Re: Part1: Another BIG Flaw in 1971 Time Dilation Flight Experiment
From: Bilge (dubious_at_radioactivex.lebesque-al.net)
Date: 02/09/05
- Next message: Lawrence Wong: "Re: GOD=G_uv FOR IQ's OVER 150"
- Previous message: Bilge: "Re: MISCONCEPTIONS OF PRESENT THEORY OF CAPACITANCE"
- In reply to: guskz_at_hotmail.com: "Part1: Another BIG Flaw in 1971 Time Dilation Flight Experiment"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 20:50:18 GMT
guskz@hotmail.com:
>
>http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/relativ/airtim.html
>
>
>----------------------
>Ok now:
>
>1. Is one clock aging less just because the plane left from Earth
>
>2. or is it because the plane's velocity relative to the Earth is much
>faster?
Actually it's do to the eye-of-newt cargo being carried in the
plane's baggage compartment.
>(or the very least much different than Earth's if one wishes not to
>attribute the wording "faster/slower").
>
>
>Answer 1 or 2? (and you musn't change your answer after reading
>what's written after this):
>
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------
>Here's the major flaw I found:
>
>1. Not one but two planes took off in opposite direction and....
>
>The difference of velocity between both planes is TWICE TWICE TWICE as
>much as their difference with that of Earth.
>
>
>2. So then why has both plane's atomic clock aged the same amount if
>they're both moving faster than the other?
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>Carefull now you can't say just because the twin never touched the
>Earth (meaning he never landed or took off from Earth) therefore he's
>aging the same as his brother on Earth.
>
- Next message: Lawrence Wong: "Re: GOD=G_uv FOR IQ's OVER 150"
- Previous message: Bilge: "Re: MISCONCEPTIONS OF PRESENT THEORY OF CAPACITANCE"
- In reply to: guskz_at_hotmail.com: "Part1: Another BIG Flaw in 1971 Time Dilation Flight Experiment"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|