Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity
From: Bilge (dubious_at_radioactivex.lebesque-al.net)
Date: 02/12/05
- Next message: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: Living in 2005"
- Previous message: guskz_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Is there Time Dilation if Twins circle the Earth at 1/3c??"
- In reply to: reany_at_asu.edu: "Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity"
- Next in thread: reany_at_asu.edu: "Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity"
- Reply: reany_at_asu.edu: "Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 12:45:13 GMT
reany@asu.edu:
>SR, like any other physical theory, is merely an attempt to model
>events in the world of measurement as accurately as possible.
Of course, none of those events are real or else an accurate model
of those events would be the true model of those events by definition
of the word ``accurate.'' Since you don't believe such a model exists,
your sentence contradicts your philosophy.
- Next message: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: Living in 2005"
- Previous message: guskz_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Is there Time Dilation if Twins circle the Earth at 1/3c??"
- In reply to: reany_at_asu.edu: "Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity"
- Next in thread: reany_at_asu.edu: "Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity"
- Reply: reany_at_asu.edu: "Re: Twin Paradox a blasphemy to Relativity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]