Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy
From: Franz Heymann (notfranz.heymann_at_btopenworld.com)
Date: 02/17/05
- Next message: Bilge: "Re: K calculus OK?"
- Previous message: Franz Heymann: "Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy"
- In reply to: newedana: "Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy"
- Next in thread: newedana: "Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 07:11:10 +0000 (UTC)
"newedana" <simplesong1004@hanmail.net> wrote in message
news:1108618131.360293.313180@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
A critical discussion on the problems with E=mc^2 can also be seen in
"Natural Science Founded on A New Atomic Model" written by Dr. Hansik
Yoon. --- http://www.yoonsatom.net
Here, I adopt Dr. Yoon's argument shown in his book, in paraphrase
form.
There is no need to make a fool of yourself twice in quick succession
-- Franz The great tragedy of science -- the slaying of a beautiful hypothesis by an ugly fact T.H. Huxley
- Next message: Bilge: "Re: K calculus OK?"
- Previous message: Franz Heymann: "Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy"
- In reply to: newedana: "Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy"
- Next in thread: newedana: "Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|