Re: Flaws wanted
From: Ka-In Yen (yenkain_at_yahoo.com.tw)
Date: 02/13/05
- Next message: JM Albuquerque: "Re: Doppler effect and relative speeds?"
- Previous message: Gary Eickmeier: "Re: GOD=G_uv FOR IQ's OVER 150"
- Maybe in reply to: Ka-In Yen: "Re: Flaws wanted"
- Next in thread: Eric Gisse: "Re: Flaws wanted"
- Reply: Eric Gisse: "Re: Flaws wanted"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 12 Feb 2005 17:21:05 -0800
Bjoern Feuerbacher wrote:
> Ka-In Yen wrote:
> >>Ka-In Yen wrote:
> >>>Bjoern Feuerbacher wrote:
> >>>>Two physical errors right at the start: neither potential
> >>>>energy nor mass are vectors.
> >>>>
> >>>Thank you for your information. It is a high
> >>>probability that a flawless derivation has
> >>>some physical meaning. Do you have any strong
> >>>reason that mass can not be vector?
> >>
> > Not strong enough.
> > F=-kx (Hook's law)
> > Try again, and please try harder. :)
>
> Read: "I can't answer your argument, so I'll simply
> ridicule it."
Dear Bjoern,
There is another equation for your reference:
tau=v^2 * mu (the equation of waves on string)
tau is the tension on string, and mu is linear mass
density of string; v is vector, but v^2 is scalar.
Ka-In Yen
Magnetic force: Drag and Bernoulli of ether dynamics
http://www.geocities.com/redlorikee/mdb2.html
http://www.geocities.com/redlorikee
- Next message: JM Albuquerque: "Re: Doppler effect and relative speeds?"
- Previous message: Gary Eickmeier: "Re: GOD=G_uv FOR IQ's OVER 150"
- Maybe in reply to: Ka-In Yen: "Re: Flaws wanted"
- Next in thread: Eric Gisse: "Re: Flaws wanted"
- Reply: Eric Gisse: "Re: Flaws wanted"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|