity Ken S. Tucker (01/26/05)
      • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity Harry (01/27/05)
      • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity John Kennaugh (01/29/05)
      • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity Tom Roberts (01/29/05)
      • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity John Kennaugh (01/29/05)
      • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity Androcles (01/29/05)
      • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity greywolf42 (01/25/05)
      • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity David Evens (01/27/05)
  • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity reany_at_asu.edu (01/19/05)
    • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity AllYou! (01/19/05)
    • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity HK (01/19/05)
      • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity reany_at_asu.edu (01/20/05)
• The Error in Relativistic Physics H. E. Retic (01/16/05)
• Coherence Force and Other Matters Peter Kinane (01/16/05)
  • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Franz Heymann (01/16/05)
    • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Dirk Van de moortel (01/16/05)
  • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Old Man (01/16/05)
    • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Peter Kinane (01/17/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Peter Kinane (01/17/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Peter Kinane (01/18/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Peter Kinane (01/18/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Jim Black (01/18/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Peter Kinane (01/19/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Bill Hobba (01/17/05)
    • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Franz Heymann (01/17/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Old Man (01/18/05)
    • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Koobee Wublee (01/18/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (01/18/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Koobee Wublee (01/18/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (01/18/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Ken S. Tucker (01/18/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Koobee Wublee (01/18/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (01/18/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Uncle Al (01/19/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (01/19/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Ken S. Tucker (01/20/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Old Man (01/20/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Ken S. Tucker (01/20/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Old Man (01/19/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (01/19/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Franz Heymann (01/19/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Koobee Wublee (01/19/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Old Man (01/20/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Ken S. Tucker (01/20/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Franz Heymann (01/20/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Ken S. Tucker (01/20/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Franz Heymann (01/26/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Franz Heymann (01/24/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Bill Hobba (01/19/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Old Man (01/19/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Franz Heymann (01/24/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Franz Heymann (01/18/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Koobee Wublee (01/18/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Bill Hobba (01/18/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Koobee Wublee (01/19/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Bill Hobba (01/19/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Koobee Wublee (01/19/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Ken S. Tucker (01/19/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Koobee Wublee (01/19/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Ken S. Tucker (01/19/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Koobee Wublee (01/20/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Ken S. Tucker (01/20/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Franz Heymann (01/20/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Old Man (01/20/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Ken S. Tucker (01/20/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Old Man (01/20/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Ken S. Tucker (01/20/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/20/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Old Man (01/21/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Ken S. Tucker (01/21/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Old Man (01/21/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Old Man (01/21/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Old Man (01/21/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Old Man (01/21/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Ken S. Tucker (01/22/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Old Man (01/23/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Bill Hobba (01/20/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Ken S. Tucker (01/20/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Koobee Wublee (01/20/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Franz Heymann (01/20/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Bill Hobba (01/20/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Ken S. Tucker (01/21/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Old Man (01/20/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Old Man (01/20/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Ken S. Tucker (01/19/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Koobee Wublee (01/19/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Ken S. Tucker (01/19/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Old Man (01/19/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Old Man (01/19/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Koobee Wublee (01/19/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Bill Hobba (01/19/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Koobee Wublee (01/19/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Bill Hobba (01/20/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Ken S. Tucker (01/20/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Franz Heymann (01/24/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Koobee Wublee (01/26/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Bill Hobba (01/26/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Koobee Wublee (01/27/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Bill Hobba (01/27/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Franz Heymann (01/19/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Koobee Wublee (01/19/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Franz Heymann (01/20/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Koobee Wublee (01/20/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/20/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Bill Hobba (01/21/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Franz Heymann (01/21/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Bill Hobba (01/20/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Franz Heymann (01/19/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Koobee Wublee (01/19/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Old Man (01/20/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Franz Heymann (01/20/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Bill Hobba (01/20/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Ken S. Tucker (01/20/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Koobee Wublee (01/21/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Dirk Van de moortel (01/21/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Koobee Wublee (01/21/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Ken S. Tucker (01/21/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Koobee Wublee (01/21/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Ken S. Tucker (01/21/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Koobee Wublee (01/22/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Bilge (01/23/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Koobee Wublee (01/23/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Bill Hobba (01/23/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Franz Heymann (01/24/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Koobee Wublee (01/25/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Franz Heymann (01/25/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Ken S. Tucker (01/23/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Koobee Wublee (01/23/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Ken S. Tucker (01/24/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Koobee Wublee (01/24/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Ken S. Tucker (01/24/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Dirk Van de moortel (01/21/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Bill Hobba (01/22/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Dirk Van de moortel (01/23/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters glbrad01 (01/24/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Roberto Guzman (01/25/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Roberto Guzman (01/25/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Bill Hobba (01/25/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Koobee Wublee (01/22/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Dirk Van de moortel (01/23/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Old Man (01/22/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Koobee Wublee (01/22/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Bill Hobba (01/23/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Koobee Wublee (01/24/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Dirk Van de moortel (01/24/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Bill Hobba (01/24/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Koobee Wublee (01/25/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Dirk Van de moortel (01/25/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Bill Hobba (01/25/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Franz Heymann (01/25/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Bill Hobba (01/26/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Franz Heymann (01/26/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Bill Hobba (01/22/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Koobee Wublee (01/22/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Bill Hobba (01/23/05)
      • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Old Man (01/20/05)
  • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Sam Wormley (01/16/05)
  • Re: Coherence Force and Other Matters Peter Kinane (01/18/05)
• Rotational end product geraldkelleher_at_hotmail.com (01/16/05)
  • Re: Rotational end product xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/16/05)
    • Re: Rotational end product geraldkelleher_at_hotmail.com (01/21/05)
• Why lepto-quarks look like points Jack Sarfatti (01/16/05)
  • Re: Why lepto-quarks look like points zzbunker_at_netscape.net (01/17/05)
• A riddle, what is the most efficient way of achieving mass change in a space ship? Simon Kristoffersson (01/16/05)
  • Re: A riddle, what is the most efficient way of achieving mass change in a space ship? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/16/05)
  • Re: A riddle, what is the most efficient way of achieving mass change in a space ship? Tom Roberts (01/17/05)
• Did it really die with Feynman? DavidBowman (01/16/05)
  • Re: Did it really die with Feynman? Ken S. Tucker (01/16/05)
  • Re: Did it really die with Feynman? David McAnally (01/16/05)
    • Re: Did it really die with Feynman? DavidBowman (01/16/05)
      • Re: Did it really die with Feynman? DavidBowman (01/16/05)
      • Re: Did it really die with Feynman? Tom Roberts (01/16/05)
  • Re: Did it really die with Feynman? Martin Hogbin (01/16/05)
    • Re: Did it really die with Feynman? DavidBowman (01/16/05)
      • Re: Did it really die with Feynman? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/16/05)
      • Re: Did it really die with Feynman? Tom Capizzi (01/16/05)
    • Re: Did it really die with Feynman? harry (01/23/05)
  • Re: Did it really die with Feynman? reany_at_asu.edu (01/16/05)
    • Re: Did it really die with Feynman? DavidBowman (01/17/05)
  • Re: Did it really die with Feynman? Bilge (01/16/05)
• Electrodynamics from the Brownian motion of a relativistic aether. LEJ Brouwer (01/16/05)
  • Re: Electrodynamics from the Brownian motion of a relativistic aether. RP (01/16/05)
    • Re: Electrodynamics from the Brownian motion of a relativistic aether. LEJ Brouwer (01/16/05)
      • Re: Electrodynamics from the Brownian motion of a relativistic aether. RP (01/16/05)
      • Re: Electrodynamics from the Brownian motion of a relativistic aether. LEJ Brouwer (01/16/05)
      • Re: Electrodynamics from the Brownian motion of a relativistic aether. shevek (01/16/05)
      • Re: Electrodynamics from the Brownian motion of a relativistic aether. harry (01/17/05)
      • Re: Electrodynamics from the Brownian motion of a relativistic aether. harry (01/17/05)
      • Re: Electrodynamics from the Brownian motion of a relativistic aether. Bilge (01/16/05)
      • Re: Electrodynamics from the Brownian motion of a relativistic aether. LEJ Brouwer (01/16/05)
      • Re: Electrodynamics from the Brownian motion of a relativistic aether. Bilge (01/17/05)
      • Re: Electrodynamics from the Brownian motion of a relativistic aether. LEJ Brouwer (01/17/05)
      • Re: Electrodynamics from the Brownian motion of a relativistic aether. Bilge (01/17/05)
    • Re: Electrodynamics from the Brownian motion of a relativistic aether. LEJ Brouwer (01/16/05)
  • Re: Electrodynamics from the Brownian motion of a relativistic aether. Bilge (01/16/05)
    • Re: Electrodynamics from the Brownian motion of a relativistic aether. shevek (01/17/05)
      • Re: Electrodynamics from the Brownian motion of a relativistic aether. Bilge (01/17/05)
  • Re: Electrodynamics from the Brownian motion of a relativistic aether. shevek (01/16/05)
    • Re: Electrodynamics from the Brownian motion of a relativistic aether. LEJ Brouwer (01/16/05)
      • Re: Electrodynamics from the Brownian motion of a relativistic aether. Ken S. Tucker (01/17/05)
      • Re: Electrodynamics from the Brownian motion of a relativistic aether. LEJ Brouwer (01/17/05)
      • Re: Electrodynamics from the Brownian motion of a relativistic aether. Ken S. Tucker (01/17/05)
      • Re: Electrodynamics from the Brownian motion of a relativistic aether. LEJ Brouwer (01/18/05)
      • Re: Electrodynamics from the Brownian motion of a relativistic aether. Ken S. Tucker (01/18/05)
      • Re: Electrodynamics from the Brownian motion of a relativistic aether. FrediFizzx (01/18/05)
      • Re: Electrodynamics from the Brownian motion of a relativistic aether. Bilge (01/19/05)
      • Re: Electrodynamics from the Brownian motion of a relativistic aether. FrediFizzx (01/20/05)
• Perceived reality: John Smith (01/15/05)
  • Re: Perceived reality: John Smith (01/16/05)
    • Re: Perceived reality: xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/16/05)
• Doppler effect and relative speeds? rotchm_at_yahoo.com (01/15/05)
  • Re: Doppler effect and relative speeds? Dirk Van de moortel (01/15/05)
    • Re: Doppler effect and relative speeds? rotchm_at_yahoo.com (01/15/05)
      • Re: Doppler effect and relative speeds? Dirk Van de moortel (01/15/05)
      • Re: Doppler effect and relative speeds? rotchm_at_yahoo.com (01/16/05)
      • Re: Doppler effect and relative speeds? rotchm_at_yahoo.com (01/16/05)
      • Re: Doppler effect and relative speeds? rotchm_at_yahoo.com (01/16/05)
      • Re: Doppler effect and relative speeds? harry (01/16/05)
      • Re: Doppler effect and relative speeds? Androcles (01/16/05)
    • Re: Doppler effect and relative speeds? RP (01/16/05)
  • Re: Doppler effect and relative speeds? Tom Capizzi (01/15/05)
  • Re: Doppler effect and relative speeds? Androcles (01/15/05)
  • Re: Doppler effect and relative speeds? harry (01/15/05)
  • Re: Doppler effect and relative speeds? beda pietanza (01/16/05)
    • Re: Doppler effect and relative speeds? Androcles (01/16/05)
      • Re: Doppler effect and relative speeds? harry (01/17/05)
      • Re: Doppler effect and relative speeds? Androcles (01/18/05)
      • Re: Doppler effect and relative speeds? The Ghost In The Machine (01/19/05)
      • Re: Doppler effect and relative speeds? Androcles (01/19/05)
      • Re: Doppler effect and relative speeds? The Ghost In The Machine (01/20/05)
      • Re: Doppler effect and relative speeds? Androcles (01/20/05)
      • Re: Doppler effect and relative speeds? JM Albuquerque (01/22/05)
      • Re: Doppler effect and relative speeds? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/22/05)
      • Re: Doppler effect and relative speeds? JM Albuquerque (01/24/05)
      • Re: Doppler effect and relative speeds? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/24/05)
      • Re: Doppler effect and relative speeds? JM Albuquerque (01/24/05)
      • Re: Doppler effect and relative speeds? Bilge (01/25/05)
      • Re: Doppler effect and relative speeds? JM Albuquerque (01/25/05)
      • Re: Doppler effect and relative speeds? Bilge (01/27/05)
      • Re: Doppler effect and relative speeds? The Ghost In The Machine (01/23/05)
    • Re: Doppler effect and relative speeds? rotchm_at_yahoo.com (01/16/05)
• Note: Relativity and FTL Travel FAQ Jason W. Hinson (01/15/05)
  • Re: Relativity and FTL Travel FAQ Raktizer Omheit (01/15/05)
    • Re: Relativity and FTL Travel FAQ DavidBowman (01/16/05)
      • Re: Relativity and FTL Travel FAQ Raktizer Omheit (01/16/05)
      • Re: Relativity and FTL Travel FAQ DavidBowman (01/17/05)
      • Re: Relativity and FTL Travel FAQ Raktizer Omheit (01/17/05)
      • Re: Relativity and FTL Travel FAQ N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/17/05)
      • Re: Relativity and FTL Travel FAQ DavidBowman (01/17/05)
      • Re: Relativity and FTL Travel FAQ Raktizer Omheit (01/18/05)
• Le Sage's Shadows (was Pioneer anomaly revisited) greywolf42 (01/15/05)
  • Re: Le Sage's Shadows (was Pioneer anomaly revisited) Dirk Van de moortel (01/15/05)
    • Re: Le Sage's Shadows (was Pioneer anomaly revisited) Paul Stowe (01/15/05)
      • Re: Le Sage's Shadows (was Pioneer anomaly revisited) Dirk Van de moortel (01/15/05)
      • Re: Le Sage's Shadows (was Pioneer anomaly revisited) Paul Stowe (01/15/05)
      • Re: Le Sage's Shadows (was Pioneer anomaly revisited) Dirk Van de moortel (01/15/05)
      • Re: Le Sage's Shadows (was Pioneer anomaly revisited) Paul Stowe (01/15/05)
      • Re: Le Sage's Shadows (was Pioneer anomaly revisited) Dirk Van de moortel (01/15/05)
      • Re: Le Sage's Shadows (was Pioneer anomaly revisited) Paul Stowe (01/15/05)
      • Re: Le Sage's Shadows (was Pioneer anomaly revisited) Bilge (01/16/05)
      • Re: Le Sage's Shadows (was Pioneer anomaly revisited) greywolf42 (01/16/05)
      • Re: Le Sage's Shadows (was Pioneer anomaly revisited) greywolf42 (01/20/05)
      • Re: Le Sage's Shadows (was Pioneer anomaly revisited) FrediFizzx (01/15/05)
      • Re: Le Sage's Shadows (was Pioneer anomaly revisited) Paul Stowe (01/15/05)
      • Re: Le Sage's Shadows (was Pioneer anomaly revisited) Dirk Van de moortel (01/15/05)
      • Re: Le Sage's Shadows (was Pioneer anomaly revisited) greywolf42 (01/15/05)
      • Re: Le Sage's Shadows (was Pioneer anomaly revisited) Dirk Van de moortel (01/15/05)
      • Re: Le Sage's Shadows (was Pioneer anomaly revisited) greywolf42 (01/15/05)
      • Re: Le Sage's Shadows (was Pioneer anomaly revisited) greywolf42 (01/15/05)
      • Re: Le Sage's Shadows (was Pioneer anomaly revisited) Dirk Van de moortel (01/15/05)
      • Re: Le Sage's Shadows (was Pioneer anomaly revisited) greywolf42 (01/16/05)
      • Re: Le Sage's Shadows (was Pioneer anomaly revisited) FrediFizzx (01/16/05)
      • Re: Le Sage's Shadows (was Pioneer anomaly revisited) greywolf42 (01/18/05)
      • Re: Le Sage's Shadows (was Pioneer anomaly revisited) Harry (01/17/05)
  • Re: Le Sage's Shadows (was Pioneer anomaly revisited) sales_at_mistral.net (01/15/05)
• structure of our solar system johnjohn (01/15/05)
  • Re: structure of our solar system N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/15/05)
• Asynchronous Anisotropy Experiment shevek (01/15/05)
  • Re: Asynchronous Anisotropy Experiment Martin Hogbin (01/15/05)
    • Re: Asynchronous Anisotropy Experiment shevek (01/19/05)
  • Re: Asynchronous Anisotropy Experiment harry (01/15/05)
    • Re: Asynchronous Anisotropy Experiment shevek (01/16/05)
      • Re: Asynchronous Anisotropy Experiment harry (01/17/05)
      • Re: Asynchronous Anisotropy Experiment shevek (01/21/05)
      • Re: Asynchronous Anisotropy Experiment shevek (01/21/05)
      • Re: Asynchronous Anisotropy Experiment harry (01/23/05)
      • Re: Asynchronous Anisotropy Experiment shevek (01/24/05)
      • Re: Asynchronous Anisotropy Experiment Harry (01/24/05)
      • Re: Asynchronous Anisotropy Experiment shevek (01/26/05)
      • Re: Asynchronous Anisotropy Experiment Harry (01/27/05)
      • Re: Asynchronous Anisotropy Experiment shevek (01/27/05)
      • Re: Asynchronous Anisotropy Experiment Harry (01/28/05)
    • Re: Asynchronous Anisotropy Experiment Martin Hogbin (01/16/05)
      • Re: Asynchronous Anisotropy Experiment Martin Hogbin (01/16/05)
      • Re: Asynchronous Anisotropy Experiment Harry (01/21/05)
  • Re: Asynchronous Anisotropy Experiment Tom Roberts (01/15/05)
    • Re: Asynchronous Anisotropy Experiment shevek (01/16/05)
      • Re: Asynchronous Anisotropy Experiment Tom Roberts (01/18/05)
      • Re: Asynchronous Anisotropy Experiment shevek (01/19/05)
      • Re: Asynchronous Anisotropy Experiment greywolf42 (01/25/05)
      • Re: Asynchronous Anisotropy Experiment shevek (01/26/05)
      • Re: Asynchronous Anisotropy Experiment greywolf42 (01/28/05)
      • Re: Asynchronous Anisotropy Experiment shevek (01/29/05)
      • Re: Asynchronous Anisotropy Experiment greywolf42 (01/29/05)
      • Re: Asynchronous Anisotropy Experiment shevek (01/29/05)
• Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Ben Bean (01/15/05)
  • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Bilge (01/15/05)
    • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Tom Roberts (01/16/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Thomas Wong (01/16/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Harry (01/17/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Thomas Wong (01/17/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Harry (01/17/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Thomas Wong (01/17/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Harry (01/17/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Thomas Wong (01/17/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Paul Stowe (01/17/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Bilge (01/18/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Harry (01/18/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Tom Roberts (01/18/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Bilge (01/19/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Harry (01/19/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Bilge (01/19/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al harry (01/19/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Bilge (01/20/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Harry (01/20/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Thomas Wong (01/18/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Paul Stowe (01/19/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Harry (01/19/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Thomas Wong (01/19/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Harry (01/19/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Thomas Wong (01/19/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Harry (01/19/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Thomas Wong (01/20/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Paul Stowe (01/20/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Paul Stowe (01/20/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Harry (01/20/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Tom Roberts (01/23/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al greywolf42 (01/24/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al greywolf42 (01/25/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al mountain man (01/26/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/26/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Tom Roberts (01/26/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al mountain man (01/27/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Thomas Wong (01/19/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Harry (01/17/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al harry (01/17/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Thomas Wong (01/17/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al harry (01/17/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al harry (01/17/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al mountain man (01/21/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al greywolf42 (01/25/05)
    • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/18/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Bilge (01/19/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Thomas Wong (01/19/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Bilge (01/19/05)
    • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Koobee Wublee (01/18/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Bilge (01/19/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Koobee Wublee (01/19/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Bilge (01/20/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Koobee Wublee (01/20/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Bilge (01/20/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Koobee Wublee (01/20/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Bilge (01/20/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Harry (01/24/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al mountain man (01/26/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Harry (01/26/05)
  • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Thomas Wong (01/16/05)
    • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al shevek (01/19/05)
    • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al greywolf42 (01/25/05)
  • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Thomas Wong (01/16/05)
    • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Harry (01/17/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Thomas Wong (01/17/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Harry (01/17/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Thomas Wong (01/17/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Thomas Wong (01/17/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al harry (01/17/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Thomas Wong (01/17/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Harry (01/18/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Thomas Wong (01/18/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Harry (01/18/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Thomas Wong (01/18/05)
      • Re: Cahill's recent paper readdressing MMX et al Harry (01/18/05)
• Good undergraduate physics departments alphageek_at_milmac.com (01/14/05)
  • Re: Good undergraduate physics departments AllYou! (01/14/05)
• Human time perception Richard (01/14/05)
  • Re: Human time perception Dirk Van de moortel (01/14/05)
  • Re: Human time perception Androcles (01/14/05)
  • Re: Human time perception AllYou! (01/14/05)
    • Re: Human time perception PD (01/14/05)
      • Re: Human time perception AllYou! (01/14/05)
      • Re: Human time perception PD (01/14/05)
      • Re: Human time perception AllYou! (01/14/05)
      • Re: Human time perception PD (01/14/05)
      • Re: Human time perception AllYou! (01/14/05)
      • Re: Human time perception PD (01/14/05)
      • Re: Human time perception AllYou! (01/14/05)
      • Re: Human time perception PD (01/14/05)
      • Re: Human time perception AllYou! (01/15/05)
      • Re: Human time perception PDraper (01/17/05)
      • Re: Human time perception AllYou! (01/17/05)
      • Re: Human time perception PD (01/17/05)
      • Re: Human time perception AllYou! (01/17/05)
      • Re: Human time perception AllYou! (01/14/05)
      • Re: Human time perception PD (01/14/05)
      • Re: Human time perception Tom Capizzi (01/14/05)
      • Re: Human time perception AllYou! (01/14/05)
      • Re: Human time perception PD (01/14/05)
      • Re: Human time perception AllYou! (01/15/05)
      • Re: Human time perception Bill Hobba (01/15/05)
      • Re: Human time perception AllYou! (01/17/05)
      • Re: Human time perception PDraper (01/17/05)
      • Re: Human time perception AllYou! (01/17/05)
      • Re: Human time perception AllYou! (01/14/05)
      • Re: Human time perception PD (01/14/05)
      • Re: Human time perception AllYou! (01/15/05)
      • Re: Human time perception PDraper (01/17/05)
      • Re: Human time perception AllYou! (01/17/05)
      • Re: Human time perception reany_at_asu.edu (01/15/05)
      • Re: Human time perception Androcles (01/15/05)
      • Re: Human time perception reany_at_asu.edu (01/15/05)
      • Re: Human time perception Androcles (01/15/05)
      • Re: Human time perception reany_at_asu.edu (01/16/05)
      • Re: Human time perception Androcles (01/16/05)
      • Does that delineate idle from non-idle speculation for you? reany_at_asu.edu (01/16/05)
      • Re: Does that delineate idle from non-idle speculation for you? Androcles (01/16/05)
      • You do not logical deduce hypotheses of physical causes reany_at_asu.edu (01/16/05)
      • Re: You do not logical deduce hypotheses of physical causes Androcles (01/16/05)
      • Re: Does that delineate idle from non-idle speculation for you? AllYou! (01/18/05)
      • Re: Does that delineate idle from non-idle speculation for you? reany_at_asu.edu (01/19/05)
      • Re: Does that delineate idle from non-idle speculation for you? AllYou! (01/19/05)
      • Re: Does that delineate idle from non-idle speculation for you? reany_at_asu.edu (01/19/05)
      • Re: Does that delineate idle from non-idle speculation for you? Daniel Weston (01/20/05)
      • Our brain, in conjunction with our senses, INTERPRETS 'reality' reany_at_asu.edu (01/20/05)
      • Re: Our brain, in conjunction with our senses, INTERPRETS 'reality' AllYou! (01/20/05)
      • Re: Does that delineate idle from non-idle speculation for you? AllYou! (01/20/05)
      • The brain cannot get outside of its own mapping rules reany_at_asu.edu (01/20/05)
      • Re: Even the intellectually challenged can learn AllYou! (01/20/05)
      • Re: Human time perception AllYou! (01/18/05)
  • Re: Human time perception Henri Wilson (01/17/05)
    • Re: Human time perception AllYou! (01/17/05)
      • Re: Human time perception reany_at_asu.edu (01/17/05)
      • Re: Human time perception AllYou! (01/17/05)
      • Re: Human time perception reany_at_asu.edu (01/18/05)
      • Re: Human time perception AllYou! (01/18/05)
      • Re: Human time perception reany_at_asu.edu (01/18/05)
      • Re: Human time perception AllYou! (01/18/05)
      • Re: Human time perception reany_at_asu.edu (01/19/05)
      • Re: Human time perception AllYou! (01/19/05)
      • Re: Human time perception reany_at_asu.edu (01/19/05)
      • Re: Human time perception AllYou! (01/19/05)
      • Re: Human time perception The Ghost In The Machine (01/17/05)
      • Re: Human time perception reany_at_asu.edu (01/18/05)
      • Re: Human time perception AllYou! (01/18/05)
      • Re: Human time perception reany_at_asu.edu (01/18/05)
      • Re: Human time perception AllYou! (01/18/05)
      • Re: Human time perception Henri Wilson (01/17/05)
      • Re: Human time perception AllYou! (01/17/05)
      • Re: Human time perception Henri Wilson (01/18/05)
      • Re: Human time perception AllYou! (01/18/05)
    • Re: Human time perception Paul B. Andersen (01/17/05)
      • Re: Human time perception Henri Wilson (01/17/05)
• Einsteins stationary clock Richard (01/14/05)
  • Re: Einsteins stationary clock Tom Capizzi (01/14/05)
    • Re: Einsteins stationary clock Androcles (01/14/05)
    • Re: Einsteins stationary clock Henri Wilson (01/17/05)
      • Re: Einsteins stationary clock The Ghost In The Machine (01/17/05)
      • Re: Einsteins stationary clock Henri Wilson (01/18/05)
      • Re: Einsteins stationary clock The Ghost In The Machine (01/18/05)
      • Re: Einsteins stationary clock Henri Wilson (01/18/05)
  • Re: Einsteins stationary clock Harry (01/14/05)
    • Re: Einsteins stationary clock Androcles (01/14/05)
      • Re: Einsteins stationary clock Harry (01/14/05)
      • Re: Einsteins stationary clock Androcles (01/14/05)
      • Re: Einsteins stationary clock Dirk Van de moortel (01/14/05)
      • Re: Einsteins stationary clock harry (01/14/05)
      • Re: Einsteins stationary clock Androcles (01/14/05)
      • Re: Einsteins stationary clock harry (01/15/05)
      • Re: Einsteins stationary clock Androcles (01/18/05)
      • Re: Einsteins stationary clock PDraper (01/18/05)
      • Re: Einsteins stationary clock Androcles (01/19/05)
      • Re: Einsteins stationary clock PD (01/19/05)
      • Re: Einsteins stationary clock Androcles (01/19/05)
      • Re: Einsteins stationary clock PD (01/19/05)
      • Re: Einsteins stationary clock Androcles (01/19/05)
      • Re: Einsteins stationary clock PD (01/19/05)
      • Re: Einsteins stationary clock Androcles (01/19/05)
      • Re: Einsteins stationary clock PD (01/19/05)
      • Re: Einsteins stationary clock Androcles (01/19/05)
      • Re: Einsteins stationary clock PD (01/19/05)
      • Re: Einsteins stationary clock Androcles (01/20/05)
      • Re: Einsteins stationary clock PD (01/20/05)
      • Re: Einsteins stationary clock Androcles (01/20/05)
      • Re: Einsteins stationary clock PD (01/20/05)
      • Re: Einsteins stationary clock Androcles (01/20/05)
      • Re: Einsteins stationary clock Androcles (01/21/05)
  • Re: Einsteins stationary clock rotchm_at_yahoo.com (01/14/05)
    • Re: Einsteins stationary clock xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/15/05)
      • Re: Einsteins stationary clock Dirk Van de moortel (01/15/05)
      • Re: Einsteins stationary clock xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/20/05)
      • Re: Einsteins stationary clock Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (01/20/05)
      • Re: Einsteins stationary clock Androcles (01/20/05)
  • Re: Einsteins stationary clock Androcles (01/14/05)
    • Re: Einsteins stationary clock xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/15/05)
  • Re: Einsteins stationary clock kenseto (01/14/05)
  • Re: Einsteins stationary clock Raktizer Omheit (01/15/05)
• Light and gravit George Kinley (01/14/05)
  • Re: Light and gravit Sam Wormley (01/14/05)
  • Re: Light and gravit Uncle Al (01/14/05)
    • Re: Light and gravit Last Timer (01/15/05)
      • Re: Light and gravit Old Man (01/17/05)
  • Re: Light and gravit N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/14/05)
  • Re: Light and gravit Old Man (01/15/05)
    • Re: Light and gravit Randy M. Dumse (01/15/05)
    • Re: Light and gravit Bill Hobba (01/15/05)
    • Re: Light and gravit Tom Roberts (01/15/05)
      • Re: Light and gravit Ken S. Tucker (01/15/05)
      • Re: Light and gravit Tom Roberts (01/17/05)
      • Re: Light and gravit Ken S. Tucker (01/18/05)
  • Re: Light and gravit ande452_at_attglobal.net (01/15/05)
  • Re: Light and gravit Old Man (01/15/05)
  • Re: Light and gravit ande452_at_attglobal.net (01/15/05)
    • Re: Light and gravit glbrad01 (01/18/05)
      • Re: Light and gravit Ken S. Tucker (01/18/05)
• To learn relativity read Quran Alphonse (01/14/05)
  • Re: To learn relativity read Quran DavidBowman (01/14/05)
    • Re: To learn relativity read Quran Alphonse (01/14/05)
      • Re: To learn relativity read Quran Androcles (01/14/05)
      • Re: To learn relativity read Quran Dirk Van de moortel (01/14/05)
      • Re: To learn relativity read Quran Alphonse (01/14/05)
      • Re: To learn relativity read Quran bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/14/05)
      • Re: To learn relativity read Quran Alphonse (01/14/05)
      • Re: To learn relativity read Quran bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/14/05)
      • Re: To learn relativity read Quran Alphonse (01/15/05)
      • Re: To learn relativity read Quran DavidBowman (01/17/05)
      • Re: To learn relativity read Quran Tom Capizzi (01/14/05)
      • Re: To learn relativity read Quran bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/14/05)
      • Re: To learn relativity read Quran Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (01/20/05)
    • Re: To learn relativity read Quran Alphonse (01/15/05)
      • Re: To learn relativity read Quran bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/17/05)
      • Re: To learn relativity read Quran Alphonse (01/17/05)
      • Re: To learn relativity read Quran DavidBowman (01/17/05)
      • Re: To learn relativity read Quran Alphonse (01/17/05)
      • Re: To learn relativity read Quran DavidBowman (01/17/05)
      • Re: To learn relativity read Quran DavidBowman (01/17/05)
      • Re: To learn relativity read Quran Alphonse (01/18/05)
      • Re: To learn relativity read Quran Alphonse (01/18/05)
      • Re: To learn relativity read Quran bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/18/05)
      • Re: To learn relativity read Quran Alphonse (01/18/05)
      • Re: To learn relativity read Quran bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/18/05)
      • Re: To learn relativity read Quran Alphonse (01/18/05)
      • Re: To learn relativity read Quran bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/18/05)
      • Re: To learn relativity read Quran Alphonse (01/18/05)
      • Re: To learn relativity read Quran DavidBowman (01/18/05)
      • Re: To learn relativity read Quran Alphonse (01/18/05)
      • Re: To learn relativity read Quran DavidBowman (01/18/05)
      • Re: To learn relativity read Quran Alphonse (01/19/05)
      • Re: To learn relativity read Quran Alphonse (01/19/05)
      • Re: To learn relativity read Quran Androcles (01/19/05)
      • Re: To learn relativity read Quran Alphonse (01/19/05)
  • Re: To learn relativity read Quran Alphonse (01/18/05)
    • Re: To learn relativity read Quran DavidBowman (01/18/05)
    • Re: To learn relativity read Quran DavidBowman (01/18/05)
    • Re: To learn relativity read Quran DavidBowman (01/18/05)
      • Re: To learn relativity read Quran Alphonse (01/19/05)
      • Re: To learn relativity read Quran Alphonse (01/19/05)
  • Re: To learn relativity read Quran Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (01/20/05)
    • Re: To learn relativity read Quran bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/20/05)
      • Re: To learn relativity read Quran Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (01/20/05)
• Distress postings. Len Gaasenbeek (01/14/05)
  • Re: Distress postings. Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (01/14/05)
  • Re: Distress postings. Dirk Van de moortel (01/14/05)
    • Re: Distress postings. AllYou! (01/14/05)
      • Re: Distress postings. Dirk Van de moortel (01/14/05)
      • Re: Distress postings. AllYou! (01/14/05)
  • Re: Distress postings. Androcles (01/14/05)
  • Re: Distress postings. DavidBowman (01/14/05)
  • Re: Distress postings. DavidBowman (01/14/05)
• Curvature, Torsion, Emergent Macro-Quantum Hologram Gravity & W^3 Jack Sarfatti (01/13/05)
• behoynd SR masquerade beda pietanza (01/13/05)
  • Re: behoynd SR masquerade Dirk Van de moortel (01/13/05)
    • Re: behoynd SR masquerade beda (01/14/05)
    • Re: behoynd SR masquerade shevek (01/17/05)
      • Re: behoynd SR masquerade beda pietanza (01/17/05)
      • Re: behoynd SR masquerade shevek (01/17/05)
      • Re: behoynd SR masquerade beda (01/18/05)
      • Re: behoynd SR masquerade beda (01/18/05)
  • Re: behoynd SR masquerade Bill Hobba (01/13/05)
    • Re: behoynd SR masquerade beda (01/14/05)
      • Re: behoynd SR masquerade kenseto (01/14/05)
      • Re: behoynd SR masquerade beda pietanza (01/15/05)
      • Re: behoynd SR masquerade kenseto (01/15/05)
      • Re: behoynd SR masquerade beda pietanza (01/16/05)
      • Re: behoynd SR masquerade kenseto (01/16/05)
      • Re: behoynd SR masquerade beda pietanza (01/16/05)
      • Re: behoynd SR masquerade kenseto (01/17/05)
      • Re: behoynd SR masquerade beda pietanza (01/17/05)
      • Re: behoynd SR masquerade kenseto (01/17/05)
      • Re: behoynd SR masquerade beda (01/18/05)
      • Re: behoynd SR masquerade kenseto (01/18/05)
      • Re: behoynd SR masquerade Bill Hobba (01/14/05)
      • Re: behoynd SR masquerade beda pietanza (01/14/05)
      • Re: behoynd SR masquerade Bill Hobba (01/15/05)
      • Re: behoynd SR masquerade beda pietanza (01/15/05)
      • Re: behoynd SR masquerade Bill Hobba (01/15/05)
      • Re: behoynd SR masquerade beda pietanza (01/16/05)
      • Re: behoynd SR masquerade shevek (01/17/05)
      • Re: behoynd SR masquerade Bill Hobba (01/17/05)
      • Re: behoynd SR masquerade beda (01/18/05)
      • Re: behoynd SR masquerade shevek (01/18/05)
      • Re: behoynd SR masquerade reany_at_asu.edu (01/18/05)
      • Re: behoynd SR masquerade AllYou! (01/18/05)
      • Re: behoynd SR masquerade beda (01/18/05)
      • Re: behoynd SR masquerade shevek (01/18/05)
      • Re: behoynd SR masquerade beda pietanza (01/18/05)
      • Re: behoynd SR masquerade shevek (01/19/05)
      • Re: behoynd SR masquerade beda pietanza (01/20/05)
      • Re: behoynd SR masquerade beda (01/18/05)
      • Re: behoynd SR masquerade beda (01/18/05)
    • Re: behoynd SR masquerade kenseto (01/14/05)
  • Re: behoynd SR masquerade ande452_at_attglobal.net (01/14/05)
    • Re: behoynd SR masquerade beda (01/14/05)
  • Re: behoynd SR masquerade Harry (01/14/05)
• Wikipedia on mass harry (01/13/05)
  • Re: Wikipedia on mass Dirk Van de moortel (01/13/05)
    • Re: Wikipedia on mass Torbjorn Larsson (01/14/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Pmb (01/14/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Dirk Van de moortel (01/14/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Torbjorn Larsson (01/14/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Dirk Van de moortel (01/14/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Torbjorn Larsson (01/16/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Dirk Van de moortel (01/16/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Bilge (01/16/05)
    • Re: Wikipedia on mass Harry (01/14/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Dirk Van de moortel (01/14/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Harry (01/14/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Dirk Van de moortel (01/14/05)
  • Re: Wikipedia on mass shuba (01/13/05)
    • Re: Wikipedia on mass Pmb (01/13/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Bilge (01/14/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass ande452_at_attglobal.net (01/14/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Bilge (01/15/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Dirk Van de moortel (01/15/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass harry (01/15/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Dirk Van de moortel (01/15/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass harry (01/16/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Dirk Van de moortel (01/16/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass harry (01/16/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Dirk Van de moortel (01/16/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Pmb (01/16/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Dirk Van de moortel (01/16/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Harry (01/17/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Pmb (01/16/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Pmb (01/16/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Thomas Wong (01/17/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Pmb (01/17/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Thomas Wong (01/17/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Pmb (01/17/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Thomas Wong (01/17/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Tom Roberts (01/17/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Thomas Wong (01/17/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Harry (01/17/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Pmb (01/17/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Harry (01/17/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Pmb (01/17/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Pmb (01/17/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass harry (01/17/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Bilge (01/17/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Harry (01/17/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Pmb (01/16/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Bilge (01/16/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Harry (01/17/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Pmb (01/17/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Bilge (01/17/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Harry (01/17/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Harry (01/17/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Pmb (01/17/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Pmb (01/15/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Bilge (01/15/05)
    • Re: Wikipedia on mass Dirk Van de moortel (01/13/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Harry (01/14/05)
    • Re: Wikipedia on mass Bill Hobba (01/13/05)
    • Re: Wikipedia on mass Harry (01/14/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass shuba (01/14/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass harry (01/15/05)
  • Re: Wikipedia on mass Pmb (01/13/05)
    • Re: Wikipedia on mass Bilge (01/14/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Harry (01/14/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Bilge (01/14/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Harry (01/14/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Pmb (01/14/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass harry (01/15/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Pmb (01/15/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Tom Roberts (01/15/05)
    • Re: Wikipedia on mass Harry (01/14/05)
  • Re: Wikipedia on mass Bilge (01/13/05)
    • Re: Wikipedia on mass Tom Roberts (01/14/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Harry (01/14/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Tom Roberts (01/14/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Harry (01/14/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Pmb (01/14/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Pmb (01/14/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Pmb (01/14/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass harry (01/15/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass harry (01/15/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Pmb (01/15/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Tom Roberts (01/15/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Tom Capizzi (01/14/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Pmb (01/14/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Tom Roberts (01/15/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Ken S. Tucker (01/15/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Tom Roberts (01/15/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Bill Rowe (01/15/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Ken S. Tucker (01/15/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Bill Rowe (01/16/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Ken S. Tucker (01/16/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Bilge (01/17/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Ken S. Tucker (01/17/05)
    • Re: Wikipedia on mass Harry (01/14/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Bilge (01/14/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Harry (01/14/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Bilge (01/15/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass harry (01/15/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Pmb (01/15/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Bilge (01/16/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass harry (01/16/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Pmb (01/16/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Tom Roberts (01/17/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Harry (01/18/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Pmb (01/18/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Bilge (01/20/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Ken S. Tucker (01/20/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/20/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Tom Roberts (01/20/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Dirk Van de moortel (01/21/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Harry (01/21/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Bilge (01/21/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Tom Roberts (01/22/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass harry (01/22/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass harry (01/22/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Tom Roberts (01/22/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Dirk Van de moortel (01/22/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Ken S. Tucker (01/22/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/18/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Harry (01/18/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/19/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Harry (01/19/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Pmb (01/19/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/19/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Harry (01/20/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Pmb (01/20/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Bilge (01/20/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Tom Roberts (01/18/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Harry (01/18/05)
  • Re: Wikipedia on mass Bill Hobba (01/13/05)
  • Re: Wikipedia on mass ande452_at_attglobal.net (01/14/05)
    • Re: Wikipedia on mass Harry (01/14/05)
  • Re: Wikipedia on mass Ken S. Tucker (01/14/05)
    • Re: Wikipedia on mass Harry (01/14/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Ken S. Tucker (01/15/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass harry (01/15/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Bilge (01/15/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Dirk Van de moortel (01/15/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass harry (01/15/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass shuba (01/15/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Dirk Van de moortel (01/15/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass harry (01/15/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Dirk Van de moortel (01/15/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Ken S. Tucker (01/15/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/16/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass shuba (01/15/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Dirk Van de moortel (01/15/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass harry (01/15/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Pmb (01/16/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass harry (01/16/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Pmb (01/16/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Bilge (01/17/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Harry (01/17/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Pmb (01/17/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass shuba (01/16/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass harry (01/16/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Pmb (01/16/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass shuba (01/17/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Harry (01/17/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass shuba (01/17/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass harry (01/17/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Pmb (01/18/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Harry (01/18/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass shuba (01/18/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Harry (01/18/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass shuba (01/18/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Harry (01/19/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass shuba (01/19/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass Harry (01/19/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass shuba (01/19/05)
      • Re: Wikipedia on mass harry (01/15/05)
  • Re: Wikipedia on mass valls_at_icmf.inf.cu (01/15/05)
    • Re: Wikipedia on mass harry (01/15/05)
    • Re: Wikipedia on mass reany_at_asu.edu (01/15/05)
• Lorentz on special relativity Harry (01/13/05)
  • Re: Lorentz on special relativity Bill Hobba (01/13/05)
    • Re: Lorentz on special relativity Harry (01/14/05)
    • Re: Lorentz on special relativity Ken S. Tucker (01/14/05)
  • Re: Lorentz on special relativity Bilge (01/14/05)
    • Re: Lorentz on special relativity harry (01/15/05)
      • Re: Lorentz on special relativity Bilge (01/15/05)
      • Re: Lorentz on special relativity harry (01/15/05)
      • Re: Lorentz on special relativity Bilge (01/16/05)
      • Re: Lorentz on special relativity harry (01/16/05)
      • Re: Lorentz on special relativity Bilge (01/16/05)
      • Re: Lorentz on special relativity Harry (01/17/05)
      • Re: Lorentz on special relativity Tom Roberts (01/18/05)
      • Re: Lorentz on special relativity Harry (01/18/05)
      • Re: Lorentz on special relativity Ken S. Tucker (01/18/05)
      • Re: Lorentz on special relativity Harry (01/18/05)
      • Re: Lorentz on special relativity Ken S. Tucker (01/18/05)
      • neutron decay and neutrinos (was: Re: Lorentz on special relativity) Tom Roberts (01/18/05)
      • Re: neutron decay and neutrinos (was: Re: Lorentz on special relativity) Ken S. Tucker (01/18/05)
      • Re: Lorentz on special relativity Bilge (01/19/05)
      • Re: Lorentz on special relativity Gerry Quinn (01/18/05)
      • Re: Lorentz on special relativity Bilge (01/19/05)
      • Re: Lorentz on special relativity Harry (01/19/05)
      • Re: Lorentz on special relativity Gerry Quinn (01/20/05)
      • Re: Lorentz on special relativity Bilge (01/21/05)
      • Re: Lorentz on special relativity Gerry Quinn (01/26/05)
      • Re: Lorentz on special relativity Bilge (01/27/05)
      • Re: Lorentz on special relativity Tom Roberts (01/19/05)
      • Re: Lorentz on special relativity Gerry Quinn (01/20/05)
      • Re: Lorentz on special relativity Bilge (01/21/05)
  • Re: Lorentz on special relativity greywolf42 (01/15/05)
    • Re: Lorentz on special relativity harry (01/16/05)
      • Re: Lorentz on special relativity greywolf42 (01/25/05)
  • Re: Lorentz on special relativity shevek (01/16/05)
• 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato (01/13/05)
  • Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson Henri Wilson (01/15/05)
    • Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson Paul B. Andersen (01/16/05)
      • Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson Henri Wilson (01/17/05)
      • Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson Paul B. Andersen (01/17/05)
      • Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson Henri Wilson (01/17/05)
      • Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson Paul B. Andersen (01/17/05)
      • Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson Henri Wilson (01/18/05)
      • Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson Paul B. Andersen (01/18/05)
      • Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson Henri Wilson (01/18/05)
      • Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson Paul B. Andersen (01/19/05)
      • Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson Henri Wilson (01/20/05)
      • Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson Paul B. Andersen (01/21/05)
      • Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson Henri Wilson (01/21/05)
      • Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson Paul B. Andersen (01/24/05)
      • Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson Henri Wilson (01/25/05)
      • Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson Paul B. Andersen (01/25/05)
      • Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson Henri Wilson (01/25/05)
      • Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson Paul B. Andersen (01/26/05)
      • Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson Henri Wilson (01/26/05)
      • Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson Paul B. Andersen (01/26/05)
      • Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson Henri Wilson (01/27/05)
      • Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson valls_at_icmf.inf.cu (01/17/05)
      • Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson Henri Wilson (01/17/05)
      • Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson Paul B. Andersen (01/17/05)
      • Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson Henri Wilson (01/18/05)
      • Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson valls_at_icmf.inf.cu (01/19/05)
      • Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson Henri Wilson (01/19/05)
      • Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson valls_at_icmf.inf.cu (01/19/05)
      • Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson Henri Wilson (01/19/05)
      • Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson valls_at_icmf.inf.cu (01/20/05)
      • Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson Henri Wilson (01/20/05)
      • Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson valls_at_icmf.inf.cu (01/26/05)
      • Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson Henri Wilson (01/26/05)
      • Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson valls_at_icmf.inf.cu (01/18/05)
      • Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson Paul B. Andersen (01/19/05)
      • Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson valls_at_icmf.inf.cu (01/20/05)
      • Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson Paul B. Andersen (01/21/05)
      • Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson valls_at_icmf.inf.cu (01/25/05)
      • Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson Paul B. Andersen (01/26/05)
      • Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson valls_at_icmf.inf.cu (01/29/05)
      • Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson Henri Wilson (01/29/05)
      • Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson Paul B. Andersen (01/30/05)
• Moving mirror experiment, answer to Henri Wilson Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato (01/13/05)
  • Re: Moving mirror experiment, answer to Henri Wilson Henri Wilson (01/14/05)
    • Re: Moving mirror experiment, answer to Henri Wilson valls_at_icmf.inf.cu (01/15/05)
      • Re: Moving mirror experiment, answer to Henri Wilson Henri Wilson (01/15/05)
      • Re: Moving mirror experiment, answer to Henri Wilson valls_at_icmf.inf.cu (01/17/05)
      • Re: Moving mirror experiment, answer to Henri Wilson Henri Wilson (01/17/05)
      • Re: Moving mirror experiment, answer to Henri Wilson Harry (01/19/05)
      • Re: Moving mirror experiment, answer to Henri Wilson Henri Wilson (01/19/05)
      • Re: Moving mirror experiment, answer to Henri Wilson harry (01/19/05)
      • Re: Moving mirror experiment, answer to Henri Wilson Henri Wilson (01/20/05)
      • Re: Moving mirror experiment, answer to Henri Wilson Harry (01/20/05)
      • Re: Moving mirror experiment, answer to Henri Wilson Henri Wilson (01/20/05)
      • Re: Moving mirror experiment, answer to Henri Wilson Harry (01/21/05)
      • Re: Moving mirror experiment, answer to Henri Wilson Henri Wilson (01/21/05)
      • Re: Moving mirror experiment, answer to Henri Wilson Paul B. Andersen (01/25/05)
      • Re: Moving mirror experiment, answer to Henri Wilson Henri Wilson (01/26/05)
• light : how far in the universe ? Thierry (01/13/05)
  • Re: light : how far in the universe ? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/13/05)
    • Re: light : how far in the universe ? Thierry (01/13/05)
  • Re: light : how far in the universe ? alistolmar_at_3dresearch.com (01/17/05)
• What is the distance to a black hole? Dr. Photon (01/13/05)
  • Re: What is the distance to a black hole? Jim Black (01/13/05)
• Re: Is light bending a function of wavelength? Randy M. Dumse (01/13/05)
  • Re: Is light bending a function of wavelength? tttpppggg_at_yahoo.com (01/18/05)
    • Re: Is light bending a function of wavelength? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/18/05)
      • Re: Is light bending a function of wavelength? tttpppggg_at_yahoo.com (01/18/05)
      • Re: Is light bending a function of wavelength? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/19/05)
      • Re: Is light bending a function of wavelength? tttpppggg_at_yahoo.com (01/22/05)
      • Re: Is light bending a function of wavelength? tttpppggg_at_yahoo.com (01/23/05)
      • Re: Is light bending a function of wavelength? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/23/05)
      • Re: Is light bending a function of wavelength? tttpppggg_at_yahoo.com (01/24/05)
      • Re: Is light bending a function of wavelength? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/25/05)
      • Re: Is light bending a function of wavelength? Tom Capizzi (01/25/05)
      • Re: Is light bending a function of wavelength? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/25/05)
      • Re: Is light bending a function of wavelength? Tom Capizzi (01/25/05)
      • Re: Is light bending a function of wavelength? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/25/05)
• Light clocks question Stuart Gall (01/12/05)
  • Re: Light clocks question N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/12/05)
  • Re: Light clocks question Eli Botkin (01/13/05)
    • Re: Light clocks question kenseto (01/13/05)
      • Re: Light clocks question Eli Botkin (01/14/05)
      • Re: Light clocks question kenseto (01/14/05)
      • Re: Light clocks question Eli Botkin (01/14/05)
      • Re: Light clocks question kenseto (01/14/05)
  • Re: Light clocks question xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/13/05)
    • Re: Light clocks question Stuart Gall (01/13/05)
      • Re: Light clocks question xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/14/05)
  • Re: Light clocks question Ben Bean (01/13/05)
    • Re: Light clocks question Stuart Gall (01/13/05)
  • Re: Light clocks question rotchm_at_yahoo.com (01/13/05)
    • Re: Light clocks question N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/13/05)
      • Re: Light clocks question Harry (01/13/05)
      • Re: Light clocks question N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/13/05)
  • Re: Light clocks question Tom Roberts (01/13/05)
    • Re: Light clocks question Stuart Gall (01/13/05)
      • Re: Light clocks question Henri Wilson (01/17/05)
      • Re: Light clocks question Tom Roberts (01/17/05)
      • Re: Light clocks question Henri Wilson (01/17/05)
  • Re: Light clocks question kenseto (01/13/05)
  • Re: Light clocks question Too many kooks spoil the brothel (01/13/05)
• Space-time (vs. "space-space") visualization by embedding in 3-D space mot12345_at_alexandria.ucsb.edu (01/12/05)
  • Re: Space-time (vs. "space-space") visualization by embedding in 3-D space DavidBowman (01/13/05)
  • Re: Space-time (vs. "space-space") visualization by embedding in 3-D space DavidBowman (01/13/05)
  • Re: Space-time (vs. "space-space") visualization by embedding in 3-D space mot12345_at_alexandria.ucsb.edu (01/13/05)
  • Re: Space-time (vs. "space-space") visualization by embedding in 3-D space Tom Roberts (01/14/05)
    • Re: Space-time (vs. "space-space") visualization by embedding in 3-D space mot12345_at_alexandria.ucsb.edu (01/14/05)
      • Re: Space-time (vs. "space-space") visualization by embedding in 3-D space Tom Roberts (01/14/05)
• Re: Dr. Van de moortel gauge5_at_hotmail.com (01/12/05)
• What is the distance to a black hole? Dr. Photon (01/12/05)
• Re: GR and QM: are them incompatible? TV (01/12/05)
  • Re: GR and QM: are them incompatible? Gambit (01/12/05)
    • Re: GR and QM: are them incompatible? robert j. kolker (01/12/05)
  • é un altro TV. Non sono io TV (01/14/05)
    • Correzione: non so se sono io? TV (01/14/05)
    • Re: Q?= un altro TV. Non sono io Uncle Al (01/14/05)
• Flaws wanted yen, ka-in (01/12/05)
• Re: Flaws wanted Ka-In Yen (01/12/05)
  • Re: Flaws wanted Bjoern Feuerbacher (01/12/05)
    • Re: Flaws wanted Ka-In Yen (01/25/05)
      • Re: Flaws wanted Bjoern Feuerbacher (01/25/05)
• Redshift problems continue.. what is going on? shevek (01/11/05)
  • Re: Redshift problems continue.. what is going on? shevek (01/12/05)
    • Re: Redshift problems continue.. what is going on? Bilge (01/13/05)
      • Re: Redshift problems continue.. what is going on? Daniel Weston (01/13/05)
      • Re: Redshift problems continue.. what is going on? Henri Wilson (01/17/05)
  • Re: Redshift problems continue.. what is going on? mtm (01/13/05)
    • Re: Redshift problems continue.. what is going on? Harry (01/13/05)
  • Re: Redshift problems continue.. what is going on? Thomas Wong (01/13/05)
    • Re: Redshift problems continue.. what is going on? Koobee Wublee (01/13/05)
      • Re: Redshift problems continue.. what is going on? Thomas Wong (01/13/05)
      • Re: Redshift problems continue.. what is going on? shevek (01/13/05)
      • Re: Redshift problems continue.. what is going on? Thomas Wong (01/14/05)
  • Re: Redshift problems continue.. what is going on? Henri Wilson (01/17/05)
    • Re: Redshift problems continue.. what is going on? shevek (01/17/05)
      • Re: Redshift problems continue.. what is going on? Henri Wilson (01/17/05)
      • Re: Redshift problems continue.. what is going on? shevek (01/17/05)
      • Re: Redshift problems continue.. what is going on? Henri Wilson (01/18/05)
      • Re: Redshift problems continue.. what is going on? The Ghost In The Machine (01/18/05)
      • Re: Redshift problems continue.. what is going on? Henri Wilson (01/18/05)
      • Re: Redshift problems continue.. what is going on? The Ghost In The Machine (01/19/05)
      • Re: Redshift problems continue.. what is going on? Henri Wilson (01/19/05)
      • Re: Redshift problems continue.. what is going on? The Ghost In The Machine (01/20/05)
      • Re: Redshift problems continue.. what is going on? Henri Wilson (01/20/05)
      • Re: Redshift problems continue.. what is going on? The Ghost In The Machine (01/21/05)
      • Re: Redshift problems continue.. what is going on? Henri Wilson (01/21/05)
      • Re: Redshift problems continue.. what is going on? The Ghost In The Machine (01/22/05)
      • Re: Redshift problems continue.. what is going on? Henri Wilson (01/22/05)
      • Re: Redshift problems continue.. what is going on? shevek (01/18/05)
      • Re: Redshift problems continue.. what is going on? Henri Wilson (01/18/05)
• the best absolute time I can get beda (01/11/05)
  • Re: the best absolute time I can get harry (01/13/05)
  • Re: the best absolute time I can get harry (01/13/05)
    • Re: the best absolute time I can get beda pietanza (01/14/05)
• distance A to B = B to A conclusion? rotchm_at_yahoo.com (01/11/05)
• A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion kenseto (01/11/05)
  • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion Sam Wormley (01/11/05)
    • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion kenseto (01/11/05)
    • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion John Sefton (01/11/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion kenseto (01/11/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion Dirk Van de moortel (01/11/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion John Zinni (01/11/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion Dirk Van de moortel (01/11/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion Sam Wormley (01/11/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion kenseto (01/11/05)
    • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion mountain man (01/12/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion robert j. kolker (01/12/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion mountain man (01/12/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion robert j. kolker (01/12/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion kenseto (01/12/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion robert j. kolker (01/12/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion kenseto (01/12/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion robert j. kolker (01/12/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion kenseto (01/12/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion Sam Wormley (01/12/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion kenseto (01/13/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion Ilja Schmelzer (01/13/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion Bilge (01/17/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion Ilja Schmelzer (01/17/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion Bilge (01/18/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion Ilja Schmelzer (01/18/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion FrediFizzx (01/19/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/19/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion FrediFizzx (01/19/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/19/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion FrediFizzx (01/19/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion Bilge (01/20/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion mountain man (01/13/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion Bilge (01/17/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion mountain man (01/19/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion Sam Wormley (01/19/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion mountain man (01/19/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion Sam Wormley (01/19/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion Bilge (01/20/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion mountain man (01/20/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion Franz Heymann (01/17/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion Ilja Schmelzer (01/13/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion kenseto (01/12/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion robert j. kolker (01/12/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion kenseto (01/12/05)
  • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion Uncle Al (01/11/05)
    • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion kenseto (01/11/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion Uncle Al (01/11/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion kenseto (01/11/05)
    • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion Maleki (01/11/05)
  • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion robert j. kolker (01/11/05)
    • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion kenseto (01/11/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion robert j. kolker (01/11/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion Uncle Al (01/11/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion kenseto (01/11/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion robert j. kolker (01/11/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion kenseto (01/12/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion Paul Cardinale (01/12/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion Lady Chatterly (01/11/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion Uncle Al (01/12/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion kenseto (01/12/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion Gregory L. Hansen (01/11/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion kenseto (01/11/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion Gregory L. Hansen (01/11/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion kenseto (01/12/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion Gregory L. Hansen (01/12/05)
      • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion kenseto (01/13/05)
• Re: GOD=G_uv and WORLD TERROR Christopher A. Lee (01/11/05)
  • Re: GOD=G_uv and WORLD TERROR George Hammond (01/12/05)
    • Re: GOD=G_uv and WORLD TERROR John Jones (01/12/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv and WORLD TERROR Christopher A. Lee (01/12/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv and WORLD TERROR George Hammond (01/13/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv and WORLD TERROR George Hammond (01/13/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv and WORLD TERROR Alfred (01/22/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv and WORLD TERROR George Hammond (01/22/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv and WORLD TERROR Dead Deity (01/19/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv and WORLD TERROR John Jones (01/18/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv and WORLD TERROR George Hammond (01/19/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv and WORLD TERROR George Hammond (01/19/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv and WORLD TERROR Dead Deity (01/20/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv and WORLD TERROR John Jones (01/20/05)
    • Re: GOD=G_uv and WORLD TERROR Onejob (01/13/05)
  • Re: GOD=G_uv and WORLD TERROR Pastor Frank (01/12/05)
    • Re: GOD=G_uv and WORLD TERROR Alfred (01/22/05)
  • Re: GOD=G_uv and WORLD TERROR Pastor Frank (01/12/05)
    • Re: GOD=G_uv and WORLD TERROR George Hammond (01/14/05)
• What is the distance to a black hole? Dr. Photon (01/11/05)
  • Re: What is the distance to a black hole? Jim Black (01/12/05)
• To Androcles and Henry: Ballistic Doppler Shift Equation Thomas Wong (01/11/05)
  • Re: To Androcles and Henry: Ballistic Doppler Shift Equation Androcles (01/11/05)
    • Re: To Androcles and Henry: Ballistic Doppler Shift Equation Thomas Wong (01/11/05)
      • Re: To Androcles and Henry: Ballistic Doppler Shift Equation Androcles (01/11/05)
      • Re: To Androcles and Henry: Ballistic Doppler Shift Equation Thomas Wong (01/11/05)
      • Re: To Androcles and Henry: Ballistic Doppler Shift Equation Androcles (01/11/05)
      • Re: To Androcles and Henry: Ballistic Doppler Shift Equation Thomas Wong (01/11/05)
      • Re: To Androcles and Henry: Ballistic Doppler Shift Equation Androcles (01/12/05)
      • Re: To Androcles and Henry: Ballistic Doppler Shift Equation Thomas Wong (01/12/05)
      • Re: To Androcles and Henry: Ballistic Doppler Shift Equation Androcles (01/12/05)
      • Re: To Androcles and Henry: Ballistic Doppler Shift Equation Thomas Wong (01/12/05)
      • Re: To Androcles and Henry: Ballistic Doppler Shift Equation Thomas Wong (01/12/05)
      • Re: To Androcles and Henry: Ballistic Doppler Shift Equation Androcles (01/12/05)
      • Re: To Androcles and Henry: Ballistic Doppler Shift Equation Thomas Wong (01/12/05)
      • Re: To Androcles and Henry: Ballistic Doppler Shift Equation Androcles (01/12/05)
      • Re: To Androcles and Henry: Ballistic Doppler Shift Equation Thomas Wong (01/12/05)
      • Re: To Androcles and Henry: Ballistic Doppler Shift Equation Androcles (01/12/05)
      • Re: To Androcles and Henry: Ballistic Doppler Shift Equation Dirk Van de moortel (01/12/05)
    • Re: To Androcles and Henry: Ballistic Doppler Shift Equation The Ghost In The Machine (01/12/05)
      • Re: To Androcles and Henry: Ballistic Doppler Shift Equation Androcles (01/12/05)
      • Re: To Androcles and Henry: Ballistic Doppler Shift Equation The Ghost In The Machine (01/12/05)
      • Re: To Androcles and Henry: Ballistic Doppler Shift Equation Androcles (01/12/05)
      • Re: To Androcles and Henry: Ballistic Doppler Shift Equation The Ghost In The Machine (01/13/05)
      • Re: To Androcles and Henry: Ballistic Doppler Shift Equation Androcles (01/13/05)
      • Re: To Androcles and Henry: Ballistic Doppler Shift Equation Jamie (01/14/05)
      • Re: To Androcles and Henry: Ballistic Doppler Shift Equation Thomas Wong (01/14/05)
  • Re: To Androcles and Henry: Ballistic Doppler Shift Equation Henri Wilson (01/16/05)
    • Re: To Androcles and Henry: Ballistic Doppler Shift Equation Thomas Wong (01/17/05)
      • Re: To Androcles and Henry: Ballistic Doppler Shift Equation Henri Wilson (01/17/05)
      • Re: To Androcles and Henry: Ballistic Doppler Shift Equation Thomas Wong (01/17/05)
      • Re: To Androcles and Henry: Ballistic Doppler Shift Equation Henri Wilson (01/17/05)
    • Re: To Androcles and Henry: Ballistic Doppler Shift Equation Paul B. Andersen (01/17/05)
      • Re: To Androcles and Henry: Ballistic Doppler Shift Equation Henri Wilson (01/17/05)
  • Re: To Androcles and Henry: Ballistic Doppler Shift Equation John Kennaugh (01/21/05)
    • Re: To Androcles and Henry: Ballistic Doppler Shift Equation Henri Wilson (01/21/05)
      • Re: To Androcles and Henry: Ballistic Doppler Shift Equation Androcles (01/21/05)
      • Re: To Androcles and Henry: Ballistic Doppler Shift Equation Henri Wilson (01/21/05)
      • Re: To Androcles and Henry: Ballistic Doppler Shift Equation Androcles (01/21/05)
      • Re: To Androcles and Henry: Ballistic Doppler Shift Equation Henri Wilson (01/22/05)
      • Re: To Androcles and Henry: Ballistic Doppler Shift Equation Androcles (01/23/05)
• GOD=G_uv and WORLD TERROR George Hammond (01/11/05)
  • Re: GOD=G_uv and WORLD TERROR Uncle Festivus (01/11/05)
    • Re: GOD=G_uv and WORLD TERROR Pastor Frank (01/12/05)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv and WORLD TERROR George Hammond (01/13/05)
• Re: GOD=G_uv and WORLD TERROR shevek (01/18/05)
  • Re: GOD=G_uv and WORLD TERROR George Hammond (01/19/05)
• Re: Pastor Frank DZ (01/11/05)
  • Re: Pastor Frank Bill Hobba (01/11/05)
    • Re: the Theology of Pastor Frank Pastor Frank (01/12/05)
      • Re: the Theology of Pastor Frank Bill Hobba (01/12/05)
      • Re: the Theology of Pastor Frank Pastor Frank (01/14/05)
      • Re: the Theology of Pastor Frank Bill Hobba (01/14/05)
      • Re: the Theology of Pastor Frank pensul (01/14/05)
      • Re: the Theology of Pastor Frank Bill Hobba (01/15/05)
  • Re: Pastor Frank Tom Capizzi (01/11/05)
  • Re: Pastor Frank Immortalist (01/11/05)
    • Re: Flat Earth? Pastor Frank (01/13/05)
      • Re: Flat Earth? Immortalist (01/13/05)
      • Re: Flat Earth? Pastor Frank (01/21/05)
      • Re: Flat Earth? Bill Hobba (01/13/05)
      • Re: Flat Earth? Pastor Frank (01/14/05)
      • Re: Flat Earth? Bill Hobba (01/16/05)
      • Re: Flat Earth? Pastor Frank (01/24/05)
      • Re: Flat Earth? Bilge (01/24/05)
  • Re: Pastor Frank Bilge (01/12/05)
    • Re: Pastor Frank robert j. kolker (01/12/05)
    • Re: Flat earth? Pastor Frank (01/13/05)
      • Re: Flat earth? Bill Hobba (01/13/05)
      • Re: Flat earth? Pastor Frank (01/14/05)
      • Re: Flat earth? Bill Hobba (01/16/05)
      • Re: Flat earth? Pastor Frank (01/16/05)
      • Re: Flat earth? Bill Hobba (01/16/05)
      • Re: Flat earth? Pastor Frank (01/17/05)
      • Re: Flat earth? bob young (01/18/05)
      • Re: Flat earth? Bill Hobba (01/21/05)
      • Re: Flat earth? Pastor Frank (01/18/05)
      • Re: Flat earth? bob young (01/17/05)
      • Re: Flat earth? Mark T (01/17/05)
      • Re: Flat earth? E. Hardy (01/17/05)
      • Re: Flat earth vs God=G_uv ? George Hammond (01/18/05)
      • Re: Flat earth vs God=G_uv ? TMG (01/18/05)
      • Re: Flat earth vs God=G_uv ? George Hammond (01/18/05)
      • Re: Flat earth vs God=G_uv ? Randy M. Dumse (01/18/05)
      • Re: Flat earth vs God=G_uv ? George Hammond (01/19/05)
      • Re: Flat earth? Pastor Frank (01/21/05)
      • Re: Flat earth? The Ghost In The Machine (01/23/05)
      • Re: Flat earth? Bilge (01/14/05)
      • Re: Flat earth? Pastor Frank (01/18/05)
      • Re: Flat earth? Randy M. Dumse (01/18/05)
      • Re: Flat earth? Bill Hobba (01/21/05)
      • Re: Flat earth? Creighton Hogg (01/21/05)
      • Re: Flat earth? Bill Hobba (01/21/05)
      • Re: Flat earth? Daniel Weston (01/22/05)
      • Re: Flat earth? Bill Hobba (01/21/05)
      • Re: Flat earth? Daniel T. (01/18/05)
      • Re: Flat earth? George Hammond (01/19/05)
      • Re: Flat earth? Daniel T. (01/23/05)
      • Re: Flat earth? Don (01/23/05)
      • Re: Flat earth? Zap (01/23/05)
      • Re: Flat earth? Don (01/23/05)
      • Re: Flat earth? George Hammond (01/24/05)
      • Re: Flat earth? Dubh Ghall (01/24/05)
      • Re: Flat earth? Daniel T. (01/23/05)
      • Re: Flat earth? Pastor Frank (01/25/05)
      • Re: Flat earth? George Hammond (01/24/05)
      • Re: Flat earth? George Hammond (01/24/05)
      • Re: Flat earth? TMG (01/24/05)
      • Re: Flat earth? George Hammond (01/25/05)
      • Re: Flat earth? TMG (01/25/05)
  • Re: Pastor Frank Pastor Frank (01/12/05)
• Question: Observer-Observed relation alAzif (01/11/05)
  • Re: Question: Observer-Observed relation Androcles (01/11/05)
    • Re: Question: Observer-Observed relation alAzif (01/11/05)
      • Re: Question: Observer-Observed relation alAzif (01/11/05)
      • Re: Question: Observer-Observed relation Androcles (01/11/05)
      • Re: Question: Observer-Observed relation alAzif (01/11/05)
      • Re: Question: Observer-Observed relation Androcles (01/12/05)
      • Re: Question: Observer-Observed relation alAzif (01/12/05)
      • Re: Question: Observer-Observed relation Dirk Van de moortel (01/12/05)
      • Re: Question: Observer-Observed relation alAzif (01/12/05)
      • Re: Question: Observer-Observed relation Dirk Van de moortel (01/12/05)
      • Re: Question: Observer-Observed relation alAzif (01/12/05)
  • Re: Question: Observer-Observed relation ande452_at_attglobal.net (01/11/05)
    • Re: Question: Observer-Observed relation Len Gaasenbeek (01/12/05)
      • Re: Question: Observer-Observed relation Bilge (01/13/05)
  • Re: Question: Observer-Observed relation Bill Hobba (01/11/05)
  • Re: Question: Observer-Observed relation John Kennaugh (01/21/05)
    • Re: Question: Observer-Observed relation Bill Hobba (01/21/05)
      • Re: Question: Observer-Observed relation Tom Capizzi (01/21/05)
      • Re: Question: Observer-Observed relation Bill Hobba (01/21/05)
• Re: Still more fun with physics on 1000 free pages Dirk Van de moortel (01/10/05)
  • Re: Still more fun with physics on 1000 free pages Tapio (01/10/05)
• What is the distance to a black hole? Dr. Photon (01/10/05)
• Re: Looking for a text by H.A. Lorentz Sam Wormley (01/10/05)
  • Re: Looking for a text by H.A. Lorentz Dirk Van de moortel (01/10/05)
  • Re: Looking for a text by H.A. Lorentz Sam Wormley (01/10/05)
  • Re: Looking for a text by H.A. Lorentz Bill Hobba (01/10/05)
    • Re: Looking for a text by H.A. Lorentz Tom Roberts (01/11/05)
      • Re: Looking for a text by H.A. Lorentz Bill Hobba (01/11/05)
  • Re: Looking for a text by H.A. Lorentz Bill Hobba (01/10/05)
  • Re: Looking for a text by H.A. Lorentz Tom Roberts (01/11/05)
  • Re: Looking for a text by H.A. Lorentz Harry (01/11/05)
    • Re: Looking for a text by H.A. Lorentz chri_schiller_at_yahoo.com (01/14/05)
• My ideas on the Beginning of Universe ksaravanakumar_at_gmail.com (01/10/05)
  • Re: My ideas on the Beginning of Universe Bill Hobba (01/11/05)
    • Re: My ideas on the Beginning of Universe Koobee Wublee (01/11/05)
      • Re: My ideas on the Beginning of Universe Bill Hobba (01/11/05)
      • Re: My ideas on the Beginning of Universe Koobee Wublee (01/12/05)
      • Re: My ideas on the Beginning of Universe Bill Hobba (01/12/05)
      • Re: My ideas on the Beginning of Universe Koobee Wublee (01/13/05)
      • Re: My ideas on the Beginning of Universe Bill Hobba (01/13/05)
      • Re: My ideas on the Beginning of Universe Bill Hobba (01/13/05)
• GMP Theory tgouveia_at_gmail.com (01/10/05)
  • Re: GMP Theory Paul Cardinale (01/10/05)
    • Re: GMP Theory taggat (01/10/05)
      • Re: GMP Theory Ken S. Tucker (01/10/05)
      • Re: GMP Theory taggat (01/10/05)
      • Re: GMP Theory Ken S. Tucker (01/11/05)
      • Re: GMP Theory Bill Hobba (01/10/05)
      • Re: GMP Theory taggat (01/10/05)
      • Re: GMP Theory Bill Hobba (01/11/05)
      • Re: GMP Theory Alphonse (01/11/05)
  • Re: GMP Theory Bilge (01/10/05)
  • Re: GMP Theory robert j. kolker (01/11/05)
• Derivation of Lorentz Transf in vector form (2nd attempt) Zinc Potterman (01/10/05)
• Absolute Speed Peter Riedt (01/10/05)
  • Re: Absolute Speed Harry (01/10/05)
  • Re: Absolute Speed Paul B. Andersen (01/12/05)
• hints of the absolutes beda pietanza (01/09/05)
  • Re: hints of the absolutes Harry (01/10/05)
    • Re: hints of the absolutes beda (01/10/05)
      • Re: hints of the absolutes xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/10/05)
• Is distance A to B = distance B to A? rotchm_at_yahoo.com (01/09/05)
  • Re: Is distance A to B = distance B to A? Bilge (01/09/05)
    • Re: Is distance A to B = distance B to A? rotchm_at_yahoo.com (01/09/05)
      • Re: Is distance A to B = distance B to A? Bilge (01/10/05)
  • Re: Is distance A to B = distance B to A? Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (01/09/05)
  • Re: Is distance A to B = distance B to A? Eugene Shubert (01/09/05)
    • Re: Is distance A to B = distance B to A? Ken S. Tucker (01/09/05)
      • Re: Is distance A to B = distance B to A? Eugene Shubert (01/09/05)
      • Re: Is distance A to B = distance B to A? rotchm_at_yahoo.com (01/09/05)
    • Re: Is distance A to B = distance B to A? rotchm_at_yahoo.com (01/09/05)
      • Re: Is distance A to B = distance B to A? Eugene Shubert (01/09/05)
      • Re: Is distance A to B = distance B to A? rotchm_at_yahoo.com (01/09/05)
      • Re: Is distance A to B = distance B to A? Eugene Shubert (01/10/05)
      • Re: Is distance A to B = distance B to A? rotchm_at_yahoo.com (01/10/05)
      • Re: Is distance A to B = distance B to A? Eugene Shubert (01/10/05)
      • Re: Is distance A to B = distance B to A? rotchm_at_yahoo.com (01/10/05)
  • Re: Is distance A to B = distance B to A? Dirk Van de moortel (01/09/05)
    • Re: Is distance A to B = distance B to A? rotchm_at_yahoo.com (01/09/05)
  • Re: Is distance A to B = distance B to A? rotchm_at_yahoo.com (01/10/05)
    • Re: Is distance A to B = distance B to A? shevek (01/10/05)
• einstein math gurus - help with velocity composition dseppala_at_austin.rr.com (01/09/05)
  • Re: einstein math gurus - help with velocity composition David McAnally (01/09/05)
    • Re: einstein math gurus - help with velocity composition dseppala_at_austin.rr.com (01/09/05)
  • Re: einstein math gurus - help with velocity composition Tom Capizzi (01/09/05)
  • Re: einstein math gurus - help with velocity composition xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/10/05)
    • Re: einstein math gurus - help with velocity composition David McAnally (01/10/05)
      • Re: einstein math gurus - help with velocity composition xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/11/05)
  • Re: einstein math gurus - help with velocity composition David McAnally (01/11/05)
    • Re: einstein math gurus - help with velocity composition xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/11/05)
      • Re: einstein math gurus - help with velocity composition David McAnally (01/11/05)
      • Re: einstein math gurus - help with velocity composition Dirk Van de moortel (01/11/05)
      • Re: einstein math gurus - help with velocity composition jem (01/11/05)
      • Re: einstein math gurus - help with velocity composition Dirk Van de moortel (01/11/05)
      • Re: einstein math gurus - help with velocity composition jem (01/12/05)
      • Re: einstein math gurus - help with velocity composition xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/13/05)
      • Re: einstein math gurus - help with velocity composition David McAnally (01/13/05)
      • Re: einstein math gurus - help with velocity composition xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/14/05)
      • Re: einstein math gurus - help with velocity composition David McAnally (01/16/05)
      • Re: einstein math gurus - help with velocity composition xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/16/05)
• Summation notation and tensors Zinc Potterman (01/09/05)
  • Re: Summation notation and tensors Todd (01/09/05)
    • Re: Summation notation and tensors Todd (01/09/05)
      • Re: Summation notation and tensors Ken S. Tucker (01/09/05)
• expanding universe / energy question DavidBowman (01/09/05)
  • Re: expanding universe / energy question N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/09/05)
    • Re: expanding universe / energy question DavidBowman (01/09/05)
      • Re: expanding universe / energy question N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/09/05)
      • Re: expanding universe / energy question DavidBowman (01/10/05)
      • Re: expanding universe / energy question N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/10/05)
      • Re: expanding universe / energy question xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/10/05)
  • Re: expanding universe / energy question Tom Roberts (01/10/05)
    • Re: expanding universe / energy question DavidBowman (01/10/05)
    • Re: expanding universe / energy question DavidBowman (01/10/05)
• Re: Interstellar propulsion - Ahad's virtual bridge to Alpha Centauri hypothesis Rob Dekker (01/09/05)
  • Re: Interstellar propulsion - Ahad's virtual bridge to Alpha Centauri hypothesis dd (01/13/05)
• Summation notation & tensors Zinc Potterman (01/09/05)
  • Re: Summation notation & tensors Bilge (01/09/05)
  • Re: Summation notation & tensors Tom Roberts (01/09/05)
• Re: Androcles' long-winded solution to the mosquito problem Dirk Van de moortel (01/09/05)
  • Re: Androcles' long-winded solution to the mosquito problem Franz Heymann (01/09/05)
  • Re: Androcles' long-winded solution to the mosquito problem Dirk Van de moortel (01/10/05)
• GPS Plate Tectonics jahn (01/08/05)
  • Re: GPS Plate Tectonics Karl Forsberg (01/08/05)
    • Re: GPS Plate Tectonics Sue... (01/09/05)
• Gravity, Torsion as Local Gauge Theory & Dark Energy from Holography Jack Sarfatti (01/08/05)
• much crazier ether theories shevek (01/08/05)
  • Re: much crazier ether theories DavidBowman (01/09/05)
    • Re: much crazier ether theories shevek (01/10/05)
• Excuse me while.... geraldkelleher_at_hotmail.com (01/08/05)
  • Re: Excuse me while.... Bill Hobba (01/08/05)
    • Re: Excuse me while.... geraldkelleher_at_hotmail.com (01/10/05)
      • Re: Excuse me while.... Bill Hobba (01/10/05)
      • Re: Excuse me while.... AllYou! (01/10/05)
      • Re: Excuse me while.... Bill Hobba (01/15/05)
      • Re: Excuse me while.... AllYou! (01/15/05)
      • Re: Excuse me while.... geraldkelleher_at_hotmail.com (01/11/05)
  • Re: Excuse me while.... robert j. kolker (01/11/05)
    • Re: Excuse me while.... geraldkelleher_at_hotmail.com (01/11/05)
• Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 PDraper (01/08/05)
  • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/08/05)
    • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 PDraper (01/09/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Sue... (01/09/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/09/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/09/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Dirk Van de moortel (01/09/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 RP (01/09/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/09/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 RP (01/09/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 PD (01/10/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/10/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 PD (01/10/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/10/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 PD (01/10/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/10/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 PDraper (01/11/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/13/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 PD (01/13/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/13/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 PD (01/13/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/13/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 PD (01/14/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/14/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 PD (01/14/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/14/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 PD (01/14/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/14/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 PD (01/14/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/14/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 PDraper (01/15/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/15/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 PD (01/15/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/15/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 jgreenfield_at_seol.net.au (01/16/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Tom Capizzi (01/16/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 The Ghost In The Machine (01/16/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 jgreenfield_at_seol.net.au (01/17/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/17/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Franz Heymann (01/17/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/16/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 jgreenfield_at_seol.net.au (01/17/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Tom Capizzi (01/17/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 jgreenfield_at_seol.net.au (01/17/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Tom Capizzi (01/17/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Franz Heymann (01/17/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Franz Heymann (01/17/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 PDraper (01/17/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/17/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 PD (01/17/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/18/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Gregory L. Hansen (01/14/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/14/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Gregory L. Hansen (01/15/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/15/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Gregory L. Hansen (01/15/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/15/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 PD (01/15/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/15/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 PDraper (01/17/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Dirk Van de moortel (01/17/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/17/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 PD (01/17/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/17/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 PDraper (01/18/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/18/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Dirk Van de moortel (01/18/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 PD (01/18/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Dirk Van de moortel (01/18/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/18/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 PD (01/18/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/18/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Franz Heymann (01/18/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 PDraper (01/18/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/18/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 jgreenfield_at_seol.net.au (01/18/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Gregory L. Hansen (01/15/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/15/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Gregory L. Hansen (01/15/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Dirk Van de moortel (01/15/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/15/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Gregory L. Hansen (01/15/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/16/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Gregory L. Hansen (01/16/05)
      • Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/16/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Ken S. Tucker (01/16/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/16/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Gregory L. Hansen (01/16/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. RP (01/16/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/16/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/16/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Gregory L. Hansen (01/16/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/16/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Gregory L. Hansen (01/16/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/16/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Gregory L. Hansen (01/17/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/17/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Gregory L. Hansen (01/17/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/17/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Gregory L. Hansen (01/17/05)
      • Re: Hansen forgets how reason. Androcles (01/21/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Franz Heymann (01/17/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Gregory L. Hansen (01/17/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Dirk Van de moortel (01/17/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Creighton Hogg (01/17/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Timo Nieminen (01/17/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Franz Heymann (01/18/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Dirk Van de moortel (01/18/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Franz Heymann (01/18/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Timo Nieminen (01/18/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/17/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Gregory L. Hansen (01/17/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/17/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Gregory L. Hansen (01/17/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/17/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Franz Heymann (01/18/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Gregory L. Hansen (01/18/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/18/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Gregory L. Hansen (01/18/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/18/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Gregory L. Hansen (01/18/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/18/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Gregory L. Hansen (01/18/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/18/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/20/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Gregory L. Hansen (01/20/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/20/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Dirk Van de moortel (01/21/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. PD (01/21/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/21/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. PD (01/21/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/21/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Randy Poe (01/21/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. PD (01/21/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/21/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. PD (01/21/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/21/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/21/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. PD (01/21/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Gregory L. Hansen (01/21/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Creighton Hogg (01/21/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/21/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. PD (01/21/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/21/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. PD (01/21/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/21/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. PD (01/22/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/23/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. YBM (01/23/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/21/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (01/21/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. PD (01/22/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (01/22/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/22/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Dirk Van de moortel (01/22/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com (01/23/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/23/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com (01/23/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/23/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com (01/24/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/24/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. PD (01/24/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/24/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. PD (01/24/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Gregory L. Hansen (01/24/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. PD (01/25/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Franz Heymann (01/25/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Gregory L. Hansen (01/25/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Franz Heymann (01/25/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/24/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Creighton Hogg (01/24/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/24/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Timo Nieminen (01/24/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/25/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Timo Nieminen (01/25/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/25/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Timo Nieminen (01/25/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/25/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Timo Nieminen (01/25/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/25/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Timo Nieminen (01/25/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Franz Heymann (01/25/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Creighton Hogg (01/24/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/25/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. PD (01/25/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/25/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/25/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Timo Nieminen (01/25/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/25/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Timo Nieminen (01/25/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. PD (01/25/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Franz Heymann (01/25/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Creighton Hogg (01/25/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. PD (01/25/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/25/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. PD (01/25/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/25/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. PDraper (01/25/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Gregory L. Hansen (01/25/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. PDraper (01/25/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/26/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com (01/26/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/26/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. David McAnally (01/26/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com (01/26/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/26/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Franz Heymann (01/27/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Franz Heymann (01/29/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Franz Heymann (01/26/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. PD (01/26/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/26/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. PD (01/26/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/26/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. PD (01/26/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/26/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. PD (01/26/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/27/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Timo Nieminen (01/27/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/27/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Timo Nieminen (01/27/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/27/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. PD (01/27/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/27/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Dirk Van de moortel (01/27/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Franz Heymann (01/29/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. YBM (01/27/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Dirk Van de moortel (01/27/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. PD (01/28/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Gregory L. Hansen (01/28/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/28/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. YBM (01/28/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Franz Heymann (01/29/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/28/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. YBM (01/28/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Creighton Hogg (01/28/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Franz Heymann (01/29/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Franz Heymann (01/29/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Timo Nieminen (01/27/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/30/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Gregory L. Hansen (01/28/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/28/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Gregory L. Hansen (01/28/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/30/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Franz Heymann (01/30/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Franz Heymann (01/29/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Franz Heymann (01/29/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. David McAnally (01/28/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Timo Nieminen (01/28/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. PD (01/27/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Franz Heymann (01/27/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Franz Heymann (01/27/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com (01/25/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/26/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com (01/26/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com (01/26/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/27/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Franz Heymann (01/27/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Franz Heymann (01/25/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Dirk Van de moortel (01/26/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Franz Heymann (01/26/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Franz Heymann (01/25/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Franz Heymann (01/25/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Franz Heymann (01/25/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com (01/24/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/24/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. jgreenfield_at_seol.net.au (01/24/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com (01/24/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/24/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com (01/25/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Gregory L. Hansen (01/22/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/22/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (01/23/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. PD (01/21/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/21/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Tom Capizzi (01/21/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/21/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Franz Heymann (01/21/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. PDraper (01/18/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/18/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Franz Heymann (01/17/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Franz Heymann (01/17/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Timo Nieminen (01/17/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Dirk Van de moortel (01/16/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. PD (01/17/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Androcles (01/17/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. PD (01/17/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Franz Heymann (01/18/05)
      • Re: Hansen discovers how to reason. Franz Heymann (01/19/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Franz Heymann (01/16/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Timo Nieminen (01/15/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 PD (01/15/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/15/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 David McAnally (01/15/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Dirk Van de moortel (01/15/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Timo Nieminen (01/15/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 PDraper (01/17/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/17/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Timo Nieminen (01/17/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Franz Heymann (01/18/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Bilge (01/11/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Ken S. Tucker (01/11/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/11/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Dirk Van de moortel (01/11/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Ken S. Tucker (01/11/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 FrediFizzx (01/11/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Ken S. Tucker (01/11/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Bilge (01/12/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Ken S. Tucker (01/12/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Dirk Van de moortel (01/12/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Ken S. Tucker (01/12/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Bilge (01/13/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Ken S. Tucker (01/13/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/13/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Ken S. Tucker (01/14/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/14/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Bilge (01/14/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Ken S. Tucker (01/14/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Bilge (01/15/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Ken S. Tucker (01/15/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Ken S. Tucker (01/15/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/15/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Ken S. Tucker (01/15/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Bilge (01/16/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Ken S. Tucker (01/16/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Gregory L. Hansen (01/16/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Bilge (01/12/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Dirk Van de moortel (01/12/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Franz Heymann (01/12/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Dirk Van de moortel (01/12/05)
    • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 PD (01/26/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Dirk Van de moortel (01/26/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/26/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 PD (01/26/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 PD (01/26/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/26/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/26/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Dirk Van de moortel (01/26/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 PD (01/26/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/27/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 PD (01/27/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Dirk Van de moortel (01/27/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/27/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 PD (01/27/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/27/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/27/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 PD (01/27/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Dirk Van de moortel (01/27/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/28/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 PD (01/28/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/28/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Dirk Van de moortel (01/28/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 David McAnally (01/28/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Dirk Van de moortel (01/28/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 David McAnally (01/29/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 PD (01/28/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/28/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 PD (01/28/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/28/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Dirk Van de moortel (01/28/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 YBM (01/28/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 PD (01/27/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/28/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 PD (01/28/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Dirk Van de moortel (01/28/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/28/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 PD (01/28/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 Androcles (01/28/05)
      • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905 YBM (01/28/05)
• Re: Understanding Einstein's Math George Hammond (01/08/05)
  • Re: Understanding Einstein's Math Tom Capizzi (01/08/05)
    • Re: Understanding Einstein's Math George Hammond (01/08/05)
• Re: The genius of the Absolute nightbat (01/08/05)
• WORLD LINES Sesselmann (01/08/05)
  • Re: WORLD LINES Ken S. Tucker (01/08/05)
    • Re: WORLD LINES Sesselmann (01/08/05)
      • Re: WORLD LINES Ken S. Tucker (01/08/05)
      • Re: WORLD LINES Sesselmann (01/08/05)
      • Re: WORLD LINES N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/09/05)
  • Re: WORLD LINES Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (01/08/05)
    • Re: WORLD LINES Sesselmann (01/08/05)
  • Re: WORLD LINES Tom Roberts (01/08/05)
    • Re: WORLD LINES Sesselmann (01/08/05)
      • Re: WORLD LINES Tom Roberts (01/12/05)
      • Re: WORLD LINES Sesselmann (01/13/05)
      • Re: WORLD LINES ande452_at_attglobal.net (01/14/05)
      • Re: WORLD LINES Sesselmann (01/14/05)
• What is the shape of the Rindler horizon? heinrich_neumaier_at_yahoo.com (01/07/05)
  • Re: What is the shape of the Rindler horizon? Eugene Shubert (01/08/05)
    • Re: What is the shape of the Rindler horizon? David McAnally (01/08/05)
      • Re: What is the shape of the Rindler horizon? Eugene Shubert (01/08/05)
    • Re: What is the shape of the Rindler horizon? David McAnally (01/08/05)
      • Re: What is the shape of the Rindler horizon? Eugene Shubert (01/08/05)
      • Re: What is the shape of the Rindler horizon? - And the color? heinrich_neumaier_at_yahoo.com (01/08/05)
      • Re: What is the shape of the Rindler horizon? - And the color? Tom Roberts (01/08/05)
      • Re: What is the shape of the Rindler horizon? - And the color? heinrich_neumaier_at_yahoo.com (01/09/05)
      • Re: What is the shape of the Rindler horizon? David McAnally (01/09/05)
      • Re: What is the shape of the Rindler horizon? David McAnally (01/13/05)
  • Re: What is the shape of the Rindler horizon? Eugene Shubert (01/08/05)
• What is the distance to a black hole? Dr. Photon (01/07/05)
• Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? qchiang2_at_yahoo.com (01/07/05)
  • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? Ken S. Tucker (01/07/05)
    • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? qchiang2_at_yahoo.com (01/08/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? Sue... (01/09/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? Androcles (01/09/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? Tom Roberts (01/09/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? Androcles (01/09/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? jahn (01/09/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? Androcles (01/10/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? qchiang2_at_yahoo.com (01/09/05)
    • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? qchiang2_at_yahoo.com (01/10/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? Ken S. Tucker (01/10/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? qchiang2_at_yahoo.com (01/11/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? Ken S. Tucker (01/11/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? robert j. kolker (01/12/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? Ken S. Tucker (01/12/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? Androcles (01/12/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? Ken S. Tucker (01/12/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? Ken S. Tucker (01/12/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? qchiang2_at_yahoo.com (01/12/05)
  • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? Bill Hobba (01/07/05)
    • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? qchiang2_at_yahoo.com (01/08/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? Tom Roberts (01/09/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? qchiang2_at_yahoo.com (01/09/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? Bill Hobba (01/11/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? qchiang2_at_yahoo.com (01/11/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? Bill Hobba (01/11/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? qchiang2_at_yahoo.com (01/12/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? Bill Hobba (01/12/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/13/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? Bill Hobba (01/13/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? qchiang2_at_yahoo.com (01/13/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? Bill Hobba (01/13/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? qchiang2_at_yahoo.com (01/14/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? Bill Hobba (01/15/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? qchiang2_at_yahoo.com (01/17/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/15/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? qchiang2_at_yahoo.com (01/17/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? Ken S. Tucker (01/17/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? qchiang2_at_yahoo.com (01/18/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? Ken S. Tucker (01/18/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/18/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? qchiang2_at_yahoo.com (01/18/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/20/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? qchiang2_at_yahoo.com (01/21/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? Tom Roberts (01/16/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? qchiang2_at_yahoo.com (01/17/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? Bill Hobba (01/10/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? qchiang2_at_yahoo.com (01/11/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? Bill Hobba (01/11/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? qchiang2_at_yahoo.com (01/12/05)
  • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/08/05)
    • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (01/08/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? Ken S. Tucker (01/08/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? xxein_at_bellsouth.net (01/11/05)
    • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? qchiang2_at_yahoo.com (01/08/05)
    • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? reany_at_asu.edu (01/09/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? AllYou! (01/10/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? reany_at_asu.edu (01/16/05)
      • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? AllYou! (01/17/05)
  • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? Tom Roberts (01/08/05)
    • Re: Is the Assumption Of Consistent Proper Time Throughout The Universe In GR Valid? qchiang2_at_yahoo.com (01/09/05)
• Speed of light NOT defined as 299 792 458 m / s rotchm_at_yahoo.com (01/07/05)
  • Re: Speed of light NOT defined as 299 792 458 m / s Dirk Van de moortel (01/07/05)
    • Re: Speed of light NOT defined as 299 792 458 m / s David Evens (01/08/05)
      • Re: Speed of light NOT defined as 299 792 458 m / s Dirk Van de moortel (01/08/05)
      • Re: Speed of light NOT defined as 299 792 458 m / s rotchm_at_yahoo.com (01/09/05)
  • Re: Speed of light NOT defined as 299 792 458 m / s Bill Hobba (01/07/05)
    • Re: Speed of light NOT defined as 299 792 458 m / s rotchm_at_yahoo.com (01/08/05)
      • Re: Speed of light NOT defined as 299 792 458 m / s Bilge (01/08/05)
      • Re: Speed of light NOT defined as 299 792 458 m / s rotchm_at_yahoo.com (01/08/05)
      • Re: Speed of light NOT defined as 299 792 458 m / s Bilge (01/08/05)
      • Re: Speed of light NOT defined as 299 792 458 m / s rotchm_at_yahoo.com (01/08/05)
      • Re: Speed of light NOT defined as 299 792 458 m / s Bilge (01/09/05)
      • Re: Speed of light NOT defined as 299 792 458 m / s rotchm_at_yahoo.com (01/09/05)
      • Re: Speed of light NOT defined as 299 792 458 m / s Tom Capizzi (01/09/05)
      • Re: Speed of light NOT defined as 299 792 458 m / s rotchm_at_yahoo.com (01/09/05)
      • Re: Speed of light NOT defined as 299 792 458 m / s Dirk Van de moortel (01/09/05)
      • Re: Speed of light NOT defined as 299 792 458 m / s rotchm_at_yahoo.com (01/09/05)
      • Re: Speed of light NOT defined as 299 792 458 m / s Bilge (01/09/05)
      • Re: Speed of light NOT defined as 299 792 458 m / s rotchm_at_yahoo.com (01/09/05)
      • Re: Speed of light NOT defined as 299 792 458 m / s Bill Hobba (01/08/05)
      • Re: Speed of light NOT defined as 299 792 458 m / s rotchm_at_yahoo.com (01/08/05)
      • Re: Speed of light NOT defined as 299 792 458 m / s Bill Hobba (01/08/05)
      • Re: Speed of light NOT defined as 299 792 458 m / s kenseto (01/08/05)
      • Re: Speed of light NOT defined as 299 792 458 m / s Bill Hobba (01/10/05)
      • Re: Speed of light NOT defined as 299 792 458 m / s kenseto (01/10/05)
      • Re: Speed of light NOT defined as 299 792 458 m / s rotchm_at_yahoo.com (01/08/05)
      • Re: Speed of light NOT defined as 299 792 458 m / s Bill Hobba (01/08/05)
      • Re: Speed of light NOT defined as 299 792 458 m / s rotchm_at_yahoo.com (01/08/05)
      • Re: Speed of light NOT defined as 299 792 458 m / s Bill Hobba (01/10/05)
      • Re: Speed of light NOT defined as 299 792 458 m / s kenseto (01/09/0