Re: Sourse dependency (for genius only)
From: Tom Capizzi (etianshrdlu_at_verizon.net)
Date: 02/20/05
- Next message: Tom Capizzi: "Re: "exchange text messages""
- Previous message: Tom Roberts: "Re: Is it true"
- In reply to: geraldkelleher_at_hotmail.com: "Sourse dependency (for genius only)"
- Next in thread: Androcles: "Re: Sourse dependency (for genius only)"
- Reply: Androcles: "Re: Sourse dependency (for genius only)"
- Reply: Oriel36: "Re: Sourse dependency (for genius only)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 19:02:57 GMT
<geraldkelleher@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1108905817.989251.247420@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
[begin quote]
The following astronomical description by Newton is the single greatest
indication that he unfortunately scrambled the insight of Roemer with
Keplerian motion hence the tangle every time contemporaries open their
mouth on finite light distance.
PHÆNOMENON V.
Then the primary planets, by radii drawn to the earth, describe areas
no wise proportional to the times; but that the areas which they
describe by radii drawn to the sun are proportional to the times of
description.
For to the earth they appear sometimes direct, sometimes stationary,
nay, and sometimes retrograde. But from the sun they are always seen
direct, and to proceed with a motion nearly uniform, that is to say, a
little swifter in the perihelion and a little slower in the aphelion
distances, so as to maintain an equality in the description of the
areas. This a noted proposition among astronomers, and particularly
demonstrable in Jupiter, from the eclipses of his satellites; by the
help of which eclipses, as we have said, the heliocentric longitudes of
that planet, and its distances from the sun, are determined."
http://members.tripod.com/~gravitee/phaenomena.htm
A genius cannot tolerate inferiority or insincerity and Newton displays
both attributes in abundance.He is a theorist who imagines he is an
astronomer as are all those who follow the empirical cult.
There is no crisis in cosmology as some would have it for basically you
are reaping what was sowed a few hundred years ago,by not co-operating
with me or among yourselves you managed to create a particularly nasty
situation for the first time in the history of the investigation of
natural phenomena and threaten to take down everything with the
scientific umbrella.
Btw,Knowing exactly what Isaac did wrong is far more enjoyable than the
early 20th century trash which is simply an exotic festering of the
Newtonian picture.So far,all anyone does is run around the Newtonian
cage like squirrels.
[end quote]
So exactly what did Isaac get wrong, according to you?
- Next message: Tom Capizzi: "Re: "exchange text messages""
- Previous message: Tom Roberts: "Re: Is it true"
- In reply to: geraldkelleher_at_hotmail.com: "Sourse dependency (for genius only)"
- Next in thread: Androcles: "Re: Sourse dependency (for genius only)"
- Reply: Androcles: "Re: Sourse dependency (for genius only)"
- Reply: Oriel36: "Re: Sourse dependency (for genius only)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|