Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress....
bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com
Date: 02/17/05
- Next message: ande452_at_attglobal.net: "Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress...."
- Previous message: Androcles: "Re: Are the 'Laws of Physics' Wrong?"
- In reply to: A.S.: "Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress...."
- Next in thread: kenseto: "Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress...."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 16 Feb 2005 18:23:21 -0800
hey Arnold "A.S." Schroedinger, let's say you stick to one nick from
now on without the syllable Qi in it. Bilge has pointed out to you that
what nick you use does not really matter, if you do have interesting
questions or raise an interesting matter, people like Bilge, Al,
Bjoern, Heymann, etc will definitely be interested in pursuing a
discussion with you. as for "Seto theory" (instead of Seto's theory
which is very characteristic of you), people have long ago pointed out
the crankiness in this theory, and i dunno why the hell you would want
to pursue this matter any further. rather than reading "Seto stuff",
may be better to read the Feynmann Lectures or a novel by Aldous Huxley
or somebody. bubye chum.
- Next message: ande452_at_attglobal.net: "Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress...."
- Previous message: Androcles: "Re: Are the 'Laws of Physics' Wrong?"
- In reply to: A.S.: "Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress...."
- Next in thread: kenseto: "Re: Debunking Ken Seto in progress...."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|