sci.physics.relativity
By Thread
6187 messages sorted by: [ date ]
Starting: 01/30/05
Ending: 02/28/05
- Communicating at Translight Velocities Einsteinhoax (02/27/05)
- The Axes of Evil are East of Eden II Jack Sarfatti (02/27/05)
- General Relativity Examined Einsteinhoax (02/27/05)
- The END of Relatvity's Time Dilation through Symmetry guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/27/05)
- SR time dilation and wires dseppala_at_austin.rr.com (02/27/05)
- Achieving Critical Mass. Anarchist Communism, EMC squared and the Arc of the Covenant. How to construct a home-made nuclear weapon. Lucifer Horus Morning Star Angel of Death (02/27/05)
- SR is An Aether Theory...and there is NO aether. Henri Wilson (02/27/05)
- medium Paulps (02/27/05)
- Help with SR time dilation dseppala_at_austin.rr.com (02/27/05)
- Measuring Magic eleaticus (02/27/05)
- What is a good clock? Rev 97654.B jahn (02/27/05)
- Kick ass reference on Tensors GR_GR (02/27/05)
- A Time Dilation Observation Flaw guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/26/05)
- A Time Dilation Observation Flaw guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/26/05)
- need help withb GR calculation uzi kohavi (02/26/05)
- http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Quantum_AI/ zetasum (02/26/05)
- The Theory of Moving Dimensions/Time Vector : Thanks For The Feedback!!! jollyrogership_at_yahoo.com (02/26/05)
- Re: The Theory of Moving Dimensions/Time Vector : Thanks For The Feedback!!! Uncle Al (02/26/05)
- Re: The Theory of Moving Dimensions/Time Vector : Thanks For The Feedback!!! GR_GR (02/26/05)
- Re: The Theory of Moving Dimensions/Time Vector : Thanks For The Feedback!!! jollyrogership_at_yahoo.com (02/27/05)
- Re: The Theory of Moving Dimensions/Time Vector : Thanks For The Feedback!!! N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/27/05)
- Re: The Theory of Moving Dimensions/Time Vector : Thanks For The Feedback!!! jollyrogership_at_yahoo.com (02/27/05)
- Re: The Theory of Moving Dimensions/Time Vector : Thanks For The Feedback!!! N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/27/05)
- Re: The Theory of Moving Dimensions/Time Vector : Thanks For The Feedback!!! Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (02/27/05)
- Re: The Theory of Moving Dimensions/Time Vector : Thanks For The Feedback!!! GR_GR (02/27/05)
- Re: The Theory of Moving Dimensions/Time Vector : Thanks For The Feedback!!! Franz Heymann (02/27/05)
- Re: The Theory of Moving Dimensions/Time Vector : Thanks For The Feedback!!! jollyrogership_at_yahoo.com (02/27/05)
- Re: Moses, Physics and the Arc of the Covenant. Physics is War. The Final Judaic Revolution. Armageddon. The Apocalypse. The Messiah. The God of the Enslaved and the Global Liberation of the Enslaved. gigo448_at_netscape.net (02/26/05)
- Re: Moses, Physics and the Arc of the Covenant. Physics is War. The Final Judaic Revolution. Armageddon. The Apocalypse. The Messiah. The God of the Enslaved and the Global Liberation of the Enslaved. GR_GR (02/26/05)
- Re: Moses, Physics and the Arc of the Covenant. Physics is War. The Final Judaic Revolution. Armageddon. The Apocalypse. The Messiah. The God of the Enslaved and the Global Liberation of the Enslaved. Quantum Mirror (02/26/05)
- Re: Moses, Physics and the Arc of the Covenant. Physics is War. The Final Judaic Revolution. Armageddon. The Apocalypse. The Messiah. The God of the Enslaved and the Global Liberation of the Enslaved. DavidBowman (02/27/05)
- Is theoryland in southern California? Clocks and Time reany_at_asu.edu (02/26/05)
- K.E. and momentum DavidBowman (02/26/05)
- Re: K.E. and momentum jahn (02/26/05)
- Re: K.E. and momentum Dirk Van de moortel (02/26/05)
- Re: K.E. and momentum jahn (02/26/05)
- Re: K.E. and momentum Dirk Van de moortel (02/26/05)
- Re: K.E. and momentum jahn (02/26/05)
- Re: K.E. and momentum jahn (02/26/05)
- Re: K.E. and momentum Daryl McCullough (02/27/05)
- Re: K.E. and momentum Dirk Van de moortel (02/27/05)
- Re: K.E. and momentum jahn (02/27/05)
- Re: K.E. and momentum Dirk Van de moortel (02/27/05)
- Re: K.E. and momentum Daryl McCullough (02/27/05)
- Re: K.E. and momentum DavidBowman (02/27/05)
- Re: K.E. and momentum Dirk Van de moortel (02/26/05)
- Re: K.E. and momentum Ken S. Tucker (02/26/05)
- Re: K.E. and momentum Daryl McCullough (02/27/05)
- Re: K.E. and momentum Dirk Van de moortel (02/27/05)
- Re: K.E. and momentum Ken S. Tucker (02/28/05)
- Re: K.E. and momentum Ken S. Tucker (02/28/05)
- Re: K.E. and momentum Daryl McCullough (02/28/05)
- Re: K.E. and momentum Paul Stowe (02/28/05)
- Re: K.E. and momentum N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/28/05)
- Re: K.E. and momentum DavidBowman (02/28/05)
- Re: K.E. and momentum Paul Stowe (02/28/05)
- Re: K.E. and momentum jahn (02/26/05)
- Re: K.E. and momentum Ken S. Tucker (02/26/05)
- Re: K.E. and momentum Jon Bell (02/26/05)
- Re: K.E. and momentum GR_GR (02/26/05)
- Re: K.E. and momentum jahn (02/26/05)
- Re: K.E. and momentum DavidBowman (02/27/05)
- The Axis of Evil is East of Eden Jack Sarfatti (02/26/05)
- relativity and time Ron Poteet (02/26/05)
- Re: relativity and time robert j. kolker (02/26/05)
- Re: relativity and time reany_at_asu.edu (02/26/05)
- Re: relativity and time N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/26/05)
- Philosophy is not a four-letter word reany_at_asu.edu (02/26/05)
- Re: Philosophy is not a four-letter word N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/26/05)
- Re: Philosophy is not a four-letter word reany_at_asu.edu (02/26/05)
- Re: Philosophy is not a four-letter word N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/26/05)
- Re: Philosophy is not a four-letter word Daniel Weston (02/26/05)
- Re: Philosophy is not a four-letter word N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/26/05)
- Agnosti-relativists? reany_at_asu.edu (02/26/05)
- Re: Agnosti-relativists? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/26/05)
- Re: Agnosti-relativists? reany_at_asu.edu (02/27/05)
- Re: Agnosti-relativists? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/27/05)
- Re: Philosophy is not a four-letter word DavidBowman (02/27/05)
- Re: Philosophy is not a four-letter word N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/27/05)
- Re: relativity and time reany_at_asu.edu (02/26/05)
- Re: relativity and time Sue... (02/26/05)
- Re: relativity and time doubter (02/26/05)
- Re: relativity and time Josef Matz (02/26/05)
- Re: relativity and time robert j. kolker (02/26/05)
- RLC twins jahn (02/25/05)
- More M & M's: so what's the story on this "Sagnac effect" then, anyway? DavidBowman (02/25/05)
- Re: More M & M's: so what's the story on this "Sagnac effect" then, anyway? DavidBowman (02/25/05)
- Re: More M & M's: so what's the story on this "Sagnac effect" then, anyway? harry (02/25/05)
- Re: More M & M's: so what's the story on this "Sagnac effect" then, anyway? Jon Bell (02/25/05)
- Re: More M & M's: so what's the story on this "Sagnac effect" then, anyway? Tom Roberts (02/25/05)
- Re: More M & M's: so what's the story on this "Sagnac effect" then, anyway? DavidBowman (02/25/05)
- Einstein's GR as a Gauge Theory and Shipov's Torsion Field Jack Sarfatti (02/25/05)
- A Question For Those Who Truly Understand The Theory of Relativity (Was: Einstein's GR as a Gauge Theory and Shipov's Torsion Field) Ross (02/25/05)
- Re: A Question For Those Who Truly Understand The Theory of Relativity (Was: Einstein's GR as a Gauge Theory and Shipov's Torsion Field) Tom Roberts (02/25/05)
- Re: A Question For Those Who Truly Understand The Theory of Relativity (Was: Einstein's GR as a Gauge Theory and Shipov's Torsion Field) Ross (02/25/05)
- Re: A Question For Those Who Truly Understand The Theory of Relativity (Was: Einstein's GR as a Gauge Theory and Shipov's Torsion Field) Larry Hammick (02/25/05)
- Re: A Question For Those Who Truly Understand The Theory of Relativity (Was: Einstein's GR as a Gauge Theory and Shipov's Torsion Field) Ross (02/26/05)
- Re: A Question For Those Who Truly Understand The Theory of Relativity (Was: Einstein's GR as a Gauge Theory and Shipov's Torsion Field) Ben Rudiak-Gould (02/26/05)
- Re: A Question For Those Who Truly Understand The Theory of Relativity (Was: Einstein's GR as a Gauge Theory and Shipov's Torsion Field) Tom Roberts (02/25/05)
- A Question For Those Who Truly Understand The Theory of Relativity (Was: Einstein's GR as a Gauge Theory and Shipov's Torsion Field) Ross (02/25/05)
- Coulomb's constant is a CGS kludge John C. Polasek (02/25/05)
- Re: Coulomb's constant is a CGS kludge jahn (02/25/05)
- Re: Coulomb's constant is a CGS kludge Eugene S. (02/25/05)
- Re: Coulomb's constant is a CGS kludge John C. Polasek (02/25/05)
- Re: Coulomb's constant is a CGS kludge FrediFizzx (02/25/05)
- Re: Coulomb's constant is a CGS kludge Tom Capizzi (02/25/05)
- Re: Coulomb's constant is a CGS kludge jahn (02/25/05)
- Re: Coulomb's constant is a CGS kludge Bilge (02/26/05)
- Re: Coulomb's constant is a CGS kludge jahn (02/26/05)
- Re: Coulomb's constant is a CGS kludge Ken S. Tucker (02/26/05)
- Re: Coulomb's constant is a CGS kludge FrediFizzx (02/26/05)
- Re: Coulomb's constant is a CGS kludge Bilge (02/26/05)
- Re: Coulomb's constant is a CGS kludge jahn (02/25/05)
- Re: Coulomb's constant is a CGS kludge John C. Polasek (02/25/05)
- Re: Coulomb's constant is a CGS kludge jahn (02/25/05)
- Re: Coulomb's constant is a CGS kludge John C. Polasek (02/25/05)
- Re: Coulomb's constant is a CGS kludge Tom Capizzi (02/26/05)
- Re: Coulomb's constant is a CGS kludge whopkins_at_csd.uwm.edu (02/26/05)
- Re: Coulomb's constant is a CGS kludge whopkins_at_csd.uwm.edu (02/26/05)
- Re: Coulomb's constant is a CGS kludge FrediFizzx (02/26/05)
- Re: Coulomb's constant is a CGS kludge jahn (02/26/05)
- Re: Coulomb's constant is a CGS kludge FrediFizzx (02/26/05)
- Re: Coulomb's constant is a CGS kludge jahn (02/26/05)
- Re: Coulomb's constant is a CGS kludge Ken S. Tucker (02/27/05)
- (epsilon_0 c) is the U(1) bundle metric (was: Coulomb's constant is a CGS kludge) whopkins_at_csd.uwm.edu (02/25/05)
- Re: (epsilon_0 c) is the U(1) bundle metric (was: Coulomb's constant is a CGS kludge) jahn (02/25/05)
- Re: (epsilon_0 c) is the U(1) bundle metric (was: Coulomb's constant is a CGS kludge) Ken S. Tucker (02/25/05)
- Re: (epsilon_0 c) is the U(1) bundle metric (was: Coulomb's constant is a CGS kludge) Eugene S. (02/26/05)
- Re: (epsilon_0 c) is the U(1) bundle metric (was: Coulomb's constant is a CGS kludge) FrediFizzx (02/27/05)
- Re: Coulomb's constant is a CGS kludge John C. Polasek (02/25/05)
- Re: Coulomb's constant is a CGS kludge GR_GR (02/25/05)
- Re: Coulomb's constant is a CGS kludge John C. Polasek (02/25/05)
- Re: Coulomb's constant is a CGS kludge Bilge (02/26/05)
- Re: Coulomb's constant is a CGS kludge John C. Polasek (02/27/05)
- FYI: Galaxy consisting exclusively of dark matter found by U. of Manchester, confirmed by Arecibo DavidBowman (02/25/05)
- Why do green M-M's make some people horny? DavidBowman (02/25/05)
- Re: Why do green M-M's make some people horny? The Ghost In The Machine (02/25/05)
- Re: Why do green M-M's make some people horny? harry (02/25/05)
- Re: Why do green M-M's make some people horny? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/25/05)
- Re: Why do green M-M's make some people horny? Dirk Van de moortel (02/25/05)
- Re: Why do green M-M's make some people horny? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/25/05)
- Re: Why do green M-M's make some people horny? DavidBowman (02/25/05)
- Re: Why do green M-M's make some people horny? Harry (02/25/05)
- Re: Why do green M-M's make some people horny? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/25/05)
- Re: Why do green M-M's make some people horny? DavidBowman (02/26/05)
- Re: Why do green M-M's make some people horny? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/26/05)
- Re: Why do green M-M's make some people horny? Harry (02/26/05)
- Re: Why do green M-M's make some people horny? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/25/05)
- Re: Why do green M-M's make some people horny? Tom Roberts (02/25/05)
- Re: Why do green M-M's make some people horny? DavidBowman (02/25/05)
- Re: What is a physical theory and variable AllYou! (02/24/05)
- Re: What is a physical theory and variable reany_at_asu.edu (02/24/05)
- Re: What is a physical theory and variable AllYou! (02/24/05)
- Re: What is a physical theory and variable Daniel Weston (02/24/05)
- Re: What is a physical theory and variable Daniel Weston (02/24/05)
- Re: What is a physical theory and variable AllYou! (02/25/05)
- Re: What is a physical theory and variable reany_at_asu.edu (02/25/05)
- Re: What is a physical theory and variable Daniel Weston (02/25/05)
- Re: What is a physical theory and variable AllYou! (02/25/05)
- Re: What is a physical theory and variable AllYou! (02/25/05)
- Re: What is a physical theory and variable reany_at_asu.edu (02/25/05)
- Re: What is a physical theory and variable AllYou! (02/25/05)
- Re: What is a physical theory and variable Daniel Weston (02/25/05)
- Re: What is a physical theory and variable N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/25/05)
- Re: What is a physical theory and variable AllYou! (02/25/05)
- Re: What is a physical theory and variable Daniel Weston (02/25/05)
- Re: What is a physical theory and variable N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/25/05)
- Re: What is a physical theory and variable reany_at_asu.edu (02/25/05)
- Re: What is a physical theory and variable N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/25/05)
- Re: What is a physical theory and variable reany_at_asu.edu (02/25/05)
- Re: What is a physical theory and variable AllYou! (02/25/05)
- Re: What is a physical theory and variable AllYou! (02/24/05)
- Re: What is a physical theory and variable reany_at_asu.edu (02/24/05)
- Axis of Evil, Preferred Frames as Spontaneous Broken Vacuum Symmetry Groups Jack Sarfatti (02/24/05)
- Hierarchical Inertial System (HIS) and GPS function. Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato (02/24/05)
- Why does a multiplication by gamma > 1 result in a contraction? The Ghost In The Machine (02/24/05)
- Time difference Ian (02/24/05)
- Re: Time difference Androcles (02/24/05)
- Re: Time difference N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/24/05)
- Re: Time difference Ian (02/24/05)
- Re: Time difference N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/24/05)
- Re: Time difference Ian (02/24/05)
- Re: Time difference N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/24/05)
- Re: Time difference DavidBowman (02/24/05)
- Re: Time difference N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/24/05)
- Re: Time difference christie.jones (02/24/05)
- Re: Time difference Martin Hogbin (02/24/05)
- Re: Time difference Ian (02/24/05)
- Re: Time difference Dirk Van de moortel (02/24/05)
- Re: Time difference Martin Hogbin (02/24/05)
- Superluminal Quasar Jets : The Beaming "Explanation" Appears Inadequate Chris O'Riordan (02/24/05)
- Re: Superluminal Quasar Jets : The Beaming "Explanation" Appears Inadequate N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/24/05)
- Re: Superluminal Quasar Jets : The Beaming "Explanation" Appears Inadequate christie.jones (02/24/05)
- Re: Superluminal Quasar Jets : The Beaming "Explanation" Appears Inadequate Jonathan Silverlight (02/24/05)
- Re: Superluminal Quasar Jets : The Beaming "Explanation" Appears Inadequate N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/24/05)
- Re: Superluminal Quasar Jets : The Beaming "Explanation" Appears Inadequate Joseph Lazio (02/26/05)
- Re: Superluminal Quasar Jets : The Beaming "Explanation" Appears Inadequate N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/26/05)
- Re: Superluminal Quasar Jets : The Beaming "Explanation" Appears Inadequate jgreen_at_seol.net.au (02/26/05)
- Re: Superluminal Quasar Jets : The Beaming "Explanation" Appears Inadequate George Dishman (02/27/05)
- Re: Superluminal Quasar Jets : The Beaming "Explanation" Appears Inadequate jgreen_at_seol.net.au (02/27/05)
- Re: Superluminal Quasar Jets : The Beaming "Explanation" Appears Inadequate Sam Wormley (02/28/05)
- Re: Superluminal Quasar Jets : The Beaming "Explanation" Appears Inadequate George Dishman (02/28/05)
- Re: Superluminal Quasar Jets : The Beaming "Explanation" Appears Inadequate Martin Brown (02/24/05)
- Re: Superluminal Quasar Jets : The Beaming "Explanation" Appears Inadequate N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/24/05)
- Re: Superluminal Quasar Jets : The Beaming "Explanation" Appears Inadequate Chris O'Riordan (02/26/05)
- Re: Superluminal Quasar Jets : The Beaming "Explanation" Appears Inadequate Joseph Lazio (02/26/05)
- Re: Superluminal Quasar Jets : The Beaming "Explanation" Appears Inadequate Jonathan Silverlight (02/27/05)
- Re: Superluminal Quasar Jets : The Beaming "Explanation" Appears Inadequate Chris O'Riordan (02/26/05)
- Re: Superluminal Quasar Jets : The Beaming "Explanation" Appears Inadequate Sam Wormley (02/24/05)
- Re: Superluminal Quasar Jets : The Beaming "Explanation" Appears Inadequate N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/24/05)
- Kinetic energy, momentum, the photon, a limit, zero, and infinity DavidBowman (02/24/05)
- Re: Kinetic energy, momentum, the photon, a limit, zero, and infinity Bilge (02/24/05)
- Re: Kinetic energy, momentum, the photon, a limit, zero, and infinity PD (02/24/05)
- Re: Kinetic energy, momentum, the photon, a limit, zero, and infinity Tom Roberts (02/24/05)
- Re: Kinetic energy, momentum, the photon, a limit, zero, and infinity DavidBowman (02/24/05)
- Re: Big Bertha Thing blogs Tony Lance (02/23/05)
- RELATIVITY THEORY - THE BIGGEST DELUSION IN SCIENCE Kolessin (02/23/05)
- Re: RELATIVITY THEORY - THE BIGGEST DELUSION IN SCIENCE Dirk Van de moortel (02/23/05)
- Re: RELATIVITY THEORY - THE BIGGEST DELUSION IN SCIENCE valls_at_icmf.inf.cu (02/23/05)
- Re: RELATIVITY THEORY - THE BIGGEST DELUSION IN SCIENCE Eric Gisse (02/24/05)
- Re: RELATIVITY THEORY - THE BIGGEST DELUSION IN SCIENCE Koobee Wublee (02/24/05)
- What is mass? Radi Khrapko (02/23/05)
- Cults. Len Gaasenbeek (02/23/05)
- re: A Most Ingenious Twin Paradox? Jack Sarfatti (02/23/05)
- Question About Starlight. Henri Wilson (02/23/05)
- Re: Question About Starlight. Dirk Van de moortel (02/23/05)
- Re: Question About Starlight. Henri Wilson (02/23/05)
- Re: Question About Starlight. Dirk Van de moortel (02/23/05)
- Re: Question About Starlight. Henri Wilson (02/24/05)
- Re: Question About Starlight. Dirk Van de moortel (02/24/05)
- Re: Question About Starlight. Henri Wilson (02/24/05)
- Re: Question About Starlight. Dirk Van de moortel (02/24/05)
- Re: Question About Starlight. Henri Wilson (02/25/05)
- Re: Question About Starlight. Dirk Van de moortel (02/25/05)
- Re: Question About Starlight. jahn (02/25/05)
- Re: Question About Starlight. Dirk Van de moortel (02/25/05)
- Re: Question About Starlight. jahn (02/25/05)
- Re: Question About Starlight. Henri Wilson (02/26/05)
- Re: Question About Starlight. DavidBowman (02/24/05)
- Re: Question About Starlight. Henri Wilson (02/23/05)
- Re: Question About Starlight. Tom Roberts (02/24/05)
- Re: Question About Starlight. Henri Wilson (02/24/05)
- Re: Question About Starlight. Tom Roberts (02/25/05)
- Re: Question About Starlight. Henri Wilson (02/26/05)
- Re: Question About Starlight. Eric Gisse (02/27/05)
- Re: Question About Starlight. Dirk Van de moortel (02/27/05)
- Re: Question About Starlight. Henri Wilson (02/27/05)
- Re: Question About Starlight. Dirk Van de moortel (02/27/05)
- Re: Question About Starlight. alanmc95210_at_yahoo.com (02/27/05)
- Re: Question About Starlight. Henri Wilson (02/28/05)
- Re: Question About Starlight. Henri Wilson (02/24/05)
- Re: Question About Starlight. Dirk Van de moortel (02/23/05)
- Expanding Space kenseto (02/23/05)
- Re: Expanding Space Dirk Van de moortel (02/23/05)
- Re: Expanding Space Sam Wormley (02/23/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations AllYou! (02/23/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations reany_at_asu.edu (02/23/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations AllYou! (02/23/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations Morituri-|-Max (02/23/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations AllYou! (02/23/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations reany_at_asu.edu (02/23/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations AllYou! (02/23/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations reany_at_asu.edu (02/24/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations DavidBowman (02/24/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations AllYou! (02/24/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations Sue... (02/23/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations Sam Wormley (02/23/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations AllYou! (02/23/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations Sue... (02/23/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations AllYou! (02/23/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations Sue... (02/23/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations AllYou! (02/23/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations Sue... (02/23/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations AllYou! (02/24/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations Androcles (02/23/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations Morituri-|-Max (02/23/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations Dirk Van de moortel (02/23/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations AllYou! (02/23/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations Franz Heymann (02/23/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations Franz Heymann (02/24/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations AllYou! (02/24/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations Franz Heymann (02/24/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations AllYou! (02/25/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations Bjoern Feuerbacher (02/23/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations Dirk Van de moortel (02/23/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations Bjoern Feuerbacher (02/23/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations AllYou! (02/23/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations Dirk Van de moortel (02/23/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations AllYou! (02/23/05)
- Re: It time what a clock measures? AllYou! (02/23/05)
- Re: It time what a clock measures? Dirk Van de moortel (02/23/05)
- Re:Ignorance equates to piece of crap. AllYou! (02/23/05)
- Re: Re:Ignorance equates to piece of crap. Dirk Van de moortel (02/23/05)
- Re: Re:Ignorance equates to piece of crap. AllYou! (02/23/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations AllYou! (02/23/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations Franz Heymann (02/23/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations AllYou! (02/24/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations AllYou! (02/23/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicality, + SPACETIME Daniel Weston (02/23/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicality, + SPACETIME AllYou! (02/23/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicality, + SPACETIME Daniel Weston (02/23/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicality, + SPACETIME N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/23/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicality, + SPACETIME Sue... (02/23/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicality, + SPACETIME kenseto (02/24/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicality, + SPACETIME AllYou! (02/24/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicality, + SPACETIME kenseto (02/25/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicality, + SPACETIME AllYou! (02/24/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicality, + SPACETIME DavidBowman (02/24/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations kenseto (02/23/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations Bjoern Feuerbacher (02/24/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations kenseto (02/25/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations Franz Heymann (02/23/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations Franz Heymann (02/23/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations jem (02/24/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations AllYou! (02/24/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations jem (02/24/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations AllYou! (02/24/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations jem (02/24/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations AllYou! (02/24/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations jem (02/25/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations AllYou! (02/25/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations DavidBowman (02/26/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations Nick (02/26/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations Laura (02/26/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations macromitch_at_internetCDS.com (02/26/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations DavidBowman (02/26/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations chosp (02/26/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations macromitch_at_internetCDS.com (02/27/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations chosp (02/27/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations Nick (02/28/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations jem (02/26/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations AllYou! (02/24/05)
- Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations reany_at_asu.edu (02/23/05)
- Re: Expanding Space Bjoern Feuerbacher (02/23/05)
- Re: Expanding Space AllYou! (02/23/05)
- Re: Expanding Space Morituri-|-Max (02/23/05)
- Re: Expanding Space AllYou! (02/23/05)
- Re: Expanding Space Bjoern Feuerbacher (02/23/05)
- Re: Expanding Space AllYou! (02/23/05)
- Re: Expanding Space kenseto (02/23/05)
- Re: Expanding Space Bjoern Feuerbacher (02/24/05)
- Re: Expanding Space kenseto (02/24/05)
- Re: Expanding Space Franz Heymann (02/23/05)
- Re: Expanding Space AllYou! (02/24/05)
- Re: Expanding Space kenseto (02/23/05)
- Re: Expanding Space Bjoern Feuerbacher (02/24/05)
- Re: Expanding Space kenseto (02/24/05)
- Re: Expanding Space Sue... (02/24/05)
- Re: Expanding Space AllYou! (02/24/05)
- Re: Expanding Space Sue... (02/24/05)
- Re: Expanding Space AllYou! (02/24/05)
- Re: Expanding Space Sue... (02/24/05)
- Re: Expanding Space AllYou! (02/24/05)
- Re: Expanding Space Sue... (02/24/05)
- Re: Expanding Space AllYou! (02/24/05)
- Re: Expanding Space Sue... (02/24/05)
- Re: Expanding Space AllYou! (02/24/05)
- Re: Expanding Space Sue... (02/24/05)
- Re: Expanding Space AllYou! (02/24/05)
- Re: Expanding Space Sue... (02/24/05)
- Re: Expanding Space AllYou! (02/25/05)
- Re: Expanding Space jahn (02/25/05)
- Re: Expanding Space AllYou! (02/25/05)
- Re: Expanding Space jahn (02/25/05)
- Re: Expanding Space AllYou! (02/25/05)
- Re: Expanding Space jahn (02/25/05)
- Re: Expanding Space kenseto (02/25/05)
- Re: Expanding Space jahn (02/25/05)
- Re: Expanding Space kenseto (02/25/05)
- Re: Expanding Space jahn (02/25/05)
- Re: Expanding Space AllYou! (02/25/05)
- Re: Expanding Space Dave P. (02/26/05)
- Re: Expanding Space Dirk Van de moortel (02/26/05)
- Re: Expanding Space jahn (02/26/05)
- Re: Expanding Space kenseto (02/25/05)
- Re: Expanding Space jahn (02/25/05)
- Re: Expanding Space kenseto (02/25/05)
- Re: Expanding Space jahn (02/25/05)
- Re: Expanding Space kenseto (02/25/05)
- Re: Expanding Space jahn (02/25/05)
- Re: Expanding Space Franz Heymann (02/25/05)
- Re: Expanding Space Franz Heymann (02/24/05)
- Re: Expanding Space kenseto (02/25/05)
- Re: Expanding Space Rudolf Drabek (02/25/05)
- Re: Expanding Space AllYou! (02/25/05)
- Re: Expanding Space Rudolf Drabek (02/27/05)
- Re: Expanding Space jahn (02/27/05)
- Re: Expanding Space Rudolf Drabek (02/27/05)
- Re: Expanding Space AllYou! (02/23/05)
- Re: Expanding Space Morituri-|-Max (02/23/05)
- Re: Expanding Space Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (02/23/05)
- Re: Expanding Space Len Gaasenbeek (02/23/05)
- Re: Expanding Space GR_GR (02/23/05)
- Re: Expanding Space Franz Heymann (02/23/05)
- Re: Expanding Space Luigi Caselli (02/23/05)
- Re: Expanding Space DavidBowman (02/24/05)
- Re: Expanding Space John Zinni (02/24/05)
- Re: Expanding Space Koobee Wublee (02/26/05)
- There are NO PHOTONS! Interdimensional Warrior (02/23/05)
- See, this is what I'm talkin 'bout DavidBowman (02/22/05)
- -symmetric- twin paradox shevek (02/22/05)
- The UGLY TROLL Uncle Al TWINS !!!! guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/22/05)
- Aunt Al always needs her Inertial Reference Frame! guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/22/05)
- Re: THE ULTRA ADVANCED PSYCHOTRONIC MONEY MAGNET Tom Capizzi (02/22/05)
- Another four-vector problem GR_GR (02/22/05)
- Re: Another four-vector problem Androcles (02/22/05)
- Re: Another four-vector problem Bruce Scott TOK (02/22/05)
- Re: Another four-vector problem Dirk Van de moortel (02/22/05)
- Re: Another four-vector problem Tom Roberts (02/23/05)
- Re: Another four-vector problem Dirk Van de moortel (02/23/05)
- Re: Another four-vector problem GR_GR (02/23/05)
- Re: Another four-vector problem Dirk Van de moortel (02/23/05)
- Re: Another four-vector problem GR_GR (02/23/05)
- Re: Another four-vector problem Dirk Van de moortel (02/23/05)
- Re: Another four-vector problem Eric Gisse (02/24/05)
- Re: Another four-vector problem GR_GR (02/24/05)
- Re: Another four-vector problem Eric Gisse (02/24/05)
- Re: Another four-vector problem Y.Porat (02/25/05)
- Re: Another four-vector problem Eric Gisse (02/25/05)
- Re: Another four-vector problem Y.Porat (02/25/05)
- Re: Another four-vector problem Eric Gisse (02/25/05)
- Re: Another four-vector problem Y.Porat (02/25/05)
- Re: Another four-vector problem Eric Gisse (02/25/05)
- Re: Another four-vector problem Dirk Van de moortel (02/25/05)
- Re: Another four-vector problem Y.Porat (02/25/05)
- Re: Another four-vector problem Dirk Van de moortel (02/25/05)
- Re: Another four-vector problem Y.Porat (02/25/05)
- Re: Another four-vector problem Sam Wormley (02/26/05)
- Re: Another four-vector problem Dirk Van de moortel (02/26/05)
- Re: Another four-vector problem Ken S. Tucker (02/26/05)
- Re: Another four-vector problem GR_GR (02/25/05)
- Re: Another four-vector problem Dirk Van de moortel (02/25/05)
- Re: Another four-vector problem GR_GR (02/23/05)
- Re: Another four-vector problem Dirk Van de moortel (02/23/05)
- Four-Velocity and four-acceleration question. GR_GR (02/22/05)
- Re: Four-Velocity and four-acceleration question. Dave Snead (02/22/05)
- Re: Four-Velocity and four-acceleration question. Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (02/22/05)
- Re: Four-Velocity and four-acceleration question. GR_GR (02/22/05)
- Re: Four-Velocity and four-acceleration question. Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (02/22/05)
- Re: Four-Velocity and four-acceleration question. GR_GR (02/22/05)
- Re: Four-Velocity and four-acceleration question. Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (02/22/05)
- Re: Four-Velocity and four-acceleration question. Franz Heymann (02/22/05)
- Re: Four-Velocity and four-acceleration question. GR_GR (02/22/05)
- Re: Four-Velocity and four-acceleration question. Bjoern Feuerbacher (02/22/05)
- Re: Four-Velocity and four-acceleration question. Ken S. Tucker (02/22/05)
- Re: Four-Velocity and four-acceleration question. Bjoern Feuerbacher (02/22/05)
- Re: Four-Velocity and four-acceleration question. Ken S. Tucker (02/22/05)
- Re: Four-Velocity and four-acceleration question. Bjoern Feuerbacher (02/23/05)
- Re: Four-Velocity and four-acceleration question. GR_GR (02/23/05)
- Re: Four-Velocity and four-acceleration question. Dirk Van de moortel (02/23/05)
- Re: Four-Velocity and four-acceleration question. GR_GR (02/23/05)
- Re: Four-Velocity and four-acceleration question. Dirk Van de moortel (02/23/05)
- Re: Four-Velocity and four-acceleration question. GR_GR (02/23/05)
- Re: Four-Velocity and four-acceleration question. Eric Gisse (02/23/05)
- Re: Four-Velocity and four-acceleration question. Dirk Van de moortel (02/23/05)
- Re: Four-Velocity and four-acceleration question. George Jones (02/23/05)
- Re: Four-Velocity and four-acceleration question. Dirk Van de moortel (02/24/05)
- Re: Four-Velocity and four-acceleration question. Mike (02/24/05)
- Re: Four-Velocity and four-acceleration question. George Jones (02/24/05)
- Re: Four-Velocity and four-acceleration question. Dirk Van de moortel (02/24/05)
- Re: Four-Velocity and four-acceleration question. Eric Gisse (02/24/05)
- Re: Four-Velocity and four-acceleration question. Tom Roberts (02/23/05)
- Re: Four-Velocity and four-acceleration question. GR_GR (02/23/05)
- Re: Four-Velocity and four-acceleration question. Tom Roberts (02/24/05)
- Re: Four-Velocity and four-acceleration question. Ken S. Tucker (02/23/05)
- Re: Four-Velocity and four-acceleration question. Tom Roberts (02/24/05)
- Re: Four-Velocity and four-acceleration question. Ken S. Tucker (02/24/05)
- Re: Four-Velocity and four-acceleration question. Ken S. Tucker (02/22/05)
- Gyroscopes Joe (02/21/05)
- Is There a Force of Gravity? Kcehc (02/21/05)
- On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder The Ghost In The Machine (02/21/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Schweinkolben (02/21/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Androcles (02/21/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Dirk Van de moortel (02/21/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder The Ghost In The Machine (02/22/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Dirk Van de moortel (02/22/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder The Ghost In The Machine (02/23/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Androcles (02/23/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder The Ghost In The Machine (02/23/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Androcles (02/23/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder The Ghost In The Machine (02/24/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Androcles (02/24/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder The Ghost In The Machine (02/21/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Androcles (02/22/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder The Ghost In The Machine (02/22/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Androcles (02/22/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Sue... (02/22/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Sue... (02/22/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Androcles (02/23/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Daryl McCullough (02/23/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Androcles (02/23/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Daryl McCullough (02/23/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Androcles (02/23/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Daryl McCullough (02/23/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Androcles (02/23/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Daryl McCullough (02/23/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Androcles (02/24/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Eric Gisse (02/24/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Androcles (02/24/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Uncle Al (02/24/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Androcles (02/24/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Sam Wormley (02/24/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder The Ghost In The Machine (02/25/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Uncle Al (02/24/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Androcles (02/24/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Daryl McCullough (02/24/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Daryl McCullough (02/24/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder The Ghost In The Machine (02/25/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Daryl McCullough (02/25/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder The Ghost In The Machine (02/25/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Daryl McCullough (02/25/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Sue... (02/23/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Daryl McCullough (02/23/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Sue... (02/23/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Daryl McCullough (02/23/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Sue... (02/23/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Daryl McCullough (02/23/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Sue... (02/23/05)
- The characteristic wavelength of a helium-neon laser Androcles (02/24/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Daryl McCullough (02/24/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder jahn (02/25/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Daryl McCullough (02/25/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder jahn (02/25/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Daryl McCullough (02/27/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder jahn (02/27/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Daryl McCullough (02/27/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder jahn (02/27/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Daryl McCullough (02/27/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder jahn (02/27/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Daryl McCullough (02/27/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder jahn (02/27/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Daryl McCullough (02/27/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder jahn (02/28/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Androcles (02/23/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder xxein_at_bellsouth.net (02/23/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Androcles (02/23/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Daryl McCullough (02/23/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Androcles (02/23/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Tom Capizzi (02/22/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Androcles (02/23/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Uncle Al (02/23/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Androcles (02/23/05)
- Re: On The Subject of The Mosquito And The Ladder Dirk Van de moortel (02/21/05)
- Definition of Uncle Al as a DUMBASS HECKLER: guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/21/05)
- Burning or not when falling into a black hole ... heinrich_neumaier_at_yahoo.com (02/21/05)
- OT: Aset keyboard skearney_at_accessbee.com (02/21/05)
- Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Jeany (02/21/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Dirk Van de moortel (02/21/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? ctiei_at_hotmail.com (02/22/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Bilge (02/22/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Dirk Van de moortel (02/22/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Jeany (02/22/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Dirk Van de moortel (02/22/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Jeany (02/22/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Ken S. Tucker (02/22/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Dirk Van de moortel (02/22/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Jeany (02/22/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Dirk Van de moortel (02/22/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Jeany (02/23/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Bilge (02/23/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Dirk Van de moortel (02/23/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Jeany (02/23/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Dirk Van de moortel (02/23/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Jeany (02/23/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Franz Heymann (02/24/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Jeany (02/23/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Dirk Van de moortel (02/23/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Jeany (02/24/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Dirk Van de moortel (02/24/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Jeany (02/24/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Dirk Van de moortel (02/24/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Androcles (02/24/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Uncle Al (02/24/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Androcles (02/24/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Androcles (02/24/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Uncle Al (02/24/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Androcles (02/24/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Franz Heymann (02/24/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Jeany (02/24/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Dirk Van de moortel (02/24/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Jeany (02/24/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Dirk Van de moortel (02/24/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Jeany (02/25/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Eric Gisse (02/25/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Jeany (02/25/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Jeany (02/25/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Dirk Van de moortel (02/25/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Jeany (02/25/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Dirk Van de moortel (02/25/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Jeany (02/25/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/25/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Jeany (02/25/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Dirk Van de moortel (02/25/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Jeany (02/26/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Dirk Van de moortel (02/26/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Jeany (02/27/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Franz Heymann (02/27/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Jeany (02/27/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Dirk Van de moortel (02/27/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Jeany (02/27/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Dirk Van de moortel (02/27/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Jeany (02/28/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Jeany (02/27/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Franz Heymann (02/27/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Jeany (02/28/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Ken S. Tucker (02/28/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Jeany (02/28/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Jeany (02/28/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/23/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Jeany (02/24/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/24/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Jeany (02/24/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/24/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Franz Heymann (02/24/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Franz Heymann (02/24/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Dirk Van de moortel (02/24/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Dirk Van de moortel (02/25/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Jeany (02/25/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/25/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Jeany (02/25/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Franz Heymann (02/25/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Dirk Van de moortel (02/25/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Franz Heymann (02/26/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Tom Capizzi (02/27/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Dirk Van de moortel (02/27/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Ken S. Tucker (02/22/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Dirk Van de moortel (02/22/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Ken S. Tucker (02/22/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Androcles (02/22/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Ken S. Tucker (02/22/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Dirk Van de moortel (02/22/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Ken S. Tucker (02/23/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Androcles (02/23/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Dirk Van de moortel (02/23/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Uncle Al (02/23/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Androcles (02/23/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Uncle Al (02/23/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Androcles (02/23/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Androcles (02/23/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Dirk Van de moortel (02/23/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Ken S. Tucker (02/23/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? ctiei_at_hotmail.com (02/22/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Dirk Van de moortel (02/22/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Jeany (02/23/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Dirk Van de moortel (02/23/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? ctiei_at_hotmail.com (02/22/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Uncle Al (02/21/05)
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein? Dirk Van de moortel (02/21/05)
- Re: What reaction in banknote testing under UV light? Androcles (02/21/05)
- Re: What reaction in banknote testing under UV light? Sam Wormley (02/21/05)
- Re: What reaction in banknote testing under UV light? Uncle Al (02/21/05)
- Re: What reaction in banknote testing under UV light? jowr.pi_at_gmail.com (02/22/05)
- Re: What reaction in banknote testing under UV light? Androcles (02/22/05)
- Re: What reaction in banknote testing under UV light? Eric Gisse (02/22/05)
- Re: What reaction in banknote testing under UV light? Androcles (02/22/05)
- Re: What reaction in banknote testing under UV light? Jan Panteltje (02/22/05)
- Re: What reaction in banknote testing under UV light? Androcles (02/22/05)
- Re: What reaction in banknote testing under UV light? Jan Panteltje (02/22/05)
- Re: What reaction in banknote testing under UV light? Androcles (02/22/05)
- The End. Androcles (02/21/05)
- Blackbody radiation DavidBowman (02/21/05)
- Re: Blackbody radiation N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/21/05)
- Re: Blackbody radiation Bill Hobba (02/22/05)
- Re: Blackbody radiation DavidBowman (02/22/05)
- Re: Blackbody radiation N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/22/05)
- Re: Blackbody radiation Ben Rudiak-Gould (02/26/05)
- Re: Blackbody radiation Dirk Van de moortel (02/26/05)
- Re: Blackbody radiation DavidBowman (02/27/05)
- Re: Blackbody radiation jahn (02/27/05)
- Re: Blackbody radiation N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/27/05)
- Re: Blackbody radiation Dave (02/27/05)
- Re: Blackbody radiation N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/27/05)
- Re: Blackbody radiation PD (02/22/05)
- Re: Blackbody radiation N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/22/05)
- Re: Blackbody radiation Creighton Hogg (02/22/05)
- Re: Blackbody radiation PD (02/22/05)
- Re: Blackbody radiation Creighton Hogg (02/22/05)
- Re: Blackbody radiation DavidBowman (02/22/05)
- Re: Blackbody radiation PD (02/22/05)
- Re: Blackbody radiation DavidBowman (02/23/05)
- Re: Blackbody radiation DavidBowman (02/23/05)
- Re: Blackbody radiation Androcles (02/23/05)
- Re: Blackbody radiation Dirk Van de moortel (02/23/05)
- Re: Blackbody radiation Androcles (02/23/05)
- Re: Blackbody radiation Dirk Van de moortel (02/23/05)
- Re: Blackbody radiation Marcus Wellpoth (02/24/05)
- Re: Blackbody radiation Dirk Van de moortel (02/24/05)
- Re: Blackbody radiation Creighton Hogg (02/22/05)
- Re: Blackbody radiation DavidBowman (02/22/05)
- Re: Blackbody radiation ande452_at_attglobal.net (02/23/05)
- Re: Blackbody radiation DavidBowman (02/23/05)
- Re: Blackbody radiation Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (02/23/05)
- Re: Blackbody radiation DavidBowman (02/24/05)
- Re: Blackbody radiation Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (02/24/05)
- Re: Blackbody radiation Creighton Hogg (02/23/05)
- Re: Blackbody radiation DavidBowman (02/23/05)
- Re: Blackbody radiation N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/23/05)
- Re: Blackbody radiation N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/22/05)
- Re: God=G_uv: An Analysis (Part 1) Reply to A.N. (02/21/05)
- ether dragging beda pietanza (02/20/05)
- Supersonic dragging beda pietanza (02/20/05)
- Re: Message to Aardpig, astrophysicist John A (02/20/05)
- Comic Theater on Einstein's Relativity Jack Sarfatti (02/20/05)
- testing via my newserver, not be doing well lately Bryan (02/20/05)
- RE double observation Bryan (02/20/05)
- RE: double observation Bryan (02/20/05)
- Geometry by itself has no physical content reany_at_asu.edu (02/20/05)
- Re: Geometry by itself has no physical content Daniel Weston (02/20/05)
- Re: Geometry by itself has no physical content Eugene Shubert (02/20/05)
- Re: Geometry by itself has no physical content Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (02/20/05)
- Re: Geometry by itself has no physical content Bilge (02/21/05)
- Re: Geometry by itself has no physical content Oriel36 (02/21/05)
- Re: Geometry by itself has no physical content AllYou! (02/22/05)
- I told you before to look up the Duhem-Quine thesis reany_at_asu.edu (02/22/05)
- Re: I told you before to look up the Duhem-Quine thesis AllYou! (02/22/05)
- Re: I told you before to look up the Duhem-Quine thesis Daniel Weston (02/22/05)
- Re: I told you before to look up the Duhem-Quine thesis reany_at_asu.edu (02/22/05)
- Re: Why do we need models? AllYou! (02/22/05)
- Re: Why do we need models? reany_at_asu.edu (02/22/05)
- Re: Why do we need models? AllYou! (02/22/05)
- I told you before to look up the Duhem-Quine thesis reany_at_asu.edu (02/22/05)
- Special Relativity is now simple and very convincing Perspicacious (02/20/05)
- Sourse dependency (for genius only) geraldkelleher_at_hotmail.com (02/20/05)
- Re: Sourse dependency (for genius only) Androcles (02/20/05)
- Re: Sourse dependency (for genius only) Tom Capizzi (02/20/05)
- Re: Sourse dependency (for genius only) Androcles (02/21/05)
- Re: Sourse dependency (for genius only) Oriel36 (02/21/05)
- Re: Sourse dependency (for genius only) Tom Capizzi (02/21/05)
- Re: Sourse dependency (for genius only) Oriel36 (02/22/05)
- Re: Sourse dependency (for genius only) Androcles (02/22/05)
- Re: Sourse dependency (for genius only) geraldkelleher_at_hotmail.com (02/22/05)
- Re: Sourse dependency (for genius only) Androcles (02/22/05)
- Re: Sourse dependency (for genius only) Dirk Van de moortel (02/22/05)
- Re: Sourse dependency (for genius only) geraldkelleher_at_hotmail.com (02/22/05)
- Re: Sourse dependency (for genius only) Eric Gisse (02/22/05)
- Re: Sourse dependency (for genius only) Creighton Hogg (02/22/05)
- Re: Sourse dependency (for genius only) Androcles (02/23/05)
- Re: Sourse dependency (for genius only) Dirk Van de moortel (02/23/05)
- Re: Sourse dependency (for genius only) Eric Gisse (02/23/05)
- Re: Sourse dependency (for genius only) Oriel36 (02/23/05)
- Re: Sourse dependency (for genius only) Tom Capizzi (02/22/05)
- Re: Sourse dependency (for genius only) Oriel36 (02/23/05)
- Re: Sourse dependency (for genius only) Tom Capizzi (02/23/05)
- Re: Sourse dependency (for genius only) geraldkelleher_at_hotmail.com (02/23/05)
- Re: Sourse dependency (for genius only) Tom Capizzi (02/23/05)
- Re: Source dependency (for genius only) Oriel36 (02/24/05)
- Re: Sourse dependency (for genius only) Bilge (02/24/05)
- Re: Sourse dependency (for genius only) geraldkelleher_at_hotmail.com (02/24/05)
- SR in the ETHER beda pietanza (02/20/05)
- Is it true Paulps (02/20/05)
- Symmetry Forms the Basis of Truth Russell E. Rierson (02/20/05)
- Open Letter to Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: DavidBowman (02/20/05)
- Re: Open Letter to Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (02/20/05)
- Re: Open Letter to Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (02/20/05)
- Re: Open Letter to Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: Androcles (02/20/05)
- Re: Open Letter to Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: DavidBowman (02/20/05)
- Re: Open Letter to Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (02/20/05)
- Re: Open Letter to Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: Androcles (02/20/05)
- Re: Open Letter to Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: DavidBowman (02/20/05)
- Re: Open Letter to Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: Androcles (02/21/05)
- Re: Open Letter to Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: DavidBowman (02/21/05)
- Re: Open Letter to Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: Androcles (02/21/05)
- Re: Open Letter to Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: DavidBowman (02/21/05)
- Re: Open Letter to Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: Androcles (02/22/05)
- Re: Open Letter to Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (02/22/05)
- Re: Open Letter to Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: DavidBowman (02/23/05)
- Re: Open Letter to Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (02/23/05)
- Re: Open Letter to Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (02/23/05)
- Re: Open Letter to Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (02/23/05)
- Re: Open Letter to Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (02/23/05)
- Re: Open Letter to Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (02/23/05)
- Re: Open Letter to Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: DavidBowman (02/23/05)
- Re: Open Letter to Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (02/24/05)
- Re: Open Letter to Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: DavidBowman (02/24/05)
- Re: Open Letter to Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (02/24/05)
- Re: Open Letter to Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (02/24/05)
- Re: Open Letter to Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: DavidBowman (02/25/05)
- Re: Open Letter to Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (02/25/05)
- Re: Open Letter to Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (02/25/05)
- Re: Open Letter to Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/25/05)
- Re: Open Letter to Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (02/25/05)
- Re: Open Letter to Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/25/05)
- Re: Open Letter to Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (02/25/05)
- Re: Open Letter to Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: DavidBowman (02/26/05)
- Re: Open Letter to Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (02/26/05)
- Re: Open Letter to Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: DavidBowman (02/26/05)
- Re: Open Letter to Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (02/26/05)
- Re: Open Letter to Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: DavidBowman (02/26/05)
- Re: Open Letter to Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (02/27/05)
- Re: Open Letter to Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: DavidBowman (02/27/05)
- Re: Open Letter to Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (02/26/05)
- Re: Open Letter to Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (02/26/05)
- Re: Open Letter to Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: Androcles (02/20/05)
- Torsion, Preferred Frames, Einstein-Cartan Theory Jack Sarfatti (02/20/05)
- DUMB UNCLE AL, the distance is measured from the Inertial Reference frame guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/19/05)
- Re: DUMB UNCLE AL, the distance is measured from the Inertial Reference frame Sam Wormley (02/19/05)
- Re: DUMB UNCLE AL, the distance is measured from the Inertial Reference frame guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/19/05)
- Re: DUMB UNCLE AL, the distance is measured from the Inertial Reference frame Morituri-|-Max (02/20/05)
- BEWARE of THE IDIOT UNCLE AL guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/19/05)
- Re: BEWARE of THE IDIOT UNCLE AL Schweinkolben (02/19/05)
- Re: BEWARE of THE IDIOT UNCLE AL guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/19/05)
- Re: BEWARE of THE IDIOT UNCLE AL Schweinkolben (02/19/05)
- Re: BEWARE of THE IDIOT UNCLE AL guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/19/05)
- Re: BEWARE of THE IDIOT UNCLE AL Schweinkolben (02/20/05)
- Re: BEWARE of THE IDIOT UNCLE AL guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/21/05)
- Re: BEWARE of THE IDIOT UNCLE AL guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/19/05)
- Re: BEWARE of THE IDIOT UNCLE AL Marcus Wellpoth (02/19/05)
- Re: BEWARE of THE IDIOT UNCLE AL guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/19/05)
- Re: BEWARE of THE IDIOT UNCLE AL Morituri-|-Max (02/20/05)
- Re: BEWARE of THE IDIOT UNCLE AL guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/19/05)
- Re: BEWARE of THE IDIOT UNCLE AL Uncle Al (02/19/05)
- Re: BEWARE of THE IDIOT UNCLE AL Morituri-|-Max (02/20/05)
- Re: BEWARE of THE IDIOT UNCLE AL Androcles (02/20/05)
- Re: BEWARE of THE IDIOT UNCLE AL Schweinkolben (02/19/05)
- Beware of IDIOT UNCLE AL guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/19/05)
- Einstein deduces Lorentz transforms in 1916 Pentcho Valev (02/19/05)
- How to calculate Twin1 at -c/3 as inertial reference frame. guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/19/05)
- The Einstein Hoax Posting (02/19/05)
- The Relevation by Dirky Mike (02/19/05)
- Einstein deduces Lorentz transforms in 1905 Pentcho Valev (02/19/05)
- Einstein's Electrodynamics Androcles (02/19/05)
- Re: Einstein's Electrodynamics Sue... (02/19/05)
- Re: Einstein's Electrodynamics Androcles (02/19/05)
- Re: Einstein's Electrodynamics Sue... (02/19/05)
- Re: Einstein's Electrodynamics Androcles (02/20/05)
- Re: Einstein's Electrodynamics Sue... (02/20/05)
- Re: Einstein's Electrodynamics Sue... (02/21/05)
- Re: Einstein's Electrodynamics Androcles (02/21/05)
- Re: Einstein's Electrodynamics Dirk Van de moortel (02/21/05)
- Re: Einstein's Electrodynamics Franz Heymann (02/21/05)
- Re: Einstein's Electrodynamics Uncle Al (02/21/05)
- Re: Einstein's Electrodynamics Sue... (02/21/05)
- Re: Einstein's Electrodynamics whopkins_at_csd.uwm.edu (02/27/05)
- Re: Einstein's Electrodynamics tj Frazir (02/21/05)
- Re: Einstein's Electrodynamics whopkins_at_csd.uwm.edu (02/27/05)
- Re: Einstein's Electrodynamics jahn (02/27/05)
- Re: Einstein's Electrodynamics Franz Heymann (02/27/05)
- Re: Einstein's Electrodynamics jahn (02/27/05)
- Re: Einstein's Electrodynamics jahn (02/27/05)
- Re: Einstein's Electrodynamics Franz Heymann (02/27/05)
- Re: Einstein's Electrodynamics jahn (02/27/05)
- Re: Einstein's Electrodynamics whopkins_at_csd.uwm.edu (02/27/05)
- Re: Einstein's Electrodynamics Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (02/27/05)
- Re: Einstein's Electrodynamics Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (02/27/05)
- Re: Einstein's Electrodynamics bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (02/27/05)
- Re: Einstein's Electrodynamics Sam Wormley (02/27/05)
- Re: Einstein's Electrodynamics Androcles (02/19/05)
- Re: Einstein's Electrodynamics Sue... (02/19/05)
- Re: THE TESLA PURPLE ENERGY SHIELD DavidBowman (02/19/05)
- Neutrinos (again, sorry) DavidBowman (02/19/05)
- Re: Neutrinos (again, sorry) DavidBowman (02/19/05)
- Re: Neutrinos (again, sorry) Bilge (02/19/05)
- Re: Neutrinos (again, sorry) Aart Heijboer (02/19/05)
- Re: Neutrinos (again, sorry) Bilge (02/22/05)
- Re: Neutrinos (again, sorry) Aart Heijboer (02/23/05)
- Re: Neutrinos (again, sorry) Bilge (02/24/05)
- Re: Neutrinos (again, sorry) Aart Heijboer (02/24/05)
- Re: Neutrinos (again, sorry) Ken S. Tucker (02/25/05)
- Re: Neutrinos (again, sorry) Aart Heijboer (02/26/05)
- Re: Neutrinos (again, sorry) Aart Heijboer (02/19/05)
- Re: Neutrinos (again, sorry) Aart Heijboer (02/19/05)
- Re: Neutrinos (again, sorry) DavidBowman (02/19/05)
- Re: Neutrinos (again, sorry) N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/20/05)
- Re: Neutrinos (again, sorry) DavidBowman (02/20/05)
- Re: Neutrinos (again, sorry) N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/20/05)
- Re: Neutrinos (again, sorry) Aart Heijboer (02/20/05)
- Re: Neutrinos (again, sorry) Aart Heijboer (02/20/05)
- Re: Neutrinos (again, sorry) DavidBowman (02/20/05)
- Re: Neutrinos (again, sorry) N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/20/05)
- Re: Neutrinos (again, sorry) Androcles (02/20/05)
- Re: Neutrinos (again, sorry) DavidBowman (02/20/05)
- Re: Neutrinos (again, sorry) Androcles (02/20/05)
- Re: Neutrinos (again, sorry) DavidBowman (02/21/05)
- Re: Neutrinos (again, sorry) Androcles (02/21/05)
- Re: Neutrinos (again, sorry) Bilge (02/22/05)
- Re: Neutrinos (again, sorry) DavidBowman (02/20/05)
- Re: Neutrinos (again, sorry) DavidBowman (02/19/05)
- question Javier (02/19/05)
- [PG] The Next Big Thing in interstellar travel Larry Hammick (02/19/05)
- Here goes the "expert" Dinkey-Donkey Mike (02/19/05)
- Re: The Role of Authority in Physics John Schutkeker (02/18/05)
- R*volume*raduis2 c3po "Theroy of everything" zetasum (02/18/05)
- A note on civil behavior Hontas F. Farmer III (02/18/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior PD (02/18/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior Bilge (02/18/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior David McAnally (02/19/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior Ken S. Tucker (02/19/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior Non Ame (02/19/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior Ken S. Tucker (02/19/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior Non Ame (02/19/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior Ken S. Tucker (02/19/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior DavidBowman (02/20/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior Non Ame (02/20/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior DavidBowman (02/20/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior Ken S. Tucker (02/20/05)
- Question about time. Androcles (02/20/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior TomGee (02/20/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior Ken S. Tucker (02/21/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior TomGee (02/21/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior Lefty (02/21/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/21/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior FrediFizzx (02/21/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/21/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior Tom Capizzi (02/21/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior TomGee (02/21/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior Franz Heymann (02/21/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior Ken S. Tucker (02/21/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior Non Ame (02/20/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior Ken S. Tucker (02/21/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior Non Ame (02/21/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior Marcus Wellpoth (02/21/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior Ken S. Tucker (02/21/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior Non Ame (02/22/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior Dirk Van de moortel (02/22/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior Marcus Wellpoth (02/24/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (02/24/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior Ken S. Tucker (02/24/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior David McAnally (02/19/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (02/18/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior DavidBowman (02/19/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior jem (02/19/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior Paul Stowe (02/19/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior Androcles (02/19/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior David McAnally (02/19/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior Paul Stowe (02/19/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/19/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior Androcles (02/19/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior Dirk Van de moortel (02/19/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior Creighton Hogg (02/19/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior Dirk Van de moortel (02/19/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior Creighton Hogg (02/19/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior Dirk Van de moortel (02/19/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior Creighton Hogg (02/19/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior Dirk Van de moortel (02/19/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior David McAnally (02/24/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior Dirk Van de moortel (02/19/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior David McAnally (02/20/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior Bilge (02/19/05)
- Re: A note on civil behavior Androcles (02/19/05)
- A question of size and time Ian (02/18/05)
- Geometric Generalization erkdurgun_at_yahoo.com (02/18/05)
- Geometric Generalization erkdurgun_at_yahoo.com (02/18/05)
- Einstein (1905) Absurdities Eleaticus (02/18/05)
- (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Eleaticus (02/18/05)
- Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Eleaticus (02/18/05)
- Unknown Functions & Einstein's Incompetence Eleaticus (02/18/05)
- Re: McCullough asks for help Androcles (02/17/05)
- Re: McCullough asks for help Randy Poe (02/17/05)
- Re: McCullough asks for help Uncle Al (02/17/05)
- Re: McCullough asks for help Daryl McCullough (02/17/05)
- Re: Ping Bill Hobba PD (02/17/05)
- Re: Ping Bill Hobba Creighton Hogg (02/17/05)
- Re: Ping Bill Hobba PD (02/17/05)
- Re: Ping Bill Hobba Randy Poe (02/17/05)
- Re: Ping Bill Hobba Randy Poe (02/17/05)
- Re: Ping Bill Hobba PD (02/17/05)
- Re: Ping Bill Hobba PD (02/17/05)
- Re: Ping Bill Hobba N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/18/05)
- Re: Ping Bill Hobba Koobee Wublee (02/18/05)
- Re: Ping Bill Hobba xxein_at_bellsouth.net (02/19/05)
- Re: Ping Bill Hobba Creighton Hogg (02/17/05)
- Re: Ping Bill Hobba Bill Hobba (02/22/05)
- Re: Ping Bill Hobba Bill Hobba (02/22/05)
- Can anyone solve the following Time Dilation equation? guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/17/05)
- Re: Can anyone solve the following Time Dilation equation? Paul Cardinale (02/17/05)
- Re: Can anyone solve the following Time Dilation equation? Sue... (02/17/05)
- Re: Can anyone solve the following Time Dilation equation? Paul B. Andersen (02/22/05)
- Re: Can anyone solve the following Time Dilation equation? Sue... (02/22/05)
- Re: Can anyone solve the following Time Dilation equation? Paul B. Andersen (02/22/05)
- Re: Can anyone solve the following Time Dilation equation? Sue... (02/22/05)
- Re: Can anyone solve the following Time Dilation equation? Sue... (02/22/05)
- Re: Can anyone solve the following Time Dilation equation? Paul B. Andersen (02/26/05)
- Re: Can anyone solve the following Time Dilation equation? jahn (02/26/05)
- Re: Can anyone solve the following Time Dilation equation? Paul B. Andersen (02/27/05)
- Re: Can anyone solve the following Time Dilation equation? jahn (02/27/05)
- Re: Can anyone solve the following Time Dilation equation? Paul B. Andersen (02/22/05)
- Re: Can anyone solve the following Time Dilation equation? Bilge (02/18/05)
- PC from IT PC (02/17/05)
- Don't WORRY... PC (02/17/05)
- Postulate #2: Time Dilation guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/17/05)
- Postulate #1: Time Dilation guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/17/05)
- SR, pipes, and capacities dseppala_at_austin.rr.com (02/17/05)
- energy and SR time dilation dseppala_at_austin.rr.com (02/17/05)
- SR & batteries dseppala_at_austin.rr.com (02/17/05)
- Muon track lengths DavidBowman (02/17/05)
- string thoey vignesh (02/17/05)
- String Theory and the Unification of Forces vignesh (02/17/05)
- Can Lorentz E Theory replace S. Relativity?? (is George Sagnac correct?) Q-on (02/17/05)
- Re: Can Lorentz E Theory replace S. Relativity?? (is George Sagnac correct?) Bilge (02/17/05)
- Re: Can Lorentz E Theory replace S. Relativity?? (is George Sagnac correct?) Uncle Al (02/17/05)
- Re: Can Lorentz E Theory replace S. Relativity?? (is George Sagnac correct?) Tom Roberts (02/17/05)
- Re: Can Lorentz E Theory replace S. Relativity?? (is George Sagnac correct?) Q-on (02/18/05)
- Re: Can Lorentz E Theory replace S. Relativity?? (is George Sagnac correct?) Koobee Wublee (02/18/05)
- Re: Can Lorentz E Theory replace S. Relativity?? (is George Sagnac correct?) Q-on (02/18/05)
- Re: Can Lorentz E Theory replace S. Relativity?? (is George Sagnac correct?) Dirk Van de moortel (02/18/05)
- Re: Can Lorentz E Theory replace S. Relativity?? (is George Sagnac correct?) Bilge (02/18/05)
- Re: Can Lorentz E Theory replace S. Relativity?? (is George Sagnac correct?) Q-on (02/19/05)
- Re: Can Lorentz E Theory replace S. Relativity?? (is George Sagnac correct?) Bilge (02/19/05)
- Re: Can Lorentz E Theory replace S. Relativity?? (is George Sagnac correct?) Koobee Wublee (02/18/05)
- Re:The neck of God (revised) Einstein or Lorentz joseph levy (02/16/05)
- Ether-SR ruler's hidden lengths beda pietanza (02/16/05)
- Ether-SR clock's hidden time rates beda pietanza (02/16/05)
- Re: Ether-SR clock's hidden time rates Bilge (02/16/05)
- Re: Ether-SR clock's hidden time rates beda pietanza (02/18/05)
- Re: Ether-SR clock's hidden time rates Bilge (02/19/05)
- Re: Ether-SR clock's hidden time rates beda pietanza (02/21/05)
- Re: Ether-SR clock's hidden time rates Bilge (02/22/05)
- Re: Ether-SR clock's hidden time rates mountain man (02/22/05)
- Re: Ether-SR clock's hidden time rates Bilge (02/22/05)
- Re: Ether-SR clock's hidden time rates beda pietanza (02/22/05)
- Re: Ether-SR clock's hidden time rates Bilge (02/23/05)
- Re: Ether-SR clock's hidden time rates beda pietanza (02/25/05)
- Re: Ether-SR clock's hidden time rates beda pietanza (02/18/05)
- Re: Ether-SR clock's hidden time rates Bilge (02/16/05)
- SR inertial frame scope Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato (02/16/05)
- Metric Engineering Star Gates and Warp Drives Jack Sarfatti (02/16/05)
- 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato (02/16/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Tom Roberts (02/16/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Androcles (02/17/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Eric Gisse (02/17/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Androcles (02/17/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Eric Gisse (02/17/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Androcles (02/17/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Gregory L. Hansen (02/17/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Androcles (02/17/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Uncle Al (02/17/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Androcles (02/18/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Uncle Al (02/18/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Androcles (02/18/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Gregory L. Hansen (02/17/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Eric Gisse (02/18/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (02/18/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Timo Nieminen (02/18/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Androcles (02/18/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Timo Nieminen (02/19/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Eric Gisse (02/19/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Androcles (02/19/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Franz Heymann (02/20/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Androcles (02/19/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy David McAnally (02/19/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Androcles (02/19/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy David McAnally (02/19/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Franz Heymann (02/20/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Androcles (02/20/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Gregory L. Hansen (02/18/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Franz Heymann (02/17/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Eric Gisse (02/18/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Androcles (02/18/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Eric Gisse (02/18/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Androcles (02/18/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Eric Gisse (02/19/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy stephen_at_nomail.com (02/19/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Androcles (02/19/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy David McAnally (02/19/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Franz Heymann (02/20/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Androcles (02/20/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Franz Heymann (02/20/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Androcles (02/21/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Uncle Al (02/21/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Eric Gisse (02/21/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Androcles (02/21/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Uncle Al (02/21/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Androcles (02/19/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy David McAnally (02/19/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Androcles (02/19/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy David McAnally (02/19/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Dirk Van de moortel (02/19/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Franz Heymann (02/20/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Franz Heymann (02/20/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Androcles (02/20/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Franz Heymann (02/20/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Franz Heymann (02/20/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Eric Gisse (02/19/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Dirk Van de moortel (02/19/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Eric Gisse (02/19/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Dirk Van de moortel (02/19/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Androcles (02/20/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Eric Gisse (02/20/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Androcles (02/20/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Uncle Al (02/18/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Androcles (02/18/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Franz Heymann (02/18/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy newedana (02/17/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy newedana (02/17/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy newedana (02/17/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy newedana (02/17/05)
- Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy Eric Gisse (02/17/05)
- Re: The neck of God Einstein or Lorentz joseph levy (02/16/05)
- Re: The neck of God Einstein or Lorentz Tom Capizzi (02/16/05)
- Re: The neck of God Einstein or Lorentz wespe_at_operamail.com (02/16/05)
- Re: The neck of God Einstein or Lorentz Ben Rudiak-Gould (02/16/05)
- Re: The neck of God Einstein or Lorentz Paul Cardinale (02/16/05)
- Re: The neck of God Einstein or Lorentz Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato (02/16/05)
- Are the 'Laws of Physics' Wrong? vignesh (02/16/05)
- Are the 'Laws of Physics' Wrong? vignesh (02/16/05)
- Are the 'Laws of Physics' Wrong? vignesh (02/16/05)
- Proof the Law of Conservation of Energy is Wrong vignesh (02/16/05)
- Re: Proof the Law of Conservation of Energy is Wrong N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/16/05)
- Re: Proof the Law of Conservation of Energy is Wrong robert j. kolker (02/16/05)
- Re: Proof the Law of Conservation of Energy is Wrong PD (02/16/05)
- Re: Proof the Law of Conservation of Energy is Wrong ring_theory (02/16/05)
- Re: Proof the Law of Conservation of Energy is Wrong Androcles (02/17/05)
- e NOT EQUAL TO mc2 vignesh (02/16/05)
- Re: Androcles asks for Derivation of LT Androcles (02/16/05)
- Re: Androcles asks for Derivation of LT Androcles (02/16/05)
- Re: Androcles asks for Derivation of LT Randy Poe (02/16/05)
- Re: Androcles asks for Derivation of LT Bilge (02/16/05)
- Re: Androcles asks for Derivation of LT Androcles (02/17/05)
- Re: Androcles asks for Derivation of LT Bilge (02/17/05)
- Re: Androcles asks for Derivation of LT Dirk Van de moortel (02/17/05)
- Re: Androcles asks for Derivation of LT Androcles (02/17/05)
- Re: Androcles asks for Derivation of LT Randy Poe (02/17/05)
- Re: Androcles asks for Derivation of LT Androcles (02/17/05)
- Re: Androcles asks for Derivation of LT Randy Poe (02/17/05)
- Re: Androcles asks for Derivation of LT Androcles (02/17/05)
- Re: Androcles asks for Derivation of LT Randy Poe (02/17/05)
- Re: Androcles asks for Derivation of LT Androcles (02/18/05)
- Re: Androcles asks for Derivation of LT Uncle Al (02/18/05)
- Re: Androcles asks for Derivation of LT Uncle Al (02/17/05)
- Re: Androcles asks for Derivation of LT Androcles (02/18/05)
- Re: Androcles asks for Derivation of LT Uncle Al (02/18/05)
- Re: Androcles asks for Derivation of LT Randy Poe (02/16/05)
- Re: Androcles asks for Derivation of LT whopkins_at_csd.uwm.edu (02/17/05)
- Re: Androcles asks for Derivation of LT whopkins_at_csd.uwm.edu (02/18/05)
- Re: Androcles asks for Derivation of LT Androcles (02/16/05)
- Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?! bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (02/16/05)
- "anti-gravity" Tesseract (02/15/05)
- Re: "anti-gravity" N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/15/05)
- Re: "anti-gravity" vignesh (02/16/05)
- Re: "anti-gravity" Aage Andersen (02/16/05)
- Re: "anti-gravity" vignesh (02/16/05)
- Re: "anti-gravity" ring_theory (02/16/05)
- Re: "anti-gravity" tj Frazir (02/17/05)
- Re: "anti-gravity" ring_theory (02/17/05)
- Re: "anti-gravity" Tesseract (02/17/05)
- Re: "anti-gravity" ring_theory (02/17/05)
- Re: "anti-gravity" Tom Capizzi (02/17/05)
- Re: "anti-gravity" ring_theory (02/18/05)
- Re: "anti-gravity" N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/18/05)
- Re: "anti-gravity" ring_theory (02/18/05)
- Re: "anti-gravity" ande452_at_attglobal.net (02/18/05)
- Re: "anti-gravity" ring_theory (02/18/05)
- Re: "anti-gravity" Creighton Hogg (02/18/05)
- Re: "anti-gravity" Tom Capizzi (02/18/05)
- Re: "anti-gravity" ring_theory (02/18/05)
- Re: "anti-gravity" Tom Capizzi (02/18/05)
- Re: "anti-gravity" ring_theory (02/18/05)
- Re: "anti-gravity" N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/18/05)
- Re: "anti-gravity" ring_theory (02/19/05)
- Re: "anti-gravity" N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/19/05)
- Re: "anti-gravity" ring_theory (02/21/05)
- Re: "anti-gravity" N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/21/05)
- Re: "anti-gravity" ring_theory (02/21/05)
- Re: "anti-gravity" tj Frazir (02/21/05)
- Re: "anti-gravity" tj Frazir (02/18/05)
- Re: "anti-gravity" tj Frazir (02/17/05)
- Re: "anti-gravity" ande452_at_attglobal.net (02/17/05)
- Re: "anti-gravity" Greysky (02/17/05)
- Re: "anti-gravity" George (02/17/05)
- Re: "anti-gravity" Rattus Norvegicus (02/19/05)
- Does total speed of light in vacuum change in a gravity field? Jack Sarfatti (02/15/05)
- Re: Does total speed of light in vacuum change in a gravity field? Uncle Al (02/15/05)
- Re: Does total speed of light in vacuum change in a gravity field? Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato (02/15/05)
- Re: Does total speed of light in vacuum change in a gravity field? Jim Greenfield (02/16/05)
- Re: Does total speed of light in vacuum change in a gravity field? Dirk Van de moortel (02/16/05)
- Re: Does total speed of light in vacuum change in a gravity field? Jim Greenfield (02/17/05)
- Re: Does total speed of light in vacuum change in a gravity field? Dirk Van de moortel (02/17/05)
- Re: Does total speed of light in vacuum change in a gravity field? jgreen_at_seol.net.au (02/18/05)
- Re: Does total speed of light in vacuum change in a gravity field? Dirk Van de moortel (02/18/05)
- Re: Does total speed of light in vacuum change in a gravity field? Henri Wilson (02/22/05)
- Re: Does total speed of light in vacuum change in a gravity field? Dirk Van de moortel (02/22/05)
- Re: Does total speed of light in vacuum change in a gravity field? Henri Wilson (02/26/05)
- Re: Does total speed of light in vacuum change in a gravity field? Dirk Van de moortel (02/26/05)
- Re: Does total speed of light in vacuum change in a gravity field? Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato (02/16/05)
- Re: Does total speed of light in vacuum change in a gravity field? Jim Greenfield (02/17/05)
- Re: Does total speed of light in vacuum change in a gravity field? Jim Greenfield (02/16/05)
- Cartan forms curvature, torsion & Einstein's GR Jack Sarfatti (02/15/05)
- To Uncle Al Alphonse (02/15/05)
- Attractive domain walls WaiteDavid137_at_yahoo.com (02/15/05)
- PD, a question for you. Van (02/15/05)
- Re: PD, a question for you. la ver (02/15/05)
- Re: PD, a question for you. la ver (02/15/05)
- Re: PD, a question for you. la ver (02/15/05)
- Re: PD, a question for you. PD (02/15/05)
- Re: PD, a question for you. Franz Heymann (02/15/05)
- Re: PD, a question for you. Gregory L. Hansen (02/16/05)
- Re: PD, a question for you. Bill Hobba (02/16/05)
- Need quick newsreader assist DavidBowman (02/15/05)
- The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian SDR (02/15/05)
- The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian SDR (02/15/05)
- 3 St. M (02/15/05)
- Re: All Odd Numbers are Prime!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!......... ... ande452_at_attglobal.net (02/15/05)
- Re: All Odd Numbers are Prime!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!......... ... bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (02/15/05)
- Re: All Odd Numbers are Prime!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!......... ... bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (02/15/05)
- Re: All Odd Numbers are Prime!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!......... ... Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (02/15/05)
- Re: All Odd Numbers are Prime!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!......... ... bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (02/16/05)
- Re: All Odd Numbers are Prime!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!......... ... Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (02/16/05)
- Re: All Odd Numbers are Prime!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!......... ... bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (02/16/05)
- Re: All Odd Numbers are Prime!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!......... ... Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (02/16/05)
- Re: All Odd Numbers are Prime!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!......... ... bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (02/16/05)
- Re: All Odd Numbers are Prime!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!......... ... Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (02/16/05)
- Re: All Odd Numbers are Prime!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!......... ... bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (02/16/05)
- Re: All Odd Numbers are Prime!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!......... ... Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (02/16/05)
- Re: All Odd Numbers are Prime!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!......... ... bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (02/16/05)
- Re: All Odd Numbers are Prime!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!......... ... Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (02/16/05)
- Re: All Odd Numbers are Prime!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!......... ... Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (02/15/05)
- To Timo Nieminen- re Einstein's electrodynamics Androcles (02/15/05)
- Still trying to understand the twin paradox -- I'm a little slow DavidBowman (02/15/05)
- Re: Still trying to understand the twin paradox -- I'm a little slow Dirk Van de moortel (02/15/05)
- Re: Still trying to understand the twin paradox -- I'm a little slow DavidBowman (02/15/05)
- Re: Still trying to understand the twin paradox -- I'm a little slow Dirk Van de moortel (02/15/05)
- Re: Still trying to understand the twin paradox -- I'm a little slow Dirk Van de moortel (02/15/05)
- Re: Still trying to understand the twin paradox -- I'm a little slow DavidBowman (02/16/05)
- Re: Still trying to understand the twin paradox -- I'm a little slow Androcles (02/16/05)
- Re: Still trying to understand the twin paradox -- I'm a little slow Ken S. Tucker (02/16/05)
- Re: Still trying to understand the twin paradox -- I'm a little slow Androcles (02/16/05)
- Re: Still trying to understand the twin paradox -- I'm a little slow Dirk Van de moortel (02/16/05)
- Re: Still trying to understand the twin paradox -- I'm a little slow Ben Rudiak-Gould (02/17/05)
- Re: Still trying to understand the twin paradox -- I'm a little slow Shadowmega (02/15/05)
- Re: Still trying to understand the twin paradox -- I'm a little slow DavidBowman (02/15/05)
- Re: Still trying to understand the twin paradox -- I'm a little slow TomGee (02/15/05)
- Re: Still trying to understand the twin paradox -- I'm a little slow Dirk Van de moortel (02/15/05)
- The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian SDR (02/15/05)
- Speed of Light in Rotating Frames Jack Sarfatti (02/15/05)
- Debunking Ken Seto in progress.... A.S. (02/15/05)
- Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress.... bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (02/15/05)
- Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress.... Bjoern Feuerbacher (02/15/05)
- Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress.... kenseto (02/17/05)
- Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress.... kenseto (02/17/05)
- Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress.... A.S. (02/18/05)
- Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress.... A.S. (02/18/05)
- Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress.... N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/18/05)
- Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress.... bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (02/18/05)
- Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress.... kenseto (02/18/05)
- Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress.... Dr. Photon (02/18/05)
- Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress.... kenseto (02/18/05)
- Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress.... Dr. Photon (02/19/05)
- Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress.... Bjoern Feuerbacher (02/18/05)
- Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress.... kenseto (02/19/05)
- Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress.... OsherD (02/18/05)
- Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress.... EjP (02/15/05)
- Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress.... Dr. Photon (02/15/05)
- Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress.... bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (02/16/05)
- Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress.... Bjoern Feuerbacher (02/16/05)
- Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress.... bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (02/16/05)
- Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress.... Bjoern Feuerbacher (02/16/05)
- Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress.... bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (02/16/05)
- Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress.... A.S. (02/16/05)
- Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress.... Bilge (02/17/05)
- Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress.... bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (02/17/05)
- Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress.... kenseto (02/17/05)
- Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress.... Bjoern Feuerbacher (02/17/05)
- Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress.... bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (02/17/05)
- Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress.... Bilge (02/16/05)
- Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress.... Dr. Photon (02/17/05)
- Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress.... Bjoern Feuerbacher (02/16/05)
- Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress.... ande452_at_attglobal.net (02/17/05)
- Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress.... bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (02/18/05)
- Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress.... Bjoern Feuerbacher (02/18/05)
- C - Constant? Adieu (02/15/05)
- Re: C - Constant? Bill Hobba (02/15/05)
- Re: C - Constant? Adieu (02/15/05)
- Re: C - Constant? Bill Hobba (02/15/05)
- Re: C - Constant? Adieu (02/15/05)
- Re: C - Constant? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/15/05)
- Re: C - Constant? Adieu (02/15/05)
- Re: C - Constant? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/15/05)
- Re: C - Constant? Adieu (02/15/05)
- Re: C - Constant? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/15/05)
- Re: C - Constant? Adieu (02/15/05)
- Re: C - Constant? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/15/05)
- Re: C - Constant? Adieu (02/15/05)
- Re: C - Constant? Bill Hobba (02/16/05)
- Re: C - Constant? Androcles (02/16/05)
- Re: C - Constant? Adieu (02/17/05)
- Re: C - Constant? Henri Wilson (02/16/05)
- Re: C - Constant? Adieu (02/15/05)
- Re: C - Constant? ande452_at_attglobal.net (02/15/05)
- Re: C - Constant? Adieu (02/15/05)
- Re: C - Constant? ande452_at_attglobal.net (02/17/05)
- Re: C - Constant? Androcles (02/15/05)
- Re: C - Constant? Adieu (02/15/05)
- Re: C - Constant? Androcles (02/15/05)
- Re: C - Constant? Adieu (02/15/05)
- Re: C - Constant? Androcles (02/15/05)
- Re: C - Constant? Adieu (02/15/05)
- Re: C - Constant? Androcles (02/15/05)
- Re: C - Constant? Adieu (02/15/05)
- Re: C - Constant? Androcles (02/15/05)
- Re: C - Constant? Adieu (02/16/05)
- Re: C - Constant? DavidBowman (02/15/05)
- Re: C - Constant? Dirk Van de moortel (02/15/05)
- Re: C - Constant? Adieu (02/15/05)
- Re: C - Constant? Adieu (02/15/05)
- Re: C - Constant? Bill Hobba (02/15/05)
- Diverging Opinions on Physics Foundations Perspicacious (02/14/05)
- Re: Diverging Opinions on Physics Foundations Gregory L. Hansen (02/14/05)
- Re: Diverging Opinions on Physics Foundations Sam Wormley (02/14/05)
- Re: Diverging Opinions on Physics Foundations Bilge (02/14/05)
- Re: Diverging Opinions on Physics Foundations Bill Hobba (02/14/05)
- Re: Diverging Opinions on Physics Foundations Uncle Al (02/14/05)
- Re: Diverging Opinions on Physics Foundations Perspicacious (02/14/05)
- Re: Diverging Opinions on Physics Foundations Perspicacious (02/14/05)
- New Theories: Time Vector & Time as a Moving Dimension, Expanding Relative to Spatial Dimensions jollyrogership_at_yahoo.com (02/14/05)
- Re: New Theories: Time Vector & Time as a Moving Dimension, Expanding Relative to Spatial Dimensions AllYou! (02/14/05)
- Re: New Theories: Time Vector & Time as a Moving Dimension, Expanding Relative to Spatial Dimensions Uncle Al (02/14/05)
- Re: New Theories: Time Vector & Time as a Moving Dimension, Expanding Relative to Spatial Dimensions Bill Hobba (02/14/05)
- Re: New Theories: Time Vector & Time as a Moving Dimension, Expanding Relative to Spatial Dimensions Jeff (02/16/05)
- Boring newsreader issues DavidBowman (02/14/05)
- Re: Boring newsreader issues N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/14/05)
- Re: Boring newsreader issues reany_at_asu.edu (02/14/05)
- Re: Boring newsreader issues Adieu (02/14/05)
- Re: Boring newsreader issues DavidBowman (02/16/05)
- Re: Boring newsreader issues DavidBowman (02/16/05)
- Re: Boring newsreader issues DavidBowman (02/16/05)
- Re: Boring newsreader issues DavidBowman (02/16/05)
- Re: Boring newsreader issues DavidBowman (02/16/05)
- Re: Boring newsreader issues DavidBowman (02/16/05)
- Re: Boring newsreader issues DavidBowman (02/16/05)
- Re: Boring newsreader issues N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/16/05)
- Re: Boring newsreader issues DavidBowman (02/18/05)
- Re: Boring newsreader issues DavidBowman (02/16/05)
- Re: Boring newsreader issues DavidBowman (02/16/05)
- Re: Boring newsreader issues DavidBowman (02/16/05)
- 4 St. M (02/14/05)
- Happy Valentine's Day la ver (02/14/05)
- space timespan - action reaction stuart (02/14/05)
- Chapter 42 - wuere does it come from? Elio Fabri (02/14/05)
- Al et al, PoE? (physic/0411052) Ken S. Tucker (02/14/05)
- JS Bell teaches Special Relativity 1 Jack Sarfatti (02/13/05)
- S. Petersburg paradox beda pietanza (02/13/05)
- Re: S. Petersburg paradox Forwarded (02/13/05)
- Re: S. Petersburg paradox aft627_at_aol.com (02/14/05)
- Re: S. Petersburg paradox royls_at_telus.net (02/14/05)
- Re: S. Petersburg paradox examachine_at_gmail.com (02/14/05)
- Re: S. Petersburg paradox jem (02/16/05)
- Re: S. Petersburg paradox Sunny (02/17/05)
- Re: S. Petersburg paradox beda pietanza (02/17/05)
- Re: S. Petersburg paradox Yan Zhang (02/17/05)
- Re: S. Petersburg paradox beda pietanza (02/17/05)
- Re: S. Petersburg paradox jem (02/18/05)
- Re: S. Petersburg paradox beda pietanza (02/18/05)
- Re: S. Petersburg paradox jem (02/19/05)
- Re: S. Petersburg paradox Nuno T. (02/20/05)
- Re: S. Petersburg paradox N. Silver (02/20/05)
- Re: S. Petersburg paradox Timothy Little (02/20/05)
- Re: S. Petersburg paradox beda pietanza (02/25/05)
- Re: S. Petersburg paradox Timothy Little (02/26/05)
- Re: S. Petersburg paradox Scott Hemphill (02/26/05)
- Re: S. Petersburg paradox beda pietanza (02/27/05)
- Re: S. Petersburg paradox Sunny (02/18/05)
- Re: S. Petersburg paradox beda pietanza (02/18/05)
- Re: S. Petersburg paradox Andy F. (02/20/05)
- Re: S. Petersburg paradox beda pietanza (02/21/05)
- Re: S. Petersburg paradox beda pietanza (02/21/05)
- Re: S. Petersburg paradox Ian Jermyn (02/21/05)
- Re: S. Petersburg paradox Timothy Little (02/21/05)
- Re: S. Petersburg paradox beda pietanza (02/14/05)
- Re: S. Petersburg paradox Timothy Little (02/18/05)
- Re: S. Petersburg paradox Forwarded (02/13/05)
- Rubber Rods? Jack Sarfatti (02/13/05)
- Double Observation Bryan (02/13/05)
- Eve: The Mother Of All Inertial Frames Jack Sarfatti (02/13/05)
- viewing light from the earliest stages of universe dougby (02/13/05)
- Re: viewing light from the earliest stages of universe N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/13/05)
- Re: viewing light from the earliest stages of universe dougby (02/13/05)
- Re: viewing light from the earliest stages of universe dougby (02/13/05)
- Re: viewing light from the earliest stages of universe dougby (02/13/05)
- Re: viewing light from the earliest stages of universe dougby (02/13/05)
- Re: viewing light from the earliest stages of universe N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/13/05)
- Re: viewing light from the earliest stages of universe DavidBowman (02/13/05)
- Re: viewing light from the earliest stages of universe N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/14/05)
- Re: viewing light from the earliest stages of universe DavidBowman (02/14/05)
- Re: viewing light from the earliest stages of universe N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/14/05)
- Re: viewing light from the earliest stages of universe DavidBowman (02/14/05)
- Re: viewing light from the earliest stages of universe N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/14/05)
- Re: viewing light from the earliest stages of universe DavidBowman (02/14/05)
- Re: viewing light from the earliest stages of universe Lady Chatterly (02/14/05)
- Re: viewing light from the earliest stages of universe DavidBowman (02/14/05)
- Re: viewing light from the earliest stages of universe DavidBowman (02/14/05)
- Re: viewing light from the earliest stages of universe N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/14/05)
- Re: viewing light from the earliest stages of universe DavidBowman (02/14/05)
- Re: viewing light from the earliest stages of universe dougby (02/14/05)
- Re: viewing light from the earliest stages of universe N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/14/05)
- Re: viewing light from the earliest stages of universe DavidBowman (02/14/05)
- Re: viewing light from the earliest stages of universe N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/14/05)
- Re: viewing light from the earliest stages of universe dougby (02/14/05)
- Re: viewing light from the earliest stages of universe DavidBowman (02/14/05)
- Re: viewing light from the earliest stages of universe N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/14/05)
- Re: viewing light from the earliest stages of universe dougby (02/14/05)
- Re: viewing light from the earliest stages of universe N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/14/05)
- Re: viewing light from the earliest stages of universe dougby (02/14/05)
- Re: viewing light from the earliest stages of universe N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/14/05)
- Re: viewing light from the earliest stages of universe tj Frazir (02/15/05)
- Re: viewing light from the earliest stages of universe DavidBowman (02/14/05)
- Re: viewing light from the earliest stages of universe N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/14/05)
- Re: viewing light from the earliest stages of universe tj Frazir (02/15/05)
- Re: viewing light from the earliest stages of universe N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/13/05)
- Re: viewing light from the earliest stages of universe Ben Rudiak-Gould (02/14/05)
- Re: viewing light from the earliest stages of universe Androcles (02/13/05)
- Re: viewing light from the earliest stages of universe N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/13/05)
- What is the equation Bryan (02/13/05)
- Decoding The Cipher of Genesis Jack Sarfatti (02/12/05)
- SR and electrical resistance, and rates dseppala_at_austin.rr.com (02/12/05)
- Re: SR and electrical resistance, and rates Bill Hobba (02/12/05)
- Re: SR and electrical resistance, and rates dseppala_at_austin.rr.com (02/13/05)
- Re: SR and electrical resistance, and rates Bill Hobba (02/13/05)
- Re: SR and electrical resistance, and rates Sue... (02/13/05)
- Re: SR and electrical resistance, and rates Bill Hobba (02/13/05)
- Re: SR and electrical resistance, and rates Sue... (02/14/05)
- Re: SR and electrical resistance, and rates Bill Hobba (02/14/05)
- Re: SR and electrical resistance, and rates Dirk Van de moortel (02/14/05)
- Re: SR and electrical resistance, and rates Sue... (02/14/05)
- Re: SR and electrical resistance, and rates Dirk Van de moortel (02/14/05)
- Re: SR and electrical resistance, and rates jahn (02/14/05)
- Re: SR and electrical resistance, and rates Bill Hobba (02/14/05)
- Re: SR and electrical resistance, and rates Sue... (02/14/05)
- Re: SR and electrical resistance, and rates Bill Hobba (02/15/05)
- Re: SR and electrical resistance, and rates Sue... (02/15/05)
- Re: SR and electrical resistance, and rates dseppala_at_austin.rr.com (02/14/05)
- Re: SR and electrical resistance, and rates Bill Hobba (02/14/05)
- Re: SR and electrical resistance, and rates dseppala_at_austin.rr.com (02/15/05)
- Re: SR and electrical resistance, and rates dseppala_at_austin.rr.com (02/13/05)
- Re: SR and electrical resistance, and rates Bill Hobba (02/12/05)
- Time Dilation: PROPOSAL #2 guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/12/05)
- Re: Time Dilation: PROPOSAL #2 guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/12/05)
- Re: Time Dilation: PROPOSAL #2 Sue... (02/14/05)
- Re: Time Dilation: PROPOSAL #2 guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/14/05)
- Re: Time Dilation: PROPOSAL #2 Sue... (02/14/05)
- Re: Time Dilation: PROPOSAL #2 guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/14/05)
- Re: Time Dilation: PROPOSAL #2 Sue... (02/14/05)
- Re: Time Dilation: PROPOSAL #2 Paul B. Andersen (02/16/05)
- Re: Time Dilation: PROPOSAL #2 Androcles (02/16/05)
- Re: Time Dilation: PROPOSAL #2 Sue... (02/22/05)
- Re: Time Dilation: PROPOSAL #2 Paul B. Andersen (02/22/05)
- Re: Time Dilation: PROPOSAL #2 Sue... (02/22/05)
- Re: Time Dilation: PROPOSAL #2 Randy Poe (02/22/05)
- Re: Time Dilation: PROPOSAL #2 Sue... (02/22/05)
- Re: Time Dilation: PROPOSAL #2 Androcles (02/23/05)
- Re: Time Dilation: PROPOSAL #2 Androcles (02/23/05)
- Re: Time Dilation: PROPOSAL #2 Paul B. Andersen (02/26/05)
- Re: Time Dilation: PROPOSAL #2 jahn (02/26/05)
- Re: Time Dilation: PROPOSAL #2 Paul B. Andersen (02/27/05)
- Re: Time Dilation: PROPOSAL #2 jahn (02/28/05)
- Re: Time Dilation: PROPOSAL #2 Androcles (02/23/05)
- Re: Time Dilation: PROPOSAL #2 Sue... (02/23/05)
- Re: Time Dilation: PROPOSAL #2 Androcles (02/23/05)
- Re: Time Dilation: PROPOSAL #2 Paul B. Andersen (02/16/05)
- Re: Time Dilation: PROPOSAL #2 Paul B. Andersen (02/16/05)
- Re: Time Dilation: PROPOSAL #2 Androcles (02/16/05)
- Re: Time Dilation: PROPOSAL #2 alanmc95210_at_yahoo.com (02/17/05)
- Re: Time Dilation: PROPOSAL #2 Paul B. Andersen (02/22/05)
- Re: Time Dilation: PROPOSAL #2 guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/22/05)
- Re: Time Dilation: PROPOSAL #2 Paul B. Andersen (02/22/05)
- Re: Time Dilation: PROPOSAL #2 guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/23/05)
- Re: Time Dilation: PROPOSAL #2 Paul B. Andersen (02/26/05)
- Re: Time Dilation: PROPOSAL #2 guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/26/05)
- Re: Time Dilation: PROPOSAL #2 Henri Wilson (02/27/05)
- Re: Time Dilation: PROPOSAL #2 Paul B. Andersen (02/27/05)
- Re: Time Dilation: PROPOSAL #2 Paul B. Andersen (02/27/05)
- Re: Time Dilation: PROPOSAL #2 guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/16/05)
- Re: Time Dilation: PROPOSAL #2 Sue... (02/22/05)
- Re: Time Dilation: PROPOSAL #2 Paul B. Andersen (02/26/05)
- Re: Time Dilation: PROPOSAL #2 jahn (02/26/05)
- Re: Time Dilation: PROPOSAL #2 Paul B. Andersen (02/27/05)
- Re: Time Dilation: PROPOSAL #2 jahn (02/28/05)
- Re: Time Dilation: PROPOSAL #2 Sue... (02/14/05)
- Re: Time Dilation: PROPOSAL #2 Bilge (02/14/05)
- Re: Time Dilation: PROPOSAL #2 guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/12/05)
- Time Dilation: PROPOSAL #1 guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/12/05)
- Special Relativity is now Absolutely Unassailable! Eugene Shubert (02/12/05)
- Does the Electromagnetic field have a Gravitational field? Ken S. Tucker (02/12/05)
- Re: Does the Electromagnetic field have a Gravitational field? la ver (02/12/05)
- Re: Does the Electromagnetic field have a Gravitational field? Ken S. Tucker (02/13/05)
- Re: Does the Electromagnetic field have a Gravitational field? FrediFizzx (02/13/05)
- Re: Does the Electromagnetic field have a Gravitational field? FrediFizzx (02/13/05)
- Re: Does the Electromagnetic field have a Gravitational field? Creighton Hogg (02/13/05)
- Re: Does the Electromagnetic field have a Gravitational field? FrediFizzx (02/13/05)
- Re: Does the Electromagnetic field have a Gravitational field? Creighton Hogg (02/13/05)
- Re: Does the Electromagnetic field have a Gravitational field? Bilge (02/14/05)
- Re: Does the Electromagnetic field have a Gravitational field? Ken S. Tucker (02/13/05)
- Re: Does the Electromagnetic field have a Gravitational field? FrediFizzx (02/14/05)
- Re: Does the Electromagnetic field have a Gravitational field? Ken S. Tucker (02/14/05)
- Re: Does the Electromagnetic field have a Gravitational field? Lady Chatterly (02/14/05)
- Re: Does the Electromagnetic field have a Gravitational field? FrediFizzx (02/15/05)
- Re: Does the Electromagnetic field have a Gravitational field? Ken S. Tucker (02/15/05)
- Re: Does the Electromagnetic field have a Gravitational field? FrediFizzx (02/16/05)
- Re: Does the Electromagnetic field have a Gravitational field? Ken S. Tucker (02/18/05)
- Re: Does the Electromagnetic field have a Gravitational field? FrediFizzx (02/18/05)
- Re: Does the Electromagnetic field have a Gravitational field? Creighton Hogg (02/18/05)
- Re: Does the Electromagnetic field have a Gravitational field? Ken S. Tucker (02/13/05)
- Re: Does the Electromagnetic field have a Gravitational field? la ver (02/12/05)
- How the Aether Physics Model came to be David Thomson (02/12/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be FrediFizzx (02/12/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be David Thomson (02/12/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be FrediFizzx (02/13/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be David Thomson (02/16/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be FrediFizzx (02/16/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be David Thomson (02/18/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be FrediFizzx (02/18/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be David Thomson (02/19/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be FrediFizzx (02/19/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be David Thomson (02/20/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be FrediFizzx (02/20/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be David Thomson (02/20/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be FrediFizzx (02/21/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be David Thomson (02/24/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be Paul Stowe (02/24/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be vern_at_bealenet.com (02/24/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be Paul Stowe (02/24/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be mingstb_at_sim-ss.com (02/27/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be John C. Polasek (02/24/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be FrediFizzx (02/25/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be David Thomson (02/12/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be Bilge (02/12/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be geraldkelleher_at_hotmail.com (02/12/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be Lady Chatterly (02/12/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be geraldkelleher_at_hotmail.com (02/12/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be Androcles (02/12/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be geraldkelleher_at_hotmail.com (02/12/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be Lady Chatterly (02/12/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be David Thomson (02/13/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be Lady Chatterly (02/12/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/12/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/12/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/12/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be David Thomson (02/13/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/13/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be David Thomson (02/16/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/16/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be David Thomson (02/18/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be Bilge (02/18/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/19/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be David Thomson (02/20/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/22/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be David Thomson (02/24/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/12/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be Ben (02/13/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be Bill Hobba (02/13/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be Ben (02/14/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/14/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be David Thomson (02/16/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be Ben (02/16/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/16/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be Bill Hobba (02/15/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be David Thomson (02/16/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be Bilge (02/14/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be Ben (02/14/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be Bilge (02/14/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be Ben (02/15/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be Bilge (02/16/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be Ben (02/16/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be Bilge (02/16/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be Ben (02/17/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be Bilge (02/17/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be Ben (02/18/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be Bilge (02/18/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be David Thomson (02/16/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be David Thomson (02/16/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be David Thomson (02/16/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be Bill Hobba (02/13/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be Ben Rudiak-Gould (02/13/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (02/15/05)
- Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be FrediFizzx (02/12/05)
- K calculus OK? DavidBowman (02/12/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? Bilge (02/12/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? Ken S. Tucker (02/12/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? Bilge (02/12/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? Ken S. Tucker (02/12/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? Bilge (02/12/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? Ken S. Tucker (02/13/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? Bilge (02/14/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? Ken S. Tucker (02/14/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/14/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? Ken S. Tucker (02/14/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? FrediFizzx (02/14/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? Bilge (02/15/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? Bilge (02/15/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? Ken S. Tucker (02/15/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? Bilge (02/16/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? Ken S. Tucker (02/16/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? Creighton Hogg (02/16/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? Bilge (02/16/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? Ken S. Tucker (02/16/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? Bilge (02/16/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? Ken S. Tucker (02/17/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? Bilge (02/17/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? Ken S. Tucker (02/17/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? Bilge (02/17/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? Ken S. Tucker (02/18/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? DavidBowman (02/18/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? Bilge (02/18/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? Ken S. Tucker (02/18/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? Ken S. Tucker (02/12/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? Dirk Van de moortel (02/12/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? Bilge (02/12/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? Ken S. Tucker (02/12/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? DavidBowman (02/12/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? Ken S. Tucker (02/13/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? Androcles (02/13/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/13/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? Androcles (02/13/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? Dirk Van de moortel (02/13/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? Ben Rudiak-Gould (02/13/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? Dirk Van de moortel (02/13/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? Bilge (02/14/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/13/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? Dirk Van de moortel (02/13/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/13/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? Androcles (02/13/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/13/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? Androcles (02/14/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/14/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? Androcles (02/14/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? Eugene Shubert (02/12/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? Bill Hobba (02/12/05)
- Re: K calculus OK? Bilge (02/12/05)
- A New Type of Hypnosis Training Seminar for YOU! tom_at_tomsilver.com (02/12/05)
- Living in 2005 Androcles (02/11/05)
- Re: Living in 2005 YBM (02/11/05)
- Re: Living in 2005 Uncle Al (02/11/05)
- Re: Living in 2005 Ken S. Tucker (02/12/05)
- Re: Living in 2005 Dirk Van de moortel (02/12/05)
- Re: Living in 2005 Ken S. Tucker (02/12/05)
- Re: Living in 2005 Androcles (02/12/05)
- Re: Living in 2005 Ken S. Tucker (02/12/05)
- Re: Living in 2005 Androcles (02/12/05)
- Re: Living in 2005 Dirk Van de moortel (02/12/05)
- Re: Living in 2005 Eric Gisse (02/12/05)
- Re: Living in 2005 la ver (02/12/05)
- Re: Living in 2005 Ken S. Tucker (02/12/05)
- Re: Living in 2005 Androcles (02/12/05)
- Re: Living in 2005 la ver (02/12/05)
- Re: Living in 2005 la ver (02/12/05)
- Re: Living in 2005 Androcles (02/13/05)
- Re: Living in 2005 Dirk Van de moortel (02/13/05)
- Re: Living in 2005 la ver (02/13/05)
- Re: Living in 2005 Androcles (02/13/05)
- Re: Living in 2005 Bilge (02/14/05)
- Re: Living in 2005 Androcles (02/14/05)
- Re: Living in 2005 Dirk Van de moortel (02/14/05)
- Re: Living in 2005 Dirk Van de moortel (02/12/05)
- Re: Living in 2005 la ver (02/12/05)
- Re: Living in 2005 Dirk Van de moortel (02/12/05)
- Re: Living in 2005 la ver (02/13/05)
- Re: Living in 2005 Dirk Van de moortel (02/13/05)
- Re: Living in 2005 Androcles (02/13/05)
- Re: Living in 2005 Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (02/12/05)
- Re: Living in 2005 Ken S. Tucker (02/12/05)
- Re: Living in 2005 whopkins_at_csd.uwm.edu (02/18/05)
- Is there Time Dilation if Twins circle the Earth at 1/3c?? guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/11/05)
- Re: Is there Time Dilation if Twins circle the Earth at 1/3c?? Eric Gisse (02/11/05)
- Re: Is there Time Dilation if Twins circle the Earth at 1/3c?? EjP (02/11/05)
- Re: Is there Time Dilation if Twins circle the Earth at 1/3c?? Jesse Mazer (02/11/05)
- Re: Is there Time Dilation if Twins circle the Earth at 1/3c?? alanmc95210_at_yahoo.com (02/12/05)
- Re: Is there Time Dilation if Twins circle the Earth at 1/3c?? Darkwing \(Double Secret Disinformation Agent\) (02/12/05)
- Re: Is there Time Dilation if Twins circle the Earth at 1/3c?? Bilge (02/12/05)
- My mistake on Time Dilation? guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/11/05)
- Re: My mistake on Time Dilation? guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/11/05)
- Re: My mistake on Time Dilation? Eric Gisse (02/11/05)
- Re: My mistake on Time Dilation? guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/11/05)
- Re: My mistake on Time Dilation? guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/11/05)
- Re: My mistake on Time Dilation? Eric Gisse (02/12/05)
- Re: My mistake on Time Dilation? guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/12/05)
- Re: My mistake on Time Dilation? guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/12/05)
- Re: My mistake on Time Dilation? Bilge (02/12/05)
- Re: My mistake on Time Dilation? guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/13/05)
- Re: My mistake on Time Dilation? guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/13/05)
- Re: My mistake on Time Dilation? guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/13/05)
- Re: My mistake on Time Dilation? guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/13/05)
- Re: My mistake on Time Dilation? Bilge (02/14/05)
- Re: My mistake on Time Dilation? guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/14/05)
- Real relativity Sue... (02/11/05)
- TIME, you old gipsy man Van (02/11/05)
- Re: TIME, you old gipsy man Sue... (02/11/05)
- Re: TIME, you old gipsy man Dirk Van de moortel (02/11/05)
- Re: TIME, you old gipsy man Van (02/11/05)
- Re: TIME, you old gipsy man Alex (02/11/05)
- Re: TIME, you old gipsy man Van (02/11/05)
- Re: TIME, you old gipsy man PD (02/11/05)
- Re: TIME, you old gipsy man Van (02/11/05)
- Re: TIME, you old gipsy man PD (02/11/05)
- Re: TIME, you old gipsy man Van (02/11/05)
- Re: TIME, you old gipsy man PD (02/11/05)
- Re: TIME, you old gipsy man Van (02/11/05)
- Re: TIME, you old gipsy man PD (02/11/05)
- Re: TIME, you old gipsy man Van (02/12/05)
- Re: TIME, you old gipsy man Alex (02/11/05)
- Re: TIME, you old gipsy man Androcles (02/11/05)
- Re: TIME, you old gipsy man Alex (02/11/05)
- Re: TIME, you old gipsy man Androcles (02/11/05)
- Re: TIME, you old gipsy man Dirk Van de moortel (02/11/05)
- Re: TIME, you old gipsy man Van (02/11/05)
- Re: TIME, you old gipsy man Dirk Van de moortel (02/11/05)
- Re: TIME, you old gipsy man Van (02/11/05)
- Re: TIME, you old gipsy man PD (02/11/05)
- Re: TIME, you old gipsy man Van (02/11/05)
- Re: TIME, you old gipsy man Sam Wormley (02/11/05)
- Re: TIME, you old gipsy man Uncle Al (02/11/05)
- Re: TIME, you old gipsy man Jon Bell (02/12/05)
- Changing the subject. Ken S. Tucker (02/11/05)
- Ambiguity in the "Affine Connection" Jack Sarfatti (02/11/05)
- SARFATTI IN "MAKES SENSE" SHOCKER!!!! Peter Harding (02/11/05)
- Re: Ambiguity in the "Affine Connection" Gerald L. O'Barr (02/12/05)
- Re: Ambiguity in the "Affine Connection" Lady Chatterly (02/12/05)
- Re: Ambiguity in the "Affine Connection" shevek4_at_yahoo.com (02/14/05)
- Re: Ambiguity in the "Affine Connection" globarr_at_yahoo.com (02/15/05)
- Re: Ambiguity in the "Affine Connection" shevek4_at_yahoo.com (02/15/05)
- Re: Ambiguity in the "Affine Connection" globarr_at_yahoo.com (02/15/05)
- Re: Ambiguity in the "Affine Connection" shevek4_at_yahoo.com (02/15/05)
- Re: Ambiguity in the "Affine Connection" globarr_at_yahoo.com (02/16/05)
- Re: Ambiguity in the "Affine Connection" shevek4_at_yahoo.com (02/16/05)
- Re: Ambiguity in the "Affine Connection" globarr_at_yahoo.com (02/17/05)
- Re: Ambiguity in the "Affine Connection" shevek4_at_yahoo.com (02/18/05)
- Re: Ambiguity in the "Affine Connection" globarr_at_yahoo.com (02/18/05)
- Re: Ambiguity in the "Affine Connection" shevek4_at_yahoo.com (02/19/05)
- Re: Ambiguity in the "Affine Connection" globarr_at_yahoo.com (02/21/05)
- Re: Ambiguity in the "Affine Connection" shevek4_at_yahoo.com (02/22/05)
- Re: Ambiguity in the "Affine Connection" globarr_at_yahoo.com (02/23/05)
- Re: Ambiguity in the "Affine Connection" shevek4_at_yahoo.com (02/25/05)
- Re: Ambiguity in the "Affine Connection" globarr_at_yahoo.com (02/25/05)
- Re: Ambiguity in the "Affine Connection" shevek4_at_yahoo.com (02/27/05)
- Re: Ambiguity in the "Affine Connection" Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (02/23/05)
- Re: Ambiguity in the "Affine Connection" globarr_at_yahoo.com (02/24/05)
- Re: Ambiguity in the "Affine Connection" Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (02/24/05)
- Re: Ambiguity in the "Affine Connection" globarr_at_yahoo.com (02/24/05)
- Re: Ambiguity in the "Affine Connection" Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (02/25/05)
- Re: Ambiguity in the "Affine Connection" globarr_at_yahoo.com (02/26/05)
- Re: Ambiguity in the "Affine Connection" Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (02/20/05)
- Re: Ambiguity in the "Affine Connection" shevek4_at_yahoo.com (02/22/05)
- Re: Ambiguity in the "Affine Connection" globarr_at_yahoo.com (02/22/05)
- Re: Ambiguity in the "Affine Connection" Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (02/23/05)
- Re: Ambiguity in the "Affine Connection" shevek4_at_yahoo.com (02/25/05)
- Re: Ambiguity in the "Affine Connection" Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (02/27/05)
- Re: Ambiguity in the "Affine Connection" Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (02/16/05)
- Re: Ambiguity in the "Affine Connection" Lady Chatterly (02/16/05)
- Re: Ambiguity in the "Affine Connection" globarr_at_yahoo.com (02/17/05)
- Re: Ambiguity in the "Affine Connection" Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (02/17/05)
- Re: Ambiguity in the "Affine Connection" globarr_at_yahoo.com (02/18/05)
- Schwartz is grieving Androcles (02/11/05)
- Message from Cahill that Relativity is wrong Jack Sarfatti (02/10/05)
- The formal mathematical disproof of relativity. Androcles (02/10/05)
- Re: The formal mathematical disproof of relativity. Eugene Shubert (02/11/05)
- Re: The formal mathematical disproof of relativity. Dirk Van de moortel (02/11/05)
- Re: The formal mathematical disproof of relativity. Paul B. Andersen (02/16/05)
- Re: The formal mathematical disproof of relativity. Androcles (02/16/05)
- Re: The formal mathematical disproof of relativity. Paul B. Andersen (02/16/05)
- Re: The formal mathematical disproof of relativity. Dirk Van de moortel (02/16/05)
- Re: The formal mathematical disproof of relativity. Bilge (02/16/05)
- Re: The formal mathematical disproof of relativity. Paul B. Andersen (02/16/05)
- Re: The formal mathematical disproof of relativity. whopkins_at_csd.uwm.edu (02/17/05)
- Re: The formal mathematical disproof of relativity. whopkins_at_csd.uwm.edu (02/17/05)
- Dumb Relativity Question The Drums of Fascinet (02/10/05)
- Re: Dumb Relativity Question Uncle Al (02/10/05)
- Re: Dumb Relativity Question Jesse Mazer (02/11/05)
- Re: Dumb Relativity Question go go goblin! (02/11/05)
- Re: Dumb Relativity Question Gregory L. Hansen (02/11/05)
- Re: Dumb Relativity Question Brian Baird (02/11/05)
- Re: Dumb Relativity Question Davorak (02/11/05)
- Re: Dumb Relativity Question Franz Heymann (02/11/05)
- A question about G N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/10/05)
- Time Dilation Mistakes guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/10/05)
- Part 1: Time Dilation simplified Math guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/10/05)
- Re: Part 1: Time Dilation simplified Math Eric Gisse (02/10/05)
- Re: Part 1: Time Dilation simplified Math guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/10/05)
- Re: Part 1: Time Dilation simplified Math Eric Gisse (02/11/05)
- Re: Part 1: Time Dilation simplified Math guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/11/05)
- Re: Part 1: Time Dilation simplified Math guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/11/05)
- Re: Part 1: Time Dilation simplified Math Eric Gisse (02/11/05)
- Re: Part 1: Time Dilation simplified Math Lady Chatterly (02/11/05)
- Re: Part 1: Time Dilation simplified Math guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/10/05)
- Re: Part 1: Time Dilation simplified Math guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/10/05)
- Re: Part 1: Time Dilation simplified Math Eric Gisse (02/10/05)
- Re: Lorentz on special relativity Spoonfed (02/10/05)
- Does a preferred inertial frame demand a cosmic torsion field? Jack Sarfatti (02/10/05)
- beauty is symmetry beda pietanza (02/10/05)
- beauty is symmetry beda pietanza (02/10/05)
- Re: beauty is symmetry Van (02/10/05)
- Re: beauty is symmetry reany_at_asu.edu (02/10/05)
- Re: beauty is symmetry ande452_at_attglobal.net (02/11/05)
- Beauty is symmetry beda pietanza (02/10/05)
- Problems Ramkins (02/10/05)
- A Play: On The Importance of Being Covariant Jack Sarfatti (02/10/05)
- johnreed take 10 randamajor_at_yahoo.com (02/10/05)
- johnreed take 9 randamajor_at_yahoo.com (02/10/05)
- accellerated clock time rate beda pietanza (02/10/05)
- Re: accellerated clock time rate Dirk Van de moortel (02/10/05)
- Re: accellerated clock time rate beda pietanza (02/10/05)
- Re: accellerated clock time rate harry (02/21/05)
- Re: accellerated clock time rate beda pietanza (02/21/05)
- Re: accellerated clock time rate Harry (02/22/05)
- Re: accellerated clock time rate Harry (02/23/05)
- Re: accellerated clock time rate beda pietanza (02/25/05)
- Re: accellerated clock time rate Dirk Van de moortel (02/25/05)
- Re: accellerated clock time rate beda pietanza (02/25/05)
- Re: accellerated clock time rate Harry (02/25/05)
- Re: accellerated clock time rate Dirk Van de moortel (02/10/05)
- McCullough's hilarious version of SR. Androcles (02/10/05)
- accellerated clock time rate beda pietanza (02/10/05)
- Re: accellerated clock time rate RP (02/10/05)
- Re: accellerated clock time rate Androcles (02/10/05)
- Re: accellerated clock time rate RP (02/10/05)
- Re: accellerated clock time rate Androcles (02/10/05)
- Re: accellerated clock time rate beda pietanza (02/10/05)
- Re: accellerated clock time rate RP (02/10/05)
- Re: accellerated clock time rate beda pietanza (02/10/05)
- Re: accellerated clock time rate valls_at_icmf.inf.cu (02/11/05)
- Re: accellerated clock time rate beda pietanza (02/12/05)
- Re: accellerated clock time rate Androcles (02/10/05)
- Re: accellerated clock time rate RP (02/10/05)
- Where is Colorado transmitter? Daniel Weston (02/09/05)
- t'hooft-Susskind hologram, preferred frames discussion with R. Kiehn Jack Sarfatti (02/09/05)
- What is "eter-wind"? Leif Andersson (02/09/05)
- Re: What is "eter-wind"? Dirk Van de moortel (02/09/05)
- Re: What is "eter-wind"? PD (02/09/05)
- Re: What is "eter-wind"? Androcles (02/09/05)
- Re: What is "eter-wind"? shevek (02/10/05)
- Re: What is "eter-wind"? Androcles (02/10/05)
- Re: What is "eter-wind"? The Ghost In The Machine (02/10/05)
- Re: What is "eter-wind"? Androcles (02/10/05)
- Re: What is "eter-wind"? shevek (02/14/05)
- Re: What is "eter-wind"? Androcles (02/14/05)
- Re: What is "eter-wind"? shevek (02/14/05)
- Re: What is "eter-wind"? Androcles (02/15/05)
- Re: What is "eter-wind"? Eric Gisse (02/10/05)
- Re: What is "eter-wind"? shevek (02/10/05)
- Re: What is "eter-wind"? Bill Hobba (02/09/05)
- Even simpler demo of Time Dilation Flaw guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/09/05)
- Re: Even simpler demo of Time Dilation Flaw guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/09/05)
- Re: Even simpler demo of Time Dilation Flaw Dirk Van de moortel (02/09/05)
- Re: Even simpler demo of Time Dilation Flaw guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/09/05)
- Re: Even simpler demo of Time Dilation Flaw Dirk Van de moortel (02/09/05)
- Re: Even simpler demo of Time Dilation Flaw guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/09/05)
- Re: Even simpler demo of Time Dilation Flaw guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/09/05)
- Re: Even simpler demo of Time Dilation Flaw Dirk Van de moortel (02/09/05)
- Re: Even simpler demo of Time Dilation Flaw TomGee (02/09/05)
- Re: Even simpler demo of Time Dilation Flaw guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/09/05)
- Re: Even simpler demo of Time Dilation Flaw Dirk Van de moortel (02/09/05)
- Re: Even simpler demo of Time Dilation Flaw AllYou! (02/10/05)
- Re: Even simpler demo of Time Dilation Flaw guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/10/05)
- Re: Even simpler demo of Time Dilation Flaw Androcles (02/09/05)
- Re: Even simpler demo of Time Dilation Flaw Bilge (02/10/05)
- Re: Even simpler demo of Time Dilation Flaw TomGee (02/10/05)
- Re: Even simpler demo of Time Dilation Flaw guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/10/05)
- Re: Even simpler demo of Time Dilation Flaw guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/09/05)
- Re: Even simpler demo of Time Dilation Flaw EjP (02/09/05)
- Re: Even simpler demo of Time Dilation Flaw Bilge (02/10/05)
- Re: Even simpler demo of Time Dilation Flaw guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/09/05)
- Time Dilation, why is Inertial Frame always center of the Earth guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/09/05)
- Glossary of common "Ahad" terms eridanus (02/09/05)
- Part2: PERFECT Example showing Time Dilation FLAW guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/09/05)
- Part1: Another BIG Flaw in 1971 Time Dilation Flight Experiment guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/09/05)
- Measuring Our Absolute Velocity ERNEST C WITTKE (02/09/05)
- Space of Inertial Frames is Affine says Einstein/is Vector says Lorentz Jack Sarfatti (02/09/05)
- The Neck of God: Einstein or Lorentz? Jack Sarfatti (02/09/05)
- New Website: www.spoonfedrelativity.com Spoonfed (02/09/05)
- Re: New Website: www.spoonfedrelativity.com Dirk Van de moortel (02/09/05)
- Re: New Website: www.spoonfedrelativity.com Spoonfed (02/10/05)
- Re: New Website: www.spoonfedrelativity.com Dirk Van de moortel (02/10/05)
- Re: New Website: www.spoonfedrelativity.com Spoonfed (02/11/05)
- Re: New Website: www.spoonfedrelativity.com Dirk Van de moortel (02/11/05)
- Re: New Website: www.spoonfedrelativity.com Spoonfed (02/11/05)
- Re: New Website: www.spoonfedrelativity.com Spoonfed (02/11/05)
- Re: New Website: www.spoonfedrelativity.com Dirk Van de moortel (02/11/05)
- Re: New Website: www.spoonfedrelativity.com Dirk Van de moortel (02/11/05)
- Re: New Website: www.spoonfedrelativity.com Bilge (02/12/05)
- Re: New Website: www.spoonfedrelativity.com Spoonfed (02/12/05)
- Re: New Website: www.spoonfedrelativity.com Dirk Van de moortel (02/12/05)
- Re: New Website: www.spoonfedrelativity.com Spoonfed (02/10/05)
- Re: New Website: www.spoonfedrelativity.com Dirk Van de moortel (02/09/05)
- 1971 Time dilation plane experiment looks flawed guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/08/05)
- Treatment of some posters N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/08/05)
- Re: Treatment of some posters Creighton Hogg (02/09/05)
- Re: Treatment of some posters dseppala_at_austin.rr.com (02/09/05)
- Re: Treatment of some posters Bill Hobba (02/09/05)
- Re: Treatment of some posters AllYou! (02/09/05)
- Re: Treatment of some posters PD (02/09/05)
- Re: Treatment of some posters AllYou! (02/09/05)
- Re: Treatment of some posters PD (02/09/05)
- Re: Treatment of some posters AllYou! (02/09/05)
- Re: Treatment of some posters PD (02/09/05)
- Re: Treatment of some posters AllYou! (02/09/05)
- Re: Treatment of some posters Bill Hobba (02/10/05)
- Re: Treatment of some posters AllYou! (02/10/05)
- Re: Treatment of some posters Daniel Weston (02/12/05)
- Re: Treatment of some posters AllYou! (02/14/05)
- Re: Treatment of some posters jem (02/09/05)
- Re: Treatment of some posters AllYou! (02/09/05)
- Re: Treatment of some posters jem (02/09/05)
- Ping PD. AllYou! (02/09/05)
- Re: Ping PD. jem (02/10/05)
- Re: Ping PD. AllYou! (02/10/05)
- Re: Treatment of some posters Bilge (02/09/05)
- Re: Treatment of some posters N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/09/05)
- Re: Treatment of some posters AllYou! (02/09/05)
- Re: Treatment of some posters Bill Hobba (02/12/05)
- Re: Treatment of some posters AllYou! (02/14/05)
- Re: Treatment of some posters Daniel Weston (02/12/05)
- Re: Treatment of some posters reany_at_asu.edu (02/13/05)
- Re: Treatment of some posters Daniel Weston (02/14/05)
- Re: Treatment of some posters reany_at_asu.edu (02/14/05)
- Re: Treatment of some posters Daniel Weston (02/14/05)
- Re: Treatment of some posters AllYou! (02/14/05)
- Re: Treatment of some posters Androcles (02/09/05)
- Re: Treatment of some posters PD (02/09/05)
- Re: Treatment of some posters Androcles (02/09/05)
- Re: Treatment of some posters dseppala_at_austin.rr.com (02/12/05)
- Re: Treatment of some posters PD (02/13/05)
- Re: Treatment of some posters Bill Hobba (02/09/05)
- Re: Treatment of some posters Dirk Van de moortel (02/10/05)
- Re: Treatment of some posters Bilge (02/12/05)
- Re: Treatment of some posters AllYou! (02/10/05)
- Re: Treatment of some posters dseppala_at_austin.rr.com (02/12/05)
- Re: Treatment of some posters Androcles (02/09/05)
- Re: Treatment of some posters reany_at_asu.edu (02/09/05)
- Re: Treatment of some posters AllYou! (02/09/05)
- Re: Treatment of some posters PD (02/09/05)
- Grab-bag of questions from dseppala (was Re: Treatment of some posters) Ben Rudiak-Gould (02/09/05)
- Re: Treatment of some posters PD (02/09/05)
- Re: Treatment of some posters Martin Hogbin (02/09/05)
- Re: Treatment of some posters Bill Hobba (02/09/05)
- Re: Treatment of some posters DavidBowman (02/09/05)
- Re: Treatment of some posters AllYou! (02/09/05)
- Re: Treatment of some posters PD (02/09/05)
- Re: Treatment of some posters beda pietanza (02/10/05)
- What is meant by 'prediction' in physics? reany_at_asu.edu (02/08/05)
- Re: What is meant by 'prediction' in physics? AllYou! (02/08/05)
- Re: What is meant by 'prediction' in physics? Dirk Van de moortel (02/08/05)
- Re: What is meant by 'prediction' in physics? stephen_at_nomail.com (02/08/05)
- Re: What is meant by 'prediction' in physics? Dirk Van de moortel (02/08/05)
- Re: What is meant by 'prediction' in physics? stephen_at_nomail.com (02/08/05)
- Re: What is meant by 'prediction' in physics? Dirk Van de moortel (02/09/05)
- Re: What is meant by 'prediction' in physics? AllYou! (02/09/05)
- Re: What is meant by 'prediction' in physics? Bilge (02/09/05)
- Here's your post, Bilge! AllYou! (02/09/05)
- Re: Here's your post, Bilge! Dirk Van de moortel (02/09/05)
- Re: Here's your post, Bilge! AllYou! (02/09/05)
- Re: Here's your post, Bilge! Bilge (02/10/05)
- Re: Here's your post, Bilge! AllYou! (02/10/05)
- Re: Here's your post, AllYou! Bilge (02/10/05)
- Re: Here's your post, AllYou! N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/10/05)
- The hit & run David A. Smith AllYou! (02/10/05)
- Re: Here's your post, AllYou! stephen_at_nomail.com (02/10/05)
- Re: Here's your post, Bilge! AllYou! (02/10/05)
- Re: Here's your post, AllYou! Bilge (02/11/05)
- Re: Here's your post, Bilge! AllYou! (02/11/05)
- Re: Here's your post, AllYou! Bilge (02/11/05)
- Re: Here's your post, AllYou! Bilge (02/11/05)
- Re: Here's your post, Bilge! AllYou! (02/11/05)
- Re: Here's your post, Bilge AllYou! (02/10/05)
- Re: Here's your post, Bilge Bilge (02/11/05)
- Re: Here's your post, Bilge AllYou! (02/11/05)
- Re: What is meant by 'prediction' in physics? Dirk Van de moortel (02/08/05)
- Re: What is meant by 'prediction' in physics? Daniel Weston (02/09/05)
- Re: What is meant by 'prediction' in physics? Daniel Weston (02/09/05)
- Re: What is meant by 'prediction' in physics? AllYou! (02/11/05)
- RIDDLE for OOOLD UNCLE AL guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/08/05)
- Accelerated frames and ticking rates: Take 2 RP (02/08/05)
- What is "Energy" Leif Andersson (02/08/05)
- Re: What is "Energy" Dirk Van de moortel (02/08/05)
- Re: What is "Energy" PD (02/08/05)
- Re: What is "Energy" Bill Hobba (02/09/05)
- Re: What is "Energy" Leif Andersson (02/10/05)
- Re: What is "Energy" Bill Hobba (02/11/05)
- Re: What is "Energy" Leif Andersson (02/11/05)
- Re: What is "Energy" Bill Hobba (02/11/05)
- Re: What is "Energy" Leif Andersson (02/12/05)
- Re: What is "Energy" Androcles (02/12/05)
- Re: What is "Energy" The Ghost In The Machine (02/12/05)
- Re: What is "Energy" Androcles (02/12/05)
- Re: What is "Energy" The Ghost In The Machine (02/14/05)
- Re: What is "Energy" Ghost tj Frazir (02/14/05)
- Re: What is "Energy" Androcles (02/15/05)
- Re: What is "Energy" Bill Hobba (02/12/05)
- Re: What is "Energy" PD (02/13/05)
- Re: What is "Energy" Sue... (02/13/05)
- Re: What is "Energy" Bill Hobba (02/14/05)
- Re: What is "Energy" Sue... (02/14/05)
- Re: What is "Energy" Mike (02/14/05)
- Re: What is "Energy" Bill Hobba (02/14/05)
- Re: What is "Energy" Dirk Van de moortel (02/14/05)
- Re: What is "Energy" Bill Hobba (02/15/05)
- Re: What is "Energy" Dirk Van de moortel (02/15/05)
- Re: What is "Energy" Mike (02/15/05)
- Re: What is "Energy" Dirk Van de moortel (02/15/05)
- Re: What is "Energy" PD (02/15/05)
- Re: What is "Energy" Dirk Van de moortel (02/15/05)
- Re: What is "Energy" Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (02/15/05)
- Re: What is "Energy" tj Frazir (02/12/05)
- Re: What is "Energy" Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (02/12/05)
- Re: What is "Energy" Leif Andersson (02/10/05)
- Re: What is "Energy" Mike (02/14/05)
- Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? John Kennaugh (02/08/05)
- Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? Bilge (02/10/05)
- Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? ande452_at_attglobal.net (02/11/05)
- Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? Bilge (02/11/05)
- Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? Ken S. Tucker (02/12/05)
- Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? John Kennaugh (02/16/05)
- Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? Bilge (02/16/05)
- Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? Ben Rudiak-Gould (02/16/05)
- Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? John Kennaugh (02/21/05)
- Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? Bilge (02/23/05)
- Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? ande452_at_attglobal.net (02/11/05)
- Re: Why can't a photon be absorbed by a stationary electron? Bilge (02/10/05)
- tampering with clocks beda pietanza (02/08/05)
- tampering with clocks beda pietanza (02/08/05)
- Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/08/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity reany_at_asu.edu (02/08/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity Harry (02/08/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity reany_at_asu.edu (02/08/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity Harry (02/17/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity Bilge (02/17/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity Harry (02/18/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity Lady Chatterly (02/18/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity Bilge (02/18/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity Harry (02/20/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity Bilge (02/21/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity reany_at_asu.edu (02/17/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity Harry (02/18/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity reany_at_asu.edu (02/18/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity Harry (02/20/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity Bilge (02/18/05)
- Twin Paradox a reduction of Relativity to the absurd eleaticus (02/19/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity reany_at_asu.edu (02/19/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity Bilge (02/21/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity TomGee (02/08/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity AllYou! (02/08/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity reany_at_asu.edu (02/08/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity AllYou! (02/08/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity reany_at_asu.edu (02/09/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity AllYou! (02/09/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity reany_at_asu.edu (02/09/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity AllYou! (02/09/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity Dirk Van de moortel (02/09/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity AllYou! (02/09/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity Bilge (02/12/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity Dirk Van de moortel (02/14/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity AllYou! (02/14/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity jem (02/14/05)
- Re: jem thinks counting is a physical process. AllYou! (02/14/05)
- Re: jem thinks counting is a physical process. jem (02/14/05)
- Re: jem thinks counting is a physical process. AllYou! (02/14/05)
- Re: jem thinks counting is a physical process. jem (02/14/05)
- Re: jem thinks counting is a physical process. AllYou! (02/14/05)
- Re: jem thinks counting is a physical process. jem (02/14/05)
- Re: jem thinks counting is a physical process. AllYou! (02/14/05)
- Re: jem thinks counting is a physical process. jem (02/14/05)
- Re: jem thinks counting is a physical process. AllYou! (02/14/05)
- Re: jem thinks counting is a physical process. jem (02/14/05)
- Re: jem thinks Bilge & van Moortel are bonkers. AllYou! (02/14/05)
- Re: jem thinks Bilge & van Moortel are bonkers. jem (02/15/05)
- Re: jem thinks Bilge & van Moortel are bonkers. AllYou! (02/15/05)
- Re:Moronicus jem (02/16/05)
- Re: jem the moron goes bonkers! AllYou! (02/16/05)
- Re: Does your employer know how you spend your time on the job Moronicus? jem (02/17/05)
- Re: jem just won't give a yes or no AllYou! (02/17/05)
- Re: jem just won't give a yes or no jem (02/17/05)
- Re: jem just won't give a yes or no AllYou! (02/17/05)
- Re: jem just won't give a yes or no jem (02/18/05)
- Re: jem just won't give a yes or no AllYou! (02/18/05)
- Re: jem just won't give a yes or no jem (02/18/05)
- Re: jem just won't give a yes or no AllYou! (02/18/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity Bilge (02/12/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity reany_at_asu.edu (02/12/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (02/12/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity Bilge (02/14/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity AllYou! (02/14/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity Harry (02/08/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity Harry (02/08/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/08/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity Harry (02/20/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity Bilge (02/21/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity Harry (02/22/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity Bilge (02/22/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity Harry (02/23/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity Bilge (02/24/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity Harry (02/24/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity Bilge (02/24/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity Harry (02/24/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity Bilge (02/26/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/08/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity Paul Cardinale (02/08/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity TomGee (02/08/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity PD (02/08/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity stephen_at_nomail.com (02/08/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/08/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity TomGee (02/09/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/09/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity PD (02/09/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity TomGee (02/09/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity PD (02/09/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity TomGee (02/09/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity Androcles (02/09/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/08/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity PD (02/08/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity Pentcho Valev (02/18/05)
- Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity reany_at_asu.edu (02/08/05)
- Time Dilation flaw: Reciprocity is a liability not a feature. guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/08/05)
- Re: Time Dilation flaw: Reciprocity is a liability not a feature. Dirk Van de moortel (02/08/05)
- Re: Time Dilation flaw: Reciprocity is a liability not a feature. Bill Hobba (02/08/05)
- Re: Time Dilation flaw: Reciprocity is a liability not a feature. Dirk Van de moortel (02/08/05)
- Re: Time Dilation flaw: Reciprocity is a liability not a feature. Marcus Wellpoth (02/08/05)
- Re: Time Dilation flaw: Reciprocity is a liability not a feature. guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/08/05)
- Re: Time Dilation flaw: Reciprocity is a liability not a feature. Ken S. Tucker (02/09/05)
- Re: Time Dilation flaw: Reciprocity is a liability not a feature. Marcus Wellpoth (02/09/05)
- Re: Time Dilation flaw: Reciprocity is a liability not a feature. Ken S. Tucker (02/10/05)
- Re: Time Dilation flaw: Reciprocity is a liability not a feature. guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/08/05)
- Re: Time Dilation flaw: Reciprocity is a liability not a feature. Marcus Wellpoth (02/08/05)
- Eric Gisse the Mighty Atomic Clock guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/08/05)
- Measuring time and distance? science_illiterate_at_hotmail.com (02/08/05)
- Russia's Response To Star Wars Nick (02/08/05)
- Re: I need to understand the Lorentz force forever (02/08/05)
- Are Harvard's Lubos Motl and Cornell's Jack Sarfatti from the same Flying Saucer? ;-) Jack Sarfatti (02/08/05)
- McCullough is caught with his pants down. Androcles (02/07/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Daryl McCullough (02/07/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Uncle Al (02/08/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Ken S. Tucker (02/08/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Androcles (02/08/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Ken S. Tucker (02/08/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Androcles (02/08/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Daryl McCullough (02/08/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Androcles (02/08/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Daryl McCullough (02/08/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Androcles (02/08/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Daryl McCullough (02/08/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Androcles (02/08/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Daryl McCullough (02/08/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Androcles (02/08/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Androcles (02/08/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Daryl McCullough (02/08/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Androcles (02/08/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Dirk Van de moortel (02/08/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Van (02/08/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Dirk Van de moortel (02/08/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Van (02/08/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Van (02/08/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Van (02/08/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Dirk Van de moortel (02/08/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Van (02/08/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Dirk Van de moortel (02/08/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Randy Poe (02/08/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Van (02/09/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Androcles (02/09/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Dirk Van de moortel (02/09/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Randy Poe (02/09/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Androcles (02/08/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Androcles (02/08/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Daryl McCullough (02/08/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Androcles (02/08/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Daryl McCullough (02/08/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Androcles (02/08/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Daryl McCullough (02/08/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Androcles (02/08/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Daryl McCullough (02/08/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Androcles (02/08/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Daryl McCullough (02/08/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Androcles (02/09/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Daryl McCullough (02/08/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Androcles (02/08/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Daryl McCullough (02/08/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Androcles (02/08/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Uncle Al (02/08/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Androcles (02/08/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Daryl McCullough (02/08/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Androcles (02/08/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Daryl McCullough (02/08/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Androcles (02/08/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Uncle Al (02/08/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Franz Heymann (02/08/05)
- Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down. Daryl McCullough (02/07/05)
- Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/07/05)
- Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong PD (02/07/05)
- Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong jem (02/08/05)
- Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong xxein_at_bellsouth.net (02/08/05)
- Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong Bilge (02/08/05)
- Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong Eric Gisse (02/08/05)
- Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong TomGee (02/08/05)
- Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong DavidBowman (02/08/05)
- Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/08/05)
- Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong Dirk Van de moortel (02/08/05)
- Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/08/05)
- Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong Dirk Van de moortel (02/08/05)
- Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/10/05)
- Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/11/05)
- Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/08/05)
- Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong Ben Bean (02/08/05)
- Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/08/05)
- Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong Ben Bean (02/09/05)
- Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/09/05)
- Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong Ben Bean (02/09/05)
- Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/10/05)
- Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/08/05)
- Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong Paul B. Andersen (02/13/05)
- Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/13/05)
- Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong Paul B. Andersen (02/14/05)
- Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/16/05)
- Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong Paul B. Andersen (02/16/05)
- Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/16/05)
- Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong The Ghost In The Machine (02/16/05)
- Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong ande452_at_attglobal.net (02/17/05)
- Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato (02/15/05)
- Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/13/05)
- Eugene Wigner's Greatest Blunder? Jack Sarfatti (02/07/05)
- Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? Ben (02/07/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? PD (02/07/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? Ben (02/08/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? PD (02/08/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? Ben (02/08/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? PD (02/09/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? Ben (02/09/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? PD (02/10/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? Androcles (02/10/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? Ben (02/11/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? PD (02/11/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? Ben (02/12/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? PD (02/13/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? Ben (02/14/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? PD (02/15/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? Ben (02/16/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? PD (02/17/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? Ken S. Tucker (02/17/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? Ben (02/18/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? stephen_at_nomail.com (02/15/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/15/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? Creighton Hogg (02/15/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? Ben (02/08/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? Bilge (02/07/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? Randy M. Dumse (02/08/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? Ken S. Tucker (02/08/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/08/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? Ken S. Tucker (02/08/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/09/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? Ken S. Tucker (02/12/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? Creighton Hogg (02/12/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? Ken S. Tucker (02/12/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? Creighton Hogg (02/12/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? Ken S. Tucker (02/13/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? Creighton Hogg (02/13/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? Ken S. Tucker (02/13/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? FrediFizzx (02/13/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? Ken S. Tucker (02/13/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? Creighton Hogg (02/13/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? FrediFizzx (02/14/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? Creighton Hogg (02/13/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? Ken S. Tucker (02/14/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? Creighton Hogg (02/09/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? Bilge (02/08/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? Randy M. Dumse (02/09/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? Bill Hobba (02/09/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? Ken S. Tucker (02/09/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? Androcles (02/09/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? Bilge (02/09/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? Randy M. Dumse (02/10/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? Bill Hobba (02/11/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? tj Frazir (02/11/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? Bill Hobba (02/11/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? tj Frazir (02/12/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? Randy M. Dumse (02/14/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? Ken S. Tucker (02/09/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? Bilge (02/09/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? Randy M. Dumse (02/10/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? Randy M. Dumse (02/16/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? Bilge (02/16/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? Randy M. Dumse (02/17/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? Ben (02/08/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? Randy M. Dumse (02/08/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? Ken S. Tucker (02/08/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? tj Frazir (02/08/05)
- Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves? PD (02/07/05)
- A correspondance with Cahill on 20 12 2004 joseph levy (02/07/05)
- SR & electrical circuits - related to help with SR time dilation thread dseppala_at_austin.rr.com (02/07/05)
- Re: SR & electrical circuits - related to help with SR time dilation thread Dirk Van de moortel (02/07/05)
- DVM is the troll of all trolls. AllYou! (02/07/05)
- Re: DVM is the troll of all trolls. Dirk Van de moortel (02/07/05)
- Re: DVM admits he's despicable and has no self respect. AllYou! (02/07/05)
- Re: DVM admits he's despicable and has no self respect. Dirk Van de moortel (02/07/05)
- Re: DVM admits he's a coward. AllYou! (02/07/05)
- Re: DVM admits he's a coward. Dirk Van de moortel (02/07/05)
- Re: DVM admits he's a coward. Eric Gisse (02/07/05)
- Re: DVM admits he's a coward. Dirk Van de moortel (02/07/05)
- Re: DVM admits he's a coward. AllYou! (02/07/05)
- Re: DVM admits he's a coward. Dirk Van de moortel (02/07/05)
- Re: DVM admits he's a coward. AllYou! (02/07/05)
- Re: DVM is the troll of all trolls. Bilge (02/07/05)
- Re: Customary delusions by Bilge AllYou! (02/08/05)
- Re: Customary delusions by AllYou, the idiot Bilge (02/09/05)
- Re: Customary delusions by AllYou, the idiot AllYou! (02/09/05)
- Re: Customary delusions by AllYou, the idiot Bilge (02/09/05)
- Re: Customary delusions the idiot Bilge. AllYou! (02/09/05)
- Re: Customary delusions of the dishonest idiot, AllYou! Bilge (02/10/05)
- Re: Customary delusions of the dishonest idiot, AllYou! AllYou! (02/10/05)
- Re: Customary delusions of the dishonest idiot, AllYou! Bilge (02/10/05)
- Re: Customary delusions of the lying Bilge AllYou! (02/10/05)
- Re: Customary delusions of the dishonest idiot, AllYou! Bilge (02/10/05)
- Re: Customary delusions of the dishonest idiot, Bilge AllYou! (02/10/05)
- Re: Customary delusions of the dishonest idiot, AllYou Bilge (02/11/05)
- Re: Customary delusions of the dishonest idiot, bilge AllYou! (02/11/05)
- Re: Customary delusions of the dishonest idiot, bilge Bilge (02/11/05)
- Re: Customary delusions of the dishonest idiot, bilge AllYou! (02/14/05)
- DVM is the troll of all trolls. AllYou! (02/07/05)
- Re: SR & electrical circuits - related to help with SR time dilation thread Sue... (02/07/05)
- Re: SR & electrical circuits - related to help with SR time dilation thread jem (02/08/05)
- Re: SR & electrical circuits - related to help with SR time dilation thread Dirk Van de moortel (02/07/05)
- gravity Kalikinkar (02/07/05)
- Re: Flaws wanted Ka-In Yen (02/07/05)
- Re: Excellent discussion of various Ether Theories Bilge (02/07/05)
- CMUcam operations Randy M. Dumse (02/07/05)
- Re: One Small step one infinite leap and RUSSIA is buildingone hell of a big ship underground......right in the center huge ass and so is the U.S.A and CHINA DavidBowman (02/07/05)
- Re: One Small step one infinite leap and RUSSIA is buildingone hell of a big ship underground......right in the center huge ass and so is the U.S.A and CHINA DavidBowman (02/07/05)
- Re: One Small step one infinite leap and RUSSIA is buildingone hell of a big ship underground......right in the center huge ass and so is the U.S.A and CHINA DavidBowman (02/07/05)
- Re: One Small step one infinite leap and RUSSIA is buildingone hell of a big ship underground......right in the center huge ass and so is the U.S.A and CHINA Sue... (02/07/05)
- Re: One Small step one infinite leap and RUSSIA is buildingone hell of a big ship underground......right in the center huge ass and so is the U.S.A and CHINA Androcles (02/07/05)
- Re: One Small step one infinite leap and RUSSIA is buildingone hell of a big ship underground......right in the center huge ass and so is the U.S.A and CHINA Sue... (02/07/05)
- Re: One Small step one infinite leap and RUSSIA is buildingone hell of a big ship underground......right in the center huge ass and so is the U.S.A and CHINA Androcles (02/07/05)
- Re: One Small step one infinite leap and RUSSIA is buildingone hell of a big ship underground......right in the center huge ass and so is the U.S.A and CHINA DavidBowman (02/07/05)
- Re: One Small step one infinite leap and RUSSIA is buildingone hell of a big ship underground......right in the center huge ass and so is the U.S.A and CHINA DavidBowman (02/07/05)
- Re: One Small step one infinite leap and RUSSIA is buildingone hell of a big ship underground......right in the center huge ass and so is the U.S.A and CHINA DavidBowman (02/07/05)
- Cahill's ether drift is not what Panofsky&Phillips describe Jack Sarfatti (02/06/05)
- One Small step one infinite leap and RUSSIA is buildingone hell of a big ship underground......right in the center huge ass and so is the U.S.A and CHINA zetasum (02/06/05)
- One Small step one infinite leap and RUSSIA is buildingone hell of a big ship underground......right in the center huge ass and so is the U.S.A and CHINA zetasum (02/06/05)
- Finsler Geometry? Who ordered that? Jack Sarfatti (02/06/05)
- Why being Real Smart SUCKS DavidBowman (02/06/05)
- Re: Why being Real Smart SUCKS PD (02/06/05)
- Re: Why being Real Smart SUCKS Ken S. Tucker (02/06/05)
- Re: Why being Real Smart SUCKS DavidBowman (02/07/05)
- Re: Why being Real Smart SUCKS N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/07/05)
- Re: Why being Real Smart SUCKS Ken S. Tucker (02/07/05)
- Re: Why being Real Smart SUCKS DavidBowman (02/07/05)
- Re: Why being Real Smart SUCKS DavidBowman (02/07/05)
- Re: Why being Real Smart SUCKS Creighton Hogg (02/07/05)
- Re: Why being Real Smart SUCKS DavidBowman (02/07/05)
- Re: Why being Real Smart SUCKS Creighton Hogg (02/07/05)
- Re: Why being Real Smart SUCKS DavidBowman (02/07/05)
- Re: Why being Real Smart SUCKS DavidBowman (02/07/05)
- Re: Why being Real Smart SUCKS PD (02/07/05)
- Re: Why being Real Smart SUCKS DavidBowman (02/07/05)
- Re: Why being Real Smart SUCKS Greysky (02/07/05)
- Re: Why being Real Smart SUCKS PD (02/07/05)
- Re: Why being Real Smart SUCKS Greysky (02/07/05)
- Re: Why being Real Smart SUCKS DavidBowman (02/08/05)
- Re: Why being Real Smart SUCKS N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/08/05)
- Re: Why being Real Smart SUCKS Ken S. Tucker (02/08/05)
- Re: Why being Real Smart SUCKS DavidBowman (02/08/05)
- Re: Why being Real Smart SUCKS DavidBowman (02/08/05)
- Re: Why being Real Smart SUCKS Bilge (02/08/05)
- Re: Why being Real Smart SUCKS RipVanWinkle (02/08/05)
- Re: Why being Real Smart SUCKS jem (02/08/05)
- Re: Why being Real Smart SUCKS RipVanWinkle (02/08/05)
- Re: Why being devens SUCKS Androcles (02/10/05)
- Re: Why being devens SUCKS DavidBowman (02/11/05)
- Re: Why being devens SUCKS Alphonse (02/11/05)
- Re: Why being devens SUCKS Androcles (02/11/05)
- Re: Why being devens SUCKS DavidBowman (02/11/05)
- Re: Why being devens SUCKS Alphonse (02/11/05)
- Re: Why being devens SUCKS Androcles (02/11/05)
- Re: Why being devens SUCKS Alphonse (02/11/05)
- Re: Why being devens SUCKS Androcles (02/11/05)
- Re: Why being devens SUCKS David Evens (02/19/05)
- Re: Why being devens SUCKS DavidBowman (02/20/05)
- Re: Why being devens SUCKS DavidBowman (02/11/05)
- Re: Why being devens SUCKS Alphonse (02/11/05)
- Re: Why being devens SUCKS DavidBowman (02/11/05)
- Re: Why being devens SUCKS jem (02/11/05)
- Re: Why being jem SUCKS AllYou! (02/14/05)
- Re: Moronicus' dilemma jem (02/14/05)
- Re: jem thinks a machine is an intellectual AllYou! (02/14/05)
- Re: Why being devens SUCKS DavidBowman (02/11/05)
- Re: Why being devens SUCKS Androcles (02/11/05)
- Re: Why being devens SUCKS DavidBowman (02/11/05)
- Re: Why being devens SUCKS Androcles (02/11/05)
- Re: Why being devens SUCKS DavidBowman (02/11/05)
- Re: Why being devens SUCKS Androcles (02/11/05)
- Re: Why being devens SUCKS DavidBowman (02/11/05)
- Re: Why being devens SUCKS JM Albuquerque (02/12/05)
- Re: Why being devens SUCKS DavidBowman (02/12/05)
- Re: Why being devens SUCKS DavidBowman (02/12/05)
- Re: Why being devens SUCKS Daniel Weston (02/13/05)
- Re: Why being devens SUCKS Androcles (02/13/05)
- Re: Why being devens SUCKS Daniel Weston (02/13/05)
- Re: Why being devens SUCKS Androcles (02/13/05)
- Re: Why being devens SUCKS PD (02/13/05)
- Re: Why being devens SUCKS Androcles (02/13/05)
- Re: Why being devens SUCKS DavidBowman (02/15/05)
- Re: Why being devens SUCKS Androcles (02/15/05)
- Re: Why being devens SUCKS DavidBowman (02/15/05)
- Re: Why being devens SUCKS Ben Rudiak-Gould (02/13/05)
- Re: Why being devens SUCKS Daniel Weston (02/13/05)
- Re: Why being devens SUCKS DavidBowman (02/15/05)
- Re: Why being devens SUCKS PD (02/15/05)
- Re: Why being Real Smart SUCKS Bilge (02/07/05)
- Re: Why being Real Smart SUCKS Alphonse (02/08/05)
- Re: Why being Real Smart SUCKS DavidBowman (02/08/05)
- Re: Why being Real Smart SUCKS Alphonse (02/08/05)
- Re: Why being Real Smart SUCKS DavidBowman (02/09/05)
- Re: Why being Real Smart SUCKS DavidBowman (02/09/05)
- Re: Why being Real Smart SUCKS DavidBowman (02/09/05)
- Re: Why being Real Smart SUCKS DavidBowman (02/09/05)
- Re: Why being Real Smart SUCKS PD (02/09/05)
- Re: Why being Real Smart SUCKS Androcles (02/09/05)
- Re: Why being Real Smart SUCKS DavidBowman (02/10/05)
- Re: Why being Real Smart SUCKS jem (02/10/05)
- Re: Why being Real Smart SUCKS PD (02/10/05)
- Re: Why being Real Smart SUCKS Androcles (02/10/05)
- Re: Why being Real Smart SUCKS DavidBowman (02/11/05)
- Re: Why being Real Smart SUCKS Daniel Weston (02/15/05)
- Re: Why being Real Smart SUCKS Androcles (02/15/05)
- Re: Why being Real Smart SUCKS Creighton Hogg (02/15/05)
- Re: Why being Real Smart SUCKS Androcles (02/15/05)
- Re: Why being Real Smart SUCKS DavidBowman (02/16/05)
- Re: Why being Real Smart SUCKS DavidBowman (02/08/05)
- Re: Why being Real Smart SUCKS DavidBowman (02/08/05)
- Re: Why being Real Smart SUCKS PD (02/06/05)
- Need real physicist please, to decide which david is right DavidBowman (02/06/05)
- Re: Need real physicist please, to decide which david is right Paul Stowe (02/06/05)
- Re: Need real physicist please, to decide which david is right Creighton Hogg (02/06/05)
- Re: Need real physicist please, to decide which david is right wespe_at_operamail.com (02/06/05)
- Re: Need real physicist please, to decide which david is right DavidBowman (02/06/05)
- Re: Need real physicist please, to decide which david is right wespe_at_operamail.com (02/06/05)
- Re: Need real physicist please, to decide which david is right DavidBowman (02/06/05)
- Re: Need real physicist please, to decide which david is right Creighton Hogg (02/06/05)
- Re: Need real physicist please, to decide which david is right DavidBowman (02/06/05)
- Re: Need real physicist please, to decide which david is right Creighton Hogg (02/06/05)
- Re: Need real physicist please, to decide which david is right Martin Hogbin (02/06/05)
- Re: Need real physicist please, to decide which david is right kenseto (02/07/05)
- Re: Need real physicist please, to decide which david is right EjP (02/07/05)
- Light clock question/pardox? wespe_at_operamail.com (02/06/05)
- Re: Light clock question/pardox? DavidBowman (02/06/05)
- Re: Light clock question/pardox? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/06/05)
- Re: Light clock question/pardox? xxein_at_bellsouth.net (02/06/05)
- Re: Light clock question/pardox? Androcles (02/06/05)
- Re: Light clock question/pardox? Henri Wilson (02/06/05)
- A New Test may alter Time Dilation Law ! guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/06/05)
- Re: A New Test may alter Time Dilation Law ! Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (02/06/05)
- Re: A New Test may alter Time Dilation Law ! guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/06/05)
- Re: A New Test may alter Time Dilation Law ! guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/06/05)
- Re: A New Test may alter Time Dilation Law ! Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (02/06/05)
- Re: A New Test may alter Time Dilation Law ! Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (02/06/05)
- Re: A New Test may alter Time Dilation Law ! guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/07/05)
- Re: A New Test may alter Time Dilation Law ! guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/06/05)
- Re: A New Test may alter Time Dilation Law ! guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/06/05)
- Re: A New Test may alter Time Dilation Law ! DavidBowman (02/06/05)
- Re: A New Test may alter Time Dilation Law ! The Ghost In The Machine (02/06/05)
- Re: A New Test may alter Time Dilation Law ! Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (02/06/05)
- New Test may alter Time Dilation Law ! guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/06/05)
- New Test may alter Time Dilation Law ! guskz_at_hotmail.com (02/06/05)
- Why spontaneous vacuum symmetry breaking always makes a preferred class of frames of reference Jack Sarfatti (02/06/05)
- SR paradox - help! DavidBowman (02/06/05)
- Re: SR paradox - help! N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/06/05)
- Re: SR paradox - help! DavidBowman (02/06/05)
- Re: SR paradox - help! N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/06/05)
- Re: SR paradox - help! DavidBowman (02/06/05)
- Re: SR paradox - help! The TimeLord (02/06/05)
- Re: SR paradox - help! DavidBowman (02/06/05)
- Re: SR paradox - help! DavidBowman (02/06/05)
- Re: SR paradox - help! N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/06/05)
- Re: SR paradox - help! DavidBowman (02/06/05)
- Re: SR paradox - help! N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/06/05)
- Re: SR paradox - help! DavidBowman (02/06/05)
- Re: SR paradox - help! Tom Capizzi (02/06/05)
- Re: SR paradox - help! DavidBowman (02/06/05)
- Re: SR paradox - help! DavidBowman (02/06/05)
- Re: SR paradox - help! TomGee (02/06/05)
- Re: SR paradox - help! The TimeLord (02/06/05)
- Re: SR paradox - help! DavidBowman (02/06/05)
- Re: SR paradox - help! The TimeLord (02/06/05)
- Re: SR paradox - help! Martin Hogbin (02/06/05)
- Re: SR paradox - help! Paul Cardinale (02/07/05)
- Re: SR paradox - help! Paul B. Andersen (02/09/05)
- Re: SR paradox - help! N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (02/06/05)
- 7 problems with usenet aether theorists shevek (02/05/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Androcles (02/05/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists The TimeLord (02/06/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Androcles (02/06/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists The TimeLord (02/06/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Dirk Van de moortel (02/06/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists reany_at_asu.edu (02/06/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists shevek (02/07/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Androcles (02/07/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists reany_at_asu.edu (02/07/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Androcles (02/06/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists bsr3997_at_my-deja.com (02/06/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists DavidBowman (02/07/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists shevek (02/07/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Androcles (02/07/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists shevek (02/07/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Androcles (02/07/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Bilge (02/07/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists DavidBowman (02/06/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists The TimeLord (02/06/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists DavidBowman (02/06/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Tom Roberts (02/07/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Androcles (02/07/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists shevek (02/07/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Paul Stowe (02/07/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists shevek (02/07/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists reany_at_asu.edu (02/08/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists AllYou! (02/09/05)
- The central role of theory in physics reany_at_asu.edu (02/09/05)
- Re: The central role of theory in physics AllYou! (02/09/05)
- What is a theory? reany_at_asu.edu (02/09/05)
- Re: What is a theory? AllYou! (02/09/05)
- Re: What is a theory? Dirk Van de moortel (02/09/05)
- Re: What is a theory? AllYou! (02/09/05)
- Re: What is a theory? Dirk Van de moortel (02/09/05)
- Re: What is a theory? AllYou! (02/10/05)
- Re: What is a theory? reany_at_asu.edu (02/09/05)
- Re: What is a theory? AllYou! (02/10/05)
- Re: What is a theory? AllYou! (02/10/05)
- Re: What is a theory? reany_at_asu.edu (02/10/05)
- Re: What is a theory? AllYou! (02/10/05)
- Re: What is a theory? reany_at_asu.edu (02/10/05)
- Re: What is a theory? AllYou! (02/10/05)
- Re: What is a theory? Lady Chatterly (02/10/05)
- Re: What is a theory? Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (02/12/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Bilge (02/08/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists shevek (02/09/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Bilge (02/09/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists shevek (02/14/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists reany_at_asu.edu (02/10/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists John Kennaugh (02/19/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Tom Roberts (02/20/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists greywolf42 (02/20/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists TC (02/21/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Paul Stowe (02/21/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists TC (02/21/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Paul Stowe (02/21/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists TC (02/21/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Paul Stowe (02/22/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists TC (02/22/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Paul Stowe (02/23/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists TC (02/23/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Paul Stowe (02/23/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists TC (02/23/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Paul Stowe (02/24/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Bilge (02/24/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists TC (02/24/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Androcles (02/24/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists TC (02/24/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Androcles (02/24/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists TC (02/24/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Dirk Van de moortel (02/24/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Paul Stowe (02/26/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists TC (02/26/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Paul Stowe (02/27/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Bilge (02/23/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Paul Stowe (02/24/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Bilge (02/24/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Tom Roberts (02/21/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Paul Stowe (02/21/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Dirk Van de moortel (02/21/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Paul Stowe (02/21/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Dirk Van de moortel (02/21/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Ilja Schmelzer (02/22/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Ilja Schmelzer (02/22/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Dirk Van de moortel (02/21/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Ilja Schmelzer (02/21/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Bilge (02/22/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Ilja Schmelzer (02/23/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Bilge (02/26/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Bilge (02/26/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Tom Roberts (02/26/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists John Kennaugh (02/22/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists TC (02/22/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists John Kennaugh (02/23/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists TC (02/23/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Androcles (02/23/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists TC (02/23/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Androcles (02/23/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists TC (02/23/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Androcles (02/23/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists TC (02/23/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Androcles (02/24/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Ilja Schmelzer (02/24/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists TC (02/24/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Androcles (02/24/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists TC (02/24/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Androcles (02/24/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Ilja Schmelzer (02/25/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Bill Rowe (02/24/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists John Kennaugh (02/26/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Bilge (02/26/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists harry (02/25/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Ilja Schmelzer (02/23/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists John Kennaugh (02/24/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Ilja Schmelzer (02/25/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists John Kennaugh (02/27/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists jahn (02/27/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Tom Roberts (02/24/05)
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists
- Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists Androcles (02/05/05)