Re: e NOT EQUAL TO mc2
From: Bilge (dubious_at_radioactivex.lebesque-al.net)
Date: 02/16/05
- Next message: Bilge: "Re: e NOT EQUAL TO mc2"
- Previous message: PD: "Re: PD, a question for you."
- In reply to: Creighton Hogg: "Re: e NOT EQUAL TO mc2"
- Next in thread: Creighton Hogg: "Re: e NOT EQUAL TO mc2"
- Reply: Creighton Hogg: "Re: e NOT EQUAL TO mc2"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 18:33:23 GMT
Creighton Hogg:
>
>
>On 16 Feb 2005, vignesh wrote:
>
>Sorry, but if you were one of my students you wouldn't be passing the
>class.
>You can argue that classical kinetic energy isn't 1/2 mv^2, but even the
>freshman physics labs I teach *show* that it is through practical
>demonstration.
Hey -- it's not fair to use real examples taken from any
actual experiment to shoot down the navel contemplations of
a crackpot. That's like telling a little kid that santa claus
doesn't exist or that there is no starship enterprise. And
stop calling me ``surely.''
- Next message: Bilge: "Re: e NOT EQUAL TO mc2"
- Previous message: PD: "Re: PD, a question for you."
- In reply to: Creighton Hogg: "Re: e NOT EQUAL TO mc2"
- Next in thread: Creighton Hogg: "Re: e NOT EQUAL TO mc2"
- Reply: Creighton Hogg: "Re: e NOT EQUAL TO mc2"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|