Re: The Complete Disproof of Relativity and current Quantum Mechanics

From: Eric Gisse (jowr.pi_at_gmail.com)
Date: 02/02/05 

Date: 2 Feb 2005 00:23:19 -0800

Jeff wrote:
> Of course, anyone even slightly familiar with QM knows we can use the
> Schrodinger Equation to calculate the wavelengths of photons emitted
> from the atom. But YOU CAN"T calculate the wavelength values of the
> atom, or the wavelength of a photon released from an electron as it
> "jumps" orbits, using the de Broglie Equation of current QM, whereas
I
> CAN using Reality Physics. This is the direct absoute proof showing
> that Reality Physics is FACT, NOT Theory, because Reality Physics
> totally agrees with objective physical reality, whereas current QM
and
> Relativity DO NOT.

http://www.quantum.univie.ac.at/research/matterwave/c60/

>
> I have already read "Modern Physics" by Krane, and several hundred
> other books on QM, and this is why I had to create Reality Physics so
> that the truth could be finally be known.

I'm sorry, what?

You have read several hundred books on QM and you spout THIS bull***?

Read them again, this time for comprehension.

>
> By the way, the "difference" between "theory' and "fact" is: "DIRECT,
> ABSOLUTE PROOF. I just revealed proof to you that Reality Physics is
> correct since I revealed how we can use the reasoning of Reality
> Physics to modify the de Broglie Equation to EXACTLY describe the
> observed values of the electron pilot waves of the Bohr atom. Now
let's
> see you use the current version of QM to do this. Hint, you will have
> to look further than "Modern Physics" by Krane", or all of the other
QM
> text books now in print.

You have revealed nothing of worth to me. Just a pile of paragraphs
that each have at least one incorrect supposition - no math, no
physics, just dialectic.

Krane's intro book can teach me more about QM than you.
> Good luck!
>
> Jeff Lee CENTER FOR REALITY PHYSICS

Quantcast