Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity
reany_at_asu.edu
Date: 02/08/05
- Next message: AllYou!: "Re: Customary delusions by Bilge"
- Previous message: guskz_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong"
- In reply to: AllYou!: "Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity"
- Next in thread: AllYou!: "Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity"
- Reply: AllYou!: "Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 8 Feb 2005 13:09:09 -0800
AllYou! wrote:
> <reany@asu.edu> wrote in message
> news:1107872029.480750.172830@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > guskz@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > SR, like any other physical theory, is merely an attempt to model
> > events in the real world (the world of measurement) as accurately
as
> > possible.
>
> (sigh)
>
> How do you judge how accurate that model might be without any way of
comparing it to
> anything? Are you suggesting that you know what's real and can
compare the model to that?
I defined what I meant be "real" in this context. How much better a
test can you get than measurement?
Patrick
- Next message: AllYou!: "Re: Customary delusions by Bilge"
- Previous message: guskz_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out what's wrong"
- In reply to: AllYou!: "Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity"
- Next in thread: AllYou!: "Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity"
- Reply: AllYou!: "Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|