Re: SARFATTI IN "MAKES SENSE" SHOCKER!!!!
From: Ken S. Tucker (dynamics_at_vianet.on.ca)
Date: 02/12/05
- Next message: Androcles: "Re: Living in 2005"
- Previous message: geraldkelleher_at_hotmail.com: "Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be"
- In reply to: Bilge: "Re: SARFATTI IN "MAKES SENSE" SHOCKER!!!!"
- Next in thread: Lady Chatterly: "Re: SARFATTI IN "MAKES SENSE" SHOCKER!!!!"
- Reply: Lady Chatterly: "Re: SARFATTI IN "MAKES SENSE" SHOCKER!!!!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 12 Feb 2005 05:44:53 -0800
I read "non-metricity" as the tail end charlie
Weyl adds to the connection, the additive is
g_uv phi_w.
It could of been clearer, but not every post
is a home-run, heard Tom Hanks figures 1/4
of his movies are successful, but of course
he competes with porn.
Ken
- Next message: Androcles: "Re: Living in 2005"
- Previous message: geraldkelleher_at_hotmail.com: "Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be"
- In reply to: Bilge: "Re: SARFATTI IN "MAKES SENSE" SHOCKER!!!!"
- Next in thread: Lady Chatterly: "Re: SARFATTI IN "MAKES SENSE" SHOCKER!!!!"
- Reply: Lady Chatterly: "Re: SARFATTI IN "MAKES SENSE" SHOCKER!!!!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
