Re: Part1: Another BIG Flaw in 1971 Time Dilation Flight Experiment
From: TomGee (lvlus_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 02/09/05
- Next message: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: Help with SR time dilation"
- Previous message: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson"
- In reply to: guskz_at_hotmail.com: "Part1: Another BIG Flaw in 1971 Time Dilation Flight Experiment"
- Next in thread: guskz_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Part1: Another BIG Flaw in 1971 Time Dilation Flight Experiment"
- Reply: guskz_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Part1: Another BIG Flaw in 1971 Time Dilation Flight Experiment"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 9 Feb 2005 08:03:46 -0800
guskz@hotmail.com wrote:
> http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/relativ/airtim.html
>
>
> ----------------------
> Ok now:
>
> 1. Is one clock aging less just because the plane left from Earth
>
> 2. or is it because the plane's velocity relative to the Earth is
much
> faster?
> (or the very least much different than Earth's if one wishes not to
> attribute the wording "faster/slower").
>
>
> Answer 1 or 2? (and you musn't change your answer after reading
> what's written after this):
>
>
1.
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> Here's the major flaw I found:
>
> 1. Not one but two planes took off in opposite direction and....
>
> The difference of velocity between both planes is TWICE TWICE TWICE
as
> much as their difference with that of Earth.
>
>
> 2. So then why has both plane's atomic clock aged the same amount if
> they're both moving faster than the other?
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
If you mean that both planes are moving faster than the Earth but at
the same speed wrt each other, it is expected that their clocks tick at
the same time rate since time rates are set by the speed of objects.
TomGee
- Next message: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: Help with SR time dilation"
- Previous message: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson"
- In reply to: guskz_at_hotmail.com: "Part1: Another BIG Flaw in 1971 Time Dilation Flight Experiment"
- Next in thread: guskz_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Part1: Another BIG Flaw in 1971 Time Dilation Flight Experiment"
- Reply: guskz_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Part1: Another BIG Flaw in 1971 Time Dilation Flight Experiment"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|