Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down.
From: Uncle Al (UncleAl0_at_hate.spam.net)
Date: 02/08/05
- Next message: Bilge: "Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity"
- Previous message: jem: "Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong"
- In reply to: Daryl McCullough: "Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down."
- Next in thread: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down."
- Reply: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down."
- Reply: Androcles: "Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down."
- Reply: Daryl McCullough: "Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 16:13:03 -0800
Daryl McCullough wrote:
>
> Androcles says...
>
> > "Daryl McCullough" wrote
>
> >> Androcles says...
> >>
> >>>WHY does Einstein define time SUCH THAT (16+4) / 2 = 16 ?
> >>
> >> He doesn't, so your question is nonsensical.
> >
> > He does in his equation
> >
> > ½[tau(0,0,0,t)+tau(0,0,0,t+x'/(c-v)+x'/(c+v))] = tau(x',0,0,t+x'/(c-v))
>
> No, he doesn't. That equation does not imply (16+4)/2 = 16.
>
> In the case we are talking about, we are using a unit of distance
> such that light travels 5 units in one second. So our unit is 1/5 of a
> light-second.
>
> x' = distance between Sam and Joe, as measured in
> the "stationary" frame = 32 units = 6.4 ligh-seconds.
>
> v = the speed of Sam and
> Joe = 3 units/second = 3/5 the speed of light.
>
> c = the speed of light = 5 units/second
>
> t = the time at which Sam sends the light signal = 0
>
> tau is what I was calling t', the time of an event as
> measured in the "moving" frame.
>
> (0,0,0,t) = the coordinates as measured in the "stationary" frame
> of the event at which Sam sends the light signal, which
> I called event e_1.
>
> (x',0,0,t+x'/(c-v)) = the coordinates as measured in the "stationary"
> frame of the event at which Joe receives the light signal, and
> bounces it back, which I called event e_2.
>
> (0,0,0,t+x'/(c-v)+x'/(c+v)) = the coordinates as measured in
> the "stationary" frame of the event at which Sam receives
> the return light signal, which I called event e_1.
>
> So, Einstein's equation is just saying
>
> t_2' = 1/2 (t_1' + t_3')
>
> With our numbers,
>
> e_1 has coordinates (0,0,0,0),
> e_2 has coordinates (80,0,0,16).
> e_3 has coordinates (60,0,0,20).
>
> To figure out tau, we use the Lorentz transformations, which
> say
>
> t' = gamma (t - vx/c^2)
> x' = gamma (x - vt)
>
> With our numbers, gamma = 1.25, so we find
>
> t_1' = gamma (t_1 - vx_1/c^2) = 0
> x_1' = 0
>
> t_2' = gamma (t_2 - vx_2/c^2) = 1.25 (16 - 3*80/25) = 8
> x_2' = gamma (x_2 - vt_2) = 1.25 (80 - 3*16) = 40
>
> t_3' = gamma (t_3 - v x_3/c^2) = 1.25 (20 - 3*60/25) = 16
> x_3' = gamma (x_3 - v t_3) = 1.25 (60 - 3*20) = 0
>
> So, we find, as Einstein said,
>
> t_2' = 1/2 (t_1' + t_3')
>
> So, Einstein's equation is saying
>
> 8 = 1/2 (0 + 16)
>
> which is true, of course.
>
> --
> Daryl McCullough
> Ithaca, NY
You are arguing with a psychotic idiot. Look at the thousands of
lines Randy Poe patiently ground into Androcyst's face. Like feeding
medicine to the dead. The stooopid should not be fixed, for there is
nothing fixable about them. They should be expunged.
Forward Androcyst's crap to his ISP with a request for termination.
-- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
- Next message: Bilge: "Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity"
- Previous message: jem: "Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong"
- In reply to: Daryl McCullough: "Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down."
- Next in thread: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down."
- Reply: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down."
- Reply: Androcles: "Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down."
- Reply: Daryl McCullough: "Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|