Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be
From: Bilge (dubious_at_radioactivex.lebesque-al.net)
Date: 02/18/05
- Next message: Sue...: "Re: Double Observation"
- Previous message: Franz Heymann: "Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein?"
- In reply to: David Thomson: "Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be"
- Next in thread: guskz_at_hotmail.com: "Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 22:08:00 GMT
David Thomson:
><guskz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:1108567536.833218.131520@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
>>> Backward time would be 180 degrees out of phase with forward time, just
>>> like
>>> forward length is 180 degrees out of phase with backward length.
>>
>> If time is a pulse rate and a wave of which is also 180 out of phase
>> then if it behaves like all other waves/pulses at 180 out of phase then
>> they would amplify each other where as two waves at 90 (or 270)
>> eliminate each other (invisible pulses = perspective only cancel each
>> other out).
>
>Lasers produce light beams that completely cancel each other out. Let's say
>we have two 1000 watt lasers and their beams are in perfect phase to cancel
>each other.
You can only accomplish that phase cancellation if the two beams are
effectively the same beam. Absolute phases are not observables, so
it's impossible to set up two independent sources to produce a particular
phase relationship at any given point.
- Next message: Sue...: "Re: Double Observation"
- Previous message: Franz Heymann: "Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein?"
- In reply to: David Thomson: "Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be"
- Next in thread: guskz_at_hotmail.com: "Re: How the Aether Physics Model came to be"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]