Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down.
From: Androcles (Androcles_at_)
Date: 02/08/05
- Next message: Jeff: "Re: The Complete Disproof of Relativity and current Quantum Mechanics"
- Previous message: Tom Capizzi: "Re: to androcles 2"
- In reply to: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down."
- Next in thread: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down."
- Reply: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down."
- Reply: Daryl McCullough: "Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 02:29:40 GMT
"Ken S. Tucker" <dynamics@vianet.on.ca> wrote in message
news:1107826891.868291.151880@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> Yup Daryl's smart.
> Taught me to be meticulous, and that's good!
> Ken
Good grief, you must have been really bad, then, because I'm
attempting to show McCullough how to derive the Lorentz
transforms and he says just use them. That's meticulous?
Androcles.
- Next message: Jeff: "Re: The Complete Disproof of Relativity and current Quantum Mechanics"
- Previous message: Tom Capizzi: "Re: to androcles 2"
- In reply to: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down."
- Next in thread: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down."
- Reply: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down."
- Reply: Daryl McCullough: "Re: McCullough is caught with his pants down."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|