Re: Eric Gisse the Mighty Atomic Clock

guskz_at_hotmail.com
Date: 02/09/05 

Date: 9 Feb 2005 07:49:44 -0800

Eric Gisse wrote:
> guskz@hotmail.com wrote:
> > Because of war with Iraq, NASA will use Eric instead of an Atomic
> Clock
> > Experiment.
>
> No. NASA can *** off. Eric is busy with coursework when not
harassing
> cranks.
>
> [snip]
>
> > Conclusion:
> >
> > It could be possible that the 1971 plane with the atomic clock may
> have
> > received a Time Dilation more due to gravity than to velocity as in
> the
> > Model C above.
>
> Gosh. How will we ever know the truth? Science is so mysterious!
>
> It isn't as if the paper is online or anything, where you could
easily
> read it.
>
> Oh wait, it is. But how could this be? I showed the paper to you with
> the explicit intent to get you to read the damn thing. Somewhere in
> these 5 pages is the table listing effects due to gravity and
velocity.
> Can you find it?
>
> http://img209.exs.cx/img209/7561/hafelekeating11cu.jpg
> http://img17.exs.cx/img17/8085/hafelekeating22io.jpg
> http://img17.exs.cx/img17/5914/hafelekeating34lh.jpg
> http://img17.exs.cx/img17/1138/hafelekeating44id.jpg
> http://img17.exs.cx/img17/7088/hafelekeating52ya.jpg
>
As I told you before: I looked at it and the link I've constantly
provided (1971 Flight Experiment) also details the exact same thing as
your links:

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/relativ/airtim.html

It already specifies the effects due to gravity and velocity and I
understand them fully and they in no way interfere with the Model I
provided.

> [Thanks Imageshack!]
>
> >
> > And it does not have to be linear for the equation due to gravity
is
> > similar to how velocity non-linearly affects gamma.
> >
> > Gravity time dilation equation at:
> > http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/relativ/gratim.html#c4