Re: Eric Gisse the Mighty Atomic Clock

From: Eric Gisse (jowr.pi_at_gmail.com)
Date: 02/08/05 

Date: 8 Feb 2005 07:10:38 -0800

guskz@hotmail.com wrote:
> Because of war with Iraq, NASA will use Eric instead of an Atomic
Clock
> Experiment.

No. NASA can *** off. Eric is busy with coursework when not harassing
cranks.

[snip]

> Conclusion:
>
> It could be possible that the 1971 plane with the atomic clock may
have
> received a Time Dilation more due to gravity than to velocity as in
the
> Model C above.

Gosh. How will we ever know the truth? Science is so mysterious!

It isn't as if the paper is online or anything, where you could easily
read it.

Oh wait, it is. But how could this be? I showed the paper to you with
the explicit intent to get you to read the damn thing. Somewhere in
these 5 pages is the table listing effects due to gravity and velocity.
Can you find it?

http://img209.exs.cx/img209/7561/hafelekeating11cu.jpg
http://img17.exs.cx/img17/8085/hafelekeating22io.jpg
http://img17.exs.cx/img17/5914/hafelekeating34lh.jpg
http://img17.exs.cx/img17/1138/hafelekeating44id.jpg
http://img17.exs.cx/img17/7088/hafelekeating52ya.jpg

[Thanks Imageshack!]

>
> And it does not have to be linear for the equation due to gravity is
> similar to how velocity non-linearly affects gamma.
>
> Gravity time dilation equation at:
> http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/relativ/gratim.html#c4

Quantcast