Re: GOD=G_uv FOR IQ's OVER 150
From: TimC (tconnors_at_no.spam.accepted.here-astro.swin.edu.au)
Date: 02/22/05
- Next message: George Hammond: "GOD=G_uv DEFINITION OF GOD"
- Previous message: George Hammond: "GOD=G_uv DEFINITION OF GOD"
- In reply to: Brian Eable: "Re: GOD=G_uv FOR IQ's OVER 150"
- Next in thread: Bryce Utting: "Re: GOD=G_uv FOR IQ's OVER 150"
- Reply: Bryce Utting: "Re: GOD=G_uv FOR IQ's OVER 150"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 02:17:29 GMT
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 at 01:37 GMT, Brian Eable (aka Bruce)
was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:
> Come off it George. You crossposted your extremely important thread to
> all these newsgroups:
>
> alt.christnet.philosophy, alt.philosophy, alt.religion.kibology,
> sci.physics.relativity, alt.sci.physics.new-theories
>
> You can't unilaterally decide the rules of all those groups, just
> because you posted there. You've got your own moderated group where
> you can do what you like. If you post to unmoderated groups, you
> aren't in charge.
Because this is alt.religion.kibology, can I be demanding that you to
please to be more of teh funn'i?
-- TimC -- http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/staff/tconnors/ Unix isn't just for geeks: grep && gawk && unzip && strip && touch && finger && mount && fsck \ && gasp && more && yes && umount && make clean && make mrproper && sleep
- Next message: George Hammond: "GOD=G_uv DEFINITION OF GOD"
- Previous message: George Hammond: "GOD=G_uv DEFINITION OF GOD"
- In reply to: Brian Eable: "Re: GOD=G_uv FOR IQ's OVER 150"
- Next in thread: Bryce Utting: "Re: GOD=G_uv FOR IQ's OVER 150"
- Reply: Bryce Utting: "Re: GOD=G_uv FOR IQ's OVER 150"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|