Re: Treatment of some posters
From: DavidBowman (dt041054_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 02/09/05
- Next message: Eric Gisse: "Re: 1971 Time dilation plane experiment looks flawed"
- Previous message: reany_at_asu.edu: "Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity"
- In reply to: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Treatment of some posters"
- Next in thread: AllYou!: "Re: Treatment of some posters"
- Reply: AllYou!: "Re: Treatment of some posters"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 8 Feb 2005 18:49:01 -0800
> In one case, treatment like this has kept one
> poster coming back here for more for as
> much as 8 years.
Maybe after years of being a nerd, he's gotten used to being verbally
abused while he's trying to learn something he thinks is important.
I have.
> If poster A is another Einstein in your eyes...
You don't have to be Einstein to be curious about SR. If they were
Einstein, they'd be ANSWERING questions.
> these folks come here for the abuse, and their
> price of admission appears to be some new
> "construct".
No, Androclese comes here for the abuse. Others come here because
there's nowhere else to go, except remaning ignorant. The price of
admisssion is the abuse.
I hate to keep invoking the Name of The Lord, but if Feynman could come
alive and hear you, he'd have a heart attack and die again.
=[ d
- Next message: Eric Gisse: "Re: 1971 Time dilation plane experiment looks flawed"
- Previous message: reany_at_asu.edu: "Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity"
- In reply to: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Treatment of some posters"
- Next in thread: AllYou!: "Re: Treatment of some posters"
- Reply: AllYou!: "Re: Treatment of some posters"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|