Re: Time Dilation flaw: Reciprocity is a liability not a feature.

From: Marcus Wellpoth (wellpoth_at_gmx.de)
Date: 02/08/05 

Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 14:11:14 +0100

guskz@hotmail.com wrote:
> Time Dilation Flaw:
>
>
> LAW 1. Relativity Liability: we cannot specify a specific Newtonian
> velocity to either twin. Example twin1 is traveling 10km/s and twin2 is
> traveling 40km/s is illegal. (Only that there is a difference of 30km/s
> between the twins is correct).
>
> LAW 2. Relativity Liability: There is no + or - vector to velocity
> therefor it is a liability to specify if a twin is accelerating or
> decelerating.
> (only that there's a change in velocity is correct otherwise it would
> be an Absolute space infringement).
>
> LAW 3. In Relativity RECIPROCITY (meaning vice-versa) is a LIABLILITY
> and not a FEATURE:
>
> CASE 1:
>
> a) If there's two pairs of twins and each pair is flying at a DIFFERENT
> VELOCITY (LAW 1)
>
> b) and then if one brother of each twin CHANGES VELOCITY (LAW 2) to
> meet the "other" brother's twin
>
> Conclusion: then according to "CASE" 1 it is a liability (meaning
> wrong) for any of the two remaining brothers (who did not change
> velocities) to specify his other twin is aging less.
>
> Jury: There is therefore a definite Time Dilation flaw in the Twin
> Paradox flaw and the flight experiment of 1971 with an atomic clock.
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Demo_1 with only one pair of twins A&B on planet_1:
>
> A flies faster than B and reaches same speed as planet_2 therefore B
> ages less than A.
>
> Demo 2:
>
> Flaw in Demo_2 since if there was also twins C&D on planet_2 and D left
> for planet_1 then:
>
> a) C and his new immigrant B would say that the new partners A&D are
> aging less than them.
>
> b) Where as A and his new immigrant D would say the exact OPPOSITE and
> that the new partners C&B are aging less than them = time dilation
> flaw.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Conclusion even for the single twin paradox it would be a SIN
> (liability) for the twin leaving to say he is flying faster or slower
> than his brother (accelerating or decelerating) without acknowledging
> that there is ABSOLUTE SPACE (LAW 1 and LAW 2 above).
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
We can say that the pair of twins have a velocity of 10 km/s and 40 km/s
with respect to a fixed point of reference. That velocities are always
relative is a cornerstone of classical mechanics which differentiates it
from Aristotelian physics.

If there wouldn't be velocity a,b with a+b=0 , velocity would not be a
vector. Or do you mean that velocities can't be added in relativity?
This is clearly wrong. When you are accelerating or decelerating you
must replace the metric tensor diag(-1,1,1,1) with the quadratic form of
the coordinate differentials and then you loose what you call reciprocity.

mw

Relevant Pages