Re: e NOT EQUAL TO mc2
From: Bilge (dubious_at_radioactivex.lebesque-al.net)
Date: 02/16/05
- Next message: Creighton Hogg: "Re: e NOT EQUAL TO mc2"
- Previous message: Bilge: "Re: e NOT EQUAL TO mc2"
- In reply to: newedana: "Re: e NOT EQUAL TO mc2"
- Next in thread: PD: "Re: e NOT EQUAL TO mc2"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 18:40:38 GMT
newedana:
>Here, I adopt Dr. Hansik Yoon's argument shown in his book, but in
>paraphrase form. Dr. Yoon, the author of the book titled "Natural
>Science Founded on A New Atomic Model", discussed and pointed out the
>flaw in today's atomic physics including E=3DMc^2. You can read some part
>of the above book, but you cannot read the portion discussed here from
>the website, http://www.yoonsatom.net
I suggest that dr. yoon consider retirment.
- Next message: Creighton Hogg: "Re: e NOT EQUAL TO mc2"
- Previous message: Bilge: "Re: e NOT EQUAL TO mc2"
- In reply to: newedana: "Re: e NOT EQUAL TO mc2"
- Next in thread: PD: "Re: e NOT EQUAL TO mc2"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
