Re: e NOT EQUAL TO mc2
From: Creighton Hogg (wchogg_at_hep.wisc.edu)
Date: 02/16/05
- Next message: Creighton Hogg: "Re: K calculus OK?"
- Previous message: bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com: "Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress...."
- In reply to: vignesh: "e NOT EQUAL TO mc2"
- Next in thread: vignesh: "Re: e NOT EQUAL TO mc2"
- Reply: vignesh: "Re: e NOT EQUAL TO mc2"
- Reply: Bilge: "Re: e NOT EQUAL TO mc2"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 04:49:12 -0600
On 16 Feb 2005, vignesh wrote:
Sorry, but if you were one of my students you wouldn't be passing the
class.
You can argue that classical kinetic energy isn't 1/2 mv^2, but even the
freshman physics labs I teach *show* that it is through practical
demonstration.
- Next message: Creighton Hogg: "Re: K calculus OK?"
- Previous message: bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com: "Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress...."
- In reply to: vignesh: "e NOT EQUAL TO mc2"
- Next in thread: vignesh: "Re: e NOT EQUAL TO mc2"
- Reply: vignesh: "Re: e NOT EQUAL TO mc2"
- Reply: Bilge: "Re: e NOT EQUAL TO mc2"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|